Jared the sandwich guy ?
Comments
-
I didn't think whatsoever that this POS would not be forgotten by his victims.dankind said:
I'm sorry. Is English not your first language? I can understand how maybe a nonnative speaker/writer might believe that "... I'm sure we can all agree that he will be forgotten forever ..." means the same thing as "'we' will forget about him," but it does not. The syntax is wrong.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
?dankind said:
You didn't. But thanks for clarifying.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No they won't.dankind said:
Yup, I'm sure that the children he sodomized will forget about him after that.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Well whatever his sentence is in November I'm sure we can all agree that he will be forgotten forever after that day.
I said "we" will forget about him.
Again, thank you for clarifying what you meant to write. It's important that we are understood, especially if/when language barriers are getting in the way. And even if language is not the barrier, it happens to all of us -- even yours truly.
For instance, I'm often misunderstood on these forums for being serious when I'm just kidding or being sarcastic. Hell, it happened to me just a few days ago. For those cases, my guess is that using the smileys would've helped me to be better understood -- or maybe even going so far as to add parentheses that say "just kidding" or "sarcasm."
Having said all that, let's get back to your contention regarding Jared Fogle and our collective memories (or lack thereof). If the "we" to which you were referring means other posters on AMT, hedonist has already stated her opinions to the contrary. As for myself, I will never eat another sandwich from Subway. Reason: Jared Fogle (and the company's failure to terminate his contract when it had caught wind of his deplorable acts). Put me down as another who will never forget.
As for the rest of us he should all ready be forgotten about - he is dead to me.
Any second spent talking about him after his sentence is time wasted.
My statement was not hard to understand at all as it was in English.
No clarification other than my first one was needed. Sometimes you have to go with your first assumption when reading.
Syntax? - really?
0 -
Yes, really.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I didn't think whatsoever that this POS would not be forgotten by his victims.dankind said:
I'm sorry. Is English not your first language? I can understand how maybe a nonnative speaker/writer might believe that "... I'm sure we can all agree that he will be forgotten forever ..." means the same thing as "'we' will forget about him," but it does not. The syntax is wrong.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
?dankind said:
You didn't. But thanks for clarifying.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No they won't.dankind said:
Yup, I'm sure that the children he sodomized will forget about him after that.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Well whatever his sentence is in November I'm sure we can all agree that he will be forgotten forever after that day.
I said "we" will forget about him.
Again, thank you for clarifying what you meant to write. It's important that we are understood, especially if/when language barriers are getting in the way. And even if language is not the barrier, it happens to all of us -- even yours truly.
For instance, I'm often misunderstood on these forums for being serious when I'm just kidding or being sarcastic. Hell, it happened to me just a few days ago. For those cases, my guess is that using the smileys would've helped me to be better understood -- or maybe even going so far as to add parentheses that say "just kidding" or "sarcasm."
Having said all that, let's get back to your contention regarding Jared Fogle and our collective memories (or lack thereof). If the "we" to which you were referring means other posters on AMT, hedonist has already stated her opinions to the contrary. As for myself, I will never eat another sandwich from Subway. Reason: Jared Fogle (and the company's failure to terminate his contract when it had caught wind of his deplorable acts). Put me down as another who will never forget.
As for the rest of us he should all ready be forgotten about - he is dead to me.
Any second spent talking about him after his sentence is time wasted.
My statement was not hard to understand at all as it was in English.
No clarification other than my first one was needed. Sometimes you have to go with your first assumption when reading.
Syntax? - really?
Syntax is the key to having our written communications understood. For the most part, we can slip up on spelling and grammar, and our readers will still get the gist of what we're trying to convey. But if we err on our syntax, our intentional meaning and purpose often get lost or are misconstrued.
If one cares to participate in intellectual discourse, especially on sensitive, delicate or controversial topics, one should be extra careful when it comes to syntax.I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
No, really, what you posted did not say what you later claimed it meant at all. Dankind was right.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I didn't think whatsoever that this POS would not be forgotten by his victims.dankind said:
I'm sorry. Is English not your first language? I can understand how maybe a nonnative speaker/writer might believe that "... I'm sure we can all agree that he will be forgotten forever ..." means the same thing as "'we' will forget about him," but it does not. The syntax is wrong.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
?dankind said:
You didn't. But thanks for clarifying.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No they won't.dankind said:
Yup, I'm sure that the children he sodomized will forget about him after that.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Well whatever his sentence is in November I'm sure we can all agree that he will be forgotten forever after that day.
I said "we" will forget about him.
Again, thank you for clarifying what you meant to write. It's important that we are understood, especially if/when language barriers are getting in the way. And even if language is not the barrier, it happens to all of us -- even yours truly.
For instance, I'm often misunderstood on these forums for being serious when I'm just kidding or being sarcastic. Hell, it happened to me just a few days ago. For those cases, my guess is that using the smileys would've helped me to be better understood -- or maybe even going so far as to add parentheses that say "just kidding" or "sarcasm."
Having said all that, let's get back to your contention regarding Jared Fogle and our collective memories (or lack thereof). If the "we" to which you were referring means other posters on AMT, hedonist has already stated her opinions to the contrary. As for myself, I will never eat another sandwich from Subway. Reason: Jared Fogle (and the company's failure to terminate his contract when it had caught wind of his deplorable acts). Put me down as another who will never forget.
As for the rest of us he should all ready be forgotten about - he is dead to me.
Any second spent talking about him after his sentence is time wasted.
My statement was not hard to understand at all as it was in English.
No clarification other than my first one was needed. Sometimes you have to go with your first assumption when reading.
Syntax? - really?
