Didn't Hilary vote in 2002 with a yes? Also I think if you want to use the Bush/Iraq war as a point, you can't ignor that Democrats gave us Vietnam. We can't just wipe that one away as if it's irrelevant either.
Kennedys cabinet, the best and the brightest, gravitated to the GOP during the 70s because the Democrats became peaceniks. They were the forefathers of the neocons.
Under tremendous public pressure. He had to run on Peace with Dignity, but he kept the effort going after LBJ. They all feel victim to the Domino Theory.
So that is a yes democrats gave us Vietnam and republican ended it?
Dude those are tired arguments that have no relevance to today. Both parties escalated the conflict, just like Korea. If you boil things down to such a simplistic level, then you are likely a dittohead.
Not a tired argument. Perfectly valid and relevant when you want to say that Republicans sent us to Iraq as a reason not to vote republican. A dittohead? Is that what someone is when they have valid points that you don't like? Or you just dismiss their points and call them a dittohead?
Another senseless war, with more lost American lives than the Iraq war, one in which Americans were drafted into, but since it was 45 years ago that voids it? It's a valid counter point to someone bringing up bush and the Iraq war. War is ugly, and both parties have senseless blood on their hands. I would find it ignorant to argue the Iraq war while dismissing Vietnam. But that's just me.
Not a tired argument. Perfectly valid and relevant when you want to say that Republicans sent us to Iraq as a reason not to vote republican. A dittohead? Is that what someone is when they have valid points that you don't like? Or you just dismiss their points and call them a dittohead?
I don't recall writing that. Can you show me where? I pointed out that Kennedys cabinet were the forefathers of the neocons, which were once known as neo liberals. Ans it is a fact that they were the architects of the Iraq war. Simply read the open letter to Bill Clinton from the Project for a New American Century. Look at the signers of that document. So yes, it's simplistic to say Democrats started the war and the GOP finished it. It's similar to dittoheads saying the Democrats were the segregationists, while ignoring the Southern Strategy. So maybe you're making a point somewhere, but this is a silly argument.
Not a tired argument. Perfectly valid and relevant when you want to say that Republicans sent us to Iraq as a reason not to vote republican. A dittohead? Is that what someone is when they have valid points that you don't like? Or you just dismiss their points and call them a dittohead?
I don't recall writing that. Can you show me where? I pointed out that Kennedys cabinet were the forefathers of the neocons, which were once known as neo liberals. Ans it is a fact that they were the architects of the Iraq war. Simply read the open letter to Bill Clinton from the Project for a New American Century. Look at the signers of that document. So yes, it's simplistic to say Democrats started the war and the GOP finished it. It's similar to dittoheads saying the Democrats were the segregationists, while ignoring the Southern Strategy. So maybe you're making a point somewhere, but this is a silly argument.
Focus people, focus. What you are saying has nothing to do with Trump.
Last night we were at a Chris Cornell concert and went outside where the smoking area was, and a guy next to us points to a tall brick portion of the building and said that would be a hell of a Trump wall. It wasn't even a wall it was the building. We both looked at him like he was on glue.
Last night we were at a Chris Cornell concert and went outside where the smoking area was, and a guy next to us points to a tall brick portion of the building and said that would be a hell of a Trump wall. It wasn't even a wall it was the building. We both looked at him like he was on glue.
Another one just like the doofus in the In Bloom chorus.
I would like to give some more truth http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/07/newt-gingrich-theres-no-evidence-at-all-that-trump-is-a-racist/489908/ Over the course of an hour, Gingrich spoke candidly about Trump’s personality, the mistakes he’s made over the course of his campaign, why his nomination signals a shift in American culture, and how Republican leaders in Congress have considerable leverage should Trump be elected. “Let’s assume for a second, which many of you will find horrifying, that Trump wins,” he said. “The first person he has to talk to about appointing a cabinet is the Senate Majority Leader, so if McConnell and he aren’t dancing, he has a huge problem.”
Comments
we will find a way, we will find our place
But we took it over from the French.
I guess you win.
we will find a way, we will find our place
What you are saying has nothing to do with Trump.
Slate: Trump Tweets (Then Deletes) Image of Clinton, a Pile of Money, and Star of David.
http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIwr6-v7SU
"
Upwards and downwards!
Go Hillary!
Over the course of an hour, Gingrich spoke candidly about Trump’s personality, the mistakes he’s made over the course of his campaign, why his nomination signals a shift in American culture, and how Republican leaders in Congress have considerable leverage should Trump be elected. “Let’s assume for a second, which many of you will find horrifying, that Trump wins,” he said. “The first person he has to talk to about appointing a cabinet is the Senate Majority Leader, so if McConnell and he aren’t dancing, he has a huge problem.”
Time for some Trump.
Get ready.
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon