So, what are you other than afraid of the elimination of the white race and Hillary and now, it seems, a Russia sympathizer and supporter and a potential Team Trump Treason voter?
So, comparing yourself as someone who routinely spouts alt-right rhetoric, links to alt-right websites and posts alt-right memes should be compared to me, who has never supported, posted or linked to an Antifa anything, other than in jest. False equivalency, of which you routinely make.
Get back on the topic and NOT each other. Posting privileges at risk.....
Hahahahaha ok I’ll try again....unsung...why do you need 7-8 of those?
The Constitution isn't based on what you or anyone determines what I need.
Just like I don't determine what you need. I actually don't care what you decide you need as long as it doesn't harm me. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause you harm.
You didn’t answer the question. I asked why you specifically think 7-8 is “a good start”. WHy is that?
Get back on the topic and NOT each other. Posting privileges at risk.....
Hahahahaha ok I’ll try again....unsung...why do you need 7-8 of those?
The Constitution isn't based on what you or anyone determines what I need.
Just like I don't determine what you need. I actually don't care what you decide you need as long as it doesn't harm me. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause you harm.
The constitution also isn't the Ten Commandments or some written in stone set of rules that we always must abide by. It took 19 amendments before women could vote. When the 2nd amendment was ratified, it was legal to own slaves. Times have changed. Situations have changed. Guns have freakin changed. It's time we amend our rights to reflect that.
The constitution also isn't the Ten Commandments or some written in stone set of rules that we always must abide by. It took 19 amendments before women could vote. When the 2nd amendment was ratified, it was legal to own slaves. Times have changed. Situations have changed. Guns have freakin changed. It's time we amend our rights to reflect that.
Try telling that to these two. How can you go on a secret mission with a single shot black powder musket?
Get back on the topic and NOT each other. Posting privileges at risk.....
Hahahahaha ok I’ll try again....unsung...why do you need 7-8 of those?
The Constitution isn't based on what you or anyone determines what I need.
Just like I don't determine what you need. I actually don't care what you decide you need as long as it doesn't harm me. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause you harm.
You didn’t answer the question. I asked why you specifically think 7-8 is “a good start”. WHy is that?
Get back on the topic and NOT each other. Posting privileges at risk.....
Hahahahaha ok I’ll try again....unsung...why do you need 7-8 of those?
The Constitution isn't based on what you or anyone determines what I need.
Just like I don't determine what you need. I actually don't care what you decide you need as long as it doesn't harm me. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause you harm.
You didn’t answer the question. I asked why you specifically think 7-8 is “a good start”. WHy is that?
The more the merrier.
Why?
hippiemom = goodness
0
Options
unsung
I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Get back on the topic and NOT each other. Posting privileges at risk.....
Hahahahaha ok I’ll try again....unsung...why do you need 7-8 of those?
The Constitution isn't based on what you or anyone determines what I need.
Just like I don't determine what you need. I actually don't care what you decide you need as long as it doesn't harm me. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause you harm.
Until it does...
So we should keep muslims out, because clearly they are peaceful until they decide to wear a suicide vest, right?
Get back on the topic and NOT each other. Posting privileges at risk.....
Hahahahaha ok I’ll try again....unsung...why do you need 7-8 of those?
The Constitution isn't based on what you or anyone determines what I need.
Just like I don't determine what you need. I actually don't care what you decide you need as long as it doesn't harm me. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause you harm.
Until it does...
So we should keep muslims out, because clearly they are peaceful until they decide to wear a suicide vest, right?
Get back on the topic and NOT each other. Posting privileges at risk.....
Hahahahaha ok I’ll try again....unsung...why do you need 7-8 of those?
The Constitution isn't based on what you or anyone determines what I need.
Just like I don't determine what you need. I actually don't care what you decide you need as long as it doesn't harm me. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause you harm.
Until it does...
So we should keep muslims out, because clearly they are peaceful until they decide to wear a suicide vest, right?
Pretty dense logic.
You do realize that comments like this only gives the anti-gun crowd more ammunition for gun control laws? I don’t have a link, but this logic represents only a small fraction of gun owners. And is part why nothing gets done, comments like these create an over-reaction instead having a realistic debate on the topic.
Get back on the topic and NOT each other. Posting privileges at risk.....
Hahahahaha ok I’ll try again....unsung...why do you need 7-8 of those?
The Constitution isn't based on what you or anyone determines what I need.
Just like I don't determine what you need. I actually don't care what you decide you need as long as it doesn't harm me. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause you harm.
Constitutional processes have made clear that gun ownership rights are not unlimited. You are misunderstanding our processes, as usual.
0
Options
unsung
I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Get back on the topic and NOT each other. Posting privileges at risk.....
Hahahahaha ok I’ll try again....unsung...why do you need 7-8 of those?
The Constitution isn't based on what you or anyone determines what I need.
Just like I don't determine what you need. I actually don't care what you decide you need as long as it doesn't harm me. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause you harm.
Until it does...
So we should keep muslims out, because clearly they are peaceful until they decide to wear a suicide vest, right?
Pretty dense logic.
We have laws and regulations for wearing vests containing bombs.
But you hate laws, so how is this relevant to you or others like you? I personally don't want anyone who hates laws to own any firearm, let alone 7 or 8 assault weapons.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
0
Options
unsung
I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
I gotta say answering the same thing over and over gets old.
I am for the non aggression principle.
Do no harm but to prevent harm.
You don't need a law for that, you just need a little respect for others.
Get back on the topic and NOT each other. Posting privileges at risk.....
Hahahahaha ok I’ll try again....unsung...why do you need 7-8 of those?
The Constitution isn't based on what you or anyone determines what I need.
Just like I don't determine what you need. I actually don't care what you decide you need as long as it doesn't harm me. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause you harm.
Until it does...
So we should keep muslims out, because clearly they are peaceful until they decide to wear a suicide vest, right?
Pretty dense logic.
We have laws and regulations for wearing vests containing bombs.
You're missing the point. Muslims aren't the weapon. The bomb vest is. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause harm to me, until they fire them upon me. The person owning and firing 8 AR's isnt the weapon, the 8 AR's are. We have laws for bombs because they're big, they go boom, and they cause a lot of damage in a short amount of time. I'm suggesting the same thing for high-powered assault weapons.
I can't begin to guess how many times I have heard that on this forum.
A “responsible” gun owner until they weren’t like the father of the kid in Maryland or Adam Lanza’s mother. But you propagate false flag operations and crisis actor theories. Again, that you own firearms is astounding.
I gotta say answering the same thing over and over gets old.
I am for the non aggression principle.
Do no harm but to prevent harm.
You don't need a law for that, you just need a little respect for others.
How do you square this with you views on abortion? How does any woman having an abortion harm you or exhibit aggression? Same for Muslim migrants?
It isn't just me. I don't want anyone to suffer harm. Why is that so difficult to understand?
So harm to someone else by someone else is your responsibility? And I’m assuming you also decide what harm is and who gets harmed and who doesn’t? Selective reprisals? Sorry but Unsungistan is nowhere I’d like to live or visit.
I gotta say answering the same thing over and over gets old.
I am for the non aggression principle.
Do no harm but to prevent harm.
You don't need a law for that, you just need a little respect for others.
How do you square this with you views on abortion? How does any woman having an abortion harm you or exhibit aggression? Same for Muslim migrants?
It isn't just me. I don't want anyone to suffer harm. Why is that so difficult to understand?
Because it’s coming from you. That’s why it’s so hard to understand. I thought your philosophy was leave me alone and I’ll leave you alone, except there now seems that you have exceptions for unborn babies and Muslims. I’m sure you have tons of exceptions for anyone who doesn’t look like you, pray like you or love like you. How many genders are there again?
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2018/03/27/texas-man-tells-police-needed-weapons-cache-tewksbury-hotel-for-secret-mission/9XbrzFRr1SM9BLeWoks2uK/story.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Pretty dense logic.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Just don't expect widespread compliance.
I am for the non aggression principle.
Do no harm but to prevent harm.
You don't need a law for that, you just need a little respect for others.
You're missing the point. Muslims aren't the weapon. The bomb vest is. Someone owning 8 AR's doesn't cause harm to me, until they fire them upon me. The person owning and firing 8 AR's isnt the weapon, the 8 AR's are. We have laws for bombs because they're big, they go boom, and they cause a lot of damage in a short amount of time. I'm suggesting the same thing for high-powered assault weapons.
Now, what was that about pretty dense logic?
I can't begin to guess how many times I have heard that on this forum.
Tell that to the entire world's population....from the beginning of time till now.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I don't know that I can honestly debate someone that actually believes that is a bad thing.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
How many more times are you going to need to hear this expression to understand it?