Republican Convention 2016/ Cleveland

1568101121

Comments

  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    Tonight was thoroughly entertaining. Very solid night 1. It won't convince people on here but if the rest of the convention goes this way it will be considered a home run. The democratic convention will be a massive snooze fest comparatively.

    This speaks for itself. I would expect an academic like yourself would want less of a reality tv show atmosphere for a presidential election.
    You are correct but I have come to the realization that academics don't win elections.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,029
    edited July 2016
    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Tonight was thoroughly entertaining. Very solid night 1. It won't convince people on here but if the rest of the convention goes this way it will be considered a home run. The democratic convention will be a massive snooze fest comparatively.

    You think that did anything but alienate minorities and pander to the base?

    A snooze fest because they'll actually talk about policy and not the boogeyman?
    Which policy?
    The one that got your friend beyond fucked up?
    Perhaps you need a history lesson...
    Your President has troops fighting in Afganistan and Iraq right now. He has been in Afganistan and Iraq longer then the previous administration. The democratic nominee intends to keep it that way. Will she discuss this policy?
    We are not completely getting out of there for the foreseeable future. I don't really consider what we have their a "war", but whatever you want to call it, fine, we have troops there. Probably 10% of what we have once upon a time when we had folks dying daily

  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    Tonight was thoroughly entertaining. Very solid night 1. It won't convince people on here but if the rest of the convention goes this way it will be considered a home run. The democratic convention will be a massive snooze fest comparatively.

    This speaks for itself. I would expect an academic like yourself would want less of a reality tv show atmosphere for a presidential election.
    You are correct but I have come to the realization that academics don't win elections.
    Hahaha then you weren't paying attention when the academic beat the POW veteran and then the super rich hedge fund manager!
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,029
    edited July 2016
    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    Tonight was thoroughly entertaining. Very solid night 1. It won't convince people on here but if the rest of the convention goes this way it will be considered a home run. The democratic convention will be a massive snooze fest comparatively.

    This speaks for itself. I would expect an academic like yourself would want less of a reality tv show atmosphere for a presidential election.
    You are correct but I have come to the realization that academics don't win elections.
    If you want a war so badly, why don't you get on your government to send troops over and take the lead? Stop talking about what the US should be doing and focus on what your country should be doing
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Tonight was thoroughly entertaining. Very solid night 1. It won't convince people on here but if the rest of the convention goes this way it will be considered a home run. The democratic convention will be a massive snooze fest comparatively.

    You think that did anything but alienate minorities and pander to the base?

    A snooze fest because they'll actually talk about policy and not the boogeyman?
    Which policy?
    The one that got your friend beyond fucked up?
    Perhaps you need a history lesson...
    Your President has troops fighting in Afganistan and Iraq right now. He has been in Afganistan and Iraq longer then the previous administration. The democratic nominee intends to keep it that way. Will she discuss this policy?
    We are not completely getting out of there for the foreseeable future. I don't really consider what we have their a "war", but whatever you want to call it, fine, we have troops there. Probably 10% of what we have once upon a time when we had folks dying daily

    Fair but this 10% has come along with diminishing returns. There is no doubt in my mind that either party will ramp up engagement come January. The only difference is that the Democratic Party wants to remain in denial on this front. Cliffy rightful wants a discussion of policy but he is ignoring the fact that the Democratic convention will bury this as an issue so as to keep the party united until Election Day. Easy to rip on the republicans but they are telegraphing what they are going to do.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,029
    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Tonight was thoroughly entertaining. Very solid night 1. It won't convince people on here but if the rest of the convention goes this way it will be considered a home run. The democratic convention will be a massive snooze fest comparatively.

    You think that did anything but alienate minorities and pander to the base?

    A snooze fest because they'll actually talk about policy and not the boogeyman?
    Which policy?
    The one that got your friend beyond fucked up?
    Perhaps you need a history lesson...
    Your President has troops fighting in Afganistan and Iraq right now. He has been in Afganistan and Iraq longer then the previous administration. The democratic nominee intends to keep it that way. Will she discuss this policy?
    We are not completely getting out of there for the foreseeable future. I don't really consider what we have their a "war", but whatever you want to call it, fine, we have troops there. Probably 10% of what we have once upon a time when we had folks dying daily

    Fair but this 10% has come along with diminishing returns. There is no doubt in my mind that either party will ramp up engagement come January. The only difference is that the Democratic Party wants to remain in denial on this front. Cliffy rightful wants a discussion of policy but he is ignoring the fact that the Democratic convention will bury this as an issue so as to keep the party united until Election Day. Easy to rip on the republicans but they are telegraphing what they are going to do.
    They're not going to send troops over there. Our country has no appetite for it. Trump said as much on 60 minutes last night. Fear mongering and empty promises of "safety"
  • what dreams
    what dreams Posts: 1,761
    edited July 2016
    RE: the sheriff: I don't think it's right that a public servant can politically endorse a candidate while in uniform. Public servants are not supposed to be partisan in their work.
    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Tonight was thoroughly entertaining. Very solid night 1. It won't convince people on here but if the rest of the convention goes this way it will be considered a home run. The democratic convention will be a massive snooze fest comparatively.

    You think that did anything but alienate minorities and pander to the base?

    A snooze fest because they'll actually talk about policy and not the boogeyman?
    I saw a number of minority speakers so I'm not sure what was so alienating. Second the American people don't think Islamic Radicalism is the boogeyman. If the democratic convention intends to treat as such then Hillary's campaign is going to struggle.
    Yes, I'm pretty sure the only minorities at the convention were the speakers. Pan the audience . . . not so much. The Republican Party has proven itself tonight to be a collection of scared white people.
    Post edited by what dreams on
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    They might want to refrain from taking wide pans of that convention. The place is half empty. Is that normal?
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Tonight was thoroughly entertaining. Very solid night 1. It won't convince people on here but if the rest of the convention goes this way it will be considered a home run. The democratic convention will be a massive snooze fest comparatively.

    You think that did anything but alienate minorities and pander to the base?

    A snooze fest because they'll actually talk about policy and not the boogeyman?
    Which policy?
    The one that got your friend beyond fucked up?
    Perhaps you need a history lesson...
    Your President has troops fighting in Afganistan and Iraq right now. He has been in Afganistan and Iraq longer then the previous administration. The democratic nominee intends to keep it that way. Will she discuss this policy?
    We are not completely getting out of there for the foreseeable future. I don't really consider what we have their a "war", but whatever you want to call it, fine, we have troops there. Probably 10% of what we have once upon a time when we had folks dying daily

    Fair but this 10% has come along with diminishing returns. There is no doubt in my mind that either party will ramp up engagement come January. The only difference is that the Democratic Party wants to remain in denial on this front. Cliffy rightful wants a discussion of policy but he is ignoring the fact that the Democratic convention will bury this as an issue so as to keep the party united until Election Day. Easy to rip on the republicans but they are telegraphing what they are going to do.
    They're not going to send troops over there. Our country has no appetite for it. Trump said as much on 60 minutes last night. Fear mongering and empty promises of "safety"
    Mark my words there will be an increase and instead of ignoring it like the media did for Obama's latest increase it will be treated as a massive escalation reminiscent of Vietnam.
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    RE: the sheriff: I don't think it's right that a public servant can politically endorse a candidate while in uniform. Public servants are not supposed to be partisan in their work.

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Tonight was thoroughly entertaining. Very solid night 1. It won't convince people on here but if the rest of the convention goes this way it will be considered a home run. The democratic convention will be a massive snooze fest comparatively.

    You think that did anything but alienate minorities and pander to the base?

    A snooze fest because they'll actually talk about policy and not the boogeyman?
    I saw a number of minority speakers so I'm not sure what was so alienating. Second the American people don't think Islamic Radicalism is the boogeyman. If the democratic convention intends to treat as such then Hillary's campaign is going to struggle.
    Yes, I'm pretty sure the only minorities at the convention were the speakers. Pan the audience . . . not so much. The Republican Party has proven itself tonight to be a collection of scared white people.
    Bias
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,667
    dignin said:

    They might want to refrain from taking wide pans of that convention. The place is half empty. Is that normal?

    No they couldn't even get any other speakers hence Trump showing up to say we're gonna win big we're gonna win big lol
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    dignin said:

    They might want to refrain from taking wide pans of that convention. The place is half empty. Is that normal?

    Yeah. They come and go depending on the speaker. Melanie was the main event tonight.
  • Smellyman
    Smellyman Asia Posts: 4,528
    edited July 2016
    The party of dumb is getting dumber.

    From 2000 to now 2016 is exponentially so.
    Post edited by Smellyman on
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,309
    so.....Obama is ignoring a real threat while Bush made up a fake threat? Do I have that right?
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,309
    Total IQ in that room?
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478

    dignin said:

    They might want to refrain from taking wide pans of that convention. The place is half empty. Is that normal?

    No they couldn't even get any other speakers hence Trump showing up to say we're gonna win big we're gonna win big lol
    Ha, that "were gonna win big" appearance was bizarre.

    This convention looks like a real snooze fest.

    But BS is jacked by the first night, so that's something that the Republicans can take to the bank!
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,029
    Wobbie said:

    Total IQ in that room?

    Negative
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    BS44325 said:

    dignin said:

    They might want to refrain from taking wide pans of that convention. The place is half empty. Is that normal?

    Yeah. They come and go depending on the speaker. Melanie was the main event tonight.
    Strange, you think they would have the biggest act on last to go out on a high note.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,029
    Andrew Sullivan was on point tonight. Good having him back, even if it's just for a couple weeks
  • Smellyman
    Smellyman Asia Posts: 4,528
    Great photo from the convention.

    image