where's the NRA to help them out maybe our Russian commarade from here can get all is gun loving comarades to help them out maybe start a drive or rally he has enough crypto coins ...
jesus greets me looks just like me ....
0
Options
unsung
I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmm.
I wonder what it could be.
0
Options
unsung
I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
where's the NRA to help them out maybe our Russian commarade from here can get all is gun loving comarades to help them out maybe start a drive or rally he has enough crypto coins ...
That was a tough read.
LOTS of crypto. Maybe I will use some for some fun things, I could use another six or seven AR's.
where's the NRA to help them out maybe our Russian commarade from here can get all is gun loving comarades to help them out maybe start a drive or rally he has enough crypto coins ...
That was a tough read.
LOTS of crypto. Maybe I will use some for some fun things, I could use another six or seven AR's.
So you can shoot through your front door when the “other” rings your door bell?
What is this, a joke?? Surely you know the answer to this.....
I voted for obama twice but to be fair he did have control of both houses for his first two years in office and didn't do shit. If it was that important to the democratic party they should have attempted to pass something.
What is this, a joke?? Surely you know the answer to this.....
I voted for obama twice but to be fair he did have control of both houses for his first two years in office and didn't do shit. If it was that important to the democratic party they should have attempted to pass something.
Conversely the repubes controlled both houses of Congress for 6 of 8 years that Obama was president and could have sent him a bill that he could have signed, particularly after Sandy Hook. They didn’t do shit, particularly after Sandy Hook.
I'm truly embarrassed for your lack of knowledge on subjects on which you opine. Senate republicans blocked EVERY PROPOSAL put forth after Sandy Hook. Thus included assault rifles, magazine capacity, and background checks, all individually. Educate yourself please, rather than relying on Twitter.
What is this, a joke?? Surely you know the answer to this.....
I voted for obama twice but to be fair he did have control of both houses for his first two years in office and didn't do shit. If it was that important to the democratic party they should have attempted to pass something.
Conversely the repubes controlled both houses of Congress for 6 of 8 years that Obama was president and could have sent him a bill that he could have signed, particularly after Sandy Hook. They didn’t do shit, particularly after Sandy Hook.
well yes of course but republicans aren't going to send any sort of gun control bills, we all know that. Like I said, democrats had two years to pass whatever gun control measures they wanted but dropped the ball for some reason. I guess it wasn't that important.
What is this, a joke?? Surely you know the answer to this.....
I voted for obama twice but to be fair he did have control of both houses for his first two years in office and didn't do shit. If it was that important to the democratic party they should have attempted to pass something.
Conversely the repubes controlled both houses of Congress for 6 of 8 years that Obama was president and could have sent him a bill that he could have signed, particularly after Sandy Hook. They didn’t do shit, particularly after Sandy Hook.
well yes of course but republicans aren't going to send any sort of gun control bills, we all know that. Like I said, democrats had two years to pass whatever gun control measures they wanted but dropped the ball for some reason. I guess it wasn't that important.
The 60 votes they had in the first two years included senators from Arkansas, west Virginia, Alaska, and Montana. They didn't have 60 gun control votes.
where's the NRA to help them out maybe our Russian commarade from here can get all is gun loving comarades to help them out maybe start a drive or rally he has enough crypto coins ...
That was a tough read.
LOTS of crypto. Maybe I will use some for some fun things, I could use another six or seven AR's.
I'm truly embarrassed for your lack of knowledge on subjects on which you opine. Senate republicans blocked EVERY PROPOSAL put forth after Sandy Hook. Thus included assault rifles, magazine capacity, and background checks, all individually. Educate yourself please, rather than relying on Twitter.
I'm truly embarrassed for your lack of knowledge on subjects on which you opine. Senate republicans blocked EVERY PROPOSAL put forth after Sandy Hook. Thus included assault rifles, magazine capacity, and background checks, all individually. Educate yourself please, rather than relying on Twitter.
1) One side gets a crazy amount of $ and they want to keep that $ and keep their political power 2) The other side is deathly afraid of those NRA voters and that $ and want to keep a low profile so they can keep their political power
It's true, almost no one in congress has the guts to stand up and do what's right here. But it's very clear to me that the biggest problem is the Republican party....even though the spineless Dems continue to do nothing and blame others. There are very few republicans I can vote for anymore...maybe none. It's pretty sad.
I'm truly embarrassed for your lack of knowledge on subjects on which you opine. Senate republicans blocked EVERY PROPOSAL put forth after Sandy Hook. Thus included assault rifles, magazine capacity, and background checks, all individually. Educate yourself please, rather than relying on Twitter.
I don't think the 2nd amendment needs repealed...though i might be in favor
I do think we need an updated version. It's being interpreted differently by many people. It's funny, people blame the courts for making laws through interpretation...but the laws are soooooo vague in some cases.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
So - is it saying that because a well regulated militia is needed everyone has an individual right to have guns? Is it saying that if you are part of a well regulated militia you have that right? meaning the feds can't take guns away from state militias? And what are "Arms"....any? rifles?
I personally think that it was written more with State's rights in mind than individual gun ownership, but I'm no legal scholar. I do think that those that want any and all Arms are missing the "well regulated" portion...most likely don;t know that text is even in there.
I'm truly embarrassed for your lack of knowledge on subjects on which you opine. Senate republicans blocked EVERY PROPOSAL put forth after Sandy Hook. Thus included assault rifles, magazine capacity, and background checks, all individually. Educate yourself please, rather than relying on Twitter.
So what he said was if we ban weapons designed for use by the military and a citizen won't turn it over he was take it from his cold dead hands?
I have a question - what do you think those people mean when they say you'll have to take their gun from their cold dead hands? They are in fact threatening to kill people.
Personally - an elected official cannot say these things, even if the tensions are high. But - if we have a law and someone disobeys the law and is handling a weapon when confronted....chances are they will get shot.
I don't think the 2nd amendment needs repealed...though i might be in favor
I do think we need an updated version. It's being interpreted differently by many people. It's funny, people blame the courts for making laws through interpretation...but the laws are soooooo vague in some cases.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
So - is it saying that because a well regulated militia is needed everyone has an individual right to have guns? Is it saying that if you are part of a well regulated militia you have that right? meaning the feds can't take guns away from state militias? And what are "Arms"....any? rifles?
I personally think that it was written more with State's rights in mind than individual gun ownership, but I'm no legal scholar. I do think that those that want any and all Arms are missing the "well regulated" portion...most likely don;t know that text is even in there.
It is not realistic to suggest it would ever be repealed anyway. At this point, I would absolutely be in favor. I firmly believe it's outlived its usefulness and has been subject to interpretations that a) are rigid in terms of any law being against it and at the same time b) ignore some of the language (well-regulated militia). It was written at a time when the idea of a weapon getting off 30 shots per second would not have occurred to anyone.
As you allude to, this is probably the most fascinating language in our Constitution. "Well regulated militia" is the most ignored language in the constitution. And it makes the whole thing confusing and open to oodles of interpretation.
The truth is, I don't really know what to do about the fact that we have hundreds of mass shootings for every one that our peer nations have. Guns are out there and you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. I believe the law against using federal funds for researching the issue is being repealed. That's good. The other thing is we have to get the NRA away from the table. This is about what is right and best...and while individual liberty is a part of it, so is safety within the reality of what is happening. The NRA is not a civil rights organization. It is a trade organization and its first duty is to sell more product. The level to which they are involved creates a conflict of interest. Legislators are literally being paid to defend them.
For my part, I've decided I can't vote for anyone that takes money from the NRA. In Minnesota, one of the key Democrats in the race for the soon-to-be-empty Governorship has taken NRA money. If he wins the nomination, I can't vote for him. For myself, I have to be firm on that because if a critical mass of people would be (particularly the middle folks that vote for both parties, and I am not one of those), it would be difference-making. If Trump's 2020 opponent has taken NRA money, I'll be voting 3rd. That's just where I am now. Again, I don't know what the best way to address our gun culture is, but we're not going to get there when the NRA literally purchases most of the decision-makers.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
Comments
http://money.cnn.com/2018/03/25/news/companies/remington-bankruptcy/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I wonder what it could be.
LOTS of crypto. Maybe I will use some for some fun things, I could use another six or seven AR's.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Hillary?
No.....wait....
Bill Clinton?
No wait....
Emails?
Benghazi?
Leftists?
Crisis actors?
Damn this is a hard one
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gun-control-overhaul-is-defeated-in-senate/2013/04/17/57eb028a-a77c-11e2-b029-8fb7e977ef71_story.html?utm_term=.ba61151317ee
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
1) One side gets a crazy amount of $ and they want to keep that $ and keep their political power
2) The other side is deathly afraid of those NRA voters and that $ and want to keep a low profile so they can keep their political power
It's true, almost no one in congress has the guts to stand up and do what's right here. But it's very clear to me that the biggest problem is the Republican party....even though the spineless Dems continue to do nothing and blame others. There are very few republicans I can vote for anymore...maybe none. It's pretty sad.
Retired Republican-appointed Supreme Court Justice says we should repeal the 2nd amendment
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I do think we need an updated version. It's being interpreted differently by many people. It's funny, people blame the courts for making laws through interpretation...but the laws are soooooo vague in some cases.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
So - is it saying that because a well regulated militia is needed everyone has an individual right to have guns?
Is it saying that if you are part of a well regulated militia you have that right? meaning the feds can't take guns away from state militias?
And what are "Arms"....any? rifles?
I personally think that it was written more with State's rights in mind than individual gun ownership, but I'm no legal scholar. I do think that those that want any and all Arms are missing the "well regulated" portion...most likely don;t know that text is even in there.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/it-begins-democrat-candidate-for-sheriff-suggests-killing-people-to-take-their-guns/
I have a question - what do you think those people mean when they say you'll have to take their gun from their cold dead hands? They are in fact threatening to kill people.
Personally - an elected official cannot say these things, even if the tensions are high. But - if we have a law and someone disobeys the law and is handling a weapon when confronted....chances are they will get shot.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/comment/6673082#Comment_6673082
"Never been on either hotshot." unsung --in reference to gateway pundit and infowars
It is not realistic to suggest it would ever be repealed anyway. At this point, I would absolutely be in favor. I firmly believe it's outlived its usefulness and has been subject to interpretations that a) are rigid in terms of any law being against it and at the same time b) ignore some of the language (well-regulated militia). It was written at a time when the idea of a weapon getting off 30 shots per second would not have occurred to anyone.
As you allude to, this is probably the most fascinating language in our Constitution. "Well regulated militia" is the most ignored language in the constitution. And it makes the whole thing confusing and open to oodles of interpretation.
The truth is, I don't really know what to do about the fact that we have hundreds of mass shootings for every one that our peer nations have. Guns are out there and you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. I believe the law against using federal funds for researching the issue is being repealed. That's good. The other thing is we have to get the NRA away from the table. This is about what is right and best...and while individual liberty is a part of it, so is safety within the reality of what is happening. The NRA is not a civil rights organization. It is a trade organization and its first duty is to sell more product. The level to which they are involved creates a conflict of interest. Legislators are literally being paid to defend them.
For my part, I've decided I can't vote for anyone that takes money from the NRA. In Minnesota, one of the key Democrats in the race for the soon-to-be-empty Governorship has taken NRA money. If he wins the nomination, I can't vote for him. For myself, I have to be firm on that because if a critical mass of people would be (particularly the middle folks that vote for both parties, and I am not one of those), it would be difference-making. If Trump's 2020 opponent has taken NRA money, I'll be voting 3rd. That's just where I am now. Again, I don't know what the best way to address our gun culture is, but we're not going to get there when the NRA literally purchases most of the decision-makers.
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin