Hilliary seemed proud of her China steal points and comments, is it fair to assume that trump would take the same approach (operate) to running a for profit business as the WH? Potus vs Prez of company
his defence of that was "so stop me and I would have bought locally". what a tool.
Hilliary seemed proud of her China steal points and comments, is it fair to assume that trump would take the same approach (operate) to running a for profit business as the WH? Potus vs Prez of company
his defence of that was "so stop me and I would have bought locally". what a tool.
Every prudent business person seeks to maximize profits, I'm saying how can you assume he would apply that to the WH?
0
Options
F Me In The Brain
this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 30,815
As if we didn't need more proof of Trump's limited intelligence.
So many funny quotes like that last night. (Until you stop and remember that this is someone who 35% of Americans want to be our leader.)
Almost any other person running in the primaries would have better numbers at this point had they been the nominee to go against Clinton, imo. (Even Lardo Christie.)
And, yes, PJFan, that means you are a troll. (Questioning if Wobbie was a fireman.)
Hilliary seemed proud of her China steal points and comments, is it fair to assume that trump would take the same approach (operate) to running a for profit business as the WH? Potus vs Prez of company
his defence of that was "so stop me and I would have bought locally". what a tool.
Every prudent business person seeks to maximize profits, I'm saying how can you assume he would apply that to the WH?
you can't. I would HOPE his interests lie with the american economy, since (we hope) he wouldn't be profitting or losing personally from the scenario, and bringing jobs back, but who really knows. I don't think he even does.
Hilliary seemed proud of her China steal points and comments, is it fair to assume that trump would take the same approach (operate) to running a for profit business as the WH? Potus vs Prez of company
his defence of that was "so stop me and I would have bought locally". what a tool.
Every prudent business person seeks to maximize profits, I'm saying how can you assume he would apply that to the WH?
you can't. I would HOPE his interests lie with the american economy, since (we hope) he wouldn't be profitting or losing personally from the scenario, and bringing jobs back, but who really knows. I don't think he even does.
I saw it this morning but I don't give a fuck what Vox, Rolling Stone or anyone else says. Plus there's a world of difference between a writer saying something and a candidate saying something. Find me where Al Gore said the election was rigged and I'll listen.
I saw it this morning but I don't give a fuck what Vox, Rolling Stone or anyone else says. Plus there's a world of difference between a writer saying something and a candidate saying something. Find me where Al Gore said the election was rigged and I'll listen.
I don't expect you to "give a fuck". This is just another example of faux outrage that will continue until the next one. That being said Donald left this opening for attack on his own as stupid as the attack may be.
good piece regarding the sanctity of elections. the lines get blurred when trump whines about the elections being rigged vs his position of lets wait and see what happens on election night when asked whether or not he will accept the results of the elections, with a yes or no answer. who officially calls a state win on election night, a news station? do most voters know how that process works? anyway rigged can mean many different things to different people. he didnt and probably is incapable of articulating that. some think the dnc rigged the primaries which isnt the same as flipping a cast vote, which some may equate to rigging. no gore didnt say rigging but he didnt just accept fox and cnn giving fl to bush either.
I saw it this morning but I don't give a fuck what Vox, Rolling Stone or anyone else says. Plus there's a world of difference between a writer saying something and a candidate saying something. Find me where Al Gore said the election was rigged and I'll listen.
I don't expect you to "give a fuck". This is just another example of faux outrage that will continue until the next one. That being said Donald left this opening for attack on his own as stupid as the attack may be.
Stated more eloquently, it's a false equivalency on Joe's part to draw a correlation between what some left wing, somewhat irrelevant rags print and what the candidate says.
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,547
I saw it this morning but I don't give a fuck what Vox, Rolling Stone or anyone else says. Plus there's a world of difference between a writer saying something and a candidate saying something. Find me where Al Gore said the election was rigged and I'll listen.
I don't expect you to "give a fuck". This is just another example of faux outrage that will continue until the next one. That being said Donald left this opening for attack on his own as stupid as the attack may be.
Stated more eloquently, it's a false equivalency on Joe's part to draw a correlation between what some left wing, somewhat irrelevant rags print and what the candidate says.
Yeah but Howard Dean was a candidate in 2004 and was then Chairman of the DNC. Hillary herself said George W was "selected not elected". And John Edwards/John Kerry were very vocal about 2004. Kerry still goes out to other countries to this day and says that Ohio was stolen...how does that look across the pond?
