Arizona Seeks To Pass Anti-Gay Bill

Cosmo

brianlux said:

Godfather, I think what Cosmo said just above here kind of hits the crux of the issue. I mean, if I wanted to, I could think of a lot of people- both men and women- for whom having sex with or my even my imagining them having sex would be a big turn off to me but those very same people, many of them, could easily be people for whom I have a great deal of respect or even great love. Like lets say imagining Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec having sex with Gertrude Stein. No, please! But if they did have sex and enjoyed it, good for them! And besides, what marvelous people they were! And I can just as easily imagine other people have sex as being anything but revolting. But so what? The basis of how I see people doesn't revolve around them having sex, it revolves around who they are as people, the quality of their mind, their deeds and actions, their motivations. If you view people from those perspectives, their sexuality will be irrelevant.

...
I think the Toulouse-Lautrec/Gertrude Stein refrerence is lost in space, here. Maybe a better bad mental image is to have Mr. Godfather imagine Bill and Hillary Clinton going at it like two sex-crazed weasles... or Liza Minelli and whoever that creepy guy she was married to 69ing it... or Anna-Nicole Smith tossing the salad on that 90 year old walking liver spot. Those are/were heterosexual relationships... and if they turn your stomach... doesn't that mean you are not agreeable with heterosexuality?
...
Also... how can any man call themselves heterosexual if you don't like the girl on girl action?
...
Oh, and you're welcome... for those mental images I planted in your heads.

pjhawks

brianlux said:

Godfather, I think what Cosmo said just above here kind of hits the crux of the issue. I mean, if I wanted to, I could think of a lot of people- both men and women- for whom having sex with or my even my imagining them having sex would be a big turn off to me but those very same people, many of them, could easily be people for whom I have a great deal of respect or even great love. Like lets say imagining Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec having sex with Gertrude Stein. No, please! But if they did have sex and enjoyed it, good for them! And besides, what marvelous people they were! And I can just as easily imagine other people have sex as being anything but revolting. But so what? The basis of how I see people doesn't revolve around them having sex, it revolves around who they are as people, the quality of their mind, their deeds and actions, their motivations. If you view people from those perspectives, their sexuality will be irrelevant.

this pretty much sums it up perfectly.

hedonist

Cosmo said:

brianlux said:

Godfather, I think what Cosmo said just above here kind of hits the crux of the issue. I mean, if I wanted to, I could think of a lot of people- both men and women- for whom having sex with or my even my imagining them having sex would be a big turn off to me but those very same people, many of them, could easily be people for whom I have a great deal of respect or even great love. Like lets say imagining Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec having sex with Gertrude Stein. No, please! But if they did have sex and enjoyed it, good for them! And besides, what marvelous people they were! And I can just as easily imagine other people have sex as being anything but revolting. But so what? The basis of how I see people doesn't revolve around them having sex, it revolves around who they are as people, the quality of their mind, their deeds and actions, their motivations. If you view people from those perspectives, their sexuality will be irrelevant.

...
I think the Toulouse-Lautrec/Gertrude Stein refrerence is lost in space, here. Maybe a better bad mental image is to have Mr. Godfather imagine Bill and Hillary Clinton going at it like two sex-crazed weasles... or Liza Minelli and whoever that creepy guy she was married to 69ing it... or Anna-Nicole Smith tossing the salad on that 90 year old walking liver spot. Those are/were heterosexual relationships... and if they turn your stomach... doesn't that mean you are not agreeable with heterosexuality?
...
Also... how can any man call themselves heterosexual if you don't like the girl on girl action?
...
Oh, and you're welcome... for those mental images I planted in your heads.

Or woman!
(though nothing coming remotely close to that plasticized Cat Woman or Angelyne, please)

(and thanks a LOT for those mental films you just generated)

Son of a...!!

Cosmo

hedonist said:

Cosmo said:

...
I think the Toulouse-Lautrec/Gertrude Stein refrerence is lost in space, here. Maybe a better bad mental image is to have Mr. Godfather imagine Bill and Hillary Clinton going at it like two sex-crazed weasles... or Liza Minelli and whoever that creepy guy she was married to 69ing it... or Anna-Nicole Smith tossing the salad on that 90 year old walking liver spot. Those are/were heterosexual relationships... and if they turn your stomach... doesn't that mean you are not agreeable with heterosexuality?
...
Also... how can any man call themselves heterosexual if you don't like the girl on girl action?
...
Oh, and you're welcome... for those mental images I planted in your heads.

Or woman!
(though nothing coming remotely close to that plasticized Cat Woman or Angelyne, please)

(and thanks a LOT for those mental films you just generated)

Son of a...!!

...
i know... I had to scrub my eyes with Ajax and a Brillo pad to get rid of those heterosexual images.
...
i guess... that must mean i'm gay now.

Kat

Love is good. Sex is good great. Thread is done.

Have a great weekend all.