yet with all the endorsements, all the big money, all the connections, the DNC's help, and the big pile of shit she is running against and she's still neck and neck .... You would think... never mind
The DNC vastly underestimated the number of racists, islamophobes, mysogists and under educated white Americans in the electorate and how to appeal to them.
So if this guy was truly attempting to delete evidence will you place the blame on him or his superior? View some of the comments at the bottom of the article.
He had immunity but pleads the fifth on every answer.
I guess he didn't want to commit suicide with two shots to the back of the head.
Guess the Constitution doesn't apply to him?
Do you know what immunity means?
Yes, and being granted it doesn't mean you forgo your constitutional rights. For someone so vociferously against "government", "law enforcement" and of the "system", you sure do seem to trust it when it suits you and your agenda. Have you reviewed his "immunity" deal?
Like I said, he had immunity from prosecution but not the hit squad.
Maybe he's a CWP holder? And let's see if anything "happens" to him.
In what amounts to a running theme with the Clinton-Kaine campaign, the Democratic ticket has essentially embraced every single foreign policy position of the neocon movement. As I noted previously, this Clinton-Kaine administration would be the imperial frankenstein, Obama’s head on Bush’s body. No HopeTM. No ChangeTM. But more and bigger wars.
I'm looking forward to some well-placed humor when she's president too. It helps to deal with all the serious stuff if you have a lighter side too. And my opinion of George H.W. Bush has risen since the leak about his possibly voting for Secretary Clinton. Country first...and he knows that.
Imagine the amount of deplorables after four years of her...
She can claim most corrupt candidate ever, that's a start.
Only if you ignore Trump. The latest news about him using his foundation to pay his personal debts is pretty corrupt. Much more so than anything Clinton has been found guilty of.
That's true. He is also giving his campaign contributions to his own kids.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
at this point, I firmly believe Trump could kill a bald eagle, shit on its head, and wipe his ass with the american flag and his supporters still wouldn't change their stance.
at this point, I firmly believe Trump could kill a bald eagle, shit on its head, and wipe his ass with the american flag and his supporters still wouldn't change their stance.
at this point, I firmly believe Trump could kill a bald eagle, shit on its head, and wipe his ass with the american flag and his supporters still wouldn't change their stance.
Care to explain why that's the case, or are you just doing over generalization because you're not intelligent enough to have a conversation about the topic being discussed?
Care to explain why that's the case, or are you just doing over generalization because you're not intelligent enough to have a conversation about the topic being discussed?
Yes. I think that Bill got on to say hello and grandchildren came up. Could the investigation have come up? Possibly. Do I think Lynch has the ethical character to not let the conversation change the outcome of the investigation? Absolutely.
Yes. I think that Bill got on to say hello and grandchildren came up. Could the investigation have come up? Possibly. Do I think Lynch has the ethical character to not let the conversation change the outcome of the investigation? Absolutely.
So you think they went through all of that to talk about grandchildren?
No. I'm saying Bill boarded the plane to say hello, small talk (where grandchildren came in), he saw it as a chance to ask about the investigation and Lynch either a) politely cut him off, b) let him say his peace knowing that it wasn't going to impact the result of the investigation. Do I think Bill tried? Yes. Do I have faith in Lynch's ethical integrity to not be swayed? Absolutely. We're talking about someone respected by both parties, both chambers of congress and by the executive office. She's a good one.
No. I'm saying Bill boarded the plane to say hello, small talk (where grandchildren came in), he saw it as a chance to ask about the investigation and Lynch either a) politely cut him off, b) let him say his peace knowing that it wasn't going to impact the result of the investigation. Do I think Bill tried? Yes. Do I have faith in Lynch's ethical integrity to not be swayed? Absolutely. We're talking about someone respected by both parties, both chambers of congress and by the executive office. She's a good one.
You also think Hillary Clinton is a good one. I don't know her personally and I'm not claiming to know what she would do in such a situation, however as intelligent and admirable as she might be, her decision to even allow it shows poor judgement. Which is why I'm sure she apologized for it. Considering what we know about the Clintons and lunch' sling history with them, I don't think the conversation was about grandchildren
No. I'm saying Bill boarded the plane to say hello, small talk (where grandchildren came in), he saw it as a chance to ask about the investigation and Lynch either a) politely cut him off, b) let him say his peace knowing that it wasn't going to impact the result of the investigation. Do I think Bill tried? Yes. Do I have faith in Lynch's ethical integrity to not be swayed? Absolutely. We're talking about someone respected by both parties, both chambers of congress and by the executive office. She's a good one.
You also think Hillary Clinton is a good one. I don't know her personally and I'm not claiming to know what she would do in such a situation, however as intelligent and admirable as she might be, her decision to even allow it shows poor judgement. Which is why I'm sure she apologized for it. Considering what we know about the Clintons and lunch' sling history with them, I don't think the conversation was about grandchildren
What you're failing to see is that while I feel that Bill did overstep and bring up the investigation, I believe as strongly that Lynch did not allow it to influence anything. Saying that I think Hillary is a "good one" is also a stretch. I think she can do the job fine. I think she's respected by world leaders. But I have my concerns with her.
Trump leads Clinton on being honest & straightforward, 41% to 31%, per nbcnews/wsj poll.
Trump also likely leads on percentage of remarks which are offensive, percentage of requests for tax returns ignored, percentage of life without involvement in politics, percentage of funds illegally taken out of a charitable foundation for self-serving actions, and probably several other statistics that indicate a bad fit for the Presidency. If you're for isolationism then I could see why you'd be for Trump: based on the way he speaks and acts, I can't imagine that his diplomatic relationships will succeed in any way, shape or form. Isolationism seems to then be the only option when your leader is arrogant, illogical, heavy-handed, and believes he is the only one who will succeed in protecting his people from the boogeyman, just ask Kim Jong-un or Binyamin Netanyahu.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Trump leads Clinton on being honest & straightforward, 41% to 31%, per nbcnews/wsj poll.
To those polled it says I "waste my vote" or I choose between 1. out the ass whatever comes to mind shit talker or 2. calculated incessant habitual liar. In a country/democracy where I can choose among 14 varieties and brands of toilet tissue, my vote is either wasted or spent on 1 and 2 above. Yakok Smirnoff!
Ummmmmm..... Maybe we should keep the Clinton out of the white house, this way we wouldn't have to worry about this. Hmmmmmm Maybe she should have endorsed a candidate with a real progressive agenda. Or shit, a candidate who isn't funded by Wall St.
Ummmmmm..... Maybe we should keep the Clinton out of the white house, this way we wouldn't have to worry about this. Hmmmmmm Maybe she should have endorsed a candidate with a real progressive agenda. Or shit, a candidate who isn't funded by Wall St.
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
www.headstonesband.com
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Do I think Bill tried? Yes. Do I have faith in Lynch's ethical integrity to not be swayed? Absolutely. We're talking about someone respected by both parties, both chambers of congress and by the executive office. She's a good one.
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Saying that I think Hillary is a "good one" is also a stretch. I think she can do the job fine. I think she's respected by world leaders. But I have my concerns with her.
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Trump leads Clinton on being honest & straightforward, 41% to 31%, per nbcnews/wsj poll.
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
In a country/democracy where I can choose among 14 varieties and brands of toilet tissue, my vote is either wasted or spent on 1 and 2 above.
Yakok Smirnoff!
Between two ferns with Hillary Clinton
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/b2fc974d1d/between-two-ferns-with-zach-galifianakis-hillary-clinton?_cc=__d___&_ccid=c171bc4f-9ace-4892-a9ef-77f1ddaf66d8
Zack had some good lines...
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/297040-warren-lets-keep-wall-street-out-of-a-clinton-cabinet
Ummmmmm..... Maybe we should keep the Clinton out of the white house, this way we wouldn't have to worry about this. Hmmmmmm Maybe she should have endorsed a candidate with a real progressive agenda. Or shit, a candidate who isn't funded by Wall St.
The irony.