I will also not forget about Jared Fogle, namely because I don't have thst bad a memory. This guy has been a part of pop culture for many years now. I must have seen his ads on TV thousands of times, right back to the first one where he holds up his huge pants. I'd have to go senile to forget him, especially now that he turned out to be a pedophile. That makes him more memorable, not less.Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:
No, really, what you posted did not say what you later claimed it meant at all. Dankind was right.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I didn't think whatsoever that this POS would not be forgotten by his victims.dankind said:
I'm sorry. Is English not your first language? I can understand how maybe a nonnative speaker/writer might believe that "... I'm sure we can all agree that he will be forgotten forever ..." means the same thing as "'we' will forget about him," but it does not. The syntax is wrong.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
?dankind said:
You didn't. But thanks for clarifying.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No they won't.dankind said:
Yup, I'm sure that the children he sodomized will forget about him after that.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Well whatever his sentence is in November I'm sure we can all agree that he will be forgotten forever after that day.
I said "we" will forget about him.
Again, thank you for clarifying what you meant to write. It's important that we are understood, especially if/when language barriers are getting in the way. And even if language is not the barrier, it happens to all of us -- even yours truly.
For instance, I'm often misunderstood on these forums for being serious when I'm just kidding or being sarcastic. Hell, it happened to me just a few days ago. For those cases, my guess is that using the smileys would've helped me to be better understood -- or maybe even going so far as to add parentheses that say "just kidding" or "sarcasm."
Having said all that, let's get back to your contention regarding Jared Fogle and our collective memories (or lack thereof). If the "we" to which you were referring means other posters on AMT, hedonist has already stated her opinions to the contrary. As for myself, I will never eat another sandwich from Subway. Reason: Jared Fogle (and the company's failure to terminate his contract when it had caught wind of his deplorable acts). Put me down as another who will never forget.
As for the rest of us he should all ready be forgotten about - he is dead to me.
Any second spent talking about him after his sentence is time wasted.
My statement was not hard to understand at all as it was in English.
No clarification other than my first one was needed. Sometimes you have to go with your first assumption when reading.
Syntax? - really?
I will also not forget about Jared Fogle, namely because I don't have thst bad a memory. This guy has been a part of pop culture for many years now. I must have seen his ads on TV thousands of times, right back to the first one where he holds up his huge pants. I'd have to go senile to forget him, especially now that he turned out to be a pedophile. That makes him more memorable, not less.
0 -
I don't understand what sentiment you are trying to express with that gif in relation to what I said.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:PJ_Soul said:
No, really, what you posted did not say what you later claimed it meant at all. Dankind was right.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I didn't think whatsoever that this POS would not be forgotten by his victims.dankind said:
I'm sorry. Is English not your first language? I can understand how maybe a nonnative speaker/writer might believe that "... I'm sure we can all agree that he will be forgotten forever ..." means the same thing as "'we' will forget about him," but it does not. The syntax is wrong.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
?dankind said:
You didn't. But thanks for clarifying.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No they won't.dankind said:
Yup, I'm sure that the children he sodomized will forget about him after that.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Well whatever his sentence is in November I'm sure we can all agree that he will be forgotten forever after that day.
I said "we" will forget about him.
Again, thank you for clarifying what you meant to write. It's important that we are understood, especially if/when language barriers are getting in the way. And even if language is not the barrier, it happens to all of us -- even yours truly.
For instance, I'm often misunderstood on these forums for being serious when I'm just kidding or being sarcastic. Hell, it happened to me just a few days ago. For those cases, my guess is that using the smileys would've helped me to be better understood -- or maybe even going so far as to add parentheses that say "just kidding" or "sarcasm."
Having said all that, let's get back to your contention regarding Jared Fogle and our collective memories (or lack thereof). If the "we" to which you were referring means other posters on AMT, hedonist has already stated her opinions to the contrary. As for myself, I will never eat another sandwich from Subway. Reason: Jared Fogle (and the company's failure to terminate his contract when it had caught wind of his deplorable acts). Put me down as another who will never forget.
As for the rest of us he should all ready be forgotten about - he is dead to me.
Any second spent talking about him after his sentence is time wasted.
My statement was not hard to understand at all as it was in English.
No clarification other than my first one was needed. Sometimes you have to go with your first assumption when reading.
Syntax? - really?
I will also not forget about Jared Fogle, namely because I don't have thst bad a memory. This guy has been a part of pop culture for many years now. I must have seen his ads on TV thousands of times, right back to the first one where he holds up his huge pants. I'd have to go senile to forget him, especially now that he turned out to be a pedophile. That makes him more memorable, not less.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
^^^^
The syntax of yourself and dankind presented to me is not computing in my brain.
I don't understand how you both are in agreement that what I wrote is not what I meant and continue to say that what I said is not correct.
This is about the POS subway guy and I think that after his sentence to jail he will be forgotten about as he won't be in headlines, news, amt and the like.
Subway franchise will rebound from this bruise. The organization is not to blame on this one.
It is the POS fogle guy who deserves to be forgotten.
If this syntax does not compute with you two then we should cease transmissions.
0 -
You are out of your league here. Proof on something like this isn't even a possibility. Evidence could be presented, but would you know anything about it's accuracy or relevance?Godfather. said:
please prove that, scientifically...medically ?PJ_Soul said:
Wrong.Godfather. said:
he can change his name, add tit's and even remove his junk but he will always be a male.Bentleyspop said:
Interesting to know you have feelings for Bruce Jenner and not Caitlin Jenner in your groin!!Godfather. said:
did not know that ! I read castration and got a Bruce Jenner feeling in my groin.. LOL !!!!oftenreading said:
Do you know what chemical castration means? It's a non-specific term referring to the use of a variety of different anti-androgen medications to reduce sex drive and sexual function. It doesn't refer to removing the penis, or any organ at all. It's not perfect, of course, but in fact does reduce "urges and desires" and thereby reduces sexual reoffending. It is also reversible once the medication is stopped. I don't see where the violence is here, any more than if someone were taking insulin for diabetes.Godfather. said:
violence comes in many forms, your words can create violence and chemical castration ?....ouch !PJ_Soul said:
Prison and chemical castration.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Ok,PJ_Soul said:
No, that is not how I roll. Not everyone turns to violence.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
yah, I don't think soPJ_Soul said:
I am not sure you are talking about, and I don't keep a spreadsheet showing who is against the death penalty and if what they say elssewhere might contradict that opinion. All I know is that I am one of those people who opposes the death penalty, and would never advocate death as a punishment in any case, including that perv Jared Fogle, and I 100% do not have a thirst for blood, so your thought is wrong.Godfather. said:
no body particularly, I just remember a somewhat heated discussion about the death penalty and some of the train members kept calling it "revenge killing" and stating that there is no reason to kill another human being and now that this sandwich guy got busted for child rape or abuse it sounds like people want him dead, I am not saying I agree or disagree, just thinking back on another thread it seems that maybe (or not) some of the train members have experienced enough anger over the sandwich guy and others like him that their thirst for blood has come to the surface, I've always thought everybody has a thirst for blood (reason to kill or ask for the death of another) given the right circumstance's.oftenreading said:
Who are you referring to, GF??Godfather. said:all roads of criminal intent led to the death penalty......wow ! I'm reading some of your comments about this guy and I think back, is this the same group that stood so tall and mighty against the death penalty ? revenge killing is now O.K. ? the human mind and emotion are so fragile and yet so capable of killing...ohhhhh the horror of it all ! LOL !!!!!!!!
Godfather.
Godfather.
If it was one of your kids he had his way with I am sure you may just get a little thirsty.
Wouldn't want to be wrong on this opinion.
So honestly can you please state what you personally feel his punishment should be?
Forget our laws, justice system et al.
What do you want done with this guy?
you're absolutely right not everybody turns to violence but many of them are very capable of creating violence, BTW castration does not remove the desire's of sexual pleasure, a freak without a penis is still a freak who can not control his urges and desires and will still commit sexual crimes...I recommend a lobotomy, the brain is key here.
the fact that you recommend castration displays a need for violence, your move.
Godfather.
Godfather.
Godfather.
btw how does feel to believe something so strongly without scientific backing ? no jab intended.
Godfather.
What scientific backing do you have to make your assertion? What is it that makes a person a man, exactly?Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
The reproductive organs he was born with.rgambs said:
You are out of your league here. Proof on something like this isn't even a possibility. Evidence could be presented, but would you know anything about it's accuracy or relevance?Godfather. said:
please prove that, scientifically...medically ?PJ_Soul said:
Wrong.Godfather. said:
he can change his name, add tit's and even remove his junk but he will always be a male.Bentleyspop said:
Interesting to know you have feelings for Bruce Jenner and not Caitlin Jenner in your groin!!Godfather. said:
did not know that ! I read castration and got a Bruce Jenner feeling in my groin.. LOL !!!!oftenreading said:
Do you know what chemical castration means? It's a non-specific term referring to the use of a variety of different anti-androgen medications to reduce sex drive and sexual function. It doesn't refer to removing the penis, or any organ at all. It's not perfect, of course, but in fact does reduce "urges and desires" and thereby reduces sexual reoffending. It is also reversible once the medication is stopped. I don't see where the violence is here, any more than if someone were taking insulin for diabetes.Godfather. said:
violence comes in many forms, your words can create violence and chemical castration ?....ouch !PJ_Soul said:
Prison and chemical castration.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Ok,PJ_Soul said:
No, that is not how I roll. Not everyone turns to violence.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
yah, I don't think soPJ_Soul said:
I am not sure you are talking about, and I don't keep a spreadsheet showing who is against the death penalty and if what they say elssewhere might contradict that opinion. All I know is that I am one of those people who opposes the death penalty, and would never advocate death as a punishment in any case, including that perv Jared Fogle, and I 100% do not have a thirst for blood, so your thought is wrong.Godfather. said:
no body particularly, I just remember a somewhat heated discussion about the death penalty and some of the train members kept calling it "revenge killing" and stating that there is no reason to kill another human being and now that this sandwich guy got busted for child rape or abuse it sounds like people want him dead, I am not saying I agree or disagree, just thinking back on another thread it seems that maybe (or not) some of the train members have experienced enough anger over the sandwich guy and others like him that their thirst for blood has come to the surface, I've always thought everybody has a thirst for blood (reason to kill or ask for the death of another) given the right circumstance's.oftenreading said:
Who are you referring to, GF??Godfather. said:all roads of criminal intent led to the death penalty......wow ! I'm reading some of your comments about this guy and I think back, is this the same group that stood so tall and mighty against the death penalty ? revenge killing is now O.K. ? the human mind and emotion are so fragile and yet so capable of killing...ohhhhh the horror of it all ! LOL !!!!!!!!
Godfather.
Godfather.
If it was one of your kids he had his way with I am sure you may just get a little thirsty.
Wouldn't want to be wrong on this opinion.
So honestly can you please state what you personally feel his punishment should be?
Forget our laws, justice system et al.
What do you want done with this guy?
you're absolutely right not everybody turns to violence but many of them are very capable of creating violence, BTW castration does not remove the desire's of sexual pleasure, a freak without a penis is still a freak who can not control his urges and desires and will still commit sexual crimes...I recommend a lobotomy, the brain is key here.
the fact that you recommend castration displays a need for violence, your move.
Godfather.
Godfather.
Godfather.
btw how does feel to believe something so strongly without scientific backing ? no jab intended.
Godfather.
What scientific backing do you have to make your assertion? What is it that makes a person a man, exactly?"My brain's a good brain!"0 -
In my opinion, people who are pedophiles are like animals that prey on the weak or powerless.
They direct their desire towards children because they don't feel able to direct their desire towards another adult. Abuse is always something like this. Weak people prey on people they think are even weaker than themselves.
That's my big picture observation about pedophiles. UGH!!!!!!!!!!
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&0 -
Animals prey on the lesser (and even sometimes the greater) for survival.
Sorry if I didn't get your point, but the comparison went by me.
0 -
You don't see that some people prey on children because they are small and powerless? I'm surprised you don't see how that's related!hedonist said:Animals prey on the lesser (and even sometimes the greater) for survival.
Sorry if I didn't get your point, but the comparison went by me.
