Yes the sides reds vs blues it smacks you upside the head, so obvious. And yes opinions about
what's in the news. A lot like here. But when you know that's what it is it's entertaining.
I enjoy listening to what others think even if I don't agree. Like Fox news.
Yes the sides reds vs blues it smacks you upside the head, so obvious. And yes opinions about
what's in the news. A lot like here. But when you know that's what it is it's entertaining.
I enjoy listening to what others think even if I don't agree. Like Fox news.
I do enjoy hearing what they think.. I would enjoy it more if that is what they talked about. But it is frustrating, leading me to change the channel when they frame their opinions or support their opinions on a foundation of deliberately faulty logic. If they have to do that, then it seems to follow that they do not really believe what they are saying, but they just want you to believe it.
Yes the sides reds vs blues it smacks you upside the head, so obvious. And yes opinions about
what's in the news. A lot like here. But when you know that's what it is it's entertaining.
I enjoy listening to what others think even if I don't agree. Like Fox news.
I do enjoy hearing what they think.. I would enjoy it more if that is what they talked about. But it is frustrating, leading me to change the channel when they frame their opinions or support their opinions on a foundation of deliberately faulty logic. If they have to do that, then it seems to follow that they do not really believe what they are saying, but they just want you to believe it.
yea for me, I change the channel as well if the right goes too far right
that's usually the way I look at it.
I happened to catch the first 10 minutes or so of O'Reilly last night
and I guess he has been getting very excited as of late.
A fellow on was brave enough to mention he enjoyed his passion
and his opinion but not when he uses name calling etc. That would be how I feel about it too.
I don't have to agree to like somebody. I might just like their passion
but it must be respectful passion. I stop listening when others start hurting.
Canada doesn't censor news stations but they DO insist that if you're going to present yourself as "news" that you are, in fact, reporting news and not intentionally lying to further your own political agenda.
They also say that you can't say "Fuck" and call yourselves a "family show for the kids."
It's called "standards in broadcasting" and while Americans for some reason fight for their right to be mislead and lied to, Canadians value honesty in their news.
Canada doesn't censor news stations but they DO insist that if you're going to present yourself as "news" that you are, in fact, reporting news and not intentionally lying to further your own political agenda.
They also say that you can't say "Fuck" and call yourselves a "family show for the kids."
It's called "standards in broadcasting" and while Americans for some reason fight for their right to be mislead and lied to, Canadians value honesty in their news.
Fancy that.
and bygolly so do i
im a god damn american
i demand honest news
canada, teach our news agencies how to be honest news frickin gosh darn channels
fire & later execute everyone currently employeed at fox news company. rehire canadian models. they tell the truth every single fucking time & they be nice & stuff
"15 of 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudis, and DHS is allowing Saudi Arabia to ID...
"TRUSTED TRAVELERS"
Fox News still proudly parades its belief that if you identify a few bad guys, their entire country is guilty. That is except of course our country and the other mostly white countries.
"15 of 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudis, and DHS is allowing Saudi Arabia to ID...
"TRUSTED TRAVELERS"
Fox News still proudly parades its belief that if you identify a few bad guys, their entire country is guilty. That is except of course our country and the other mostly white countries.
initially of course they extended this guilt to Iraq.
I used to follow Fox News religiously ... Thank god I woke up to the bullshit. The media as a whole tells you what to think and feel... I say no more. Gave up news a few months ago
1. Fight to finish, Obama moves to shame congress on gun control
2. U.S. sends not so stealth message to North Korea
the funny thing about this.. They like being the tough guy and threatening North Korea so that credit that to The U.S. They couldn't say President Obama sends not so stealth message, because it is good message.
over the years though they've had some pretty decent broads give us bullshit news stories all distorted and shit. nonetheless they were hot in skirts & had big boobs & long fine ass legs
It really is 'nuff said. As soon as you see it comes from the Blaze you know there is no need to click on it.
But if the Blaze is so biased wouldn't they have made fox look better then CNN? Or let me guess...you saw the blaze and never took the time to read it. Right?
every once in a while a see The Five when stopping by the parents place. there is one guy that is pretty freaking funny. overall, it's tons better then having to suffer through glen beck.
It really is 'nuff said. As soon as you see it comes from the Blaze you know there is no need to click on it.
But if the Blaze is so biased wouldn't they have made fox look better then CNN? Or let me guess...you saw the blaze and never took the time to read it. Right?
That was my point. If it comes from the Blaze it is not worth reading. Post a link to a legitimate news sourse (hint: Brietbart and WND do not qualify) and I will gladly give it a read.
pathetic. I could post a link from anywhere. If you don't agree with it, you blame the source. Liberals are so predictable. They do a study and then explain how they did that study. Take it or leave it. dont care either way.
If I found one from huffington post would that help?
pathetic. I could post a link from anywhere. If you don't agree with it, you blame the source. Liberals are so predictable. They do a study and then explain how they did that study. Take it or leave it. dont care either way.
Not everyone who disagrees with you is a liberal. Just a thought.
pathetic. I could post a link from anywhere. If you don't agree with it, you blame the source. Liberals are so predictable. They do a study and then explain how they did that study. Take it or leave it. dont care either way.
Not everyone who disagrees with you is a liberal. Just a thought.
pathetic. I could post a link from anywhere. If you don't agree with it, you blame the source. Liberals are so predictable. They do a study and then explain how they did that study. Take it or leave it. dont care either way.
Not everyone who disagrees with you is a liberal. Just a thought.
OK. Whatever. I'll take your word on that. Even though you're from Boston. But you still didn't answer my question. If The Blaze is so biased, why did they make CNN look better then Fox?
OK. Whatever. I'll take your word on that. Even though you're from Boston. But you still didn't answer my question. If The Blaze is so biased, why did they make CNN look better then Fox?
Even though I'm from Boston? My god man.
I would not presume to know why the Blaze does anything, let alone why it published this particular article.
OK. Whatever. I'll take your word on that. Even though you're from Boston. But you still didn't answer my question. If The Blaze is so biased, why did they make CNN look better then Fox?
Even though I'm from Boston? My god man.
I would not presume to know why the Blaze does anything, let alone why it published this particular article.
Lol. Mass is one of the most liberal states in the country.
They published this particular article because it was a good honest study between CNN FOX and MSNBC. But everyone on here talks trash about fox and turns a blind eye to msnbc (ok, maybe they give the little "msnbc is bad but not as bad as fox"). Then someone does an honest study showing how absolutely fucking ridiculous msnbc is so they go to trashing the source of the aricle. You can call yourself not a liberal for whatever reason. But if walks like a duck and talks like a duck....
Never mind, like leading a blind squirell to a nut.
OK. Whatever. I'll take your word on that. Even though you're from Boston. But you still didn't answer my question. If The Blaze is so biased, why did they make CNN look better then Fox?
Even though I'm from Boston? My god man.
I would not presume to know why the Blaze does anything, let alone why it published this particular article.
Lol. Mass is one of the most liberal states in the country.
Implying all citizens of Massachusetts/Boston are liberal
Comments
what's in the news. A lot like here. But when you know that's what it is it's entertaining.
I enjoy listening to what others think even if I don't agree. Like Fox news.
I do enjoy hearing what they think.. I would enjoy it more if that is what they talked about. But it is frustrating, leading me to change the channel when they frame their opinions or support their opinions on a foundation of deliberately faulty logic. If they have to do that, then it seems to follow that they do not really believe what they are saying, but they just want you to believe it.
that's usually the way I look at it.
I happened to catch the first 10 minutes or so of O'Reilly last night
and I guess he has been getting very excited as of late.
A fellow on was brave enough to mention he enjoyed his passion
and his opinion but not when he uses name calling etc. That would be how I feel about it too.
I don't have to agree to like somebody. I might just like their passion
but it must be respectful passion. I stop listening when others start hurting.
haha
edit: hmm. I guess I didn't make that up
Canada doesn't censor news stations but they DO insist that if you're going to present yourself as "news" that you are, in fact, reporting news and not intentionally lying to further your own political agenda.
They also say that you can't say "Fuck" and call yourselves a "family show for the kids."
It's called "standards in broadcasting" and while Americans for some reason fight for their right to be mislead and lied to, Canadians value honesty in their news.
Fancy that.
im a god damn american
i demand honest news
canada, teach our news agencies how to be honest news frickin gosh darn channels
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
Today a headline: "Sequester hits dead troops and children"
"TRUSTED TRAVELERS"
Fox News still proudly parades its belief that if you identify a few bad guys, their entire country is guilty. That is except of course our country and the other mostly white countries.
initially of course they extended this guilt to Iraq.
1. Fight to finish, Obama moves to shame congress on gun control
2. U.S. sends not so stealth message to North Korea
the funny thing about this.. They like being the tough guy and threatening North Korea so that credit that to The U.S. They couldn't say President Obama sends not so stealth message, because it is good message.
over the years though they've had some pretty decent broads give us bullshit news stories all distorted and shit. nonetheless they were hot in skirts & had big boobs & long fine ass legs
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
Headline reads
Navy moves ship off coast of Korean Penninsula, White house looks to reassure allies
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04 ... -n-korean/
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03 ... han-msnbc/
It really is 'nuff said. As soon as you see it comes from the Blaze you know there is no need to click on it.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Eeek.
True
But if the Blaze is so biased wouldn't they have made fox look better then CNN? Or let me guess...you saw the blaze and never took the time to read it. Right?
That was my point. If it comes from the Blaze it is not worth reading. Post a link to a legitimate news sourse (hint: Brietbart and WND do not qualify) and I will gladly give it a read.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
If I found one from huffington post would that help?
Not everyone who disagrees with you is a liberal. Just a thought.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Maybe not. But you are.
No, I am really not.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Even though I'm from Boston? My god man.
I would not presume to know why the Blaze does anything, let alone why it published this particular article.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Lol. Mass is one of the most liberal states in the country.
They published this particular article because it was a good honest study between CNN FOX and MSNBC. But everyone on here talks trash about fox and turns a blind eye to msnbc (ok, maybe they give the little "msnbc is bad but not as bad as fox"). Then someone does an honest study showing how absolutely fucking ridiculous msnbc is so they go to trashing the source of the aricle. You can call yourself not a liberal for whatever reason. But if walks like a duck and talks like a duck....
Never mind, like leading a blind squirell to a nut.
Implying all citizens of Massachusetts/Boston are liberal