do not fool yourselves for 5 seconds & believe i am a crazed blood thirsty maniac. im not. i do fully believe pedophiles & rapists & abusive freaks should stop breathing
i'm sorry but your words simply do not reconcile imo ... your first response to people who you feel has done an injustice is violence ... and in many cases - what you put forth is brutal violence ... these are not the words of a man of peace ...
Said with a slightly obnoxious air of self-righteousness.
Chadwick might go over the top in graphically expressing his outrage for the most despicable crimes we could ever have the misfortune of hearing about, but it is clear to me that his heart is in the right place: he values the lives that have been taken and understands the pain for those left to feel it.
Go ahead and advocate for child murderers and rapists, but don't look down your nose at people not as eager to forgive these types of people for such hideous and vulgar acts. It's ironic that you are so willing to paint people supporting harder measures of discipline as baboons, yet paint our most obscene criminals as more human.
The guy made an attempt to back off his 'hard line' and you kept him there by dismissing him. I typically like your words- especially in the environmental threads- but I think your approach and your words here were uncool.
thing is i write everyday. it may be terrible, it may be a few lines, it may be awesome, it may be 5 pages long, it may be shit, but i write everyday. i like creating a scene, i like stirring emotions in people & myself & when it is graphic it is not always fiction but rather what we are truly living amongst.
poetry, poetry, poetry, that is what i love, that & writing about disgusting monsters who deserve to wear a bullet.
my girl friend has demanded i write on her nake body, & so i do. it is then & only then that my bloody axe is laid down... still within sight though as you can imagine
i truly never made up the rules. vile men made up the rules once they turned evil. the rules state they deserve unpleasantness. case closed. one more quick fact... it is to bad it isn't 1400 years ago. back then i really could have been killing nasty bastards for entertainment purposes
Said with a slightly obnoxious air of self-righteousness.
Chadwick might go over the top in graphically expressing his outrage for the most despicable crimes we could ever have the misfortune of hearing about, but it is clear to me that his heart is in the right place: he values the lives that have been taken and understands the pain for those left to feel it.
Go ahead and advocate for child murderers and rapists, but don't look down your nose at people not as eager to forgive these types of people for such hideous and vulgar acts. It's ironic that you are so willing to paint people supporting harder measures of discipline as baboons, yet paint our most obscene criminals as more human.
The guy made an attempt to back off his 'hard line' and you kept him there by dismissing him. I typically like your words- especially in the environmental threads- but I think your approach and your words here were uncool.
again - project all you want ... it doesn't bother me ... it serves no purpose here ...
i speak the truth as i see it ... if you don't like those words - i'm sorry but there is nothing i can do about that ... just look at your rationale here ... i don't support violence and now i'm an advocate for rapists? ... i don't like the idea of vigilante justice and i tremble under blankets? ... maybe you should look at your own words and recognize why i don't want someone like yourself to dictate the justice system ... where is your rationality? ... you don't like what i say and so you project falsehoods to achieve nothing ...
Said with a slightly obnoxious air of self-righteousness.
Chadwick might go over the top in graphically expressing his outrage for the most despicable crimes we could ever have the misfortune of hearing about, but it is clear to me that his heart is in the right place: he values the lives that have been taken and understands the pain for those left to feel it.
Go ahead and advocate for child murderers and rapists, but don't look down your nose at people not as eager to forgive these types of people for such hideous and vulgar acts. It's ironic that you are so willing to paint people supporting harder measures of discipline as baboons, yet paint our most obscene criminals as more human.
The guy made an attempt to back off his 'hard line' and you kept him there by dismissing him. I typically like your words- especially in the environmental threads- but I think your approach and your words here were uncool.
again - project all you want ... it doesn't bother me ... it serves no purpose here ...
i speak the truth as i see it ... if you don't like those words - i'm sorry but there is nothing i can do about that ... just look at your rationale here ... i don't support violence and now i'm an advocate for rapists? ... i don't like the idea of vigilante justice and i tremble under blankets? ... maybe you should look at your own words and recognize why i don't want someone like yourself to dictate the justice system ... where is your rationality? ... you don't like what i say and so you project falsehoods to achieve nothing ...
To quote Byrnzie...
"What a load of odd cobblers."
I suggest you stop skimming people's comments in your eagerness to flaunt your position. You have been provided well-structured and reasonable arguments contrasting your position, but unable to be objective... you fail to understand what doesn't fit with your schema.
And then... as the discussion became a little clearer to you (and somewhat badly in my opinion)... do you remember when you spun it to what amounted to character assassinations and twisted it into a philosophical discussion about how people are baboons for feeling that this father was not a criminal and for wanting the death penalty in the death penalty thread?
After stating that this conversation had gotten messy... I tried to get the conversation back on track with the following, but you didn't seem interested (persisting with trying to enlighten- or call down- all us crude folk):
Bottom line:
* I feel this father acted as he was compelled to do and legally entitled to do. It is not against the law to defend your home and your children.
* There can be debate as to whether or not he used excessive force. It appears he did, but given the circumstances... the law (and society) should understand that he was dealing with a situation that was forced upon him- not one he created. As such, I feel we should afford him the benefit of the doubt.
If you have something to say regarding these statements and wish to have a discussion centered on the issue instead of other people's value systems... then respond. If you wish to reply with another demeaning comment such as, "What's the use, Hugh?" then that is your prerogative too.
i've repeated my positions quite enough on this thread ... all i'm doing today is responding to your continued attempts to your barbs ... and to try and highlight how ridiculous your projections are ...
i've repeated my positions quite enough on this thread ... all i'm doing today is responding to your continued attempts to your barbs ... and to try and highlight how ridiculous your projections are ...
He will likely get off and he delivered where the justice system would not ... the pervert will get some taxpayer funded lawyer and likely get a slap on the wrist, in reality the pervert should get some jail time in general population.
The law should be quite clear stay the fuck off people's property or risk a beat down (with a few exceptions of course ie mailman, paper delivery person ... etc) .
I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
He will likely get off and he delivered where the justice system would not ... the pervert will get some taxpayer funded lawyer and likely get a slap on the wrist, in reality the pervert should get some jail time in general population.
The law should be quite clear stay the fuck off people's property or risk a beat down (with a few exceptions of course ie mailman, paper delivery person ... etc) .
shall we do a search for updates on this story? i am interested in what kinda injuries the freak has sustained & of course i am interested in the father's situation w/ the courts
edit.
i've looked & haven't found much of any kind of update
Comments
Said with a slightly obnoxious air of self-righteousness.
Chadwick might go over the top in graphically expressing his outrage for the most despicable crimes we could ever have the misfortune of hearing about, but it is clear to me that his heart is in the right place: he values the lives that have been taken and understands the pain for those left to feel it.
Go ahead and advocate for child murderers and rapists, but don't look down your nose at people not as eager to forgive these types of people for such hideous and vulgar acts. It's ironic that you are so willing to paint people supporting harder measures of discipline as baboons, yet paint our most obscene criminals as more human.
The guy made an attempt to back off his 'hard line' and you kept him there by dismissing him. I typically like your words- especially in the environmental threads- but I think your approach and your words here were uncool.
thing is i write everyday. it may be terrible, it may be a few lines, it may be awesome, it may be 5 pages long, it may be shit, but i write everyday. i like creating a scene, i like stirring emotions in people & myself & when it is graphic it is not always fiction but rather what we are truly living amongst.
poetry, poetry, poetry, that is what i love, that & writing about disgusting monsters who deserve to wear a bullet.
my girl friend has demanded i write on her nake body, & so i do. it is then & only then that my bloody axe is laid down... still within sight though as you can imagine
i truly never made up the rules. vile men made up the rules once they turned evil. the rules state they deserve unpleasantness. case closed. one more quick fact... it is to bad it isn't 1400 years ago. back then i really could have been killing nasty bastards for entertainment purposes
enjoy your day,
me
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
you say you aren't a violent person, then you say something like this. as polaris said, that just doesn't reconcile.
Fargo 2003
Winnipeg 2005
Winnipeg 2011
St. Paul 2014
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
again - project all you want ... it doesn't bother me ... it serves no purpose here ...
i speak the truth as i see it ... if you don't like those words - i'm sorry but there is nothing i can do about that ... just look at your rationale here ... i don't support violence and now i'm an advocate for rapists? ... i don't like the idea of vigilante justice and i tremble under blankets? ... maybe you should look at your own words and recognize why i don't want someone like yourself to dictate the justice system ... where is your rationality? ... you don't like what i say and so you project falsehoods to achieve nothing ...
To quote Byrnzie...
"What a load of odd cobblers."
I suggest you stop skimming people's comments in your eagerness to flaunt your position. You have been provided well-structured and reasonable arguments contrasting your position, but unable to be objective... you fail to understand what doesn't fit with your schema.
And then... as the discussion became a little clearer to you (and somewhat badly in my opinion)... do you remember when you spun it to what amounted to character assassinations and twisted it into a philosophical discussion about how people are baboons for feeling that this father was not a criminal and for wanting the death penalty in the death penalty thread?
After stating that this conversation had gotten messy... I tried to get the conversation back on track with the following, but you didn't seem interested (persisting with trying to enlighten- or call down- all us crude folk):
Bottom line:
* I feel this father acted as he was compelled to do and legally entitled to do. It is not against the law to defend your home and your children.
* There can be debate as to whether or not he used excessive force. It appears he did, but given the circumstances... the law (and society) should understand that he was dealing with a situation that was forced upon him- not one he created. As such, I feel we should afford him the benefit of the doubt.
If you have something to say regarding these statements and wish to have a discussion centered on the issue instead of other people's value systems... then respond. If you wish to reply with another demeaning comment such as, "What's the use, Hugh?" then that is your prerogative too.
character assassinations!
keep going ...
i've repeated my positions quite enough on this thread ... all i'm doing today is responding to your continued attempts to your barbs ... and to try and highlight how ridiculous your projections are ...
Well then I guess we are done, here.
Have a nice day.
The law should be quite clear stay the fuck off people's property or risk a beat down (with a few exceptions of course ie mailman, paper delivery person ... etc)
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
you as well, thirty bills unpaid
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
edit.
i've looked & haven't found much of any kind of update
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce