Options

Hillary won more votes for President

1144145147149150325

Comments

  • Options
    unsung said:

    unsung said:

    unsung said:

    tonifig8 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    yet with all the endorsements, all the big money, all the connections, the DNC's help, and the big pile of shit she is running against and she's still neck and neck .... You would think... never mind
    The DNC vastly underestimated the number of racists, islamophobes, mysogists and under educated white Americans in the electorate and how to appeal to them.
    So if this guy was truly attempting to delete evidence will you place the blame on him or his superior? View some of the comments at the bottom of the article.

    http://regated.com/2016/09/paul-combetta-asking-destroy-evidence/
    He had immunity but pleads the fifth on every answer.

    I guess he didn't want to commit suicide with two shots to the back of the head.
    Guess the Constitution doesn't apply to him?
    Do you know what immunity means?
    Yes, and being granted it doesn't mean you forgo your constitutional rights. For someone so vociferously against "government", "law enforcement" and of the "system", you sure do seem to trust it when it suits you and your agenda. Have you reviewed his "immunity" deal?
    Like I said, he had immunity from prosecution but not the hit squad.
    Maybe he's a CWP holder? And let's see if anything "happens" to him.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    Hopefully he doesn't get "robbed" of nothing like that Seth guy.
  • Options
    JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:

    In what amounts to a running theme with the Clinton-Kaine campaign, the Democratic ticket has essentially embraced every single foreign policy position of the neocon movement. As I noted previously, this Clinton-Kaine administration would be the imperial frankenstein, Obama’s head on Bush’s body. No HopeTM. No ChangeTM. But more and bigger wars.

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/09/20/if-hillarys-not-able-theres-always-kaine/

    In her book Hilliary says "Kaine would be a terrible choice for VP" referring to Obama 2008 prospects.
  • Options
    unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    He is owed it.
  • Options
    rssesqrssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    unsung said:

    Hopefully he doesn't get "robbed" of nothing like that Seth guy.

    LMAO
  • Options
    PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,661

    unsung said:

    Kat said:

    hahaha, Secretary Clinton gave a bag of softballs to Jimmy Fallon.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-burns-jimmy-fallon-over-donald-trump-interview_us_57e12cc8e4b04a1497b680d6?section=&

    I'm looking forward to some well-placed humor when she's president too. It helps to deal with all the serious stuff if you have a lighter side too. :)
    And my opinion of George H.W. Bush has risen since the leak about his possibly voting for Secretary Clinton. Country first...and he knows that.


    Imagine the amount of deplorables after four years of her...

    She can claim most corrupt candidate ever, that's a start.
    Only if you ignore Trump. The latest news about him using his foundation to pay his personal debts is pretty corrupt. Much more so than anything Clinton has been found guilty of.
    That's true. He is also giving his campaign contributions to his own kids.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Options
    PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,661
    brianlux said:

    Free said:

    brianlux said:

    Until they call me, all polls are invalid.

    Exactly. So much trust put on these polls, by some, so let's take a vote on the last time anyone here was called, why don't we.
    In the 47 years I've been a registered voter, not once. Nor has anyone I known. I think they must make this shit up.



    Really? Different country, but I get called before just about every election at least once. The phone polls seem to be real, lol.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Options
    HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,871
    at this point, I firmly believe Trump could kill a bald eagle, shit on its head, and wipe his ass with the american flag and his supporters still wouldn't change their stance.
    Flight Risk out NOW!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • Options
    CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via Chicago Posts: 6,793

    at this point, I firmly believe Trump could kill a bald eagle, shit on its head, and wipe his ass with the american flag and his supporters still wouldn't change their stance.

    They certainly are a deplorable bunch:
    https://youtu.be/BYpw2uAD9bg
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18 IT 07/05/2020 AT 07/07/2020
  • Options
    rssesqrssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
  • Options
    rssesqrssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
  • Options
    JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Small sample size! LOL

    https://youtu.be/VoHdBkTTSkE
  • Options
    BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    at this point, I firmly believe Trump could kill a bald eagle, shit on its head, and wipe his ass with the american flag and his supporters still wouldn't change their stance.

    Those are all democratic positions
  • Options
    Care to explain why that's the case, or are you just doing over generalization because you're not intelligent enough to have a conversation about the topic being discussed?
  • Options
    BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    Care to explain why that's the case, or are you just doing over generalization because you're not intelligent enough to have a conversation about the topic being discussed?

    Must be the intelligence thing
  • Options
    Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    Does anyone believe that Lynch and Clinton met on the tarmac to discuss grandchildren?
  • Options
    Yes. I think that Bill got on to say hello and grandchildren came up. Could the investigation have come up? Possibly. Do I think Lynch has the ethical character to not let the conversation change the outcome of the investigation? Absolutely.
  • Options
    Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672

    Yes. I think that Bill got on to say hello and grandchildren came up. Could the investigation have come up? Possibly. Do I think Lynch has the ethical character to not let the conversation change the outcome of the investigation? Absolutely.

    So you think they went through all of that to talk about grandchildren?
  • Options
    No. I'm saying Bill boarded the plane to say hello, small talk (where grandchildren came in), he saw it as a chance to ask about the investigation and Lynch either a) politely cut him off, b) let him say his peace knowing that it wasn't going to impact the result of the investigation.
    Do I think Bill tried? Yes. Do I have faith in Lynch's ethical integrity to not be swayed? Absolutely. We're talking about someone respected by both parties, both chambers of congress and by the executive office. She's a good one.
  • Options
    Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672

    No. I'm saying Bill boarded the plane to say hello, small talk (where grandchildren came in), he saw it as a chance to ask about the investigation and Lynch either a) politely cut him off, b) let him say his peace knowing that it wasn't going to impact the result of the investigation.
    Do I think Bill tried? Yes. Do I have faith in Lynch's ethical integrity to not be swayed? Absolutely. We're talking about someone respected by both parties, both chambers of congress and by the executive office. She's a good one.

    You also think Hillary Clinton is a good one. I don't know her personally and I'm not claiming to know what she would do in such a situation, however as intelligent and admirable as she might be, her decision to even allow it shows poor judgement. Which is why I'm sure she apologized for it. Considering what we know about the Clintons and lunch' sling history with them, I don't think the conversation was about grandchildren
  • Options
    tonifig8 said:

    No. I'm saying Bill boarded the plane to say hello, small talk (where grandchildren came in), he saw it as a chance to ask about the investigation and Lynch either a) politely cut him off, b) let him say his peace knowing that it wasn't going to impact the result of the investigation.
    Do I think Bill tried? Yes. Do I have faith in Lynch's ethical integrity to not be swayed? Absolutely. We're talking about someone respected by both parties, both chambers of congress and by the executive office. She's a good one.

    You also think Hillary Clinton is a good one. I don't know her personally and I'm not claiming to know what she would do in such a situation, however as intelligent and admirable as she might be, her decision to even allow it shows poor judgement. Which is why I'm sure she apologized for it. Considering what we know about the Clintons and lunch' sling history with them, I don't think the conversation was about grandchildren
    What you're failing to see is that while I feel that Bill did overstep and bring up the investigation, I believe as strongly that Lynch did not allow it to influence anything.
    Saying that I think Hillary is a "good one" is also a stretch. I think she can do the job fine. I think she's respected by world leaders. But I have my concerns with her.
  • Options
    JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited September 2016
    I'll leave this here

    Trump leads Clinton on being honest & straightforward, 41% to 31%, per nbcnews/wsj poll.
  • Options
    FreeFree Posts: 3,562
    JC29856 said:

    I'll leave this here

    Trump leads Clinton on being honest & straightforward, 41% to 31%, per nbcnews/wsj poll.

    :lol:
  • Options
    benjsbenjs Toronto, ON Posts: 8,942
    JC29856 said:

    I'll leave this here

    Trump leads Clinton on being honest & straightforward, 41% to 31%, per nbcnews/wsj poll.

    Trump also likely leads on percentage of remarks which are offensive, percentage of requests for tax returns ignored, percentage of life without involvement in politics, percentage of funds illegally taken out of a charitable foundation for self-serving actions, and probably several other statistics that indicate a bad fit for the Presidency. If you're for isolationism then I could see why you'd be for Trump: based on the way he speaks and acts, I can't imagine that his diplomatic relationships will succeed in any way, shape or form. Isolationism seems to then be the only option when your leader is arrogant, illogical, heavy-handed, and believes he is the only one who will succeed in protecting his people from the boogeyman, just ask Kim Jong-un or Binyamin Netanyahu.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • Options
    JC29856 said:

    I'll leave this here

    Trump leads Clinton on being honest & straightforward, 41% to 31%, per nbcnews/wsj poll.

    And that's just amongst those voting for Trump.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:

    I'll leave this here

    Trump leads Clinton on being honest & straightforward, 41% to 31%, per nbcnews/wsj poll.

    To those polled it says I "waste my vote" or I choose between 1. out the ass whatever comes to mind shit talker or 2. calculated incessant habitual liar.
    In a country/democracy where I can choose among 14 varieties and brands of toilet tissue, my vote is either wasted or spent on 1 and 2 above.
    Yakok Smirnoff!
  • Options
    Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    dignin said:
    She doesn't say much. Is this considered an actual press conference?
    Zack had some good lines...
  • Options
    Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    Warren: Let's keep Wall Street out of a Clinton Cabinet

    http://thehill.com/policy/finance/297040-warren-lets-keep-wall-street-out-of-a-clinton-cabinet


    Ummmmmm..... Maybe we should keep the Clinton out of the white house, this way we wouldn't have to worry about this. Hmmmmmm Maybe she should have endorsed a candidate with a real progressive agenda. Or shit, a candidate who isn't funded by Wall St.

    The irony.
  • Options
    rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    tonifig8 said:

    Warren: Let's keep Wall Street out of a Clinton Cabinet

    http://thehill.com/policy/finance/297040-warren-lets-keep-wall-street-out-of-a-clinton-cabinet


    Ummmmmm..... Maybe we should keep the Clinton out of the white house, this way we wouldn't have to worry about this. Hmmmmmm Maybe she should have endorsed a candidate with a real progressive agenda. Or shit, a candidate who isn't funded by Wall St.

    The irony.

    Would have been nice, but it didn't happen.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
This discussion has been closed.