Over and out!

Indifference

jeffbr said:

JimmyV said:

Jason P said:

Ironic: Man protesting against Trump inciting violence does it by inciting violence.

Not the first time I've wished we had a :nodding: emoticon.

Thomas DiMassimo is a tool. He got arrested for disorderly conduct and inducing panic. Hopefully he serves a little time for it. Wish he'd seen the mean end of the taser as well. Protests outside of a venue are one thing (and I support them). Going into a building to shut down speech is another (and my support wanes). Rushing the stage to try to get past a secret service security detail to access a presidential candidate is an entirely different level and the guy should be made an example of.

+1

BS44325

rgambs said:

BS44325 said:

brianlux said:

CH156378 said:

Not smart.

Probably not something I would do but wouldn't it be great if someone had stood up to Hitler?

To make this comparison is beyond ridiculous. People who make it are beyond discredited in my books. Sorry but it officially makes one far more part of the problem then the solution.

That means nothing when it's taken into consideration that you refuse to even acknowledge that Trump is spouting racist, xenophobic, and misogynist BS.
Discredited in your books?
What a joke.

You still haven't done anything at all to dispute the similarities in use of racist fearmongering to elevate himself and facism.
Easier to just say it's crazy than to actually deal with it.

I won't acknowledge it because I don't believe it to be true. In fact I believe the opposite is happening. Trump is raising the concept of controlled immigration and you are shouting racism just to avoid the topic. Pretty much standard militant progressive behaviour.

In the last few years 124 illegal immigrants released from custody were later charged for committing 135 homicide-related crimes. See below...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/14/124-illegal-immigrants-released-by-dhs-later-charg/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS&google_editors_picks=true

Again...I don't support Trump but I also don't think it is racist of him to want to do something about the problem above.

JimmyV

BS44325 said:

rgambs said:

BS44325 said:

brianlux said:

CH156378 said:

Not smart.

Probably not something I would do but wouldn't it be great if someone had stood up to Hitler?

To make this comparison is beyond ridiculous. People who make it are beyond discredited in my books. Sorry but it officially makes one far more part of the problem then the solution.

That means nothing when it's taken into consideration that you refuse to even acknowledge that Trump is spouting racist, xenophobic, and misogynist BS.
Discredited in your books?
What a joke.

You still haven't done anything at all to dispute the similarities in use of racist fearmongering to elevate himself and facism.
Easier to just say it's crazy than to actually deal with it.

I won't acknowledge it because I don't believe it to be true. In fact I believe the opposite is happening. Trump is raising the concept of controlled immigration and you are shouting racism just to avoid the topic. Pretty much standard militant progressive behaviour.

In the last few years 124 illegal immigrants released from custody were later charged for committing 135 homicide-related crimes. See below...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/14/124-illegal-immigrants-released-by-dhs-later-charg/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS&google_editors_picks=true

Again...I don't support Trump but I also don't think it is racist of him to want to do something about the problem above.

Wanting to do something about illegal immigration doesn't make Trump racist, agree there. But the continued tone of his rhetoric strongly indicates racist tendencies.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/9-outrageous-things-donald-trump-has-said-about-latinos_us_55e483a1e4b0c818f618904b

rgambs

BS44325 said:

rgambs said:

BS44325 said:

brianlux said:

CH156378 said:

Not smart.

Probably not something I would do but wouldn't it be great if someone had stood up to Hitler?

To make this comparison is beyond ridiculous. People who make it are beyond discredited in my books. Sorry but it officially makes one far more part of the problem then the solution.

That means nothing when it's taken into consideration that you refuse to even acknowledge that Trump is spouting racist, xenophobic, and misogynist BS.
Discredited in your books?
What a joke.

You still haven't done anything at all to dispute the similarities in use of racist fearmongering to elevate himself and facism.
Easier to just say it's crazy than to actually deal with it.

I won't acknowledge it because I don't believe it to be true. In fact I believe the opposite is happening. Trump is raising the concept of controlled immigration and you are shouting racism just to avoid the topic. Pretty much standard militant progressive behaviour.

In the last few years 124 illegal immigrants released from custody were later charged for committing 135 homicide-related crimes. See below...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/14/124-illegal-immigrants-released-by-dhs-later-charg/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS&google_editors_picks=true

Again...I don't support Trump but I also don't think it is racist of him to want to do something about the problem above.

Denying the existence of racism, standard militant conservative behavior.

You just brought attention to a real problem without generalizing all immigrants as scum. You could probably do the same with the issue of Islamic terrorism, though a total ban and registration of Muslims is inherently racist.
If Trump could do that, people would consider him a serious man, not a racist clown.

At the very least, you should be acknowledging that Trump's rhetoric is directed at and tailored for those who are unequivocally racist. The KKK nutties and all these bumfucks at these rallies are turning out for Trump, not for Cruz, who has similar takes on the issue. It is not a coincidence.

PJfanwillneverleave1

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

BS44325

JimmyV said:

BS44325 said:

rgambs said:

BS44325 said:

brianlux said:

CH156378 said:

Not smart.

Probably not something I would do but wouldn't it be great if someone had stood up to Hitler?

To make this comparison is beyond ridiculous. People who make it are beyond discredited in my books. Sorry but it officially makes one far more part of the problem then the solution.

That means nothing when it's taken into consideration that you refuse to even acknowledge that Trump is spouting racist, xenophobic, and misogynist BS.
Discredited in your books?
What a joke.

You still haven't done anything at all to dispute the similarities in use of racist fearmongering to elevate himself and facism.
Easier to just say it's crazy than to actually deal with it.

I won't acknowledge it because I don't believe it to be true. In fact I believe the opposite is happening. Trump is raising the concept of controlled immigration and you are shouting racism just to avoid the topic. Pretty much standard militant progressive behaviour.

In the last few years 124 illegal immigrants released from custody were later charged for committing 135 homicide-related crimes. See below...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/14/124-illegal-immigrants-released-by-dhs-later-charg/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS&google_editors_picks=true

Again...I don't support Trump but I also don't think it is racist of him to want to do something about the problem above.

Wanting to do something about illegal immigration doesn't make Trump racist, agree there. But the continued tone of his rhetoric strongly indicates racist tendencies.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/9-outrageous-things-donald-trump-has-said-about-latinos_us_55e483a1e4b0c818f618904b

Tone does not indicate racist tendencies. Sorry.

JimmyV

BS44325 said:

JimmyV said:

BS44325 said:

rgambs said:

BS44325 said:

brianlux said:

CH156378 said:

Not smart.

Probably not something I would do but wouldn't it be great if someone had stood up to Hitler?

To make this comparison is beyond ridiculous. People who make it are beyond discredited in my books. Sorry but it officially makes one far more part of the problem then the solution.

That means nothing when it's taken into consideration that you refuse to even acknowledge that Trump is spouting racist, xenophobic, and misogynist BS.
Discredited in your books?
What a joke.

You still haven't done anything at all to dispute the similarities in use of racist fearmongering to elevate himself and facism.
Easier to just say it's crazy than to actually deal with it.

I won't acknowledge it because I don't believe it to be true. In fact I believe the opposite is happening. Trump is raising the concept of controlled immigration and you are shouting racism just to avoid the topic. Pretty much standard militant progressive behaviour.

In the last few years 124 illegal immigrants released from custody were later charged for committing 135 homicide-related crimes. See below...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/14/124-illegal-immigrants-released-by-dhs-later-charg/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS&google_editors_picks=true

Again...I don't support Trump but I also don't think it is racist of him to want to do something about the problem above.

Wanting to do something about illegal immigration doesn't make Trump racist, agree there. But the continued tone of his rhetoric strongly indicates racist tendencies.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/9-outrageous-things-donald-trump-has-said-about-latinos_us_55e483a1e4b0c818f618904b

Tone does not indicate racist tendencies. Sorry.