I saw it this morning but I don't give a fuck what Vox, Rolling Stone or anyone else says. Plus there's a world of difference between a writer saying something and a candidate saying something. Find me where Al Gore said the election was rigged and I'll listen.
I don't expect you to "give a fuck". This is just another example of faux outrage that will continue until the next one. That being said Donald left this opening for attack on his own as stupid as the attack may be.
Stated more eloquently, it's a false equivalency on Joe's part to draw a correlation between what some left wing, somewhat irrelevant rags print and what the candidate says.
Yeah but Howard Dean was a candidate in 2004 and was then Chairman of the DNC. Hillary herself said George W was "selected not elected". And John Edwards/John Kerry were very vocal about 2004. Kerry still goes out to other countries to this day and says that Ohio was stolen...how does that look across the pond?
Bush was selected not elected, I use the term appointed.
I saw it this morning but I don't give a fuck what Vox, Rolling Stone or anyone else says. Plus there's a world of difference between a writer saying something and a candidate saying something. Find me where Al Gore said the election was rigged and I'll listen.
I don't expect you to "give a fuck". This is just another example of faux outrage that will continue until the next one. That being said Donald left this opening for attack on his own as stupid as the attack may be.
Stated more eloquently, it's a false equivalency on Joe's part to draw a correlation between what some left wing, somewhat irrelevant rags print and what the candidate says.
Yeah but Howard Dean was a candidate in 2004 and was then Chairman of the DNC. Hillary herself said George W was "selected not elected". And John Edwards/John Kerry were very vocal about 2004. Kerry still goes out to other countries to this day and says that Ohio was stolen...how does that look across the pond?
You are saying that in his capacity as SOS and/or Senator, John Kerry has said Ohio was stolen?? I have never heard or seen that. Please post it. I'd be curious and it would be a breach of protocol in many ways.
I saw it this morning but I don't give a fuck what Vox, Rolling Stone or anyone else says. Plus there's a world of difference between a writer saying something and a candidate saying something. Find me where Al Gore said the election was rigged and I'll listen.
I don't expect you to "give a fuck". This is just another example of faux outrage that will continue until the next one. That being said Donald left this opening for attack on his own as stupid as the attack may be.
Stated more eloquently, it's a false equivalency on Joe's part to draw a correlation between what some left wing, somewhat irrelevant rags print and what the candidate says.
Yeah but Howard Dean was a candidate in 2004 and was then Chairman of the DNC. Hillary herself said George W was "selected not elected". And John Edwards/John Kerry were very vocal about 2004. Kerry still goes out to other countries to this day and says that Ohio was stolen...how does that look across the pond?
You are saying that in his capacity as SOS and/or Senator, John Kerry has said Ohio was stolen?? I have never heard or seen that. Please post it. I'd be curious and it would be a breach of protocol in many ways.
Here's an example in the New Yorker: (key part about 20 paragraphs in)
Speaking to Abdullah Abdullah from Afghanistan he said that there were election irregularities in Ohio. Now he didn't use the word "stolen" but he said they could have fought in court but for the good of the country he let it go. He used this story to encourage Abdullah to accept the results of the Afghani election. Now one can look at this and say what Kerry did was noble but others can look at this and say he painted W's Presidency as an illegitimate one. In my opinion talk like this should be left at the water's edge even if it has political usefulness. Too many dangerous games can be played with legitimacy.
Not particularly. Its mean-reverted bias is a few points leans Republican first off. Second, you never look at any one poll. That's why 538 is so useful in understanding the preponderance of the evidence as to where the election is trending. LA Times, Rasmussen, IBD always seem to have the race closer because of their assessment of the election demographic.
I saw it this morning but I don't give a fuck what Vox, Rolling Stone or anyone else says. Plus there's a world of difference between a writer saying something and a candidate saying something. Find me where Al Gore said the election was rigged and I'll listen.
I don't expect you to "give a fuck". This is just another example of faux outrage that will continue until the next one. That being said Donald left this opening for attack on his own as stupid as the attack may be.
Stated more eloquently, it's a false equivalency on Joe's part to draw a correlation between what some left wing, somewhat irrelevant rags print and what the candidate says.
Yeah but Howard Dean was a candidate in 2004 and was then Chairman of the DNC. Hillary herself said George W was "selected not elected". And John Edwards/John Kerry were very vocal about 2004. Kerry still goes out to other countries to this day and says that Ohio was stolen...how does that look across the pond?
I remember how spineless Kerry was, he wouldn't challenge the results. Some 3rd parties actually tried doing DNC dirty work for him. He should have challenged the voting machines and exit polling data.
