Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

12345679»

Comments

  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    See to me, that's the problem with this whole genre. There's too many "universes" too close together. It's confusing!

    As a huge fan of the Nolan Batman films, the Afleck version just didn't work for me. 
    www.myspace.com
  • pjsteelerfan
    pjsteelerfan Maryland Posts: 9,905
    I'm curious to see it.  Snyder shot something like 95% or more of the movie, possibly some to be used in what was to be a sequel that is probably dead. There are some conflicting reports on whether he left due to the death of his child, or Warner simply removed him. Just as he has disputed that he chose Joss Whedon to finish it, and it was the studios choice all along. Allegedly the people at the Studio had Whedon basically re-write most of the story and then I guess reshoot  a lot of it so the version put in theaters was a bastardized version of two directors, and what Warner thought fans wanted. Warners was in such a rush to get their universe together, they screwed the whole thing up, but now all those people are gone. 
    I doubt Reeves Batman was be pulled in via the flashpoint movie. I think that will be its own standalone thing, just like the Joker movie. 
    ...got a mind full of questions and a teacher in my soul...
  • igotid88
    igotid88 Posts: 28,636
    pjsteelerfan said:
    I'm curious to see it.  Snyder shot something like 95% or more of the movie, possibly some to be used in what was to be a sequel that is probably dead. There are some conflicting reports on whether he left due to the death of his child, or Warner simply removed him. Just as he has disputed that he chose Joss Whedon to finish it, and it was the studios choice all along. Allegedly the people at the Studio had Whedon basically re-write most of the story and then I guess reshoot  a lot of it so the version put in theaters was a bastardized version of two directors, and what Warner thought fans wanted. Warners was in such a rush to get their universe together, they screwed the whole thing up, but now all those people are gone. 
    I doubt Reeves Batman was be pulled in via the flashpoint movie. I think that will be its own standalone thing, just like the Joker movie. 
    For a minute I thought you meant Christopher Reeves. Michael Keaton's Batman will be in the Flash movie. Which by the time it comes out there will be a 50th reboot of Batman?
    I miss igotid88
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    igotid88 said:
    pjsteelerfan said:
    I'm curious to see it.  Snyder shot something like 95% or more of the movie, possibly some to be used in what was to be a sequel that is probably dead. There are some conflicting reports on whether he left due to the death of his child, or Warner simply removed him. Just as he has disputed that he chose Joss Whedon to finish it, and it was the studios choice all along. Allegedly the people at the Studio had Whedon basically re-write most of the story and then I guess reshoot  a lot of it so the version put in theaters was a bastardized version of two directors, and what Warner thought fans wanted. Warners was in such a rush to get their universe together, they screwed the whole thing up, but now all those people are gone. 
    I doubt Reeves Batman was be pulled in via the flashpoint movie. I think that will be its own standalone thing, just like the Joker movie. 
    For a minute I thought you meant Christopher Reeves. Michael Keaton's Batman will be in the Flash movie. Which by the time it comes out there will be a 50th reboot of Batman?
    IT'S TOO CONFUSING! THERE ARE TOO MANY BATMANS FLYING AROUND AT ONCE!
    www.myspace.com
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    The Juggler said:
    igotid88 said:
    pjsteelerfan said:
    I'm curious to see it.  Snyder shot something like 95% or more of the movie, possibly some to be used in what was to be a sequel that is probably dead. There are some conflicting reports on whether he left due to the death of his child, or Warner simply removed him. Just as he has disputed that he chose Joss Whedon to finish it, and it was the studios choice all along. Allegedly the people at the Studio had Whedon basically re-write most of the story and then I guess reshoot  a lot of it so the version put in theaters was a bastardized version of two directors, and what Warner thought fans wanted. Warners was in such a rush to get their universe together, they screwed the whole thing up, but now all those people are gone. 
    I doubt Reeves Batman was be pulled in via the flashpoint movie. I think that will be its own standalone thing, just like the Joker movie. 
    For a minute I thought you meant Christopher Reeves. Michael Keaton's Batman will be in the Flash movie. Which by the time it comes out there will be a 50th reboot of Batman?
    IT'S TOO CONFUSING! THERE ARE TOO MANY BATMANS FLYING AROUND AT ONCE!
    I SWEAR!
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,889
    dankind said:
    The Juggler said:
    igotid88 said:
    pjsteelerfan said:
    I'm curious to see it.  Snyder shot something like 95% or more of the movie, possibly some to be used in what was to be a sequel that is probably dead. There are some conflicting reports on whether he left due to the death of his child, or Warner simply removed him. Just as he has disputed that he chose Joss Whedon to finish it, and it was the studios choice all along. Allegedly the people at the Studio had Whedon basically re-write most of the story and then I guess reshoot  a lot of it so the version put in theaters was a bastardized version of two directors, and what Warner thought fans wanted. Warners was in such a rush to get their universe together, they screwed the whole thing up, but now all those people are gone. 
    I doubt Reeves Batman was be pulled in via the flashpoint movie. I think that will be its own standalone thing, just like the Joker movie. 
    For a minute I thought you meant Christopher Reeves. Michael Keaton's Batman will be in the Flash movie. Which by the time it comes out there will be a 50th reboot of Batman?
    IT'S TOO CONFUSING! THERE ARE TOO MANY BATMANS FLYING AROUND AT ONCE!
    I SWEAR!
    I see what you did there.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    Good work there.

    Am I the only one who finds it confusing though? Seriously. I really like the Batman character but I have never been into comics so I am not overly familiar with all the different universes. Nobody else sees a problem with 3 separate versions of Batman/Bruce Wayne appearing in upcoming movies?
    www.myspace.com
  • CROJAM95
    CROJAM95 Posts: 10,832
    When Batman is grounded ( in Gotham City) without all the other super best friends....it seams to work well, good films

    When its super CGI, or nipples are the main story....it kinda sucks ass

    Batman Returns I always felt was underated 

Categories