Then substitute content for tone if that makes it easier to swallow. Refusing to consider what I posted as an indication of racism seriously cuts into your credibility.

Free

brianlux said:

CH156378 said:

brianlux said:

CH156378 said:

Not smart.

Probably not something I would do but wouldn't it be great if someone had stood up to Hitler?

I dont know about this one. Obviously it would of been great for someone to kill Hitler. Some even question wheather we would kill baby Hitler. I'm just saying lots of people like to compare Obama to Hitler. I don't want the other side thinking it's ok to rush the stage when hes making a speach.
I'm fine with interruptions and protests but rushing the stage is a threat.

Someone compared Obama to Hitler? I've never heard that.

I agree that rushing the stage was a bit over the top but it could also be argued that what Trump is all about is far more than simply over the top.

So let's look at this. If we could all agree that Trump is racist, misogynistic, hate mongering and power-hungry (it really hard to argue that he is not those things) and that this is what he is doing and spreading, what is the best way to bring attention to this? If someone is kicking a kitten or a baby or robbing an old lady on the street or killing whales in a whale sanctuary- those things are illegal so you do what it takes to stop them. But what do you do about something that is immoral like spreading hate and encouraging violence? Do you sit by idly and hope the guy will just go away? Or do you put your own well being and freedom at risk and take a stand?

These are not easy questions.

Go BrianLux!

brianlux

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

PJfanwillneverleave1

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

brianlux

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

It's not the approach I would take but I can see where sooner or later someone is going to react this way. Trump is all about provoking. That provocation often leads to the kind of blind acceptance we've seen in many of his supporters (thus the comparisons being made to Hitler and Nazism) and the outright (or at least consequential) acceptance of racism, misogyny and hatred Trump promotes or retaliation of the sort of thing DiMassimo did. If you're not in favor of at least the former, you're probably not going to vote for Trump. And even if you don't care for DiMassimo's tactics but still don't accept the negative qualities the man embraces, you probably won't vote for Trump.

But you're Canadian so you won't vote here anyway. Go home Canuck!
(You know I'm joking. In most ways, Canada is a marvelous country.)

PJfanwillneverleave1

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

It's not the approach I would take but I can see where sooner or later someone is going to react this way. Trump is all about provoking. That provocation often leads to the kind of blind acceptance we've seen in many of his supporters (thus the comparisons being made to Hitler and Nazism) and the outright (or at least consequential) acceptance of racism, misogyny and hatred Trump promotes or retaliation of the sort of thing DiMassimo did. If you're not in favor of at least the former, you're probably not going to vote for Trump. And even if you don't care for DiMassimo's tactics but still don't accept the negative qualities the man embraces, you probably won't vote for Trump.

But you're Canadian so you won't vote here anyway. Go home Canuck!
(You know I'm joking. In most ways, Canada is a marvelous country.)

Marvelous without Trump indeed!

brianlux

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

It's not the approach I would take but I can see where sooner or later someone is going to react this way. Trump is all about provoking. That provocation often leads to the kind of blind acceptance we've seen in many of his supporters (thus the comparisons being made to Hitler and Nazism) and the outright (or at least consequential) acceptance of racism, misogyny and hatred Trump promotes or retaliation of the sort of thing DiMassimo did. If you're not in favor of at least the former, you're probably not going to vote for Trump. And even if you don't care for DiMassimo's tactics but still don't accept the negative qualities the man embraces, you probably won't vote for Trump.

But you're Canadian so you won't vote here anyway. Go home Canuck!
(You know I'm joking. In most ways, Canada is a marvelous country.)

Marvelous without Trump indeed!

Thank your lucky stars!

rgambs

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

It's not the approach I would take but I can see where sooner or later someone is going to react this way. Trump is all about provoking. That provocation often leads to the kind of blind acceptance we've seen in many of his supporters (thus the comparisons being made to Hitler and Nazism) and the outright (or at least consequential) acceptance of racism, misogyny and hatred Trump promotes or retaliation of the sort of thing DiMassimo did. If you're not in favor of at least the former, you're probably not going to vote for Trump. And even if you don't care for DiMassimo's tactics but still don't accept the negative qualities the man embraces, you probably won't vote for Trump.

But you're Canadian so you won't vote here anyway. Go home Canuck!
(You know I'm joking. In most ways, Canada is a marvelous country.)

Marvelous without Trump indeed!

Shouldn't you Love him? As a fellow shit disturber, I would think he would be your guy. You go around these threads chiming in with one liners supporting Trump, but you don't like the guy? Sounds like shit stirring to me.

PJfanwillneverleave1

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

It's not the approach I would take but I can see where sooner or later someone is going to react this way. Trump is all about provoking. That provocation often leads to the kind of blind acceptance we've seen in many of his supporters (thus the comparisons being made to Hitler and Nazism) and the outright (or at least consequential) acceptance of racism, misogyny and hatred Trump promotes or retaliation of the sort of thing DiMassimo did. If you're not in favor of at least the former, you're probably not going to vote for Trump. And even if you don't care for DiMassimo's tactics but still don't accept the negative qualities the man embraces, you probably won't vote for Trump.

But you're Canadian so you won't vote here anyway. Go home Canuck!
(You know I'm joking. In most ways, Canada is a marvelous country.)

Marvelous without Trump indeed!

Shouldn't you Love him? As a fellow shit disturber, I would think he would be your guy. You go around these threads chiming in with one liners supporting Trump, but you don't like the guy? Sounds like shit stirring to me.

I think he is an all round American- a perfect fit for your country.
He wouldn't be a good fit for us though - in fact our country would not allow his antics.
I love watching his campaign unfold and I wouldn't mind getting his autograph.

brianlux

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

It's not the approach I would take but I can see where sooner or later someone is going to react this way. Trump is all about provoking. That provocation often leads to the kind of blind acceptance we've seen in many of his supporters (thus the comparisons being made to Hitler and Nazism) and the outright (or at least consequential) acceptance of racism, misogyny and hatred Trump promotes or retaliation of the sort of thing DiMassimo did. If you're not in favor of at least the former, you're probably not going to vote for Trump. And even if you don't care for DiMassimo's tactics but still don't accept the negative qualities the man embraces, you probably won't vote for Trump.

But you're Canadian so you won't vote here anyway. Go home Canuck!
(You know I'm joking. In most ways, Canada is a marvelous country.)

Marvelous without Trump indeed!

Shouldn't you Love him? As a fellow shit disturber, I would think he would be your guy. You go around these threads chiming in with one liners supporting Trump, but you don't like the guy? Sounds like shit stirring to me.

I think he is an all round American- a perfect fit for your country.
He wouldn't be a good fit for us though - in fact our country would not allow his antics.
I love watching his campaign unfold and I wouldn't mind getting his autograph.

Whoa- wait a sec. Of what percentage of our country is he a good fit? Not half!

PJfanwillneverleave1

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

It's not the approach I would take but I can see where sooner or later someone is going to react this way. Trump is all about provoking. That provocation often leads to the kind of blind acceptance we've seen in many of his supporters (thus the comparisons being made to Hitler and Nazism) and the outright (or at least consequential) acceptance of racism, misogyny and hatred Trump promotes or retaliation of the sort of thing DiMassimo did. If you're not in favor of at least the former, you're probably not going to vote for Trump. And even if you don't care for DiMassimo's tactics but still don't accept the negative qualities the man embraces, you probably won't vote for Trump.

But you're Canadian so you won't vote here anyway. Go home Canuck!
(You know I'm joking. In most ways, Canada is a marvelous country.)

Marvelous without Trump indeed!

Shouldn't you Love him? As a fellow shit disturber, I would think he would be your guy. You go around these threads chiming in with one liners supporting Trump, but you don't like the guy? Sounds like shit stirring to me.

You just called yourself a shit disturber?

rgambs

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

It's not the approach I would take but I can see where sooner or later someone is going to react this way. Trump is all about provoking. That provocation often leads to the kind of blind acceptance we've seen in many of his supporters (thus the comparisons being made to Hitler and Nazism) and the outright (or at least consequential) acceptance of racism, misogyny and hatred Trump promotes or retaliation of the sort of thing DiMassimo did. If you're not in favor of at least the former, you're probably not going to vote for Trump. And even if you don't care for DiMassimo's tactics but still don't accept the negative qualities the man embraces, you probably won't vote for Trump.

But you're Canadian so you won't vote here anyway. Go home Canuck!
(You know I'm joking. In most ways, Canada is a marvelous country.)

Marvelous without Trump indeed!

Shouldn't you Love him? As a fellow shit disturber, I would think he would be your guy. You go around these threads chiming in with one liners supporting Trump, but you don't like the guy? Sounds like shit stirring to me.

You just called yourself a shit disturber?

You are the subject of the sentence.

PJfanwillneverleave1

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

It's not the approach I would take but I can see where sooner or later someone is going to react this way. Trump is all about provoking. That provocation often leads to the kind of blind acceptance we've seen in many of his supporters (thus the comparisons being made to Hitler and Nazism) and the outright (or at least consequential) acceptance of racism, misogyny and hatred Trump promotes or retaliation of the sort of thing DiMassimo did. If you're not in favor of at least the former, you're probably not going to vote for Trump. And even if you don't care for DiMassimo's tactics but still don't accept the negative qualities the man embraces, you probably won't vote for Trump.

But you're Canadian so you won't vote here anyway. Go home Canuck!
(You know I'm joking. In most ways, Canada is a marvelous country.)

Marvelous without Trump indeed!

Shouldn't you Love him? As a fellow shit disturber, I would think he would be your guy. You go around these threads chiming in with one liners supporting Trump, but you don't like the guy? Sounds like shit stirring to me.

I think he is an all round American- a perfect fit for your country.
He wouldn't be a good fit for us though - in fact our country would not allow his antics.
I love watching his campaign unfold and I wouldn't mind getting his autograph.

Whoa- wait a sec. Of what percentage of our country is he a good fit? Not half!

It wouldn't be America without people like Trump. It is the stereotypical perception of Americans - yeehaw, rootin, tootin rednecks mixed with liberals.
This Trump thing is comical and the world expects nothing less than a fiasco like this - only in America.

brianlux

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

brianlux said:

In what way was DiMassimo inciting violence?

come on man.
He was shit disturbing.
Kind of like this question.

If asking pertinent questions is disturbing shit then I guess you could say I'm disturbing shit. But carefully thought out and posed questions are also intended to stimulate the mind. Hopefully there is no correlation there.

I know what Trump means when he thinks that any protester who attempts violence should be met with a smack. This guy is a repugnant individual who does nothing except shit disturb.
Vote for change. Bum rushing a stage does nothing. Especially if it was a global warming speech.

It's not the approach I would take but I can see where sooner or later someone is going to react this way. Trump is all about provoking. That provocation often leads to the kind of blind acceptance we've seen in many of his supporters (thus the comparisons being made to Hitler and Nazism) and the outright (or at least consequential) acceptance of racism, misogyny and hatred Trump promotes or retaliation of the sort of thing DiMassimo did. If you're not in favor of at least the former, you're probably not going to vote for Trump. And even if you don't care for DiMassimo's tactics but still don't accept the negative qualities the man embraces, you probably won't vote for Trump.

But you're Canadian so you won't vote here anyway. Go home Canuck!
(You know I'm joking. In most ways, Canada is a marvelous country.)

Marvelous without Trump indeed!

Shouldn't you Love him? As a fellow shit disturber, I would think he would be your guy. You go around these threads chiming in with one liners supporting Trump, but you don't like the guy? Sounds like shit stirring to me.

You just called yourself a shit disturber?

You know what he meant and you know you like to egg people on. It's an odd hobby PJf.