Hillary won more votes for President

Gern Blansten

Smellyman said:

PJ_Soul said:

brianlux said:

PJ_Soul said:

I would like to throw in that I think part of what makes these dark days is the fucked up extremism behind this loathing of Clinton, as well as the underreaction to Trump's sexually predatory behaviour and nature.

I'm not sure why you call it "extremism behind this loathing of Clinton". Many of the people who now are supporting Hillary were very much against here before the Dem convention. Then she became the democratic nominee and all of the sudden her sins were not so egregious. Reacting negatively to the election of a candidate who has so much dirt on here record seems very reasonable, not extreme.

You must be kidding. People are talking about how she should be thrown in prison when she hasn't even been charged with anything, literally fabricating corruption in her charitable foundation, and saying that she is having multiple people murdered. And that she supports her husband being a rapist, that she victim shames... etc. And there are so many other lies floating around, and now this crazy thing with the new FBI info. None of this is reasonable. It is fanatical propaganda. Meanwhile, None of her actual accomplishments are ever referenced or considered.
I am not even a Clinton supporter, but I think this fanatical loathing is as obvious as a punch in the face. Meanwhile, Trump gets away with being a sexual predator, while there is actual proof that he committed fraud in his own charity foundation. He is getting away with it just because, I suppose, he is not held up to any standards whatsoever, but also because there are people working hard to maintain and grow unjustified, deep, visceral hate of Clinton in order to distract from Trump. I think there should be a criminal investigation against him, but that idea isn't even a blip on the radar. Meanwhile, the a FBI seems to now have involvement in politicizing their work days before the election. It's absolutely bizarre.

The Clinton witch hunts began in 1992. Ask most people why they hate Hilary and they can't articulate it. It has been beaten in their heads for 24 years.

Ask Godffather and it is about 1% factual.

Yeah and no matter how many times you challenge him to back up what he says he still repeats the same false crap.

That's what is wrong with America.

Smellyman

Gern Blansten said:

Smellyman said:

PJ_Soul said:

brianlux said:

PJ_Soul said:

I would like to throw in that I think part of what makes these dark days is the fucked up extremism behind this loathing of Clinton, as well as the underreaction to Trump's sexually predatory behaviour and nature.

I'm not sure why you call it "extremism behind this loathing of Clinton". Many of the people who now are supporting Hillary were very much against here before the Dem convention. Then she became the democratic nominee and all of the sudden her sins were not so egregious. Reacting negatively to the election of a candidate who has so much dirt on here record seems very reasonable, not extreme.

You must be kidding. People are talking about how she should be thrown in prison when she hasn't even been charged with anything, literally fabricating corruption in her charitable foundation, and saying that she is having multiple people murdered. And that she supports her husband being a rapist, that she victim shames... etc. And there are so many other lies floating around, and now this crazy thing with the new FBI info. None of this is reasonable. It is fanatical propaganda. Meanwhile, None of her actual accomplishments are ever referenced or considered.
I am not even a Clinton supporter, but I think this fanatical loathing is as obvious as a punch in the face. Meanwhile, Trump gets away with being a sexual predator, while there is actual proof that he committed fraud in his own charity foundation. He is getting away with it just because, I suppose, he is not held up to any standards whatsoever, but also because there are people working hard to maintain and grow unjustified, deep, visceral hate of Clinton in order to distract from Trump. I think there should be a criminal investigation against him, but that idea isn't even a blip on the radar. Meanwhile, the a FBI seems to now have involvement in politicizing their work days before the election. It's absolutely bizarre.

The Clinton witch hunts began in 1992. Ask most people why they hate Hilary and they can't articulate it. It has been beaten in their heads for 24 years.

Ask Godffather and it is about 1% factual.

Yeah and no matter how many times you challenge him to back up what he says he still repeats the same false crap.

That's what is wrong with America.

Benghazi! emails!

BS44325

This is the best article so far on Hillary's current predicament

http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-may-include-thousands-of-emails-linked-to-hillary-clintons-private-server-1477854957

Four separate FBI field offices are/were investigating the Clinton Foundation. It also appears that the FBI and the Justice Department are at odds with each other over the approach. The whole atmosphere seems toxic and it is the fault of the Clinton's and the Clinton's alone. Their unethical behaviour in both setting up of the server and through the fundraising and enrichment through the foundation put the FBI in the position of having to investigate. Dems had the choice to vote for a "clean" candidate in the primaries but chose to elect her baggage and all.

JC29856

So is the Clinton Foundation also being investigated?

JC29856

Anyone try googling pathological liar or pathological lying?

unsung

ledvedderman said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

unsung said:

But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.

In turn begin anew.

Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.

No one is assuming anything.
Just responding to your thoughts.
Don't know why you would think that.
lol

How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?

I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly.
I can't assume you will.
Will you?

I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.

I'll take that as a no.

Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!

Good one
Will you call her corrupt openly?

How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?

The same amount that Trump has been convicted of.
So how many is that?

Ha. You couldn't bring yourself to answer it as "Hillary hasn't been convicted of any charges", could ya?

Remember that the next time you talk of the Oregon protestors.

CM189191

unsung said:

ledvedderman said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

unsung said:

But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.

In turn begin anew.

Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.

No one is assuming anything.
Just responding to your thoughts.
Don't know why you would think that.
lol

How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?

I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly.
I can't assume you will.
Will you?

I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.

I'll take that as a no.

Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!

Good one
Will you call her corrupt openly?

How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?

The same amount that Trump has been convicted of.
So how many is that?

Ha. You couldn't bring yourself to answer it as "Hillary hasn't been convicted of any charges", could ya?

Remember that the next time you talk of the Oregon protestors.

Again, Hillary hasn't even been charged.
Some of the Branch Dildoians still have a day in court to attend.

unsung

unsung

CM189191 said:

unsung said:

ledvedderman said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

unsung said:

But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.

In turn begin anew.

Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.

No one is assuming anything.
Just responding to your thoughts.
Don't know why you would think that.
lol

How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?

I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly.
I can't assume you will.
Will you?

I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.

I'll take that as a no.

Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!

Good one
Will you call her corrupt openly?

How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?

The same amount that Trump has been convicted of.
So how many is that?

Ha. You couldn't bring yourself to answer it as "Hillary hasn't been convicted of any charges", could ya?

Remember that the next time you talk of the Oregon protestors.

Again, Hillary hasn't even been charged.
Some of the Branch Dildoians still have a day in court to attend.

All citzens get their day in court, unless Obama decides to drone strike you.

CM189191

unsung said:

CM189191 said:

unsung said:

ledvedderman said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

unsung said:

But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.

In turn begin anew.

Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.

No one is assuming anything.
Just responding to your thoughts.
Don't know why you would think that.
lol

How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?

I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly.
I can't assume you will.
Will you?

I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.

I'll take that as a no.

Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!

Good one
Will you call her corrupt openly?

How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?

The same amount that Trump has been convicted of.
So how many is that?

Ha. You couldn't bring yourself to answer it as "Hillary hasn't been convicted of any charges", could ya?

Remember that the next time you talk of the Oregon protestors.

Again, Hillary hasn't even been charged.
Some of the Branch Dildoians still have a day in court to attend.

All citzens get their day in court, unless Obama decides to drone strike you.

Well, that just would have been unfair to the birds at the sanctuary

JC29856

unsung said:

Wiener got in trouble for sexting (some teenagers) in 2011 and 2013, why would anyone let him or his spouse anywhere near their presidential campaign?

Gern Blansten

JC29856 said:

unsung said:

Wiener got in trouble for sexting (some teenagers) in 2011 and 2013, why would anyone let him or his spouse anywhere near their presidential campaign?

Wait....you are blaming his spouse (who left him) for his sexting?

unsung

CM189191 said:

unsung said:

CM189191 said:

unsung said:

ledvedderman said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

unsung said:

But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.

In turn begin anew.

Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.

No one is assuming anything.
Just responding to your thoughts.
Don't know why you would think that.
lol

How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?

I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly.
I can't assume you will.
Will you?

I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.

I'll take that as a no.

Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!

Good one
Will you call her corrupt openly?

How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?

The same amount that Trump has been convicted of.
So how many is that?

Ha. You couldn't bring yourself to answer it as "Hillary hasn't been convicted of any charges", could ya?

Remember that the next time you talk of the Oregon protestors.

Again, Hillary hasn't even been charged.
Some of the Branch Dildoians still have a day in court to attend.

All citzens get their day in court, unless Obama decides to drone strike you.

Well, that just would have been unfair to the birds at the sanctuary

And to the Patriots standing up to the Federal government.

unsung

Gern Blansten said:

JC29856 said:

unsung said:

Wiener got in trouble for sexting (some teenagers) in 2011 and 2013, why would anyone let him or his spouse anywhere near their presidential campaign?

Wait....you are blaming his spouse (who left him) for his sexting?

Im not blaming her for leaving him, I blame her for being a foreign agent.

Gern Blansten

unsung said:

Gern Blansten said:

JC29856 said:

unsung said:

Wiener got in trouble for sexting (some teenagers) in 2011 and 2013, why would anyone let him or his spouse anywhere near their presidential campaign?

Wait....you are blaming his spouse (who left him) for his sexting?

Im not blaming her for leaving him, I blame her for being a foreign agent.

Whoa....I wasn't aware of that. Can you provide me some information that shows she is a foreign agent?

mrussel1

Gern Blansten said:

unsung said:

Gern Blansten said:

JC29856 said:

unsung said:

Wiener got in trouble for sexting (some teenagers) in 2011 and 2013, why would anyone let him or his spouse anywhere near their presidential campaign?

Wait....you are blaming his spouse (who left him) for his sexting?

Im not blaming her for leaving him, I blame her for being a foreign agent.

Whoa....I wasn't aware of that. Can you provide me some information that shows she is a foreign agent?

