But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
Not to mention that Canada seems to think it is okay to lock them unattended in a car (look at the paragraph below the one you circled)...which was a topic of conversation recently too, lol
Responsible until they aren’t.
I’m not aware whether or not you can store an #Ptape with them, though, lol
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
Not to mention that Canada seems to think it is okay to lock them unattended in a car (look at the paragraph below the one you circled)...which was a topic of conversation recently too, lol
Responsible until they aren’t.
I’m not aware whether or not you can store an #Ptape with them, though, lol
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
Not to mention that Canada seems to think it is okay to lock them unattended in a car (look at the paragraph below the one you circled)...which was a topic of conversation recently too, lol
Responsible until they aren’t.
I’m not aware whether or not you can store an #Ptape with them, though, lol
Not to mention that Canada seems to think it is okay to lock them unattended in a car (look at the paragraph below the one you circled)...which was a topic of conversation recently too, lol
Responsible until they aren’t.
I’m not aware whether or not you can store an #Ptape with them, though, lol
Funny how you denied “to” but not “with.” LOL.
Um huh? Are you high?
No, are you?
Nope, but maybe not paying enough attention to gather wtf you are talking about? Anyways, carry on #Ptape
But what... so now all of a sudden Canada and America are looking fairly equal in terms of gun laws to you? That isn't the case at all.
Explain to me the restricted weapon access. Do you need a certain level of background checks to get one? Maybe i should research since you Canadians can not And I do think we are more similar than you think, big difference is the training and mag limits imo.
I don't think we are even close to similar in either way, but like I always say, it's the American gun culture that really makes the most difference by far, and in that way we are worlds apart.
Anyway, here is a link to the RCMP website where it defines these things:
The American mentality is a big part of it. As soon as you say "gun laws" or "gun reform" or "assault weapons ban" about 200 million mouth breathers all shout "DER CANT TAYK AWR GUNZ, S'MY CONSTATOOSHNAL RYYTE!" instead of actually listening to proprosals, offering constructive input, or even understanding why we want/need reform. People want to pretend that just because it's in the constitution, it's untouchable. TImes changes, purposes change, meanings change, function & availability change. Everything fucking changes. The reasons the 2nd Amendment were originally written are (mostly) irrelevant & unnecessary today. I invite everyone who doesn't want change in gun laws... next time you all go to the doctor, have surgery, etc, please make sure to ask your doctor to give you medical advice or perform procedures from the 18th fucking century. Instead of reaching for some Tylenol when you have a headache, call your doctor and schedule a lobotomy instead. You wouldn't. And rightfully so, because it's completely fucking archaic. Just like the 2nd fucking Amendment. So stop hiding behind that god damn skirt (and I'm not saying anyone here in particular is, just talking in general) and do something so our elementary schools, movie theaters, churches, mosques, shopping centers, etc, etc, etc don't get shot the fuck up on a god damn daily basis.
What really is the American fascination with guns anyway? We NEED to get away from that. (And before anyone retorts, yes, we really do.) And "it's my right" isn't a valid answer. It's your right to protest, right to vote, but I don't see hundreds of million Americans so vehemently expressing how awesome it is do those things nor fighting to keep them. No we do just the exact polar fucking opposite of those; we try to suppress them. I want to know exactly what is the mentality, what is the desire, the amazement, what is at the CORE of wanting to many god damn guns? What makes people feel so threatened if suddenly guns didn't exist?
The founders thought owning firearms was so important that it was the sixth right they listed (behind the first five in the first amendment). Training? Sounds good. Registration? Zero problems with it. Background checks? Giddy up. Banning something, yeah no thanks. Because after you ban something then the question becomes, what is next? Oh yeah, senators from Hawaii: https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/hawaii-democrats-want-us-congress-consider-repeal-second-amendment
Hawaii Democrats Want U.S. Congress to Consider Repeal of Second Amendment
A resolution introduced in the Hawaii Senate this week urges the U.S. Congress to "consider and discuss whether the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution should be repealed or amended to clarify that the right to bear arms is a collective, rather than individual, constitutional right."
The resolution also urges Congress to adopt a proposed constitutional amendment "to clarify the constitutional right to bear arms."
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2008 that the Second Amendment "protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."
The article continues on the web page I referenced.
