Fox News

13567

Comments

  • I used to follow Fox News religiously ... Thank god I woke up to the bullshit. The media as a whole tells you what to think and feel... I say no more. Gave up news a few months ago
  • Abuskedti
    Abuskedti Posts: 1,917
    Today

    1. Fight to finish, Obama moves to shame congress on gun control

    2. U.S. sends not so stealth message to North Korea

    the funny thing about this.. They like being the tough guy and threatening North Korea so that credit that to The U.S. They couldn't say President Obama sends not so stealth message, because it is good message.
  • chadwick
    chadwick up my ass Posts: 21,157
    fox news sucks big huge ones.

    over the years though they've had some pretty decent broads give us bullshit news stories all distorted and shit. nonetheless they were hot in skirts & had big boobs & long fine ass legs
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."

    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
  • Abuskedti
    Abuskedti Posts: 1,917
    No mention of the President or the Commander in Chief - in the entire article

    Headline reads

    Navy moves ship off coast of Korean Penninsula, White house looks to reassure allies

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04 ... -n-korean/
  • peacefrompaul
    peacefrompaul Posts: 25,293
    Just as shitty as MSNBC but more entertaining
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,604
    OnTheEdge wrote:

    It really is 'nuff said. As soon as you see it comes from the Blaze you know there is no need to click on it.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • peacefrompaul
    peacefrompaul Posts: 25,293
    JimmyV wrote:
    OnTheEdge wrote:

    It really is 'nuff said. As soon as you see it comes from the Blaze you know there is no need to click on it.

    Eeek.

    True
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    edited April 2013
    JimmyV wrote:
    OnTheEdge wrote:

    It really is 'nuff said. As soon as you see it comes from the Blaze you know there is no need to click on it.


    But if the Blaze is so biased wouldn't they have made fox look better then CNN? Or let me guess...you saw the blaze and never took the time to read it. Right?
    Post edited by OnTheEdge on
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,327
    every once in a while a see The Five when stopping by the parents place. there is one guy that is pretty freaking funny. overall, it's tons better then having to suffer through glen beck.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,604
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    JimmyV wrote:
    OnTheEdge wrote:

    It really is 'nuff said. As soon as you see it comes from the Blaze you know there is no need to click on it.


    But if the Blaze is so biased wouldn't they have made fox look better then CNN? Or let me guess...you saw the blaze and never took the time to read it. Right?

    That was my point. If it comes from the Blaze it is not worth reading. Post a link to a legitimate news sourse (hint: Brietbart and WND do not qualify) and I will gladly give it a read.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    pathetic. I could post a link from anywhere. If you don't agree with it, you blame the source. Liberals are so predictable. They do a study and then explain how they did that study. Take it or leave it. dont care either way.

    If I found one from huffington post would that help? :lol:
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,604
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    pathetic. I could post a link from anywhere. If you don't agree with it, you blame the source. Liberals are so predictable. They do a study and then explain how they did that study. Take it or leave it. dont care either way.

    Not everyone who disagrees with you is a liberal. Just a thought.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    JimmyV wrote:
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    pathetic. I could post a link from anywhere. If you don't agree with it, you blame the source. Liberals are so predictable. They do a study and then explain how they did that study. Take it or leave it. dont care either way.

    Not everyone who disagrees with you is a liberal. Just a thought.

    Maybe not. But you are.
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,604
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    JimmyV wrote:
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    pathetic. I could post a link from anywhere. If you don't agree with it, you blame the source. Liberals are so predictable. They do a study and then explain how they did that study. Take it or leave it. dont care either way.

    Not everyone who disagrees with you is a liberal. Just a thought.

    Maybe not. But you are.

    :lol:

    No, I am really not.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    OK. Whatever. I'll take your word on that. Even though you're from Boston. But you still didn't answer my question. If The Blaze is so biased, why did they make CNN look better then Fox?
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,604
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    OK. Whatever. I'll take your word on that. Even though you're from Boston. But you still didn't answer my question. If The Blaze is so biased, why did they make CNN look better then Fox?

    Even though I'm from Boston? My god man.

    I would not presume to know why the Blaze does anything, let alone why it published this particular article.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    JimmyV wrote:
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    OK. Whatever. I'll take your word on that. Even though you're from Boston. But you still didn't answer my question. If The Blaze is so biased, why did they make CNN look better then Fox?

    Even though I'm from Boston? My god man.

    I would not presume to know why the Blaze does anything, let alone why it published this particular article.

    Lol. Mass is one of the most liberal states in the country.

    They published this particular article because it was a good honest study between CNN FOX and MSNBC. But everyone on here talks trash about fox and turns a blind eye to msnbc (ok, maybe they give the little "msnbc is bad but not as bad as fox"). Then someone does an honest study showing how absolutely fucking ridiculous msnbc is so they go to trashing the source of the aricle. You can call yourself not a liberal for whatever reason. But if walks like a duck and talks like a duck....

    Never mind, like leading a blind squirell to a nut.
  • peacefrompaul
    peacefrompaul Posts: 25,293
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    JimmyV wrote:
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    OK. Whatever. I'll take your word on that. Even though you're from Boston. But you still didn't answer my question. If The Blaze is so biased, why did they make CNN look better then Fox?

    Even though I'm from Boston? My god man.

    I would not presume to know why the Blaze does anything, let alone why it published this particular article.

    Lol. Mass is one of the most liberal states in the country.

    Implying all citizens of Massachusetts/Boston are liberal
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    No. I just figured my chances in getting that one right were pretty good. :)