She isn't white, so she must be foreign... right Unsung?? I mean her and Weiner having a child would further the elimination of the white 'race', so Unsung should probably be happy that marriage dissolved.

pjalive21

Smellyman said:

Gern Blansten said:

Smellyman said:

PJ_Soul said:

brianlux said:

PJ_Soul said:

I would like to throw in that I think part of what makes these dark days is the fucked up extremism behind this loathing of Clinton, as well as the underreaction to Trump's sexually predatory behaviour and nature.

I'm not sure why you call it "extremism behind this loathing of Clinton". Many of the people who now are supporting Hillary were very much against here before the Dem convention. Then she became the democratic nominee and all of the sudden her sins were not so egregious. Reacting negatively to the election of a candidate who has so much dirt on here record seems very reasonable, not extreme.

You must be kidding. People are talking about how she should be thrown in prison when she hasn't even been charged with anything, literally fabricating corruption in her charitable foundation, and saying that she is having multiple people murdered. And that she supports her husband being a rapist, that she victim shames... etc. And there are so many other lies floating around, and now this crazy thing with the new FBI info. None of this is reasonable. It is fanatical propaganda. Meanwhile, None of her actual accomplishments are ever referenced or considered.
I am not even a Clinton supporter, but I think this fanatical loathing is as obvious as a punch in the face. Meanwhile, Trump gets away with being a sexual predator, while there is actual proof that he committed fraud in his own charity foundation. He is getting away with it just because, I suppose, he is not held up to any standards whatsoever, but also because there are people working hard to maintain and grow unjustified, deep, visceral hate of Clinton in order to distract from Trump. I think there should be a criminal investigation against him, but that idea isn't even a blip on the radar. Meanwhile, the a FBI seems to now have involvement in politicizing their work days before the election. It's absolutely bizarre.

The Clinton witch hunts began in 1992. Ask most people why they hate Hilary and they can't articulate it. It has been beaten in their heads for 24 years.

Ask Godffather and it is about 1% factual.

Yeah and no matter how many times you challenge him to back up what he says he still repeats the same false crap.

That's what is wrong with America.

Benghazi! emails!

My disdain for Clinton is that she is a pathological liar....i don't know how much more i could articulate that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI

I love how Gowdy puts the smack down on her in this video

HughFreakingDillon

part of me wishes for a Trump win, just so the anti-liberals can get exactly what they wished for and realize just how good they had it.

but it would still be all obama's fault, even when he's a private citizen, having moved back to Kenya and all.

benjs

pjalive21 said:

Smellyman said:

Gern Blansten said:

Smellyman said:

PJ_Soul said:

brianlux said:

PJ_Soul said:

I would like to throw in that I think part of what makes these dark days is the fucked up extremism behind this loathing of Clinton, as well as the underreaction to Trump's sexually predatory behaviour and nature.

I'm not sure why you call it "extremism behind this loathing of Clinton". Many of the people who now are supporting Hillary were very much against here before the Dem convention. Then she became the democratic nominee and all of the sudden her sins were not so egregious. Reacting negatively to the election of a candidate who has so much dirt on here record seems very reasonable, not extreme.

You must be kidding. People are talking about how she should be thrown in prison when she hasn't even been charged with anything, literally fabricating corruption in her charitable foundation, and saying that she is having multiple people murdered. And that she supports her husband being a rapist, that she victim shames... etc. And there are so many other lies floating around, and now this crazy thing with the new FBI info. None of this is reasonable. It is fanatical propaganda. Meanwhile, None of her actual accomplishments are ever referenced or considered.
I am not even a Clinton supporter, but I think this fanatical loathing is as obvious as a punch in the face. Meanwhile, Trump gets away with being a sexual predator, while there is actual proof that he committed fraud in his own charity foundation. He is getting away with it just because, I suppose, he is not held up to any standards whatsoever, but also because there are people working hard to maintain and grow unjustified, deep, visceral hate of Clinton in order to distract from Trump. I think there should be a criminal investigation against him, but that idea isn't even a blip on the radar. Meanwhile, the a FBI seems to now have involvement in politicizing their work days before the election. It's absolutely bizarre.

The Clinton witch hunts began in 1992. Ask most people why they hate Hilary and they can't articulate it. It has been beaten in their heads for 24 years.

Ask Godffather and it is about 1% factual.

Yeah and no matter how many times you challenge him to back up what he says he still repeats the same false crap.

That's what is wrong with America.

Benghazi! emails!

My disdain for Clinton is that she is a pathological liar....i don't know how much more i could articulate that

I don't think she's a pathological liar, but I think her lies are a byproduct of her obsession with taking the position which is statistically best. If she has morals, they do not seem to be factored into her positions whatsoever.

Gern Blansten

HughFreakingDillon said:

part of me wishes for a Trump win, just so the anti-liberals can get exactly what they wished for and realize just how good they had it.

but it would still be all obama's fault, even when he's a private citizen, having moved back to Kenya and all.

I hear you. And imagine the bullshit that would constantly pop up that they would have to defend....because you know they would.