You did 100% exactly what I asked not to. I need to know what you personally think. Pretend the 2nd Amendment never existed. Why are Americans so fascinated with guns? Why away are you so threatened if weapons were banned? Forget the Constitution, what’s at the core? Why do Americans jerk off every time they see a gun?
Just going on record saying that I have never jerked off to a gun...lol
The American mentality is a big part of it. As soon as you say "gun laws" or "gun reform" or "assault weapons ban" about 200 million mouth breathers all shout "DER CANT TAYK AWR GUNZ, S'MY CONSTATOOSHNAL RYYTE!" instead of actually listening to proprosals, offering constructive input, or even understanding why we want/need reform. People want to pretend that just because it's in the constitution, it's untouchable. TImes changes, purposes change, meanings change, function & availability change. Everything fucking changes. The reasons the 2nd Amendment were originally written are (mostly) irrelevant & unnecessary today. I invite everyone who doesn't want change in gun laws... next time you all go to the doctor, have surgery, etc, please make sure to ask your doctor to give you medical advice or perform procedures from the 18th fucking century. Instead of reaching for some Tylenol when you have a headache, call your doctor and schedule a lobotomy instead. You wouldn't. And rightfully so, because it's completely fucking archaic. Just like the 2nd fucking Amendment. So stop hiding behind that god damn skirt (and I'm not saying anyone here in particular is, just talking in general) and do something so our elementary schools, movie theaters, churches, mosques, shopping centers, etc, etc, etc don't get shot the fuck up on a god damn daily basis.
What really is the American fascination with guns anyway? We NEED to get away from that. (And before anyone retorts, yes, we really do.) And "it's my right" isn't a valid answer. It's your right to protest, right to vote, but I don't see hundreds of million Americans so vehemently expressing how awesome it is do those things nor fighting to keep them. No we do just the exact polar fucking opposite of those; we try to suppress them. I want to know exactly what is the mentality, what is the desire, the amazement, what is at the CORE of wanting to many god damn guns? What makes people feel so threatened if suddenly guns didn't exist?
The founders thought owning firearms was so important that it was the sixth right they listed (behind the first five in the first amendment). Training? Sounds good. Registration? Zero problems with it. Background checks? Giddy up. Banning something, yeah no thanks. Because after you ban something then the question becomes, what is next? Oh yeah, senators from Hawaii: https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/hawaii-democrats-want-us-congress-consider-repeal-second-amendment
Hawaii Democrats Want U.S. Congress to Consider Repeal of Second Amendment
A resolution introduced in the Hawaii Senate this week urges the U.S. Congress to "consider and discuss whether the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution should be repealed or amended to clarify that the right to bear arms is a collective, rather than individual, constitutional right."
The resolution also urges Congress to adopt a proposed constitutional amendment "to clarify the constitutional right to bear arms."
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2008 that the Second Amendment "protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."
The article continues on the web page I referenced.
You did 100% exactly what I asked not to. I need to know what you personally think. Pretend the 2nd Amendment never existed. Why are Americans so fascinated with guns? Why away are you so threatened if weapons were banned? Forget the Constitution, what’s at the core? Why do Americans jerk off every time they see a gun?
Just going on record saying that I have never jerked off to a gun...lol
There you go JO.
Well, guns cannot jerk off, so...But really, this is what you came up with? Wow...weak... But since you are prone to carry this shit on forever...No, I have never and do not ever plan on jerking off “with” a gun either. Satisfied #Ptape?
I m definitely not a fan of this law. Guilty until proven innocent.
I don't interpret that in such a way. Unless there is a trial involved, that concept doesn't apply IMO. But either way, in this context it's simply about putting public safety ahead of individual rights, which I'm all for, and in most cases, so are Americans in general as far as I can tell. And with the obvious dangers brought to the public when it comes to people who shouldn't have guns having guns, this kind of legislation makes all the sense in the world to me.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
The American mentality is a big part of it. As soon as you say "gun laws" or "gun reform" or "assault weapons ban" about 200 million mouth breathers all shout "DER CANT TAYK AWR GUNZ, S'MY CONSTATOOSHNAL RYYTE!" instead of actually listening to proprosals, offering constructive input, or even understanding why we want/need reform. People want to pretend that just because it's in the constitution, it's untouchable. TImes changes, purposes change, meanings change, function & availability change. Everything fucking changes. The reasons the 2nd Amendment were originally written are (mostly) irrelevant & unnecessary today. I invite everyone who doesn't want change in gun laws... next time you all go to the doctor, have surgery, etc, please make sure to ask your doctor to give you medical advice or perform procedures from the 18th fucking century. Instead of reaching for some Tylenol when you have a headache, call your doctor and schedule a lobotomy instead. You wouldn't. And rightfully so, because it's completely fucking archaic. Just like the 2nd fucking Amendment. So stop hiding behind that god damn skirt (and I'm not saying anyone here in particular is, just talking in general) and do something so our elementary schools, movie theaters, churches, mosques, shopping centers, etc, etc, etc don't get shot the fuck up on a god damn daily basis.
What really is the American fascination with guns anyway? We NEED to get away from that. (And before anyone retorts, yes, we really do.) And "it's my right" isn't a valid answer. It's your right to protest, right to vote, but I don't see hundreds of million Americans so vehemently expressing how awesome it is do those things nor fighting to keep them. No we do just the exact polar fucking opposite of those; we try to suppress them. I want to know exactly what is the mentality, what is the desire, the amazement, what is at the CORE of wanting to many god damn guns? What makes people feel so threatened if suddenly guns didn't exist?
The founders thought owning firearms was so important that it was the sixth right they listed (behind the first five in the first amendment). Training? Sounds good. Registration? Zero problems with it. Background checks? Giddy up. Banning something, yeah no thanks. Because after you ban something then the question becomes, what is next? Oh yeah, senators from Hawaii: https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/hawaii-democrats-want-us-congress-consider-repeal-second-amendment
Hawaii Democrats Want U.S. Congress to Consider Repeal of Second Amendment
A resolution introduced in the Hawaii Senate this week urges the U.S. Congress to "consider and discuss whether the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution should be repealed or amended to clarify that the right to bear arms is a collective, rather than individual, constitutional right."
The resolution also urges Congress to adopt a proposed constitutional amendment "to clarify the constitutional right to bear arms."
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2008 that the Second Amendment "protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."
The article continues on the web page I referenced.
You did 100% exactly what I asked not to. I need to know what you personally think. Pretend the 2nd Amendment never existed. Why are Americans so fascinated with guns? Why away are you so threatened if weapons were banned? Forget the Constitution, what’s at the core? Why do Americans jerk off every time they see a gun?
Just going on record saying that I have never jerked off to a gun...lol
There you go JO.
Well, guns cannot jerk off, so...But really, this is what you came up with? Wow...weak... But since you are prone to carry this shit on forever...No, I have never and do not ever plan on jerking off “with” a gun either. Satisfied #Ptape?
I don’t believe your lies.
Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.
The American mentality is a big part of it. As soon as you say "gun laws" or "gun reform" or "assault weapons ban" about 200 million mouth breathers all shout "DER CANT TAYK AWR GUNZ, S'MY CONSTATOOSHNAL RYYTE!" instead of actually listening to proprosals, offering constructive input, or even understanding why we want/need reform. People want to pretend that just because it's in the constitution, it's untouchable. TImes changes, purposes change, meanings change, function & availability change. Everything fucking changes. The reasons the 2nd Amendment were originally written are (mostly) irrelevant & unnecessary today. I invite everyone who doesn't want change in gun laws... next time you all go to the doctor, have surgery, etc, please make sure to ask your doctor to give you medical advice or perform procedures from the 18th fucking century. Instead of reaching for some Tylenol when you have a headache, call your doctor and schedule a lobotomy instead. You wouldn't. And rightfully so, because it's completely fucking archaic. Just like the 2nd fucking Amendment. So stop hiding behind that god damn skirt (and I'm not saying anyone here in particular is, just talking in general) and do something so our elementary schools, movie theaters, churches, mosques, shopping centers, etc, etc, etc don't get shot the fuck up on a god damn daily basis.
What really is the American fascination with guns anyway? We NEED to get away from that. (And before anyone retorts, yes, we really do.) And "it's my right" isn't a valid answer. It's your right to protest, right to vote, but I don't see hundreds of million Americans so vehemently expressing how awesome it is do those things nor fighting to keep them. No we do just the exact polar fucking opposite of those; we try to suppress them. I want to know exactly what is the mentality, what is the desire, the amazement, what is at the CORE of wanting to many god damn guns? What makes people feel so threatened if suddenly guns didn't exist?
The founders thought owning firearms was so important that it was the sixth right they listed (behind the first five in the first amendment). Training? Sounds good. Registration? Zero problems with it. Background checks? Giddy up. Banning something, yeah no thanks. Because after you ban something then the question becomes, what is next? Oh yeah, senators from Hawaii: https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/hawaii-democrats-want-us-congress-consider-repeal-second-amendment
Hawaii Democrats Want U.S. Congress to Consider Repeal of Second Amendment
A resolution introduced in the Hawaii Senate this week urges the U.S. Congress to "consider and discuss whether the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution should be repealed or amended to clarify that the right to bear arms is a collective, rather than individual, constitutional right."
The resolution also urges Congress to adopt a proposed constitutional amendment "to clarify the constitutional right to bear arms."
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2008 that the Second Amendment "protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."
The article continues on the web page I referenced.
You did 100% exactly what I asked not to. I need to know what you personally think. Pretend the 2nd Amendment never existed. Why are Americans so fascinated with guns? Why away are you so threatened if weapons were banned? Forget the Constitution, what’s at the core? Why do Americans jerk off every time they see a gun?
Just going on record saying that I have never jerked off to a gun...lol
There you go JO.
Well, guns cannot jerk off, so...But really, this is what you came up with? Wow...weak... But since you are prone to carry this shit on forever...No, I have never and do not ever plan on jerking off “with” a gun either. Satisfied #Ptape?
I don’t believe your lies.
Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.
I m definitely not a fan of this law. Guilty until proven innocent.
I don't interpret that in such a way. Unless there is a trial involved, that concept doesn't apply IMO. But either way, in this context it's simply about putting public safety ahead of individual rights, which I'm all for, and in most cases, so are Americans in general as far as I can tell. And with the obvious dangers brought to the public when it comes to people who shouldn't have guns having guns, this kind of legislation makes all the sense in the world to me.
I ll have to do more research on it. Maybe I am missing something.
I m definitely not a fan of this law. Guilty until proven innocent.
I don't interpret that in such a way. Unless there is a trial involved, that concept doesn't apply IMO. But either way, in this context it's simply about putting public safety ahead of individual rights, which I'm all for, and in most cases, so are Americans in general as far as I can tell. And with the obvious dangers brought to the public when it comes to people who shouldn't have guns having guns, this kind of legislation makes all the sense in the world to me.
I ll have to do more research on it. Maybe I am missing something.
What are your feelings about sheriffs refusing to follow a law/legislation/bylaw that they don't agree with?
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Dude, its clear you have no clue what you're talking about. Please stop jumping to conclusions and making assumptions about me. You don't know anything about what I believe or do. Just stop.
Should I quote your “facts” of only 50 women a month for 600? It’s a pretty insensitive view point. Stop minimizing the carnage of gun violence and I’ll stop calling you out on it.
He never used "only" so please stop misquoting him.
The “facts” he used to back up his number of domestic violence victims only referenced women and appeared to dismiss the number of 600 victims as insinificant.
I don't know why, but I'll try one last time then I'll just have to give up on getting through to some people. I never minimized anything. I'll try to break it down as much as I can one last time. It was stated that ammo should be stored separately to allow victims of domestic violence an extra 15 seconds to escape a heated argument before getting shot. I did not agree with that logic, if a gun is stored and locked properly I don't think it is going to make a difference. Then I added why make laws that to protect only a small group, why not make laws that protect everyone against guns, including those 600 women killed every year? Make laws that make it easier to take guns away from those in a violent relationship, support the abused more, strict background checks. registration and accountability for guns. All of which would not only protect those victims better than having a separate box to open, but also help protect thousands more as well. Since then others have said it is to prevent kids from getting both guns and ammo. And while I still believe the safest place in my house is my gun safe, and therefore no one is getting guns or ammo, I can at least recognize the logic in that. The reality is if someone gets ammo because it was stored with a gun, then the guns weren't properly stored to begin with. SO making separate laws on ammo isn't going to save a singe life. If someone stores their guns so a kid and access it, are they really going to make their ammo more secure? If they lock their guns up properly, no kid is getting to it. As someone else already said, it would just be a "feel good" law, and a tally mark for another victory that has no real impact.
Now explain how that is minimizing anything? Actually, on second thought, please don't.
And yet, requirind ammunition to be stored separately from guns is used effectively elsewhere, so there’s that.
The easier it is for people to make the wrong decision in a moment of anger, the more likely they are to make that decision. The harder it is to make it, the more road blocks in the way, the more likely they are to rethink during that time.
1. How do you measure whether or not it is effective? 2. How do you enforce that law?
Evidently Canada doesn’t even enforce this and it isn’t even law...so this whole conversation is pointless...: “Store the ammunition separately or lock it up. It can be stored in the same locked container as the firearms” https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-98-209/index.html
Lol. Oh geez
That's is surprising to me. I know at one-time ammo had to be stored in a separate location.
There are several reasons it wouldn't happen, but the biggest one is cost. I rarely hear anyone talk about the cost of a buyback program. If it is not voluntary, but mandatory then it isn't right to only offer $100 a gun, it would have to be the fair market value. And it is not uncommon for guns to cost $1000 or more. The $5.5 billion that many laughed at to build the wall is probably what a buyback program would cost. Who here wants to donate a ten thousands dollars to support this?
Statistics show that about 43% of American households have at least one gun and I'm guessing that's low. So think about how many people would have to be hired to go out and confiscate all those guns. Basically half the country would be confiscating guns from the other half and nothing else would get done.
So the logical thing to do is to start by banning assault rifles and then, even more importantly, work on making life better (and by better I don't mean just being able to buy more stuff) so that people will be happier and feel safer and then maybe opt not to buy yet another goddamn gun in the first place.
Would the half that gets to confiscate the guns get danger pay. I can not imagine what could go wrong by trying to confiscate guns from people that have plenty of ammo and are pissed that they are having their guns confiscated...lol
I guess the trick is to just ask nicely.
Seriously though, there are just too many gun owners who literally see it as their God-given right to possess fire arms and most of whom are no way just going to hand over their fire arms. No, the answer is very complicated and complex- more education, build safer communities, stronger background checks and registration including gun safety courses, banning of automatic weapons. Even just one of those is a big goal. Unfortunately, I don't see how this gun issue will ever be resolved.
That is so true. That's why disarming them is not a real feasible goal. Tougher gun laws would be a start, better background checks.
Background checks is a hot talking point.
What should a background check consist of?
What would you like to see done?
I am a Canadian.
In Canada, you must take a firearms safety course and pass before purchasing unrestricted firearms. You must also take a hunters safety course before you can hunt legally.
You can own restricted weapons, but 1st must apply for a restricted weapons permit, and if you get restricted weapons permit, the rules involved in transporting your gun are stiff. Upon purchasing your restricted weapon, you would be placed on the restricted weapons registry.
And all guns must be in the locked cabinet and stored separately from the ammo.
Once again this does nothing to stop the criminal, and we have our fair share of gun crime.
Good ole meltdown started this one.
Geez Meltdown, no wonder you're a Ford and Scheer supporter. You've got all your facts fucked up.
Let's get one thing straight. I did not vote for Ford or Sheer, I will be voting Sheer in 2019, I am in no way a supporter of him or any politician. My resolve that politicians are right there with lawyers, insurance salesmen and bankers as some of the lowest life form among us has not changed, but politicians are the absolute lowest of scum. I made a mistake. It's also quite possible that the laws were changed at some point under Harper. It still wouldn't be a bad idea.
Yes, we could probably adjust our laws a bit. Go to the RCMP's website for a clearer definition. It's not like Canadians leave loaded guns laying around the house or in the car, they still must have a trigger.
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Anyways, carry on #Ptape
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://apple.news/ACyeMkAxuQ7KT3WJAzHog8w
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
But since you are prone to carry this shit on forever...No, I have never and do not ever plan on jerking off “with” a gun either. Satisfied #Ptape?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Storing, Transporting and Displaying Firearms
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/cfp-pcaf/fs-fd/storage-entreposage-eng.htm
Yes, we could probably adjust our laws a bit. Go to the RCMP's website for a clearer definition. It's not like Canadians leave loaded guns laying around the house or in the car, they still must have a trigger.
New Zealand's Prime Minister announces ban on all assault rifles following massacre https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/20/asia/new-zealand-christchurch-gun-ban-intl/index.html