Bernie Sanders campaign kickoff.

brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
Stumbled across this article today and was super glad to see Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org, will be speaking at Bernie Sanders campaign kickoff next week. Will be watching this closely:

http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/politics/2015/05/21/bill-mckibben-bernie-sanders/27738317/

"Bill McKibben, a Vermont environmental activist and author, will speak at the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign kickoff in Burlington next week, according to a Sanders spokesman.

"Bernie's sponsored the most aggressive climate change legislation in Congress," said Michael Briggs, a spokesman for the Sanders campaign. He added that McKibben and Sanders both worked to stop the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline and participated in a New York City climate change march last fall.

"Bernie is the ultimate what-you-see-is-what-you-get politician," McKibben said in an email. "There's no fancy moves and no adroit spin, just relentless day-in day-out advocacy for working people, and for a working planet. Bernie's been in the forefront of all the crucial environmental fights of recent years, always willing to knuckle down and do the hard work of fighting the big corporations."

Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, founders of Ben & Jerry's Homemade Inc., are also expected to speak — with free ice cream in tow.

Sanders, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for president, will launch his campaign from Burlington 5 p.m. Tuesday at Waterfront Park."
“The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













«13456789

Comments

  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    Free ice cream!!!!
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    CH156378 said:

    Free ice cream!!!!

    If they don't fix the climate by the time the campaign kicks off it will all probably melt.
  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    Bernie is the man. I like how he uses facts. I would vote for him in the primary.
  • InHiding80InHiding80 Posts: 7,623
    edited May 2015
    BS44325 said:

    CH156378 said:

    Free ice cream!!!!

    If they don't fix the climate by the time the campaign kicks off it will all probably melt.
    Saying that climate change doesn't exist based on your (lack of) logic is like saying Kevin Bacon is dead because I ate a strip of bacon today.

    I'm pulling for Bernie or Jill Stein. Fuck that DINO bitch Sillary.
    Post edited by InHiding80 on
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    BS44325 said:

    CH156378 said:

    Free ice cream!!!!

    If they don't fix the climate by the time the campaign kicks off it will all probably melt.
    Saying that climate change doesn't exist base on your (lack of) logic is like saying Kevin Bacon is dead because I ate a strip of bacon today.

    I'm pulling for Bernie or Jill Stein. Fuck that DINO bitch Sillary.
    I don't support Hillary at all but I think calling her a "bitch" is inappropriate.

    Also...climate change exists and so does Kevin Bacon...not sure what you're getting at.
  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdFw1btbkLM

    Probably the only candidate who
    "knew then" what lots of others still don't.
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171

    Fuck that DINO bitch Sillary.

    Classy.

    Also, the RINO thing is laughable when Republicans do it. Always reminded me of Pearl Jam superfans deciding who is and who isn't a "true fan". That Democrats have now adopted it speaks to how both our parties have become two sides of the same coin.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255
    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.
  • InHiding80InHiding80 Posts: 7,623
    JimmyV said:

    Fuck that DINO bitch Sillary.

    Classy.

    Truth isn't always pretty and nice.
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171

    JimmyV said:

    Fuck that DINO bitch Sillary.

    Classy.

    Truth isn't always pretty and nice.
    Not pretty and nice, no, but I'm not sure that is truth you are peddling. She has huge leads in fundraising and support over every potential challenger for the nomination. Her lead in most polls is almost insurmountable. At this point it would be mind boggling if anyone else was on the ballot as a Democrat in November of 2016. I don't think anyone accomplishes all that without being more than just a member of a party in name only.

    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171
    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    True. I voted for Nader believing there was no difference between Bush and Gore. The Iraq debacle showed that I was wrong. But too often they have their hands out to the same influence peddlers. Many things don't change regardless of which party is in power.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    JimmyV said:

    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    True. I voted for Nader believing there was no difference between Bush and Gore. The Iraq debacle showed that I was wrong. But too often they have their hands out to the same influence peddlers. Many things don't change regardless of which party is in power.
    This is the thing that makes the presidential election process so frustrating to me. I voted for Gore believing there was no way Nader could win and also believing Gore was better than Bush (and I still believe that). But if all of us who had thought about voting for Nader... who knows? So what do you do? And how much does it matter? Not a whole lot any more, I'm sorry to believe. So I'm not sure what I'll do next time but I do know this: I will not likely hold out a lot of hope that ONE MAN or ONE WOMAN elected president will make all that much difference. I don't think they are allowed to. It seems to me that it is more important to support initiatives and groups that are working to make the world better and be less focused on one person. I also believe it's useful to understand and be involved in local issues as well.

    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,138
    Now that he has officially retired from the Yankees, I guess it is a good time to make a political run.
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    Jason P said:

    Now that he has officially retired from the Yankees, I guess it is a good time to make a political run.

    Huh??


    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,138
    brianlux said:

    Jason P said:

    Now that he has officially retired from the Yankees, I guess it is a good time to make a political run.

    Huh??


    One of the best center fielders of all time!
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    Jason P said:

    brianlux said:

    Jason P said:

    Now that he has officially retired from the Yankees, I guess it is a good time to make a political run.

    Huh??


    One of the best center fielders of all time!
    I must be getting names confused... sleep deprivation does that!

    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171
    Carter over Ford, Reagan over Carter, Reagan over Mondale, Bush over Dukakis, Clinton over Bush, Clinton over Dole, Bush over Gore, Bush over Kerry, Obama over McCain, Obama over Romney...those are the presidential contests during my lifetime. If any of them had gone the other way, would anything really be different?

    Gore I do not believe would have invaded Iraq, while McCain very well may have bombed Iran. So there is that.

    Does Carter or Mondale embark on Iran/Contra? Probably not. Doubtful also that Carter would have invaded Grenada.

    If we got President Dole we would never have known Monica Lewinsky. Also unclear what the state of Hillary's political career would be today.

    Shit, as I'm typing this maybe a lot of things would be different.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • CH156378CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    brianlux said:

    Jason P said:

    brianlux said:

    Jason P said:

    Now that he has officially retired from the Yankees, I guess it is a good time to make a political run.

    Huh??


    One of the best center fielders of all time!
    I must be getting names confused... sleep deprivation does that!

    Bernie Williams?
  • InHiding80InHiding80 Posts: 7,623
    Jason P said:

    Now that he has officially retired from the Yankees, I guess it is a good time to make a political run.

    Well we'd have a jazz POTUS which would be nice. Remember Clinton on sax? I'm an Angels fan who doesn't root for them but he had class unlike the A Rods of today.
  • InHiding80InHiding80 Posts: 7,623
    Jason P said:

    brianlux said:

    Jason P said:

    Now that he has officially retired from the Yankees, I guess it is a good time to make a political run.

    Huh??


    One of the best center fielders of all time!
    My team's Trout giving him a run for his money.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    JimmyV said:

    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    True. I voted for Nader believing there was no difference between Bush and Gore. The Iraq debacle showed that I was wrong. But too often they have their hands out to the same influence peddlers. Many things don't change regardless of which party is in power.
    If 9/11 happened while Gore was President he probably would have been equally as hawkish. The Clintons supported the Iraq war. His VP nominee Joe Lieberman supported it big time. Gore would have been right there and the democratic party would have championed him as the greatest war time president in history.
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    edited May 2015
    BS44325 said:

    JimmyV said:

    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    True. I voted for Nader believing there was no difference between Bush and Gore. The Iraq debacle showed that I was wrong. But too often they have their hands out to the same influence peddlers. Many things don't change regardless of which party is in power.
    If 9/11 happened while Gore was President he probably would have been equally as hawkish. The Clintons supported the Iraq war. His VP nominee Joe Lieberman supported it big time. Gore would have been right there and the democratic party would have championed him as the greatest war time president in history.
    I'm not sure I'd say he would have been "hawkish" but I'll bet he would have had little choice but to respond. Don't want to get into conspiracy theories too much here but that whole issue is definitely rather clouded. I will say this though, Gore would have held the book right side up and actually been reading to the kids and would not have had such a blank stare.

    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,171
    BS44325 said:

    JimmyV said:

    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    True. I voted for Nader believing there was no difference between Bush and Gore. The Iraq debacle showed that I was wrong. But too often they have their hands out to the same influence peddlers. Many things don't change regardless of which party is in power.
    If 9/11 happened while Gore was President he probably would have been equally as hawkish. The Clintons supported the Iraq war. His VP nominee Joe Lieberman supported it big time. Gore would have been right there and the democratic party would have championed him as the greatest war time president in history.
    Any sitting president would have been hawkish, but only Bush was going to turn his attention to Iraq. It remains the worst foreign policy blunder of this generation.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    brianlux said:

    BS44325 said:

    JimmyV said:

    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    True. I voted for Nader believing there was no difference between Bush and Gore. The Iraq debacle showed that I was wrong. But too often they have their hands out to the same influence peddlers. Many things don't change regardless of which party is in power.
    If 9/11 happened while Gore was President he probably would have been equally as hawkish. The Clintons supported the Iraq war. His VP nominee Joe Lieberman supported it big time. Gore would have been right there and the democratic party would have championed him as the greatest war time president in history.
    I'm not sure I'd say he would have been "hawkish" but I'll bet he would have had little choice but to respond. Don't want to get into conspiracy theories too much here but that whole issue is definitely rather clouded. I will say this though, Gore would have held the book right side up and actually been reading to the kids and would not have had such a blank stare.

    You do realize that the "upside down book" thing is a hoax right? Seriously can't tell if you are joking.

    http://terrific-top10.com/2013/06/12/top-10-historical-altered-photos2/

  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    JimmyV said:

    BS44325 said:

    JimmyV said:

    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    True. I voted for Nader believing there was no difference between Bush and Gore. The Iraq debacle showed that I was wrong. But too often they have their hands out to the same influence peddlers. Many things don't change regardless of which party is in power.
    If 9/11 happened while Gore was President he probably would have been equally as hawkish. The Clintons supported the Iraq war. His VP nominee Joe Lieberman supported it big time. Gore would have been right there and the democratic party would have championed him as the greatest war time president in history.
    Any sitting president would have been hawkish, but only Bush was going to turn his attention to Iraq. It remains the worst foreign policy blunder of this generation.
    Can we really go back and time and say someone would or wouldn't have made the same decision?

    What we know is this...

    George Tenet was both Clinton and Bush's CIA director. He was the one who told W that the case on WMD was "a slam dunk". Al Gore was one of only 10 democrats who supported the first gulf war and was very hawkish on saddam during Clinton's final years. With or without 9/11 Saddam was going to be dealt with in some capacity as the sanction was collapsing and he was firing on countries enforcing the no-fly zone. Gore/Lieberman would have absolutely been "hawkish".

    In hindsight we like to tell ourselves that things would have been different but there is very little evidence to support that.

    To keep the thread on topic though you can be certain that only a President Sanders will keep you out of another war. Stay away from nominating Hillary if the end of military action is your number one cause.
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 39,025
    BS44325 said:

    JimmyV said:

    BS44325 said:

    JimmyV said:

    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    True. I voted for Nader believing there was no difference between Bush and Gore. The Iraq debacle showed that I was wrong. But too often they have their hands out to the same influence peddlers. Many things don't change regardless of which party is in power.
    If 9/11 happened while Gore was President he probably would have been equally as hawkish. The Clintons supported the Iraq war. His VP nominee Joe Lieberman supported it big time. Gore would have been right there and the democratic party would have championed him as the greatest war time president in history.
    Any sitting president would have been hawkish, but only Bush was going to turn his attention to Iraq. It remains the worst foreign policy blunder of this generation.
    Can we really go back and time and say someone would or wouldn't have made the same decision?

    What we know is this...

    George Tenet was both Clinton and Bush's CIA director. He was the one who told W that the case on WMD was "a slam dunk". Al Gore was one of only 10 democrats who supported the first gulf war and was very hawkish on saddam during Clinton's final years. With or without 9/11 Saddam was going to be dealt with in some capacity as the sanction was collapsing and he was firing on countries enforcing the no-fly zone. Gore/Lieberman would have absolutely been "hawkish".

    In hindsight we like to tell ourselves that things would have been different but there is very little evidence to support that.

    To keep the thread on topic though you can be certain that only a President Sanders will keep you out of another war. Stay away from nominating Hillary if the end of military action is your number one cause.
    What? The sanctions were collapsing and Saddam was firing on countries enforcing the no fly zone? What? So now this is your apologists excuse for invading Iraq and "there is very little evidence to support" the dems doing something different? Way to project your fantasy onto the rest of us. You really are a piece of work with your revisionist history. And Lieberman? Yea, he was so fucking hawkish, mainly because he was Israel's bitch, that his own party primaried him and he had to run as an independent to retain his seat in the senate. Keep moving the pieces on the Risk board. Or is it Battleship? Or Stratego?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    edited May 2015

    BS44325 said:

    JimmyV said:

    BS44325 said:

    JimmyV said:

    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    True. I voted for Nader believing there was no difference between Bush and Gore. The Iraq debacle showed that I was wrong. But too often they have their hands out to the same influence peddlers. Many things don't change regardless of which party is in power.
    If 9/11 happened while Gore was President he probably would have been equally as hawkish. The Clintons supported the Iraq war. His VP nominee Joe Lieberman supported it big time. Gore would have been right there and the democratic party would have championed him as the greatest war time president in history.
    Any sitting president would have been hawkish, but only Bush was going to turn his attention to Iraq. It remains the worst foreign policy blunder of this generation.
    Can we really go back and time and say someone would or wouldn't have made the same decision?

    What we know is this...

    George Tenet was both Clinton and Bush's CIA director. He was the one who told W that the case on WMD was "a slam dunk". Al Gore was one of only 10 democrats who supported the first gulf war and was very hawkish on saddam during Clinton's final years. With or without 9/11 Saddam was going to be dealt with in some capacity as the sanction was collapsing and he was firing on countries enforcing the no-fly zone. Gore/Lieberman would have absolutely been "hawkish".

    In hindsight we like to tell ourselves that things would have been different but there is very little evidence to support that.

    To keep the thread on topic though you can be certain that only a President Sanders will keep you out of another war. Stay away from nominating Hillary if the end of military action is your number one cause.
    What? The sanctions were collapsing and Saddam was firing on countries enforcing the no fly zone? What? So now this is your apologists excuse for invading Iraq
    Yes the sanctions were collapsing and Saddam was firing on planes and No this is not my apologist excuse for invading Iraq

    Again man...you're not paying attention...please follow the flow. Some of us are discussing whether a Gore/Lieberman administration would have behaved differently. I am not certain they would have. It is an answer we cannot know. They certainly would have dealt with Saddam in some way. It was inevitable. Please take Circle in the Sand by Christian Alfonsi off your vast bookshelf and read it again.
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    BS44325 said:

    brianlux said:

    BS44325 said:

    JimmyV said:

    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    Same policies, same shit every candidate, only the R and D are different.

    Can list many things that would of been different if McCain or Romney were elected. Yes not a total change between parties but there are differences.
    True. I voted for Nader believing there was no difference between Bush and Gore. The Iraq debacle showed that I was wrong. But too often they have their hands out to the same influence peddlers. Many things don't change regardless of which party is in power.
    If 9/11 happened while Gore was President he probably would have been equally as hawkish. The Clintons supported the Iraq war. His VP nominee Joe Lieberman supported it big time. Gore would have been right there and the democratic party would have championed him as the greatest war time president in history.
    I'm not sure I'd say he would have been "hawkish" but I'll bet he would have had little choice but to respond. Don't want to get into conspiracy theories too much here but that whole issue is definitely rather clouded. I will say this though, Gore would have held the book right side up and actually been reading to the kids and would not have had such a blank stare.

    You do realize that the "upside down book" thing is a hoax right? Seriously can't tell if you are joking.

    http://terrific-top10.com/2013/06/12/top-10-historical-altered-photos2/

    Oh yeah, maybe, maybe not. I should have used one of those crazy sound bites to get the point across. You know, one of those exemplary moments of verbal prowess he so frequently employed in order to vociferate an articulate announcement. Smoke 'em out! LOL!

    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 39,025
    So your claiming, via your claim of collapsing sanctions and Saddam firing on the aircraft enforcing the no fly zone, that somehow Iraq was a threat and needed to be addressed with military power and that because Gore was one of 10 democrats to vote for the first gulf war and the Israeli bitch Lieberman was his running mate, the dems, had they been elected,would have done something militarily to deal with Saddam and Iraq? Right, that's what you implied, correct? If your position is/was, "we'll never know" then why all your gobblygook about Tenet, post 9/11, blah, blah, blah.

    Why not just say, "it's an answer we cannot know" like you did after I called you out? You are slippery BS, I'll give you that.

    It was only "inevitable" with GWB, Cheney and the neocons in office. Circle in the Sand or not.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
Sign In or Register to comment.