Children have the disadvantage that they are physically small. Bad people take advantage of that. Children wouldn't be preyed on as they are if they were full-sized to begin with. (IMHO)
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&0 -
And if born with both, or none?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
The reproductive organs he was born with.rgambs said:
You are out of your league here. Proof on something like this isn't even a possibility. Evidence could be presented, but would you know anything about it's accuracy or relevance?Godfather. said:
please prove that, scientifically...medically ?PJ_Soul said:
Wrong.Godfather. said:
he can change his name, add tit's and even remove his junk but he will always be a male.Bentleyspop said:
Interesting to know you have feelings for Bruce Jenner and not Caitlin Jenner in your groin!!Godfather. said:
did not know that ! I read castration and got a Bruce Jenner feeling in my groin.. LOL !!!!oftenreading said:
Do you know what chemical castration means? It's a non-specific term referring to the use of a variety of different anti-androgen medications to reduce sex drive and sexual function. It doesn't refer to removing the penis, or any organ at all. It's not perfect, of course, but in fact does reduce "urges and desires" and thereby reduces sexual reoffending. It is also reversible once the medication is stopped. I don't see where the violence is here, any more than if someone were taking insulin for diabetes.Godfather. said:
violence comes in many forms, your words can create violence and chemical castration ?....ouch !PJ_Soul said:
Prison and chemical castration.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Ok,PJ_Soul said:
No, that is not how I roll. Not everyone turns to violence.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
yah, I don't think soPJ_Soul said:
I am not sure you are talking about, and I don't keep a spreadsheet showing who is against the death penalty and if what they say elssewhere might contradict that opinion. All I know is that I am one of those people who opposes the death penalty, and would never advocate death as a punishment in any case, including that perv Jared Fogle, and I 100% do not have a thirst for blood, so your thought is wrong.Godfather. said:
no body particularly, I just remember a somewhat heated discussion about the death penalty and some of the train members kept calling it "revenge killing" and stating that there is no reason to kill another human being and now that this sandwich guy got busted for child rape or abuse it sounds like people want him dead, I am not saying I agree or disagree, just thinking back on another thread it seems that maybe (or not) some of the train members have experienced enough anger over the sandwich guy and others like him that their thirst for blood has come to the surface, I've always thought everybody has a thirst for blood (reason to kill or ask for the death of another) given the right circumstance's.oftenreading said:
Who are you referring to, GF??Godfather. said:all roads of criminal intent led to the death penalty......wow ! I'm reading some of your comments about this guy and I think back, is this the same group that stood so tall and mighty against the death penalty ? revenge killing is now O.K. ? the human mind and emotion are so fragile and yet so capable of killing...ohhhhh the horror of it all ! LOL !!!!!!!!
Godfather.
Godfather.
If it was one of your kids he had his way with I am sure you may just get a little thirsty.
Wouldn't want to be wrong on this opinion.
So honestly can you please state what you personally feel his punishment should be?
Forget our laws, justice system et al.
What do you want done with this guy?
you're absolutely right not everybody turns to violence but many of them are very capable of creating violence, BTW castration does not remove the desire's of sexual pleasure, a freak without a penis is still a freak who can not control his urges and desires and will still commit sexual crimes...I recommend a lobotomy, the brain is key here.
the fact that you recommend castration displays a need for violence, your move.
Godfather.
Godfather.
Godfather.
btw how does feel to believe something so strongly without scientific backing ? no jab intended.
Godfather.
What scientific backing do you have to make your assertion? What is it that makes a person a man, exactly?Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
Unique cases.rgambs said:
And if born with both, or none?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
The reproductive organs he was born with.rgambs said:
You are out of your league here. Proof on something like this isn't even a possibility. Evidence could be presented, but would you know anything about it's accuracy or relevance?Godfather. said:
please prove that, scientifically...medically ?PJ_Soul said:
Wrong.Godfather. said:
he can change his name, add tit's and even remove his junk but he will always be a male.Bentleyspop said:
Interesting to know you have feelings for Bruce Jenner and not Caitlin Jenner in your groin!!Godfather. said:
did not know that ! I read castration and got a Bruce Jenner feeling in my groin.. LOL !!!!oftenreading said:
Do you know what chemical castration means? It's a non-specific term referring to the use of a variety of different anti-androgen medications to reduce sex drive and sexual function. It doesn't refer to removing the penis, or any organ at all. It's not perfect, of course, but in fact does reduce "urges and desires" and thereby reduces sexual reoffending. It is also reversible once the medication is stopped. I don't see where the violence is here, any more than if someone were taking insulin for diabetes.Godfather. said:
violence comes in many forms, your words can create violence and chemical castration ?....ouch !PJ_Soul said:
Prison and chemical castration.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Ok,PJ_Soul said:
No, that is not how I roll. Not everyone turns to violence.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
yah, I don't think soPJ_Soul said:
I am not sure you are talking about, and I don't keep a spreadsheet showing who is against the death penalty and if what they say elssewhere might contradict that opinion. All I know is that I am one of those people who opposes the death penalty, and would never advocate death as a punishment in any case, including that perv Jared Fogle, and I 100% do not have a thirst for blood, so your thought is wrong.Godfather. said:
no body particularly, I just remember a somewhat heated discussion about the death penalty and some of the train members kept calling it "revenge killing" and stating that there is no reason to kill another human being and now that this sandwich guy got busted for child rape or abuse it sounds like people want him dead, I am not saying I agree or disagree, just thinking back on another thread it seems that maybe (or not) some of the train members have experienced enough anger over the sandwich guy and others like him that their thirst for blood has come to the surface, I've always thought everybody has a thirst for blood (reason to kill or ask for the death of another) given the right circumstance's.oftenreading said:
Who are you referring to, GF??Godfather. said:all roads of criminal intent led to the death penalty......wow ! I'm reading some of your comments about this guy and I think back, is this the same group that stood so tall and mighty against the death penalty ? revenge killing is now O.K. ? the human mind and emotion are so fragile and yet so capable of killing...ohhhhh the horror of it all ! LOL !!!!!!!!
Godfather.
Godfather.
If it was one of your kids he had his way with I am sure you may just get a little thirsty.
Wouldn't want to be wrong on this opinion.
So honestly can you please state what you personally feel his punishment should be?
Forget our laws, justice system et al.
What do you want done with this guy?
you're absolutely right not everybody turns to violence but many of them are very capable of creating violence, BTW castration does not remove the desire's of sexual pleasure, a freak without a penis is still a freak who can not control his urges and desires and will still commit sexual crimes...I recommend a lobotomy, the brain is key here.
the fact that you recommend castration displays a need for violence, your move.
Godfather.
Godfather.
Godfather.
btw how does feel to believe something so strongly without scientific backing ? no jab intended.
Godfather.
What scientific backing do you have to make your assertion? What is it that makes a person a man, exactly?
Bruce Jenner was born without male genitalia or with female reproductive organs?"My brain's a good brain!"0 -
No worries (although, what about little people or whatever the PC term is, who are adults, or adults who are mentally impaired?). I just see it differently.justam said:
You don't see that some people prey on children because they are small and powerless? I'm surprised you don't see how that's related!hedonist said:Animals prey on the lesser (and even sometimes the greater) for survival.
Sorry if I didn't get your point, but the comparison went by me.
Children have the disadvantage that they are physically small. Bad people take advantage of that. Children wouldn't be preyed on as they are if they were full-sized to begin with. (IMHO)0 -
really ?????? well lets start with the simple stuff like reproduction. Lets see a man do that, the Chemical and physical difference's.....man ! out of my league ?rgambs said:
You are out of your league here. Proof on something like this isn't even a possibility. Evidence could be presented, but would you know anything about it's accuracy or relevance?Godfather. said:
please prove that, scientifically...medically ?PJ_Soul said:
Wrong.Godfather. said:
he can change his name, add tit's and even remove his junk but he will always be a male.Bentleyspop said:
Interesting to know you have feelings for Bruce Jenner and not Caitlin Jenner in your groin!!Godfather. said:
did not know that ! I read castration and got a Bruce Jenner feeling in my groin.. LOL !!!!oftenreading said:
Do you know what chemical castration means? It's a non-specific term referring to the use of a variety of different anti-androgen medications to reduce sex drive and sexual function. It doesn't refer to removing the penis, or any organ at all. It's not perfect, of course, but in fact does reduce "urges and desires" and thereby reduces sexual reoffending. It is also reversible once the medication is stopped. I don't see where the violence is here, any more than if someone were taking insulin for diabetes.Godfather. said:
violence comes in many forms, your words can create violence and chemical castration ?....ouch !PJ_Soul said:
Prison and chemical castration.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Ok,PJ_Soul said:
No, that is not how I roll. Not everyone turns to violence.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
yah, I don't think soPJ_Soul said:
I am not sure you are talking about, and I don't keep a spreadsheet showing who is against the death penalty and if what they say elssewhere might contradict that opinion. All I know is that I am one of those people who opposes the death penalty, and would never advocate death as a punishment in any case, including that perv Jared Fogle, and I 100% do not have a thirst for blood, so your thought is wrong.Godfather. said:
no body particularly, I just remember a somewhat heated discussion about the death penalty and some of the train members kept calling it "revenge killing" and stating that there is no reason to kill another human being and now that this sandwich guy got busted for child rape or abuse it sounds like people want him dead, I am not saying I agree or disagree, just thinking back on another thread it seems that maybe (or not) some of the train members have experienced enough anger over the sandwich guy and others like him that their thirst for blood has come to the surface, I've always thought everybody has a thirst for blood (reason to kill or ask for the death of another) given the right circumstance's.oftenreading said:
Who are you referring to, GF??Godfather. said:all roads of criminal intent led to the death penalty......wow ! I'm reading some of your comments about this guy and I think back, is this the same group that stood so tall and mighty against the death penalty ? revenge killing is now O.K. ? the human mind and emotion are so fragile and yet so capable of killing...ohhhhh the horror of it all ! LOL !!!!!!!!
Godfather.
Godfather.
If it was one of your kids he had his way with I am sure you may just get a little thirsty.
Wouldn't want to be wrong on this opinion.
So honestly can you please state what you personally feel his punishment should be?
Forget our laws, justice system et al.
What do you want done with this guy?
you're absolutely right not everybody turns to violence but many of them are very capable of creating violence, BTW castration does not remove the desire's of sexual pleasure, a freak without a penis is still a freak who can not control his urges and desires and will still commit sexual crimes...I recommend a lobotomy, the brain is key here.
the fact that you recommend castration displays a need for violence, your move.
Godfather.
Godfather.
Godfather.
btw how does feel to believe something so strongly without scientific backing ? no jab intended.
Godfather.
What scientific backing do you have to make your assertion? What is it that makes a person a man, exactly?
Godfather.
0 -
Yes, out of your league. Men do reproduce, obviously.Godfather. said:
really ?????? well lets start with the simple stuff like reproduction. Lets see a man do that, the Chemical and physical difference's.....man ! out of my league ?rgambs said:
You are out of your league here. Proof on something like this isn't even a possibility. Evidence could be presented, but would you know anything about it's accuracy or relevance?Godfather. said:
please prove that, scientifically...medically ?PJ_Soul said:
Wrong.Godfather. said:
he can change his name, add tit's and even remove his junk but he will always be a male.Bentleyspop said:
Interesting to know you have feelings for Bruce Jenner and not Caitlin Jenner in your groin!!Godfather. said:
did not know that ! I read castration and got a Bruce Jenner feeling in my groin.. LOL !!!!oftenreading said:
Do you know what chemical castration means? It's a non-specific term referring to the use of a variety of different anti-androgen medications to reduce sex drive and sexual function. It doesn't refer to removing the penis, or any organ at all. It's not perfect, of course, but in fact does reduce "urges and desires" and thereby reduces sexual reoffending. It is also reversible once the medication is stopped. I don't see where the violence is here, any more than if someone were taking insulin for diabetes.Godfather. said:
violence comes in many forms, your words can create violence and chemical castration ?....ouch !PJ_Soul said:
Prison and chemical castration.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Ok,PJ_Soul said:
No, that is not how I roll. Not everyone turns to violence.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
yah, I don't think soPJ_Soul said:
I am not sure you are talking about, and I don't keep a spreadsheet showing who is against the death penalty and if what they say elssewhere might contradict that opinion. All I know is that I am one of those people who opposes the death penalty, and would never advocate death as a punishment in any case, including that perv Jared Fogle, and I 100% do not have a thirst for blood, so your thought is wrong.Godfather. said:
no body particularly, I just remember a somewhat heated discussion about the death penalty and some of the train members kept calling it "revenge killing" and stating that there is no reason to kill another human being and now that this sandwich guy got busted for child rape or abuse it sounds like people want him dead, I am not saying I agree or disagree, just thinking back on another thread it seems that maybe (or not) some of the train members have experienced enough anger over the sandwich guy and others like him that their thirst for blood has come to the surface, I've always thought everybody has a thirst for blood (reason to kill or ask for the death of another) given the right circumstance's.oftenreading said:
Who are you referring to, GF??Godfather. said:all roads of criminal intent led to the death penalty......wow ! I'm reading some of your comments about this guy and I think back, is this the same group that stood so tall and mighty against the death penalty ? revenge killing is now O.K. ? the human mind and emotion are so fragile and yet so capable of killing...ohhhhh the horror of it all ! LOL !!!!!!!!
Godfather.
Godfather.
If it was one of your kids he had his way with I am sure you may just get a little thirsty.
Wouldn't want to be wrong on this opinion.
So honestly can you please state what you personally feel his punishment should be?
Forget our laws, justice system et al.
What do you want done with this guy?
you're absolutely right not everybody turns to violence but many of them are very capable of creating violence, BTW castration does not remove the desire's of sexual pleasure, a freak without a penis is still a freak who can not control his urges and desires and will still commit sexual crimes...I recommend a lobotomy, the brain is key here.
the fact that you recommend castration displays a need for violence, your move.
Godfather.
Godfather.
Godfather.
btw how does feel to believe something so strongly without scientific backing ? no jab intended.
Godfather.
What scientific backing do you have to make your assertion? What is it that makes a person a man, exactly?
Godfather.
Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
Not as unique as you think.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Unique cases.rgambs said:
And if born with both, or none?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
The reproductive organs he was born with.rgambs said:
You are out of your league here. Proof on something like this isn't even a possibility. Evidence could be presented, but would you know anything about it's accuracy or relevance?Godfather. said:
please prove that, scientifically...medically ?PJ_Soul said:
Wrong.Godfather. said:
he can change his name, add tit's and even remove his junk but he will always be a male.Bentleyspop said:
Interesting to know you have feelings for Bruce Jenner and not Caitlin Jenner in your groin!!Godfather. said:
did not know that ! I read castration and got a Bruce Jenner feeling in my groin.. LOL !!!!oftenreading said:
Do you know what chemical castration means? It's a non-specific term referring to the use of a variety of different anti-androgen medications to reduce sex drive and sexual function. It doesn't refer to removing the penis, or any organ at all. It's not perfect, of course, but in fact does reduce "urges and desires" and thereby reduces sexual reoffending. It is also reversible once the medication is stopped. I don't see where the violence is here, any more than if someone were taking insulin for diabetes.Godfather. said:
violence comes in many forms, your words can create violence and chemical castration ?....ouch !PJ_Soul said:
Prison and chemical castration.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Ok,PJ_Soul said:
No, that is not how I roll. Not everyone turns to violence.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
yah, I don't think soPJ_Soul said:
I am not sure you are talking about, and I don't keep a spreadsheet showing who is against the death penalty and if what they say elssewhere might contradict that opinion. All I know is that I am one of those people who opposes the death penalty, and would never advocate death as a punishment in any case, including that perv Jared Fogle, and I 100% do not have a thirst for blood, so your thought is wrong.Godfather. said:
no body particularly, I just remember a somewhat heated discussion about the death penalty and some of the train members kept calling it "revenge killing" and stating that there is no reason to kill another human being and now that this sandwich guy got busted for child rape or abuse it sounds like people want him dead, I am not saying I agree or disagree, just thinking back on another thread it seems that maybe (or not) some of the train members have experienced enough anger over the sandwich guy and others like him that their thirst for blood has come to the surface, I've always thought everybody has a thirst for blood (reason to kill or ask for the death of another) given the right circumstance's.oftenreading said:
Who are you referring to, GF??Godfather. said:all roads of criminal intent led to the death penalty......wow ! I'm reading some of your comments about this guy and I think back, is this the same group that stood so tall and mighty against the death penalty ? revenge killing is now O.K. ? the human mind and emotion are so fragile and yet so capable of killing...ohhhhh the horror of it all ! LOL !!!!!!!!
Godfather.
Godfather.
If it was one of your kids he had his way with I am sure you may just get a little thirsty.
Wouldn't want to be wrong on this opinion.
So honestly can you please state what you personally feel his punishment should be?
Forget our laws, justice system et al.
What do you want done with this guy?
you're absolutely right not everybody turns to violence but many of them are very capable of creating violence, BTW castration does not remove the desire's of sexual pleasure, a freak without a penis is still a freak who can not control his urges and desires and will still commit sexual crimes...I recommend a lobotomy, the brain is key here.
the fact that you recommend castration displays a need for violence, your move.
Godfather.
Godfather.
Godfather.
btw how does feel to believe something so strongly without scientific backing ? no jab intended.
Godfather.
What scientific backing do you have to make your assertion? What is it that makes a person a man, exactly?
Bruce Jenner was born without male genitalia or with female reproductive organs?
If genitalia can't be used (they can't) to divide people into 2 sexes, then what does?
Next you might say "Y chromosome", and I will point out that 1 in 500 people are born with an XXY chromosomal configuration.
The point is that sex and gender are not equal concepts, and neither are they concrete. In a colloquial sense, maybe, but in a scientific or medical sense, it is not so simple.Post edited by rgambs onMonkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
your just reaching for something that is not there, dumping a load does not constitute giving birth.rgambs said:
Yes, out of your league. Men do reproduce, obviously.Godfather. said:
really ?????? well lets start with the simple stuff like reproduction. Lets see a man do that, the Chemical and physical difference's.....man ! out of my league ?rgambs said:
You are out of your league here. Proof on something like this isn't even a possibility. Evidence could be presented, but would you know anything about it's accuracy or relevance?Godfather. said:
please prove that, scientifically...medically ?PJ_Soul said:
Wrong.Godfather. said:
he can change his name, add tit's and even remove his junk but he will always be a male.Bentleyspop said:
Interesting to know you have feelings for Bruce Jenner and not Caitlin Jenner in your groin!!Godfather. said:
did not know that ! I read castration and got a Bruce Jenner feeling in my groin.. LOL !!!!oftenreading said:
Do you know what chemical castration means? It's a non-specific term referring to the use of a variety of different anti-androgen medications to reduce sex drive and sexual function. It doesn't refer to removing the penis, or any organ at all. It's not perfect, of course, but in fact does reduce "urges and desires" and thereby reduces sexual reoffending. It is also reversible once the medication is stopped. I don't see where the violence is here, any more than if someone were taking insulin for diabetes.Godfather. said:
violence comes in many forms, your words can create violence and chemical castration ?....ouch !PJ_Soul said:
Prison and chemical castration.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Ok,PJ_Soul said:
No, that is not how I roll. Not everyone turns to violence.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
yah, I don't think soPJ_Soul said:
I am not sure you are talking about, and I don't keep a spreadsheet showing who is against the death penalty and if what they say elssewhere might contradict that opinion. All I know is that I am one of those people who opposes the death penalty, and would never advocate death as a punishment in any case, including that perv Jared Fogle, and I 100% do not have a thirst for blood, so your thought is wrong.Godfather. said:
no body particularly, I just remember a somewhat heated discussion about the death penalty and some of the train members kept calling it "revenge killing" and stating that there is no reason to kill another human being and now that this sandwich guy got busted for child rape or abuse it sounds like people want him dead, I am not saying I agree or disagree, just thinking back on another thread it seems that maybe (or not) some of the train members have experienced enough anger over the sandwich guy and others like him that their thirst for blood has come to the surface, I've always thought everybody has a thirst for blood (reason to kill or ask for the death of another) given the right circumstance's.oftenreading said:
Who are you referring to, GF??Godfather. said:all roads of criminal intent led to the death penalty......wow ! I'm reading some of your comments about this guy and I think back, is this the same group that stood so tall and mighty against the death penalty ? revenge killing is now O.K. ? the human mind and emotion are so fragile and yet so capable of killing...ohhhhh the horror of it all ! LOL !!!!!!!!
Godfather.
Godfather.
If it was one of your kids he had his way with I am sure you may just get a little thirsty.
Wouldn't want to be wrong on this opinion.
So honestly can you please state what you personally feel his punishment should be?
Forget our laws, justice system et al.
What do you want done with this guy?
you're absolutely right not everybody turns to violence but many of them are very capable of creating violence, BTW castration does not remove the desire's of sexual pleasure, a freak without a penis is still a freak who can not control his urges and desires and will still commit sexual crimes...I recommend a lobotomy, the brain is key here.
the fact that you recommend castration displays a need for violence, your move.
Godfather.
Godfather.
Godfather.
btw how does feel to believe something so strongly without scientific backing ? no jab intended.
Godfather.
What scientific backing do you have to make your assertion? What is it that makes a person a man, exactly?
Godfather.
Godfather.0 -
I didn't suggest dumping a load constitutes giving birth. Sexual reproduction requires 2 sets of DNA, and the roles of the DNA donors varies among species.Godfather. said:
your just reaching for something that is not there, dumping a load does not constitute giving birth.rgambs said:
Yes, out of your league. Men do reproduce, obviously.Godfather. said:
really ?????? well lets start with the simple stuff like reproduction. Lets see a man do that, the Chemical and physical difference's.....man ! out of my league ?rgambs said:
You are out of your league here. Proof on something like this isn't even a possibility. Evidence could be presented, but would you know anything about it's accuracy or relevance?Godfather. said:
please prove that, scientifically...medically ?PJ_Soul said:
Wrong.Godfather. said:
he can change his name, add tit's and even remove his junk but he will always be a male.Bentleyspop said:
Interesting to know you have feelings for Bruce Jenner and not Caitlin Jenner in your groin!!Godfather. said:
did not know that ! I read castration and got a Bruce Jenner feeling in my groin.. LOL !!!!oftenreading said:
Do you know what chemical castration means? It's a non-specific term referring to the use of a variety of different anti-androgen medications to reduce sex drive and sexual function. It doesn't refer to removing the penis, or any organ at all. It's not perfect, of course, but in fact does reduce "urges and desires" and thereby reduces sexual reoffending. It is also reversible once the medication is stopped. I don't see where the violence is here, any more than if someone were taking insulin for diabetes.Godfather. said:
violence comes in many forms, your words can create violence and chemical castration ?....ouch !PJ_Soul said:
Prison and chemical castration.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Ok,PJ_Soul said:
No, that is not how I roll. Not everyone turns to violence.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
yah, I don't think soPJ_Soul said:
I am not sure you are talking about, and I don't keep a spreadsheet showing who is against the death penalty and if what they say elssewhere might contradict that opinion. All I know is that I am one of those people who opposes the death penalty, and would never advocate death as a punishment in any case, including that perv Jared Fogle, and I 100% do not have a thirst for blood, so your thought is wrong.Godfather. said:
no body particularly, I just remember a somewhat heated discussion about the death penalty and some of the train members kept calling it "revenge killing" and stating that there is no reason to kill another human being and now that this sandwich guy got busted for child rape or abuse it sounds like people want him dead, I am not saying I agree or disagree, just thinking back on another thread it seems that maybe (or not) some of the train members have experienced enough anger over the sandwich guy and others like him that their thirst for blood has come to the surface, I've always thought everybody has a thirst for blood (reason to kill or ask for the death of another) given the right circumstance's.oftenreading said:
Who are you referring to, GF??Godfather. said:all roads of criminal intent led to the death penalty......wow ! I'm reading some of your comments about this guy and I think back, is this the same group that stood so tall and mighty against the death penalty ? revenge killing is now O.K. ? the human mind and emotion are so fragile and yet so capable of killing...ohhhhh the horror of it all ! LOL !!!!!!!!
Godfather.
Godfather.
If it was one of your kids he had his way with I am sure you may just get a little thirsty.
Wouldn't want to be wrong on this opinion.
So honestly can you please state what you personally feel his punishment should be?
Forget our laws, justice system et al.
What do you want done with this guy?
you're absolutely right not everybody turns to violence but many of them are very capable of creating violence, BTW castration does not remove the desire's of sexual pleasure, a freak without a penis is still a freak who can not control his urges and desires and will still commit sexual crimes...I recommend a lobotomy, the brain is key here.
the fact that you recommend castration displays a need for violence, your move.
Godfather.
Godfather.
Godfather.
btw how does feel to believe something so strongly without scientific backing ? no jab intended.
Godfather.
What scientific backing do you have to make your assertion? What is it that makes a person a man, exactly?
Godfather.
Godfather.
The reason you are out of your league is because you invoked medical science to back up an opinion which is entirely devoid of a background knowledge of medical science.
If you can't express your ideas in valid terminology, their merit is irrelevant, they will be fundamentally misunderstood.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
.....? well I'll just go on knowing I'm right and you know it too.rgambs said:
I didn't suggest dumping a load constitutes giving birth. Sexual reproduction requires 2 sets of DNA, and the roles of the DNA donors varies among species.Godfather. said:
your just reaching for something that is not there, dumping a load does not constitute giving birth.rgambs said:
Yes, out of your league. Men do reproduce, obviously.Godfather. said:
really ?????? well lets start with the simple stuff like reproduction. Lets see a man do that, the Chemical and physical difference's.....man ! out of my league ?rgambs said:
You are out of your league here. Proof on something like this isn't even a possibility. Evidence could be presented, but would you know anything about it's accuracy or relevance?Godfather. said:
please prove that, scientifically...medically ?PJ_Soul said:
Wrong.Godfather. said:
he can change his name, add tit's and even remove his junk but he will always be a male.Bentleyspop said:
Interesting to know you have feelings for Bruce Jenner and not Caitlin Jenner in your groin!!Godfather. said:
did not know that ! I read castration and got a Bruce Jenner feeling in my groin.. LOL !!!!oftenreading said:
Do you know what chemical castration means? It's a non-specific term referring to the use of a variety of different anti-androgen medications to reduce sex drive and sexual function. It doesn't refer to removing the penis, or any organ at all. It's not perfect, of course, but in fact does reduce "urges and desires" and thereby reduces sexual reoffending. It is also reversible once the medication is stopped. I don't see where the violence is here, any more than if someone were taking insulin for diabetes.Godfather. said:
violence comes in many forms, your words can create violence and chemical castration ?....ouch !PJ_Soul said:
Prison and chemical castration.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Ok,PJ_Soul said:
No, that is not how I roll. Not everyone turns to violence.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
yah, I don't think soPJ_Soul said:
I am not sure you are talking about, and I don't keep a spreadsheet showing who is against the death penalty and if what they say elssewhere might contradict that opinion. All I know is that I am one of those people who opposes the death penalty, and would never advocate death as a punishment in any case, including that perv Jared Fogle, and I 100% do not have a thirst for blood, so your thought is wrong.Godfather. said:
no body particularly, I just remember a somewhat heated discussion about the death penalty and some of the train members kept calling it "revenge killing" and stating that there is no reason to kill another human being and now that this sandwich guy got busted for child rape or abuse it sounds like people want him dead, I am not saying I agree or disagree, just thinking back on another thread it seems that maybe (or not) some of the train members have experienced enough anger over the sandwich guy and others like him that their thirst for blood has come to the surface, I've always thought everybody has a thirst for blood (reason to kill or ask for the death of another) given the right circumstance's.oftenreading said:
Who are you referring to, GF??Godfather. said:all roads of criminal intent led to the death penalty......wow ! I'm reading some of your comments about this guy and I think back, is this the same group that stood so tall and mighty against the death penalty ? revenge killing is now O.K. ? the human mind and emotion are so fragile and yet so capable of killing...ohhhhh the horror of it all ! LOL !!!!!!!!
Godfather.
Godfather.
If it was one of your kids he had his way with I am sure you may just get a little thirsty.
Wouldn't want to be wrong on this opinion.
So honestly can you please state what you personally feel his punishment should be?
Forget our laws, justice system et al.
What do you want done with this guy?
you're absolutely right not everybody turns to violence but many of them are very capable of creating violence, BTW castration does not remove the desire's of sexual pleasure, a freak without a penis is still a freak who can not control his urges and desires and will still commit sexual crimes...I recommend a lobotomy, the brain is key here.
the fact that you recommend castration displays a need for violence, your move.
Godfather.
Godfather.
Godfather.
btw how does feel to believe something so strongly without scientific backing ? no jab intended.
Godfather.
What scientific backing do you have to make your assertion? What is it that makes a person a man, exactly?
Godfather.
Godfather.
The reason you are out of your league is because you invoked medical science to back up an opinion which is entirely devoid of a background knowledge of medical science.
If you can't express your ideas in valid terminology, their merit is irrelevant, they will be fundamentally misunderstood.
Godfather.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help