Hillary won more votes for President

Options
1…468469471473474…488

Comments

  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,550
    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    Like I've asked you before who will you blame after 1/20/17 , it's all about Bafoon after that date ..
    So instead of always hating on her please tell me what would make you happy
    1-disband the DNC completely I'm down with that
    2- put her in jail
    3- move on and start watching what Bafoon does ..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    josevolution said:

    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    Like I've asked you before who will you blame after 1/20/17 , it's all about Bafoon after that date ..
    So instead of always hating on her please tell me what would make you happy
    1-disband the DNC completely I'm down with that
    2- put her in jail
    3- move on and start watching what Bafoon does ..
    1 & 3.

    https://www.facebook.com/TheYoungTurks/videos/10154221996679205/
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Free said:

    josevolution said:

    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    Like I've asked you before who will you blame after 1/20/17 , it's all about Bafoon after that date ..
    So instead of always hating on her please tell me what would make you happy
    1-disband the DNC completely I'm down with that
    2- put her in jail
    3- move on and start watching what Bafoon does ..
    1 & 3.

    https://www.facebook.com/TheYoungTurks/videos/10154221996679205/
    How about some policies that you would enact that are materially different than the platform? Start there.
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    You are utterly unable to see reality for what it is on any issue involving Clinton.
    Mrussel accepted her faults, criticized, and was realistic through the entire process. That is just fact.

    Let us know when you get 20/20 on Bernie's primary loss.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited December 2016
    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    You are utterly unable to see reality for what it is on any issue involving Clinton.
    Mrussel accepted her faults, criticized, and was realistic through the entire process. That is just fact.

    Let us know when you get 20/20 on Bernie's primary loss.
    ... another Hillary supporter (downright apologist) who will never admit their ways OR that they were wrong.

    How's that working for you two? Thinking of the next personal insult you can throw at me?

    I suggest you watch that video link I posted. You'll eat your words.
    Post edited by Free on
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    You are utterly unable to see reality for what it is on any issue involving Clinton.
    Mrussel accepted her faults, criticized, and was realistic through the entire process. That is just fact.

    Let us know when you get 20/20 on Bernie's primary loss.
    ... another Hillary supporter (downright apologist) who will never admit their ways OR that they were wrong.

    How's that working for you two? Thinking of the next personal insult you can throw at me?

    I suggest you watch that video link I posted. You'll eat your words.
    What ways? Wrong about what?

    All along I was afraid of her flaws and openly voiced those flaws. I wished that Sanders had won, and I wished that Biden had run.
    I didn't lose my mind over the Podesta emails because objective reason showed them to be lacking in substance from the perspective of someone who understands political realities.
    What was I wrong about?

    Was I wrong in stating that obsessing over her faults would play right into Trump's hands?

    Nope, I was right because that's obvious.

    Was I wrong that all the butthurt BernieBro's were shaping up to help Trump win by refusing to vote for the only person who could beat him? Nope. I was right.

    Was I wrong in stating that there was no need to vote for her to keep Trump out, because she already had the whole thing rigged? Nope, that was you.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    You are utterly unable to see reality for what it is on any issue involving Clinton.
    Mrussel accepted her faults, criticized, and was realistic through the entire process. That is just fact.

    Let us know when you get 20/20 on Bernie's primary loss.
    ... another Hillary supporter (downright apologist) who will never admit their ways OR that they were wrong.

    How's that working for you two? Thinking of the next personal insult you can throw at me?

    I suggest you watch that video link I posted. You'll eat your words.
    What ways? Wrong about what?

    All along I was afraid of her flaws and openly voiced those flaws. I wished that Sanders had won, and I wished that Biden had run.
    I didn't lose my mind over the Podesta emails because objective reason showed them to be lacking in substance from the perspective of someone who understands political realities.
    What was I wrong about?

    Was I wrong in stating that obsessing over her faults would play right into Trump's hands?

    Nope, I was right because that's obvious.

    Was I wrong that all the butthurt BernieBro's were shaping up to help Trump win by refusing to vote for the only person who could beat him? Nope. I was right.

    Was I wrong in stating that there was no need to vote for her to keep Trump out, because she already had the whole thing rigged? Nope, that was you.
    You clearly didn't watch the YT video. Because you are wrong.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    You are utterly unable to see reality for what it is on any issue involving Clinton.
    Mrussel accepted her faults, criticized, and was realistic through the entire process. That is just fact.

    Let us know when you get 20/20 on Bernie's primary loss.
    ... another Hillary supporter (downright apologist) who will never admit their ways OR that they were wrong.

    How's that working for you two? Thinking of the next personal insult you can throw at me?

    I suggest you watch that video link I posted. You'll eat your words.
    Still waiting for policy....

    How about instead of watching links, we get some original thought around here. That would a nice change.
  • Degeneratefk
    Degeneratefk Posts: 3,123
    Thumpers won't get off of Hilary because they have nothing good to say,about trump
    will myself to find a home, a home within myself
    we will find a way, we will find our place
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    You are utterly unable to see reality for what it is on any issue involving Clinton.
    Mrussel accepted her faults, criticized, and was realistic through the entire process. That is just fact.

    Let us know when you get 20/20 on Bernie's primary loss.
    ... another Hillary supporter (downright apologist) who will never admit their ways OR that they were wrong.

    How's that working for you two? Thinking of the next personal insult you can throw at me?

    I suggest you watch that video link I posted. You'll eat your words.
    What ways? Wrong about what?

    All along I was afraid of her flaws and openly voiced those flaws. I wished that Sanders had won, and I wished that Biden had run.
    I didn't lose my mind over the Podesta emails because objective reason showed them to be lacking in substance from the perspective of someone who understands political realities.
    What was I wrong about?

    Was I wrong in stating that obsessing over her faults would play right into Trump's hands?

    Nope, I was right because that's obvious.

    Was I wrong that all the butthurt BernieBro's were shaping up to help Trump win by refusing to vote for the only person who could beat him? Nope. I was right.

    Was I wrong in stating that there was no need to vote for her to keep Trump out, because she already had the whole thing rigged? Nope, that was you.
    You clearly didn't watch the YT video. Because you are wrong.
    For the record, you are the one that said over and over that HRC was going to win, it was just drama, blah blah. Aren't you the one that was wrong about everything? Isnt this just more projection by you?
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    You are utterly unable to see reality for what it is on any issue involving Clinton.
    Mrussel accepted her faults, criticized, and was realistic through the entire process. That is just fact.

    Let us know when you get 20/20 on Bernie's primary loss.
    ... another Hillary supporter (downright apologist) who will never admit their ways OR that they were wrong.

    How's that working for you two? Thinking of the next personal insult you can throw at me?

    I suggest you watch that video link I posted. You'll eat your words.
    What ways? Wrong about what?

    All along I was afraid of her flaws and openly voiced those flaws. I wished that Sanders had won, and I wished that Biden had run.
    I didn't lose my mind over the Podesta emails because objective reason showed them to be lacking in substance from the perspective of someone who understands political realities.
    What was I wrong about?

    Was I wrong in stating that obsessing over her faults would play right into Trump's hands?

    Nope, I was right because that's obvious.

    Was I wrong that all the butthurt BernieBro's were shaping up to help Trump win by refusing to vote for the only person who could beat him? Nope. I was right.

    Was I wrong in stating that there was no need to vote for her to keep Trump out, because she already had the whole thing rigged? Nope, that was you.
    You clearly didn't watch the YT video. Because you are wrong.
    I love the TYT, but I don't have a large enough data allowance to watch their videos, Cenk is not particularly concise.

    I don't see how he could have much insight into what we posted about Clinton leading up to the election and whether we were right or wrong.

    Am I wrong that people who refused to vote for Clinton gave an electoral advantage to Trump? I seem to remember Cenk agreeing with me. I seem to remember he voted for Clinton.

    Were you right when you stated over and over that the election was rigged and Trump wouldn't be POTUS even if he won?
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    Watch the link.
  • what dreams
    what dreams Posts: 1,761
    Everyone who disagrees with Free is just wrong.
    Free said:

    what dreams said:

    Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.

    Yet you're not over it if you feel the need to post in this thread.
    3200 vs. 800. You tell me who is obsessed with posting in threads
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    what dreams said:

    Everyone who disagrees with Free is just wrong.

    Free said:

    what dreams said:

    Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.

    Yet you're not over it if you feel the need to post in this thread.
    3200 vs. 800. You tell me who is obsessed with posting in threads
    There's a saying I think about at work from time to time...

    Never argue with crazy. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    what dreams said:

    Everyone who disagrees with Free is just wrong.

    Free said:

    what dreams said:

    Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.

    Yet you're not over it if you feel the need to post in this thread.
    3200 vs. 800. You tell me who is obsessed with posting in threads
    ...I understood feelings I've understood words I've figured out numbers and what there for...
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    mrussel1 said:

    what dreams said:

    Everyone who disagrees with Free is just wrong.

    Free said:

    what dreams said:

    Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.

    Yet you're not over it if you feel the need to post in this thread.
    3200 vs. 800. You tell me who is obsessed with posting in threads
    There's a saying I think about at work from time to time...

    Never argue with crazy. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.
    And you wonder why I stop responding to you.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    what dreams said:

    Everyone who disagrees with Free is just wrong.

    Free said:

    what dreams said:

    Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.

    Yet you're not over it if you feel the need to post in this thread.
    3200 vs. 800. You tell me who is obsessed with posting in threads
    There's a saying I think about at work from time to time...

    Never argue with crazy. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.
    And you wonder why I stop responding to you.
    Not directed at you personally. There's lots of crazy people on here. I'm sure you're not insane.

    But you do seem to accuse people of things in which you are clearly at least as guilty.
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,396
    edited December 2016
    mrussel1 said:

    what dreams said:

    Everyone who disagrees with Free is just wrong.

    Free said:

    what dreams said:

    Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.

    Yet you're not over it if you feel the need to post in this thread.
    3200 vs. 800. You tell me who is obsessed with posting in threads
    There's a saying I think about at work from time to time...

    Never argue with crazy. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.
    Thus the reason people shouldn't respond to the trolls on here
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,148
    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    Agreed....I would have preferred Sanders or Biden. I think Sanders would have had the better shot but I love Biden.

    I think Clinton got railroaded. I think the part of her loss that hurt me the most was knowing those assholes that pushed the bullshit Benghazi and email scandals actually got their way.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,550
    Degeneratefk said:

    Thumpers won't get off of Hilary because they have nothing good to say,about trump

    There's a lot of truth in this ^^^^

    Bafoon is the PE yet folks still want to keep Clinton in the convo as if she's still campaigning !
    Why I'm not sure instead of focusing on all the things the next administration has up its sleeve people still want point out how fucked up Clinton was/is as if she has any influence in the future of this nation...
    Me personally I don't want Bernie or Warren in 2020 at all I hope the DNC can come up with some fresh blood !
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
This discussion has been closed.

Categories