______ is on my turntable right now.

1154155157159160390

Comments

  • DBT - The Unraveling 
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,627
    ikiT said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Breaking in a new stylus in Mick's honor


    hows the sound on that print? 1989? zoom that copyright got a little fuzzy
    No,  it's a 2015 Analog Productions. It's amazing. 

    https://www.discogs.com/The-Dave-Brubeck-Quartet-Time-Out/release/7632519
    so is the original. ;)
    I bet.  I'd like to find an original Brubeck plays Brubeck
    ok. so research shows mine is a 1962 reissue not og as I guessed......

    and halt. So, the vinyl label itself shows as 59 with a 62 cover? wtf?

    that discogs site is MAD confusing
    Yeah especially when you're into old records that were popular.   You have to start reading the run out grooves or even scratch on the wax for an initial. 
    Buy a copy of a Beatles record or Exile on main street.  Brutal. 
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,478
    edited February 2020
    ikiT said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Breaking in a new stylus in Mick's honor


    hows the sound on that print? 1989? zoom that copyright got a little fuzzy
    No,  it's a 2015 Analog Productions. It's amazing. 

    https://www.discogs.com/The-Dave-Brubeck-Quartet-Time-Out/release/7632519
    so is the original. ;)
    I bet.  I'd like to find an original Brubeck plays Brubeck
    ok. so research shows mine is a 1962 reissue not og as I guessed......

    and halt. So, the vinyl label itself shows as 59 with a 62 cover? wtf?

    that discogs site is MAD confusing
    am kinda figuring it out. .
    further research is showing my configuration is a 61-262 cover with a "6 eye" center  label mono version. making it a 61 reissue.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,627
    mickeyrat said:
    ikiT said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Breaking in a new stylus in Mick's honor


    hows the sound on that print? 1989? zoom that copyright got a little fuzzy
    No,  it's a 2015 Analog Productions. It's amazing. 

    https://www.discogs.com/The-Dave-Brubeck-Quartet-Time-Out/release/7632519
    so is the original. ;)
    I bet.  I'd like to find an original Brubeck plays Brubeck
    ok. so research shows mine is a 1962 reissue not og as I guessed......

    and halt. So, the vinyl label itself shows as 59 with a 62 cover? wtf?

    that discogs site is MAD confusing
    am kinda figuring it out. .
    further research is showing my configuration is a 61-262 cover with a "6 eye" center  label mono version. making it a 61 reissue.
    You're officially in the rabbit hole when start typing shit like that. 
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,478
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    ikiT said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Breaking in a new stylus in Mick's honor


    hows the sound on that print? 1989? zoom that copyright got a little fuzzy
    No,  it's a 2015 Analog Productions. It's amazing. 

    https://www.discogs.com/The-Dave-Brubeck-Quartet-Time-Out/release/7632519
    so is the original. ;)
    I bet.  I'd like to find an original Brubeck plays Brubeck
    ok. so research shows mine is a 1962 reissue not og as I guessed......

    and halt. So, the vinyl label itself shows as 59 with a 62 cover? wtf?

    that discogs site is MAD confusing
    am kinda figuring it out. .
    further research is showing my configuration is a 61-262 cover with a "6 eye" center  label mono version. making it a 61 reissue.
    You're officially in the rabbit hole when start typing shit like that. 
    is it comfy down here? 70s shag carpet on the walls.....
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,627
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    ikiT said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Breaking in a new stylus in Mick's honor


    hows the sound on that print? 1989? zoom that copyright got a little fuzzy
    No,  it's a 2015 Analog Productions. It's amazing. 

    https://www.discogs.com/The-Dave-Brubeck-Quartet-Time-Out/release/7632519
    so is the original. ;)
    I bet.  I'd like to find an original Brubeck plays Brubeck
    ok. so research shows mine is a 1962 reissue not og as I guessed......

    and halt. So, the vinyl label itself shows as 59 with a 62 cover? wtf?

    that discogs site is MAD confusing
    am kinda figuring it out. .
    further research is showing my configuration is a 61-262 cover with a "6 eye" center  label mono version. making it a 61 reissue.
    You're officially in the rabbit hole when start typing shit like that. 
    is it comfy down here? 70s shag carpet on the walls.....
    If you're a meticulous person,  then this hobby is right up your alley. 
  • mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    ikiT said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Breaking in a new stylus in Mick's honor


    hows the sound on that print? 1989? zoom that copyright got a little fuzzy
    No,  it's a 2015 Analog Productions. It's amazing. 

    https://www.discogs.com/The-Dave-Brubeck-Quartet-Time-Out/release/7632519
    so is the original. ;)
    I bet.  I'd like to find an original Brubeck plays Brubeck
    ok. so research shows mine is a 1962 reissue not og as I guessed......

    and halt. So, the vinyl label itself shows as 59 with a 62 cover? wtf?

    that discogs site is MAD confusing
    am kinda figuring it out. .
    further research is showing my configuration is a 61-262 cover with a "6 eye" center  label mono version. making it a 61 reissue.
    You're officially in the rabbit hole when start typing shit like that. 
    is it comfy down here? 70s shag carpet on the walls.....
    If you're a meticulous person,  then this hobby is right up your alley. 
    I think I might start doing more of this than prospecting baseball players...
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,478
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    ikiT said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Breaking in a new stylus in Mick's honor


    hows the sound on that print? 1989? zoom that copyright got a little fuzzy
    No,  it's a 2015 Analog Productions. It's amazing. 

    https://www.discogs.com/The-Dave-Brubeck-Quartet-Time-Out/release/7632519
    so is the original. ;)
    I bet.  I'd like to find an original Brubeck plays Brubeck
    ok. so research shows mine is a 1962 reissue not og as I guessed......

    and halt. So, the vinyl label itself shows as 59 with a 62 cover? wtf?

    that discogs site is MAD confusing
    am kinda figuring it out. .
    further research is showing my configuration is a 61-262 cover with a "6 eye" center  label mono version. making it a 61 reissue.
    You're officially in the rabbit hole when start typing shit like that. 
    is it comfy down here? 70s shag carpet on the walls.....
    If you're a meticulous person,  then this hobby is right up your alley. 
    I think I might start doing more of this than prospecting baseball players...
    on the hunt for used?
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • ikiTikiT Posts: 11,055
    edited February 2020
    mickeyrat said:
    ikiT said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Breaking in a new stylus in Mick's honor


    hows the sound on that print? 1989? zoom that copyright got a little fuzzy
    No,  it's a 2015 Analog Productions. It's amazing. 

    https://www.discogs.com/The-Dave-Brubeck-Quartet-Time-Out/release/7632519
    so is the original. ;)
    I bet.  I'd like to find an original Brubeck plays Brubeck
    ok. so research shows mine is a 1962 reissue not og as I guessed......

    and halt. So, the vinyl label itself shows as 59 with a 62 cover? wtf?

    that discogs site is MAD confusing
    am kinda figuring it out. .
    further research is showing my configuration is a 61-262 cover with a "6 eye" center  label mono version. making it a 61 reissue.
    I think that's what my version is...it says CBS on the label.
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    ikiT said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Breaking in a new stylus in Mick's honor


    hows the sound on that print? 1989? zoom that copyright got a little fuzzy
    No,  it's a 2015 Analog Productions. It's amazing. 

    https://www.discogs.com/The-Dave-Brubeck-Quartet-Time-Out/release/7632519
    so is the original. ;)
    I bet.  I'd like to find an original Brubeck plays Brubeck
    ok. so research shows mine is a 1962 reissue not og as I guessed......

    and halt. So, the vinyl label itself shows as 59 with a 62 cover? wtf?

    that discogs site is MAD confusing
    am kinda figuring it out. .
    further research is showing my configuration is a 61-262 cover with a "6 eye" center  label mono version. making it a 61 reissue.
    You're officially in the rabbit hole when start typing shit like that. 
    is it comfy down here? 70s shag carpet on the walls.....
    If you're a meticulous person,  then this hobby is right up your alley. 
    I think I might start doing more of this than prospecting baseball players...
    on the hunt for used?
    Yes.  Just start doing the flea markets and record shops.
  • The National- Alligator

    Forget how great this album is sometimes.  What a masterpiece.  
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,478
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Black Pumas 
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,627
    mickeyrat said:
    Wow.. that sucks.  DMM is good,  for the handful I have,  but still. 
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,478
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    Wow.. that sucks.  DMM is good,  for the handful I have,  but still. 
    given vinyl resurgance, would expect it gets rebuilt, no?
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,627
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    Wow.. that sucks.  DMM is good,  for the handful I have,  but still. 
    given vinyl resurgance, would expect it gets rebuilt, no?
    Definitely,  but does that mean no new cuts coming from Cohearent until then? Does mean new albums won't be in true analog? Or due to low supply,  vinyl goes up by 20% for a few years?
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,478
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    Wow.. that sucks.  DMM is good,  for the handful I have,  but still. 
    given vinyl resurgance, would expect it gets rebuilt, no?
    Definitely,  but does that mean no new cuts coming from Cohearent until then? Does mean new albums won't be in true analog? Or due to low supply,  vinyl goes up by 20% for a few years?
    could be, guess it depends on production capacity of the the Japanese......
    So DMM doesnt provide for true analog?


    Glad PJ is releasing when they are. Guess that means we wait longer for those 10c singles we have yet to receive .
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,627
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    Wow.. that sucks.  DMM is good,  for the handful I have,  but still. 
    given vinyl resurgance, would expect it gets rebuilt, no?
    Definitely,  but does that mean no new cuts coming from Cohearent until then? Does mean new albums won't be in true analog? Or due to low supply,  vinyl goes up by 20% for a few years?
    could be, guess it depends on production capacity of the the Japanese......
    So DMM doesnt provide for true analog?


    Glad PJ is releasing when they are. Guess that means we wait longer for those 10c singles we have yet to receive .
    Someone hear might be able to describe it better,  but DMM is true analog but evidently it favors higher frequencies.  Abbey Road Studios uses it often and it's very clean.  
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,478
    edited February 2020
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    ikiT said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Breaking in a new stylus in Mick's honor


    hows the sound on that print? 1989? zoom that copyright got a little fuzzy
    No,  it's a 2015 Analog Productions. It's amazing. 

    https://www.discogs.com/The-Dave-Brubeck-Quartet-Time-Out/release/7632519
    so is the original. ;)
    I bet.  I'd like to find an original Brubeck plays Brubeck
    ok. so research shows mine is a 1962 reissue not og as I guessed......

    and halt. So, the vinyl label itself shows as 59 with a 62 cover? wtf?

    that discogs site is MAD confusing
    am kinda figuring it out. .
    further research is showing my configuration is a 61-262 cover with a "6 eye" center  label mono version. making it a 61 reissue.
    You're officially in the rabbit hole when start typing shit like that. 
    is it comfy down here? 70s shag carpet on the walls.....
    If you're a meticulous person,  then this hobby is right up your alley. 
    I think I might start doing more of this than prospecting baseball players...
    on the hunt for used?
    Yes.  Just start doing the flea markets and record shops.
    if you haven't already , look into joining      www.discogs.com   good resource for title specific hunts....
    Post edited by mickeyrat on
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,478

    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,478
    Side 4 of the Jar of Flies/ SAP repress done by MOV.

    Uncut and laser etched? Simply badass. If I didnt like the music on Side 3 so much this would likely get mounted......


    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,627
    The MOV of that is outstanding.  I love it.   
  • deadendpdeadendp Posts: 10,434

    2014: Cincinnati
    2016: Lexington and Wrigley 1
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,478
    mrussel1 said:
    The MOV of that is outstanding.  I love it.   
    first spin if that title today. JoF later after a mich needed nap.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • dankinddankind Posts: 20,839

    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • dankinddankind Posts: 20,839
    On daughter’s TT:


    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • dankinddankind Posts: 20,839

    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • dankinddankind Posts: 20,839

    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • dankinddankind Posts: 20,839

    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • dankinddankind Posts: 20,839

    I SAW PEARL JAM
Sign In or Register to comment.