"Right wing" sources have identified a link between soros and smartmatic voting machines installed in 16 states.
I saw it this morning but I don't give a fuck what Vox, Rolling Stone or anyone else says. Plus there's a world of difference between a writer saying something and a candidate saying something. Find me where Al Gore said the election was rigged and I'll listen.
I don't expect you to "give a fuck". This is just another example of faux outrage that will continue until the next one. That being said Donald left this opening for attack on his own as stupid as the attack may be.
Stated more eloquently, it's a false equivalency on Joe's part to draw a correlation between what some left wing, somewhat irrelevant rags print and what the candidate says.
Yeah but Howard Dean was a candidate in 2004 and was then Chairman of the DNC. Hillary herself said George W was "selected not elected". And John Edwards/John Kerry were very vocal about 2004. Kerry still goes out to other countries to this day and says that Ohio was stolen...how does that look across the pond?
You are saying that in his capacity as SOS and/or Senator, John Kerry has said Ohio was stolen?? I have never heard or seen that. Please post it. I'd be curious and it would be a breach of protocol in many ways.
Here's an example in the New Yorker: (key part about 20 paragraphs in)
Speaking to Abdullah Abdullah from Afghanistan he said that there were election irregularities in Ohio. Now he didn't use the word "stolen" but he said they could have fought in court but for the good of the country he let it go. He used this story to encourage Abdullah to accept the results of the Afghani election. Now one can look at this and say what Kerry did was noble but others can look at this and say he painted W's Presidency as an illegitimate one. In my opinion talk like this should be left at the water's edge even if it has political usefulness. Too many dangerous games can be played with legitimacy.
I don't understand the good of the country bit, he was probably pressured into not challenging by the DNC in exchange for a favor to be named later. Spineless!
I saw it this morning but I don't give a fuck what Vox, Rolling Stone or anyone else says. Plus there's a world of difference between a writer saying something and a candidate saying something. Find me where Al Gore said the election was rigged and I'll listen.
I don't expect you to "give a fuck". This is just another example of faux outrage that will continue until the next one. That being said Donald left this opening for attack on his own as stupid as the attack may be.
Stated more eloquently, it's a false equivalency on Joe's part to draw a correlation between what some left wing, somewhat irrelevant rags print and what the candidate says.
Yeah but Howard Dean was a candidate in 2004 and was then Chairman of the DNC. Hillary herself said George W was "selected not elected". And John Edwards/John Kerry were very vocal about 2004. Kerry still goes out to other countries to this day and says that Ohio was stolen...how does that look across the pond?
I remember how spineless Kerry was, he wouldn't challenge the results. Some 3rd parties actually tried doing DNC dirty work for him. He should have challenged the voting machines and exit polling data.
"Right wing" sources have identified a link between soros and smartmatic voting machines installed in 16 states.
Exit polling data is irrelevant. Most states have auto recount provisions if they are within a certain % (not sure about Ohio). But there's something to be said about how Gore and Kerry handled the situation. I wouldn't call it spineless. I would call it "country over party".
Comments
www.headstonesband.com
(Until you stop and remember that this is someone who 35% of Americans want to be our leader.)
Almost any other person running in the primaries would have better numbers at this point had they been the nominee to go against Clinton, imo. (Even Lardo Christie.)
And, yes, PJFan, that means you are a troll. (Questioning if Wobbie was a fireman.)
www.headstonesband.com
Made in China. Profits over jobs.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Hilliary was wrong when she suggests trump would operate the WH the same or similar to operating a for profit business.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/watch-donald-trump-shower-love-and-praise-on-hillary-and-bill-clinton_us_580885fbe4b0dd54ce383a3f
anyway rigged can mean many different things to different people. he didnt and probably is incapable of articulating that. some think the dnc rigged the primaries which isnt the same as flipping a cast vote, which some may equate to rigging.
no gore didnt say rigging but he didnt just accept fox and cnn giving fl to bush either.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
This might hurt some feelwings
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/12/21/negotiating-the-whirlwind
Speaking to Abdullah Abdullah from Afghanistan he said that there were election irregularities in Ohio. Now he didn't use the word "stolen" but he said they could have fought in court but for the good of the country he let it go. He used this story to encourage Abdullah to accept the results of the Afghani election. Now one can look at this and say what Kerry did was noble but others can look at this and say he painted W's Presidency as an illegitimate one. In my opinion talk like this should be left at the water's edge even if it has political usefulness. Too many dangerous games can be played with legitimacy.
"Right wing" sources have identified a link between soros and smartmatic voting machines installed in 16 states.