And again, with the silly clips. She clearly wasn't saying he was going to personally pay her bills, she was saying her economic future was better. Wether that's true or not, posting these four year old videos shows you really don't have much.
Should be interesting to see how this all pans out in a couple months...
Lots of folks voted for an "Image" last time around....
"Change" was the big slogan...Right?
Many people havent seen too much change....
Should be an interesting couple of months....
Very interesting, to say the least.
Change? My life hasn't changed much at all, for the better or the worse.
And I guess that can be construed as a good thing.
But I do know that my recently graduated from college daughter applied for 120 jobs
before she was finally able to find something worthwhile.
And that's more than a bit concerning, whomever is in the White House.
It's downright scary. Frightening actually.
Is it unusual for someone straight out of college to have that kind of time find I g a worthwhile job?? I don't think so. I recall that 12 years ago people straight from university had just as much trouble as that, and it wasn't because of the economy. It's because they are all straight out of school and have no real experience, while postsecondary educations are less and less revered by many employers over experience. I'm not saying that the employment situation isn't shitty, but to use a new college graduate having to apply for 120 jobs before getting one (that's a lot of available jibs in her area!) is an appropriate way to judge that situation. Plus, fa tor in the other factors on top of that (ie, new graduates often reach beyond their limits at that time because they overvalue their degree, they are inexperienced in professional interviews, they are going for entry positions that every kid who just graduated with them are going for, etc), and I think it might show that not everything necessarily demonstrates some kind of failure on the part of the Obama administration. Just a reminder to consider all factors before getting freaked about what's going on where you live. You know, balanced perspective.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Bob Newhart to Clint Eastwood: Call me, I can offer comedy tips
By Susan King
August 31, 2012, 5:59 p.m.
"I heard that Clint Eastwood is channeling me at the RNC. My lawyers and I are drafting our lawsuit.” @bobnewhart
During Thursday’s telecast of the Republican National Convention, legendary comedian Bob Newhart, 82, got a call from his daughter Jennifer, who runs his Twitter account, @bobnewhart.
His account was going through the roof during Eastwood’s rambling “stand-up” routine, during in which he pretended to have a conversation with an imaginary President Obama sitting in a chair next to him.
The routine called to mind Newhart’s classic comedy bits where he would pretend to be talking on the phone with someone who was often in a panic, like a young security guard seeking help from his boss when King Kong starts climbing the Empire State building.
“She said [twitter followers] are saying, 'He’s doing you,'” Newhart said by phone Friday afternoon. “We need a quote of some kind.”
Newhart had the RNC on the television waiting to catch Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney make his acceptance speech but wasn’t paying attention to Eastwood’s remarks until his daughter called.
“I just caught the tail end of Clint,” said Newhart, who has met Eastwood and found him to be a “very nice man.”
“I don’t know how long he had been on, but the chair was there,” he said. “I kept watching it and watching it. I want to say to Clint -- it’s not as easy as it looks, is it?”
Newhart quipped that he thought Eastwood’s unique speech, which lighted up social media sites as soon as the Oscar-winning director-actor hit the stage in Tampa, Fla., was “a nice break” from the rest of the proceedings.
“Both of the conventions are like four-day infomercials. The only thing missing is [someone saying] ‘wait, we’ll give you two Romneys for the price of one.'”
The comic is apolitical these days. “I was very political when JFK ran,” the 82-year-old Newhart said. “I campaigned for JFK because he’s Catholic and I’m Catholic and they never said it, but you knew you were going to hell if you didn’t campaign for him.”
But he doesn't feel it is his place to publicly support any candidate. “I just felt people shouldn’t vote because I like somebody. I would hate to influence someone.”
Since his tweet Thursday evening, Newhart said he’s gotten 4,000 new followers and is inching toward 27,000.
“This was a bolt out of the blue,” Newhart said. “It was totally unexpected. It shows you today how this social media is so immediate.”
And he is more than willing to help Eastwood hone his stand-up comedy style. “I would be more than glad to help Clint out,” Newhart said. “I am waiting for a phone call. So far, I haven’t gotten it.”
I'm not saying that the employment situation isn't shitty, but to use a new college graduate having to apply for 120 jobs before getting one (that's a lot of available jibs in her area!) is an appropriate way to judge that situation.
I would think it is a very appropriate way to judge the current state of our economy. Earning a college degree, getting an education, is paramount for the future of this country, at least in my opinion. Or at least it should be. The enthusiasm and optimism that goes along with such an accomplishment is invaluable.
And I'm not judging nor condeming Obama by any means, just stating that there is a lot wrong with a lot of things in this country, and whomever can change that for the better, I'm all for.
And for the record, the teaching job my daughter got was strictly based on experience. 90% of the jobs applied for were not offered to her because she was overqualified. Higher education seems to have taken a backseat to actually finding a somewhat decent job to pay the rent.
I'm not saying that the employment situation isn't shitty, but to use a new college graduate having to apply for 120 jobs before getting one (that's a lot of available jibs in her area!) is an appropriate way to judge that situation.
I would think it is a very appropriate way to judge the current state of our economy. Earning a college degree, getting an education, is paramount for the future of this country, at least in my opinion. Or at least it should be. The enthusiasm and optimism that goes along with such an accomplishment is invaluable.
And I'm not judging nor condeming Obama by any means, just stating that there is a lot wrong with a lot of things in this country, and whomever can change that for the better, I'm all for.
And for the record, the teaching job my daughter got was strictly based on experience. 90% of the jobs applied for were not offered to her because she was overqualified. Higher education seems to have taken a backseat to actually finding a somewhat decent job to pay the rent.
A sad state of affairs.
But that reality for most new graduates hasn't' been true for years and years... it wasn't true during a really strong economy. Because the things driving it aren't necessarily related to the economic situation, but to the business culture and the attitude that experience rules over education (generally of course). Sure, college kids are still wide-eyed optimists when they come out, having spent the last 4 years in a glorious bubble where everyone is congratulating each other for being so fucking educated... but out in the real world, sorry, no one gives a shit. In a highly educated society, a college education loses value. That's actually a result of prosperity, not the other way around. And hey, your daughter and apparently at least 120 others found worthwhile jobs in the end.
As for your daughter's overabundance of teaching experience holding her back... sounds like there is a glut in the education system. That is very widespread. WAY too many people are being trained as teachers. The college PDPs know this full well, but spend their time convincing the students that it's amazing career to per sue anyway because they make money hand over fist through those programs. As someone who works at a university, and as someone whose parents are teachers/principals, I can tell you that your daughter's experiences aren't politically related as much as they are created by the postsecondary mentality. It is less and less influence by what's actually going on in the real world.... which is shitty, but not scary and not political.
Sorry... so far off track the topic! Now I'm derailing! Apologies!
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Sure, college kids are still wide-eyed optimists when they come out, having spent the last 4 years in a glorious bubble where everyone is congratulating each other for being so fucking educated... but out in the real world, sorry, no one gives a shit. In a highly educated society, a college education loses value.
And that is, by far, the most disappointing, disheartening and deflating point of all. Then why concern ourselves with educating the future of our country when apparently it is becoming more and more meaningless? Are our priorities that skewed?
That's the part that I find the most shocking and overwhelmingly disturbing on every level.
But I do know that my recently graduated from college daughter applied for 120 jobs
before she was finally able to find something worthwhile.
And that's more than a bit concerning, whomever is in the White House.
It's downright scary. Frightening actually.
OK... and I know I'm begging for a smack down here but...
See..
NOBODY gets a "worth while job" right out of college. Unless they're football stars, prodigies or geniuses, once you get out of college, back to the bottom of the heap you go... with all the other people who just got out of college and think it means anything.
I graduated top of my own college class at 21 and didn't have an actual "worth while job" for another 10 years. Expecting that college just gives you a ticket to riches and success is falling for the big lie that a college degree means anything. I come from a whole family of classical musicians and university professors who all have more degrees than sense and they're baffled that their degrees don't really open that many doors for them. Doors are opened by hard work, excellent networking skills and the ability to see a need and fill it.
I once had an aunt tell me that she was "so impressed" that I was able to "do all that with only two bachelor's degrees." I felt like a mentally retarded child being praised for drawing a picture of a cat (by "all that," she was responding in shock and surprise that I was the Vice President of the studio I was working for at the time. When I told my parents I was working for an adult movie studio, they thought that meant I was a cashier at a DVD rental store. For some reason people who go to university and never leave that world have a very warped view of the way the real world works).
I don't know what your daughter studied, what her major was, what her marks were like or what jobs she considered "worthwhile."
Nor do I know if she's worth hiring. I've known a lot of very educated, book-smart people who have no interpersonal skills, no cognitive reasoning ability and a sense of entitlement that would send their resumes to the "FUCK NO" pile.
Meghan McCain has a degree from Columbia and she's an idiot. The only reason she has a career is that the ditzy blonde valley girl daughter of John McCain is funny to watch. News shows like to get her on because the clips of her mangling the english language, displaying a complete lack of understanding about the world and saying "like, Oh ma GAWD" go viral and get a lot of views, thus generating a lot of revenue. If her father wasn't her father, she never would have gotten into Columbia and her job qualifications would be saying "would you like fries with that?"
I know I come across as a bleeding heart liberal, usually, but regardless of my advocacy for the poor, my work raising money for a gay homeless youth shelter and my support of GLBT marriage equality, I'm also pretty hard on the younger generation who think that just showing up to class means they should get an A. The generation who think that holding a degree entitles them to a job in their chosen field or that showing up to the race means they should get a gold star even if they're not the winner.
Blaming the president that your daughter can't get a job might be... a bit off target. There may be many reasons she didn't get a great job right away and the job market or who the president is may have nothing to do with it.
Sure, college kids are still wide-eyed optimists when they come out, having spent the last 4 years in a glorious bubble where everyone is congratulating each other for being so fucking educated... but out in the real world, sorry, no one gives a shit. In a highly educated society, a college education loses value.
And that is, by far, the most disappointing, disheartening and deflating point of all. Then why concern ourselves with educating the future of our country when apparently it is becoming more and more meaningless? Are our priorities that skewed?
That's the part that I find the most shocking and overwhelmingly disturbing on every level.
Sorry for derailing.
I totally understand why you feel like that, but when you stop and think about it, it's a positive, not a negative. While it's not romantic, it means that higher education is no longer for the elite (yes, in the US the cost of some universities is prohibitive, but that fact actually hasn't prevented what I'm getting at). Higher education has become ubiquitous enough for people to think of it as nothing special. That does NOT reduce the usefulness of education at all. The education and gaining of knowledge is Still the same as it always was. But the competition among educated people has grown by leaps and bounds because it's such a highly educated society. It's the competition that makes businesses care less about every applicant who is educated, meaning that more people are educated. Businesses have the luxury of picking people who are educated AND experienced. And that is a great thing, really, even if the glorious romance of graduating is minimized and the reality of slogging it until you find a job when you graduate hits you in the face (which leads to some really good life experience btw). For some reason these days kids are so entitled that they expect to carry a lifestyle that is way beyond their realistic abilities after graduation. I bet things would seem a lot more exciting for them if they could embrace the adventure of using milk crates as furniture and eating kraft dinner and shopping at thrift stores and riding an old bike for a few years while they establish themselves in the real world after college. Instead they think they ought to have more immediately, and then are sorely discouraged when they don't. Well, I wanna know where the fuck anyone got the idea it was supposed to be anything other than hard to start out in the working world. Seriously, who came up with that?
Oh, yeah, Clint Eastwood: don't make the running mates uncomfortable at their own convention... did you seriously make a joke about Mitt Romney masturbating? I think ya did!!
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
0
brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,420
This is kind of funny (ha-ha and strange) but it's just an observation so here goes:
When a liberal musician or actor comes out in support of a candidate some of my liberal friends get a little giddy while some of my conservative friend (yeah, I really do have some ) see it as unqualified meddling. When a conservative musician (like, all three of them ) or actor comes out in favor of a candidate my liberal friends just kind of ignore it but my conservative friends see it as the word of God.
I don't know- maybe I just have weird friends.
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
This is kind of funny (ha-ha and strange) but it's just an observation so here goes:
When a liberal musician or actor comes out in support of a candidate some of my liberal friends get a little giddy while some of my conservative friend (yeah, I really do have some ) see it as unqualified meddling. When a conservative musician (like, all three of them ) or actor comes out in favor of a candidate my liberal friends just kind of ignore it but my conservative friends see it as the word of God.
I don't know- maybe I just have weird friends.
My guess for the reason is that the majority of performers tend to be liberal. There are many reasons for this but the end result is that Democrats can pick and choose. They have a huge base to choose from. So they can get a massive star that everyone loves at the top of their game. The Democrats have Mary J Blige at their convention and a bunch more names to play events. They have Barbara Streisand and Oprah. You may not like those women much but I'm willing to bet your mother does.
Republicans don't have those choices. They need to go with blowhard country stars, seldom very big stars, and a lot of cranky, old doddering white men who come out on stage and go on either diatribes about how dumb liberals are or tell off furniture. OR they have formerly-famous blonde women of questionable intelligence. Bo Derek and Victoria Jackson.
When Liberals see a huge star endorsing their candidate, it's... well, it's nice but not a huge event. When Republicans get a big star, they react the same way gay people do when they find out a hot and famous man is gay. They are SO glad that a famous person is on their team.
When Matt Bomber and Anderson Cooper came out it was like Christmas. So I can't judge. I mean, when Ricky Martin came out I was like Meg Ryan in the restaurant scene in "When Harry Met Sally."
When Matt Bomber and Anderson Cooper came out it was like Christmas. So I can't judge. I mean, when Ricky Martin came out I was like Meg Ryan in the restaurant scene in "When Harry Met Sally."
And what's strange about this to me is that way back in the late 60's I saw "Hair" at the Orpheum in San Francisco and one of the male actors was humping a poster of Mick Jagger and when "Boys in the Band" did so well at A.C.T I thought, wow, cool ,now maybe my gay friends won't get so much mistreatment anymore and here we are so many years later and it's still an issue. Sad. Sad and pathetic.
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
As a liberal and someone who reluctantly wants Obama to win this election, I thought Eastwood's speech was pretty entertaining. It was a nice change of the pace from the typical political garbage shoved down our throats. He did not make me think anymore of Romney, and I didn't need him to realize that Obama has not lived up to his promises, but at least the man did something different.
this. I didn't find this awkward at all. He's not a politician. he's not used to speaking to a live crowd. even in his oscar speeches he has stumbled a bit. that's just how he talks.
dismissing him as an embarassment or just some old man is quite disrespectful.
Gimli 1993
Fargo 2003
Winnipeg 2005
Winnipeg 2011
St. Paul 2014
dismissing him as an embarassment or just some old man is quite disrespectful.
Meh. I figure anyone who puts themselves out there in front of millions of people and tells jokes like "Oprah was crying" to riotous applause and then essentially does the Bob Newhart bit has left themselves wide open. And that's just what he did.
But the REAL thing that he did was derail the whole message of the night. While Romney and Rubio were really hoping everyone would be talking about their speeches, the national dialogue has been about what a mess Clint was. And for that, they're all just going to have to soak in it.
The comparison to Britney Spears was a good one. She was a mess, was unprepared and looked like crap. And performed in front of millions of people and that became a bigger story than the performance. Kinda how the entertainment world works.
I thought he was brilliant ...
what really bothered me was how the candidates and their families received it...
thanks but no thanks attitude, just rude...
they best learn when the cameras are on them... smile
maybe they don't get the humor, don't get the man.
I mean he's 82 and stills got it
I'm not going to let 1 speech change my opinion of Clint Eastwood...I don't think he's ever been the greatest public speaker. He tried something different with his speech and many didn't like and it was a failed attempt humour according to many.
And i sure as hell wouldn't care which political party had the most celebrities, hippest celebrities or coolest celebrities because you think people would realize by now these celebrities for the most part are just as greedy as the politicians they support.
I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
Comments
Put them all on stage!!!!!!!
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
And again, with the silly clips. She clearly wasn't saying he was going to personally pay her bills, she was saying her economic future was better. Wether that's true or not, posting these four year old videos shows you really don't have much.
Put em on stage!!
Oh wait...
They are on stage!!!
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
But ok.. Let's talk to some conservatives.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOXZjDIX ... ata_player
Should be interesting to see how this all pans out in a couple months...
Lots of folks voted for an "Image" last time around....
"Change" was the big slogan...Right?
Many people havent seen too much change....
Should be an interesting couple of months....
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
Very interesting, to say the least.
Change? My life hasn't changed much at all, for the better or the worse.
And I guess that can be construed as a good thing.
But I do know that my recently graduated from college daughter applied for 120 jobs
before she was finally able to find something worthwhile.
And that's more than a bit concerning, whomever is in the White House.
It's downright scary. Frightening actually.
I read this last night:
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/mo ... 2214.story
I would think it is a very appropriate way to judge the current state of our economy. Earning a college degree, getting an education, is paramount for the future of this country, at least in my opinion. Or at least it should be. The enthusiasm and optimism that goes along with such an accomplishment is invaluable.
And I'm not judging nor condeming Obama by any means, just stating that there is a lot wrong with a lot of things in this country, and whomever can change that for the better, I'm all for.
And for the record, the teaching job my daughter got was strictly based on experience. 90% of the jobs applied for were not offered to her because she was overqualified. Higher education seems to have taken a backseat to actually finding a somewhat decent job to pay the rent.
A sad state of affairs.
As for your daughter's overabundance of teaching experience holding her back... sounds like there is a glut in the education system. That is very widespread. WAY too many people are being trained as teachers. The college PDPs know this full well, but spend their time convincing the students that it's amazing career to per sue anyway because they make money hand over fist through those programs. As someone who works at a university, and as someone whose parents are teachers/principals, I can tell you that your daughter's experiences aren't politically related as much as they are created by the postsecondary mentality. It is less and less influence by what's actually going on in the real world.... which is shitty, but not scary and not political.
Sorry... so far off track the topic! Now I'm derailing! Apologies!
And that is, by far, the most disappointing, disheartening and deflating point of all. Then why concern ourselves with educating the future of our country when apparently it is becoming more and more meaningless? Are our priorities that skewed?
That's the part that I find the most shocking and overwhelmingly disturbing on every level.
Sorry for derailing.
OK... and I know I'm begging for a smack down here but...
See..
NOBODY gets a "worth while job" right out of college. Unless they're football stars, prodigies or geniuses, once you get out of college, back to the bottom of the heap you go... with all the other people who just got out of college and think it means anything.
I graduated top of my own college class at 21 and didn't have an actual "worth while job" for another 10 years. Expecting that college just gives you a ticket to riches and success is falling for the big lie that a college degree means anything. I come from a whole family of classical musicians and university professors who all have more degrees than sense and they're baffled that their degrees don't really open that many doors for them. Doors are opened by hard work, excellent networking skills and the ability to see a need and fill it.
I once had an aunt tell me that she was "so impressed" that I was able to "do all that with only two bachelor's degrees." I felt like a mentally retarded child being praised for drawing a picture of a cat (by "all that," she was responding in shock and surprise that I was the Vice President of the studio I was working for at the time. When I told my parents I was working for an adult movie studio, they thought that meant I was a cashier at a DVD rental store. For some reason people who go to university and never leave that world have a very warped view of the way the real world works).
I don't know what your daughter studied, what her major was, what her marks were like or what jobs she considered "worthwhile."
Nor do I know if she's worth hiring. I've known a lot of very educated, book-smart people who have no interpersonal skills, no cognitive reasoning ability and a sense of entitlement that would send their resumes to the "FUCK NO" pile.
Meghan McCain has a degree from Columbia and she's an idiot. The only reason she has a career is that the ditzy blonde valley girl daughter of John McCain is funny to watch. News shows like to get her on because the clips of her mangling the english language, displaying a complete lack of understanding about the world and saying "like, Oh ma GAWD" go viral and get a lot of views, thus generating a lot of revenue. If her father wasn't her father, she never would have gotten into Columbia and her job qualifications would be saying "would you like fries with that?"
I know I come across as a bleeding heart liberal, usually, but regardless of my advocacy for the poor, my work raising money for a gay homeless youth shelter and my support of GLBT marriage equality, I'm also pretty hard on the younger generation who think that just showing up to class means they should get an A. The generation who think that holding a degree entitles them to a job in their chosen field or that showing up to the race means they should get a gold star even if they're not the winner.
