Give A Man A Fish...

ParachuteParachute Posts: 409
edited June 2011 in A Moving Train
I heard a saying the other day:

"Give a man a fish, he can feed himself for a day. Teach a man to fish, he can feed himself for life."

Then I saw this bumper sticker:

"Liberalism: Give a man a fish. Conservatism: Teach a man to fish."


It seems that, while simplified, the metaphor is fairly accurate...

Just wondering what others think of it.... cheers.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    i think it's a standard crap analogy by conservatives ... if conservatism was all about "teaching a man to fish" - maybe they'd be into a social program called education ...
  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    Teach a man to fish, but only after you've taken all of the fish... then charge the man an inflated amount in exchange for releasing a few fish for him to catch.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • ParachuteParachute Posts: 409
    To say that conservatives "aren't into education" is like saying conservatives "want you to die sooner."

    Its just not true.

    So.... I fail to see your point.

    I also fail to see why some people think Unions have to be instrumental in the education process.... in case thats where you were going.
  • ParachuteParachute Posts: 409
    Teach a man to fish, but only after you've taken all of the fish... then charge the man an inflated amount in exchange for releasing a few fish for him to catch.


    What are the "fish" in your metaphor?
  • he still standshe still stands Posts: 2,835
    this is some really useful partisan rhetoric here!

    an easier way to state that analogy; All Liberals want to give lazy people everything they need to do nothing and live care-free life. All Conservatives want to give lazy people nothing and let them all figure it out on their own, which they will surely do.
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • BlockheadBlockhead Posts: 1,538
    Dems - Reward poor and lazy people with handouts. Do not educate people on/practice personal responsibility and give privliages as rights, that most other people work and pay for. They have created a culture of entitlements. This ensures them votes as these people are dependant on the gov. to provide for all their basic needs.

    The poor in the u.s.a. are not poor by any standard. If you are given free food/shelter/cloathing/water/education, etc... you are not poor.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    conservatives are not into social programs such as education ... they believe that the control of education should be determined and controlled by the individual and that items like this and health care should be privatized and determined by the free market ... where its every person for themselves ...

    feel free to correct me ...
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Parachute wrote:
    I heard a saying the other day:

    "Give a man a fish, he can feed himself for a day. Teach a man to fish, he can feed himself for life."

    Then I saw this bumper sticker:

    "Liberalism: Give a man a fish. Conservatism: Teach a man to fish."


    It seems that, while simplified, the metaphor is fairly accurate...

    Just wondering what others think of it.... cheers.
    ...
    That simple saying works... as long as the man doing the teaching is a hunter, not a fisherman... right?
    ...
    So, are conservatives okay with teaching a man to fish... and having him fish in the same waters as himself?
    That expands to... are Conservatives okay with trainning and educating people to take over THEIR jobs? Or do they want to teach poor people to compete for someone else's job.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • BlockheadBlockhead Posts: 1,538
    polaris_x wrote:
    conservatives are not into social programs such as education ... they believe that the control of education should be determined and controlled by the individual and that items like this and health care should be privatized and determined by the free market ... where its every person for themselves ...

    feel free to correct me ...
    And the problem lies where??? There will always be charities...
    Taking away individuality/competition is not a good thing for society...
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    Cosmo wrote:
    Parachute wrote:
    I heard a saying the other day:

    "Give a man a fish, he can feed himself for a day. Teach a man to fish, he can feed himself for life."

    Then I saw this bumper sticker:

    "Liberalism: Give a man a fish. Conservatism: Teach a man to fish."


    It seems that, while simplified, the metaphor is fairly accurate...

    Just wondering what others think of it.... cheers.
    ...
    That simple saying works... as long as the man doing the teaching is a hunter, not a fisherman... right?
    ...
    So, are conservatives okay with teaching a man to fish... and having him fish in the same waters as himself?
    That expands to... are Conservatives okay with trainning and educating people to take over THEIR jobs? Or do they want to teach poor people to compete for someone else's job.


    yes actually they are...as competition is what conservatives should be about. Fake conservatives may not be, but competition in the work place benefits companies as well as consumers
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • Saw this bumper sticker the other day: I think, therefore I am Conservative. Made me want to have a bumper sticker!
    "If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit." - Mitch Hedberg
  • BlockheadBlockhead Posts: 1,538
    Cosmo wrote:
    Parachute wrote:
    I heard a saying the other day:

    "Give a man a fish, he can feed himself for a day. Teach a man to fish, he can feed himself for life."

    Then I saw this bumper sticker:

    "Liberalism: Give a man a fish. Conservatism: Teach a man to fish."


    It seems that, while simplified, the metaphor is fairly accurate...

    Just wondering what others think of it.... cheers.
    ...
    That simple saying works... as long as the man doing the teaching is a hunter, not a fisherman... right?
    ...
    So, are conservatives okay with teaching a man to fish... and having him fish in the same waters as himself?
    That expands to... are Conservatives okay with trainning and educating people to take over THEIR jobs? Or do they want to teach poor people to compete for someone else's job.
    Yes, in the private sector... What kind of work do you do?
    Because in my field (private engineering) it is enforced that people continue to grow, its really the only way to succeed.
    Do you think socialized health care will breed doc/practices to exceed if there is no encentive?
  • markin ballmarkin ball Posts: 1,075
    I'd give the guy some of my fish and teach him, too. We're all in this together.
    "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win ."

    "With our thoughts we make the world"
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Blockhead wrote:
    polaris_x wrote:
    conservatives are not into social programs such as education ... they believe that the control of education should be determined and controlled by the individual and that items like this and health care should be privatized and determined by the free market ... where its every person for themselves ...

    feel free to correct me ...
    And the problem lies where??? There will always be charities...
    Taking away individuality/competition is not a good thing for society...

    first of all ... thanks for corroborating my point ... secondly, it's only a problem if your end goal is an educated society ... the US is essentially a conservative nation ... and all one has to do is see where it stands in the OECD PISA survey to see how well educated americans are ...
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,157
    polaris_x wrote:
    conservatives are not into social programs such as education ... they believe that the control of education should be determined and controlled by the individual and that items like this and health care should be privatized and determined by the free market ... where its every person for themselves ...

    feel free to correct me ...
    I have over 1,400 reasons each April why it would be awesome if they privatized education!! (and that's only my State giving me those reasons ... I'd have to calculate how many reasons the Feds give me). However, they keep giving me another 1,400+ reasons each year ... one of the reasons why I don't subscribe to the pity-party on education.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    mikepegg44 wrote:
    Cosmo wrote:
    Parachute wrote:
    I heard a saying the other day:
    "Give a man a fish, he can feed himself for a day. Teach a man to fish, he can feed himself for life."
    Then I saw this bumper sticker:
    "Liberalism: Give a man a fish. Conservatism: Teach a man to fish."
    It seems that, while simplified, the metaphor is fairly accurate...
    Just wondering what others think of it.... cheers.
    ...
    That simple saying works... as long as the man doing the teaching is a hunter, not a fisherman... right?
    ...
    So, are conservatives okay with teaching a man to fish... and having him fish in the same waters as himself?
    That expands to... are Conservatives okay with trainning and educating people to take over THEIR jobs? Or do they want to teach poor people to compete for someone else's job.
    yes actually they are...as competition is what conservatives should be about. Fake conservatives may not be, but competition in the work place benefits companies as well as consumers
    ...
    But in the real world, specifically, the U.S, for the better part, most people.... competition for their jobs... are okay with it as long as it's someone else's job. I don't think there are many people willing to train someone younger to take over their job... just as I don't think the fisherman will teach someone to fish, if it takes fish off his own table.
    The only exception i can see are people who are poised to retire within the next few years.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • VINNY GOOMBAVINNY GOOMBA Posts: 1,818
    I'd give the guy some of my fish and teach him, too. We're all in this together.

    ^ Damn straight.
  • BlockheadBlockhead Posts: 1,538
    polaris_x wrote:
    Blockhead wrote:
    polaris_x wrote:
    conservatives are not into social programs such as education ... they believe that the control of education should be determined and controlled by the individual and that items like this and health care should be privatized and determined by the free market ... where its every person for themselves ...

    feel free to correct me ...
    And the problem lies where??? There will always be charities...
    Taking away individuality/competition is not a good thing for society...

    first of all ... thanks for corroborating my point ... secondly, it's only a problem if your end goal is an educated society ... the US is essentially a conservative nation ... and all one has to do is see where it stands in the OECD PISA survey to see how well educated americans are ...
    We can thank our (socialized) public schooling for that...
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    I'd give the guy some of my fish and teach him, too. We're all in this together.
    ...
    That's a tough call.
    Would you split a shift with someone so they won't be laid off? That is, would you cut your hours/pay in half for this guy?
    It's not easy.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Blockhead wrote:
    We can thank our (socialized) public schooling for that...

    hahaha ... america and socialized is like saying alaska and tropical ...
  • BlockheadBlockhead Posts: 1,538
    polaris_x wrote:
    Blockhead wrote:
    We can thank our (socialized) public schooling for that...

    hahaha ... america and socialized is like saying alaska and tropical ...
    good... I would hate to have to wait 10 weeks to get something as simple as a MRI. (median wait time in canada)
  • ParachuteParachute Posts: 409
    I'd give the guy some of my fish and teach him, too. We're all in this together.

    ^ Damn straight.

    A lot of good points in here... I like this one especially.

    I'd be happy to share my fish while the person learns to fish for himself, as long as they are learning...
    At some point, people have to become responsible for themselves.
  • BlockheadBlockhead Posts: 1,538
    Parachute wrote:
    I'd give the guy some of my fish and teach him, too. We're all in this together.

    ^ Damn straight.

    A lot of good points in here... I like this one especially.

    I'd be happy to share my fish while the person learns to fish for himself, as long as they are learning...
    At some point, people have to become responsible for themselves.
    There is a difference between sharing and being Forced to share. Especially if that fish is feeding your family...
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    Cosmo wrote:
    mikepegg44 wrote:
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    That simple saying works... as long as the man doing the teaching is a hunter, not a fisherman... right?
    ...
    So, are conservatives okay with teaching a man to fish... and having him fish in the same waters as himself?
    That expands to... are Conservatives okay with trainning and educating people to take over THEIR jobs? Or do they want to teach poor people to compete for someone else's job.
    yes actually they are...as competition is what conservatives should be about. Fake conservatives may not be, but competition in the work place benefits companies as well as consumers
    ...
    But in the real world, specifically, the U.S, for the better part, most people.... competition for their jobs... are okay with it as long as it's someone else's job. I don't think there are many people willing to train someone younger to take over their job... just as I don't think the fisherman will teach someone to fish, if it takes fish off his own table.
    The only exception i can see are people who are poised to retire within the next few years.


    people do it everyday...people teach and train others every day...how can people become plumbers, electricians, engineers, psychologists...people are taught daily how to do a job...but some just don't want to participate in the learning and expect things to be okay for them...when they are not it is someone else's fault...some phantom "cause" that is deliberately keeping them down...when education and training is the key...and often times education in the private sector is actually much better than you get a state run institutions...universities are a great example of that...state run facilities are ok, but private schools are where the best education comes from...
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • ParachuteParachute Posts: 409
    polaris_x wrote:
    conservatives are not into social programs such as education ... they believe that the control of education should be determined and controlled by the individual and that items like this and health care should be privatized and determined by the free market ... where its every person for themselves ...

    feel free to correct me ...

    Pretty darn close... Except the point about completely privatizing education- its just not feasable- and Im sure that underprivledged children would be left out on an even greater scale. ]

    We already have private schools- that are light years ahead, and we have public, or government schools that like everything else the gov't runs, are expensive, bloated, and inefficient.

    I think conservatives are more likely take the Fed out of anything they can, including education, and run it at the state level. (except the states are broke now).
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    I'd give the guy some of my fish and teach him, too. We're all in this together.

    This is definitely the best answer so far.
  • ParachuteParachute Posts: 409
    I'd be happy to share my fish while the person learns to fish for himself, as long as they are learning...
    At some point, people have to become responsible for themselves.
    There is a difference between sharing and being Forced to share. Especially if that fish is feeding your family...

    You are absolutely right...

    I think I fucked up the quote button...
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    Parachute wrote:
    I'd be happy to share my fish while the person learns to fish for himself, as long as they are learning...
    At some point, people have to become responsible for themselves.
    There is a difference between sharing and being Forced to share. Especially if that fish is feeding your family...

    You are absolutely right...

    I think I fucked up the quote button...

    If you know this Blockhead person, he has made it quite clear in other threads that he's completely unwilling to contribute in any sort of universal "taking care of another person", whatsoever. He is only in it for himself and himself only. Forget anyone else. We know...
  • BlockheadBlockhead Posts: 1,538
    Jeanwah wrote:

    If you know this Blockhead person, he has made it quite clear in other threads that he's completely unwilling to contribute in any sort of universal "taking care of another person", whatsoever. He is only in it for himself and himself only. Forget anyone else. We know...
    :roll: Its forced help that I am against. I have a family of my own who is dependant on my money, and that money that I make with my body/brain should belong to me. I should not be forced to give out something that I work for... How is this such a hard concept to grasp. And guess what, the road i took to achieve what I have is made availabe to everybody, Its not my problem if some people choose to make other decisions in their life. I should not have to pay for people making the wrong decisions/actions.
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,196
    Saw this bumper sticker the other day: I think, therefore I am Conservative. Made me want to have a bumper sticker!

    I love those ironic hipsters!
Sign In or Register to comment.