2016 Democratic Presidential Candidates

189101214

Comments

  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited March 2016
    Will nestle draining the lakes and then providing bottled water come up?
    Post edited by JC29856 on
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171
    New Hampshire goes to Bernie.
    Vermont goes to Bernie.
    Tonight Maine goes to Bernie.

    It would be a clear pattern in New England if Massachusetts hadn't screwed it up.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • FreeFree Posts: 3,562
    JC29856 said:

    Anyone know how these attendees at the flint "debate" got their ticket to attend?

    Is the crowd just a bunch of democrat insiders?

    I read today that people are angry because the public was not invited. Those questions supposedly don't represent the people of Flint.
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171
    edited March 2016
    So here is a potential problem. Record turnout in the Maine Republican Caucuses yesterday is dwarfing turnout in the Democratic Caucuses today. Unless there is something strange in the numbers - which is possible, sometimes caucus math is weird - then this might be a bad sign in a state which has gone blue twice for Obama.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,086
    JimmyV said:

    So here is a potential problem. Record turnout in the Maine Republican Caucuses yesterday is dwarfing turnout in the Democratic Caucuses today. Unless there is something strange in the numbers - which is possible, sometimes caucus math is weird - then this might be a bad sign in a state which has gone blue twice for Obama.

    You think Maine is going to go Republican? No way. If that happens, I'll eat my shorts and post the video on AMT.
  • FreeFree Posts: 3,562
    edited March 2016
    JimmyV said:

    So here is a potential problem. Record turnout in the Maine Republican Caucuses yesterday is dwarfing turnout in the Democratic Caucuses today. Unless there is something strange in the numbers - which is possible, sometimes caucus math is weird - then this might be a bad sign in a state which has gone blue twice for Obama.

    http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2016/03/06/turnout-in-maine-democratic-caucuses-is-insanely-high-n2129540
    Post edited by Free on
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171

    JimmyV said:

    So here is a potential problem. Record turnout in the Maine Republican Caucuses yesterday is dwarfing turnout in the Democratic Caucuses today. Unless there is something strange in the numbers - which is possible, sometimes caucus math is weird - then this might be a bad sign in a state which has gone blue twice for Obama.

    You think Maine is going to go Republican? No way. If that happens, I'll eat my shorts and post the video on AMT.
    It wouldn't be a bet I would be eager to make, no. But these numbers tonight are surprising.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    JimmyV said:

    JimmyV said:

    So here is a potential problem. Record turnout in the Maine Republican Caucuses yesterday is dwarfing turnout in the Democratic Caucuses today. Unless there is something strange in the numbers - which is possible, sometimes caucus math is weird - then this might be a bad sign in a state which has gone blue twice for Obama.

    You think Maine is going to go Republican? No way. If that happens, I'll eat my shorts and post the video on AMT.
    It wouldn't be a bet I would be eager to make, no. But these numbers tonight are surprising.
    I will do the same. (Note to self, check on-line for edible undies... just in case).

    Hopefully all the L.L. Beaners will have a strong turn out.
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • FreeFree Posts: 3,562
    JimmyV said:

    JimmyV said:

    So here is a potential problem. Record turnout in the Maine Republican Caucuses yesterday is dwarfing turnout in the Democratic Caucuses today. Unless there is something strange in the numbers - which is possible, sometimes caucus math is weird - then this might be a bad sign in a state which has gone blue twice for Obama.

    You think Maine is going to go Republican? No way. If that happens, I'll eat my shorts and post the video on AMT.
    It wouldn't be a bet I would be eager to make, no. But these numbers tonight are surprising.
    Where are you getting your numbers because turnout for today is very high...
  • FreeFree Posts: 3,562
    ...not to mention Bernie won 65% - 35%.
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171
    Free said:

    JimmyV said:

    JimmyV said:

    So here is a potential problem. Record turnout in the Maine Republican Caucuses yesterday is dwarfing turnout in the Democratic Caucuses today. Unless there is something strange in the numbers - which is possible, sometimes caucus math is weird - then this might be a bad sign in a state which has gone blue twice for Obama.

    You think Maine is going to go Republican? No way. If that happens, I'll eat my shorts and post the video on AMT.
    It wouldn't be a bet I would be eager to make, no. But these numbers tonight are surprising.
    Where are you getting your numbers because turnout for today is very high...
    The GOP numbers dwarf the Democratic numbers with 80% of the vote counted. The parties may be counting differently though which would help explain it.

    http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/maine
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,086
    JimmyV said:

    Free said:

    JimmyV said:

    JimmyV said:

    So here is a potential problem. Record turnout in the Maine Republican Caucuses yesterday is dwarfing turnout in the Democratic Caucuses today. Unless there is something strange in the numbers - which is possible, sometimes caucus math is weird - then this might be a bad sign in a state which has gone blue twice for Obama.

    You think Maine is going to go Republican? No way. If that happens, I'll eat my shorts and post the video on AMT.
    It wouldn't be a bet I would be eager to make, no. But these numbers tonight are surprising.
    Where are you getting your numbers because turnout for today is very high...
    The GOP numbers dwarf the Democratic numbers with 80% of the vote counted. The parties may be counting differently though which would help explain it.

    http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/maine
    These numbers don't really mean anything for predicting how Maine will go in November. About 600,000 Mainers will vote in Nov. Less than 20,000 participated in the caucus.
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    I'd love to see you guys eat your panties.
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171

    JimmyV said:

    Free said:

    JimmyV said:

    JimmyV said:

    So here is a potential problem. Record turnout in the Maine Republican Caucuses yesterday is dwarfing turnout in the Democratic Caucuses today. Unless there is something strange in the numbers - which is possible, sometimes caucus math is weird - then this might be a bad sign in a state which has gone blue twice for Obama.

    You think Maine is going to go Republican? No way. If that happens, I'll eat my shorts and post the video on AMT.
    It wouldn't be a bet I would be eager to make, no. But these numbers tonight are surprising.
    Where are you getting your numbers because turnout for today is very high...
    The GOP numbers dwarf the Democratic numbers with 80% of the vote counted. The parties may be counting differently though which would help explain it.

    http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/maine
    These numbers don't really mean anything for predicting how Maine will go in November. About 600,000 Mainers will vote in Nov. Less than 20,000 participated in the caucus.
    It does (potentially) show a huge enthusiasm gap between the two parties. The numbers aren't close.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Hillary is starting to echo Bernie...especially with regard to race and education costs
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    JC29856 said:

    Hillary is starting to echo Bernie...especially with regard to race and education costs

    What's that saying about imitation and flattery? :wink:
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • FreeFree Posts: 3,562
    JC29856 said:

    Hillary is starting to echo Bernie...especially with regard to race and education costs

    She's been doing it for a while now.
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    She is dried up
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171
    Wow. MSNBC reporter just got caught on live TV working out what questions they were going to ask Clinton's communication director. Maybe that's routine but it was a BAD look.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JimmyV said:

    Wow. MSNBC reporter just got caught on live TV working out what questions they were going to ask Clinton's communication director. Maybe that's routine but it was a BAD look.

    Yeah I wish they did the voice disclosures like at the end of prescription drug commercials.
    Nausea light headedness....Hillary may cause suicidal thoughts...
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    Hillary is starting to echo Bernie...especially with regard to race and education costs

    She's been doing it for a while now.
    If she echoing Bernie now...will she echo trump later
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    Truth be told
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    JC29856 said:

    Free said:

    JC29856 said:

    Hillary is starting to echo Bernie...especially with regard to race and education costs

    She's been doing it for a while now.
    If she echoing Bernie now...will she echo trump later
    :i_dunno:
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171
    JimmyV said:

    JimmyV said:

    Free said:

    JimmyV said:

    JimmyV said:

    So here is a potential problem. Record turnout in the Maine Republican Caucuses yesterday is dwarfing turnout in the Democratic Caucuses today. Unless there is something strange in the numbers - which is possible, sometimes caucus math is weird - then this might be a bad sign in a state which has gone blue twice for Obama.

    You think Maine is going to go Republican? No way. If that happens, I'll eat my shorts and post the video on AMT.
    It wouldn't be a bet I would be eager to make, no. But these numbers tonight are surprising.
    Where are you getting your numbers because turnout for today is very high...
    The GOP numbers dwarf the Democratic numbers with 80% of the vote counted. The parties may be counting differently though which would help explain it.

    http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/maine
    These numbers don't really mean anything for predicting how Maine will go in November. About 600,000 Mainers will vote in Nov. Less than 20,000 participated in the caucus.
    It does (potentially) show a huge enthusiasm gap between the two parties. The numbers aren't close.
    This has to be another case of the Dems using the odd "delegate equivalents" system we heard about in Iowa. It can't be straight one man/one vote totals. The numbers don't match the pictures.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    rgambs said:

    hedonist said:

    JC29856 said:

    hedonist said:

    Is having a basic ID (not even a driver's license) such a preposterous notion?

    Preposterous never.
    May not be as easy or as affordable to some then others.
    What are the requirements to get the basic ID? Where? HOW MUCH? Etc...
    I just checked. Here in California, go to the DMV (you can make an appointment at most locations), fill out the application (or can get it online), have your thumbprint and photo taken, and pay $28. Provide birth certificate or similar documentation. Not too much to do. I managed this feat in my teens, without assistance other than a ride to the DMV.

    Agree with jeff's comments as well. Logical, as usual.

    And I'm not sure the ticket pick-up example is unequatable - to me, it illustrated that something as simple and innocuous as acquiring concert tickets via the 10C requires ID. Most here are good with that scenario, unless I'm mistaken.

    That another something so much more important (I'd hope! To me, at least, it is) would require the same isn't over the top...or is it, really, to some?
    28 dollars buys a dozen eggs, a few loaves of bread, peanut butter and jelly, and more. A trip to the DMV is a pain in the ass for everyone, those who don't drive even more so.
    There is no doubt that it diacpurages a greater number of people from voting than the number who try to commit voter fraud.
    "birth certificate or other similar such doc" is also barrier for many.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    callen said:

    rgambs said:

    hedonist said:

    JC29856 said:

    hedonist said:

    Is having a basic ID (not even a driver's license) such a preposterous notion?

    Preposterous never.
    May not be as easy or as affordable to some then others.
    What are the requirements to get the basic ID? Where? HOW MUCH? Etc...
    I just checked. Here in California, go to the DMV (you can make an appointment at most locations), fill out the application (or can get it online), have your thumbprint and photo taken, and pay $28. Provide birth certificate or similar documentation. Not too much to do. I managed this feat in my teens, without assistance other than a ride to the DMV.

    Agree with jeff's comments as well. Logical, as usual.

    And I'm not sure the ticket pick-up example is unequatable - to me, it illustrated that something as simple and innocuous as acquiring concert tickets via the 10C requires ID. Most here are good with that scenario, unless I'm mistaken.

    That another something so much more important (I'd hope! To me, at least, it is) would require the same isn't over the top...or is it, really, to some?
    28 dollars buys a dozen eggs, a few loaves of bread, peanut butter and jelly, and more. A trip to the DMV is a pain in the ass for everyone, those who don't drive even more so.
    There is no doubt that it diacpurages a greater number of people from voting than the number who try to commit voter fraud.
    "birth certificate or other similar such doc" is also barrier for many.
    Absolutely, and rarely do you get a correct answer when you call (any administrative body public or private) and ask which documents you will need and where to go with them.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • FreeFree Posts: 3,562
    no comments after last night's debate?
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171
    Free said:

    no comments after last night's debate?

    I didn't get to see it. Only some of the wrap-up afterwards.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
Sign In or Register to comment.