Blaming the president that your daughter can't get a job might be... a bit off target. There may be many reasons she didn't get a great job right away and the job market or who the president is may have nothing to do with it.
Oh, yeah, Clint Eastwood: don't make the running mates uncomfortable at their own convention... did you seriously make a joke about Mitt Romney masturbating? I think ya did!!
When a liberal musician or actor comes out in support of a candidate some of my liberal friends get a little giddy while some of my conservative friend (yeah, I really do have some
I don't know- maybe I just have weird friends.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
My guess for the reason is that the majority of performers tend to be liberal. There are many reasons for this but the end result is that Democrats can pick and choose. They have a huge base to choose from. So they can get a massive star that everyone loves at the top of their game. The Democrats have Mary J Blige at their convention and a bunch more names to play events. They have Barbara Streisand and Oprah. You may not like those women much but I'm willing to bet your mother does.
Republicans don't have those choices. They need to go with blowhard country stars, seldom very big stars, and a lot of cranky, old doddering white men who come out on stage and go on either diatribes about how dumb liberals are or tell off furniture. OR they have formerly-famous blonde women of questionable intelligence. Bo Derek and Victoria Jackson.
When Liberals see a huge star endorsing their candidate, it's... well, it's nice but not a huge event. When Republicans get a big star, they react the same way gay people do when they find out a hot and famous man is gay. They are SO glad that a famous person is on their team.
When Matt Bomber and Anderson Cooper came out it was like Christmas. So I can't judge. I mean, when Ricky Martin came out I was like Meg Ryan in the restaurant scene in "When Harry Met Sally."
True. No wonder some of the older country guys like Merle Haggard and Willie Nelson feels out of place in the (new) world of country music.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
And what's strange about this to me is that way back in the late 60's I saw "Hair" at the Orpheum in San Francisco and one of the male actors was humping a poster of Mick Jagger and when "Boys in the Band" did so well at A.C.T I thought, wow, cool ,now maybe my gay friends won't get so much mistreatment anymore and here we are so many years later and it's still an issue. Sad. Sad and pathetic.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
"I need your strength for me to be strong...I need your love to feel loved"
And bad for the meanness toward him.
http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/clin ... oint-view/
this. I didn't find this awkward at all. He's not a politician. he's not used to speaking to a live crowd. even in his oscar speeches he has stumbled a bit. that's just how he talks.
dismissing him as an embarassment or just some old man is quite disrespectful.
Fargo 2003
Winnipeg 2005
Winnipeg 2011
St. Paul 2014
Thank you for yours.
Meh. I figure anyone who puts themselves out there in front of millions of people and tells jokes like "Oprah was crying" to riotous applause and then essentially does the Bob Newhart bit has left themselves wide open. And that's just what he did.
But the REAL thing that he did was derail the whole message of the night. While Romney and Rubio were really hoping everyone would be talking about their speeches, the national dialogue has been about what a mess Clint was. And for that, they're all just going to have to soak in it.
The comparison to Britney Spears was a good one. She was a mess, was unprepared and looked like crap. And performed in front of millions of people and that became a bigger story than the performance. Kinda how the entertainment world works.
<img src="http://i740.photobucket.com/albums/xx46/tremors25/thrillafixterorange.gif" align="left">
<img src="http://i740.photobucket.com/albums/xx46/tremors25/thrillafixterblack.gif" align="left">
<img src="http://i740.photobucket.com/albums/xx46/tremors25/thrillafixterwhite.gif" align="left
<img src="http://i740.photobucket.com/albums/xx46/tremors25/thefixerthrilla1.gif" align="left">
what really bothered me was how the candidates and their families received it...
thanks but no thanks attitude, just rude...
they best learn when the cameras are on them... smile
maybe they don't get the humor, don't get the man.
I mean he's 82 and stills got it
And i sure as hell wouldn't care which political party had the most celebrities, hippest celebrities or coolest celebrities because you think people would realize by now these celebrities for the most part are just as greedy as the politicians they support.
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon