Your 2024 WNBA Champions New York Liberty
Comments
-
Good pointscutz said:
I meant as far as her game(shooting & passing ability)F Me In The Brain said:
She is more Magic and Bird, far more impactful than Curry on the league's revenue.cutz said:Clark is the ALL -TIME Scorer in College history. Plenty of people were already watching her at Iowa.
She did transform the game like Steph Curry did for the NBA.
So I agree with you but emphasize it more to align with Tempos assessment.
We'll be seeing more woman/girls shooting like her with the way Curry has with more men/boys shooting.The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
lol still no credit given to her...igotid88 said:
Or maybe because CC watched the other players I've mentioned. She didn't need to be on the Olympic roster. If anything it was probably good for her. She barely had a break with the college games then going straight to the WNBA. She will be on future rosterstempo_n_groove said:
I'm still not a fan. Like I mentioned before I do enjoy talking about it. I have never seen a league mishandle someones superstardom more than the WNBA has.igotid88 said:
No one knew about her until that "You can't see me game". And by no one. I mean these new "fans". Not saying she isn't helping the game grow. And it's not even that I'm against her. It's those "fans". Who crapped on the W. And are now saying the game is better because of her. I do think she gets unfairly criticized. My point was she is not better or worse than the others I've mentioned. Also if Steph doesn't win championships he wouldn't have the same impact. Hopefully she doesn't win this year because I want my Liberty to win. Only original team to not win.cutz said:Clark is the ALL -TIME Scorer in College history. Plenty of people were already watching her at Iowa.
She did transform the game like Steph Curry did for the NBA.
They should have sent her to the Olympics just to grow the sport more but, they failed...
If she isn't better or worse than the ones you've mentioned then why is she breaking records as a Rookie?
I agree w Cutz where u will see better and better players in the future and it will be because they watched CC.0 -
So i watched the highlights. Switched back and forth for some of the games. Collier couldn't miss. CC needs help. NY looks good. Bye Diana. She will be on the Mt Rushmore of WNBA for a long time.0
-
I give her credit. You're not giving otherstempo_n_groove said:
lol still no credit given to her...igotid88 said:
Or maybe because CC watched the other players I've mentioned. She didn't need to be on the Olympic roster. If anything it was probably good for her. She barely had a break with the college games then going straight to the WNBA. She will be on future rosterstempo_n_groove said:
I'm still not a fan. Like I mentioned before I do enjoy talking about it. I have never seen a league mishandle someones superstardom more than the WNBA has.igotid88 said:
No one knew about her until that "You can't see me game". And by no one. I mean these new "fans". Not saying she isn't helping the game grow. And it's not even that I'm against her. It's those "fans". Who crapped on the W. And are now saying the game is better because of her. I do think she gets unfairly criticized. My point was she is not better or worse than the others I've mentioned. Also if Steph doesn't win championships he wouldn't have the same impact. Hopefully she doesn't win this year because I want my Liberty to win. Only original team to not win.cutz said:Clark is the ALL -TIME Scorer in College history. Plenty of people were already watching her at Iowa.
She did transform the game like Steph Curry did for the NBA.
They should have sent her to the Olympics just to grow the sport more but, they failed...
If she isn't better or worse than the ones you've mentioned then why is she breaking records as a Rookie?
I agree w Cutz where u will see better and better players in the future and it will be because they watched CC.I miss igotid880 -
You missed where I said Turasi is the best to ever do it and Bird is a close second, but ok...igotid88 said:
I give her credit. You're not giving otherstempo_n_groove said:
lol still no credit given to her...igotid88 said:
Or maybe because CC watched the other players I've mentioned. She didn't need to be on the Olympic roster. If anything it was probably good for her. She barely had a break with the college games then going straight to the WNBA. She will be on future rosterstempo_n_groove said:
I'm still not a fan. Like I mentioned before I do enjoy talking about it. I have never seen a league mishandle someones superstardom more than the WNBA has.igotid88 said:
No one knew about her until that "You can't see me game". And by no one. I mean these new "fans". Not saying she isn't helping the game grow. And it's not even that I'm against her. It's those "fans". Who crapped on the W. And are now saying the game is better because of her. I do think she gets unfairly criticized. My point was she is not better or worse than the others I've mentioned. Also if Steph doesn't win championships he wouldn't have the same impact. Hopefully she doesn't win this year because I want my Liberty to win. Only original team to not win.cutz said:Clark is the ALL -TIME Scorer in College history. Plenty of people were already watching her at Iowa.
She did transform the game like Steph Curry did for the NBA.
They should have sent her to the Olympics just to grow the sport more but, they failed...
If she isn't better or worse than the ones you've mentioned then why is she breaking records as a Rookie?
I agree w Cutz where u will see better and better players in the future and it will be because they watched CC.0 -
And, Maya Mooretempo_n_groove said:
You missed where I said Turasi is the best to ever do it and Bird is a close second, but ok...igotid88 said:
I give her credit. You're not giving otherstempo_n_groove said:
lol still no credit given to her...igotid88 said:
Or maybe because CC watched the other players I've mentioned. She didn't need to be on the Olympic roster. If anything it was probably good for her. She barely had a break with the college games then going straight to the WNBA. She will be on future rosterstempo_n_groove said:
I'm still not a fan. Like I mentioned before I do enjoy talking about it. I have never seen a league mishandle someones superstardom more than the WNBA has.igotid88 said:
No one knew about her until that "You can't see me game". And by no one. I mean these new "fans". Not saying she isn't helping the game grow. And it's not even that I'm against her. It's those "fans". Who crapped on the W. And are now saying the game is better because of her. I do think she gets unfairly criticized. My point was she is not better or worse than the others I've mentioned. Also if Steph doesn't win championships he wouldn't have the same impact. Hopefully she doesn't win this year because I want my Liberty to win. Only original team to not win.cutz said:Clark is the ALL -TIME Scorer in College history. Plenty of people were already watching her at Iowa.
She did transform the game like Steph Curry did for the NBA.
They should have sent her to the Olympics just to grow the sport more but, they failed...
If she isn't better or worse than the ones you've mentioned then why is she breaking records as a Rookie?
I agree w Cutz where u will see better and better players in the future and it will be because they watched CC.0 -
-
Did someone do something stupid or is their a twitter troll? I hope it's all huff n puff.igotid88 said:0 -
Lot of Caitlin fans saying racist stuff. Not blaming Caitlin. I remember reading somewhere when they reported she liked the Taylor vote tweet. Someone said something to the effect of remember who made you and not a good way to throw away your career.tempo_n_groove said:
Did someone do something stupid or is their a twitter troll? I hope it's all huff n puff.igotid88 said:Post edited by igotid88 onI miss igotid880 -
I saw the other way too w some racist crap. Growing pains of the sport unfortunately. They are all most likely incels.igotid88 said:
Lot of Caitlin fans saying racist stuff. Not blaming Caitlin. I remember reading somewhere when they reported she liked the Taylor vote tweet. Someone said something to the effect of remember who made you and not a good way to throw away your career.tempo_n_groove said:
Did someone do something stupid or is their a twitter troll? I hope it's all huff n puff.igotid88 said:
aaaaaand I just realized I used the wrong "Their" Whoops.0 -
I know this is a Liberty Thread, you want to start a new one for all of the WNBA? Or just leave it here?
Liberty w a win the other day to go up 2-0.
Read a VERY interesting article in the Washington post by Ben Strauss. "A reporter keeps asking about CC. Players want her banned."
Very good read on what is going on in the WNBA. So reporter Brennan, a white female, goes around asking other players about CC. It makes it out that it is ALL she asks about. The players are getting peeved and feel they are being baited. They want her credentials pulled.
I get it.
Another angle showing that the WNBA is squandering their opportunities to make the league bigger than what it is and say maybe they aren't ready for the attention it is receiving.
I think all the ladies need to take PR courses because these types of questions aren't going anywhere. The league is growing, fan base is growing. This kind of reminds me of when Tiger Woods was on top. He would lose a tourney and still be front page news like "Tiger places third in TPC" and no mention of whom came in 1st.
Hopefully the world takes notice of the other players or is it that there is a person that other people can identify with in Clark? Is it deeper than that or simpler?0 -
I don't believe they want her banned. The WNBA has been about inclusivity and such. Obviously they want to grow the game.tempo_n_groove said:I know this is a Liberty Thread, you want to start a new one for all of the WNBA? Or just leave it here?
Liberty w a win the other day to go up 2-0.
Read a VERY interesting article in the Washington post by Ben Strauss. "A reporter keeps asking about CC. Players want her banned."
Very good read on what is going on in the WNBA. So reporter Brennan, a white female, goes around asking other players about CC. It makes it out that it is ALL she asks about. The players are getting peeved and feel they are being baited. They want her credentials pulled.
I get it.
Another angle showing that the WNBA is squandering their opportunities to make the league bigger than what it is and say maybe they aren't ready for the attention it is receiving.
I think all the ladies need to take PR courses because these types of questions aren't going anywhere. The league is growing, fan base is growing. This kind of reminds me of when Tiger Woods was on top. He would lose a tourney and still be front page news like "Tiger places third in TPC" and no mention of whom came in 1st.
Hopefully the world takes notice of the other players or is it that there is a person that other people can identify with in Clark? Is it deeper than that or simpler?I miss igotid880 -
The WNBA has literally asked for her removal, lol.igotid88 said:
I don't believe they want her banned. The WNBA has been about inclusivity and such. Obviously they want to grow the game.tempo_n_groove said:I know this is a Liberty Thread, you want to start a new one for all of the WNBA? Or just leave it here?
Liberty w a win the other day to go up 2-0.
Read a VERY interesting article in the Washington post by Ben Strauss. "A reporter keeps asking about CC. Players want her banned."
Very good read on what is going on in the WNBA. So reporter Brennan, a white female, goes around asking other players about CC. It makes it out that it is ALL she asks about. The players are getting peeved and feel they are being baited. They want her credentials pulled.
I get it.
Another angle showing that the WNBA is squandering their opportunities to make the league bigger than what it is and say maybe they aren't ready for the attention it is receiving.
I think all the ladies need to take PR courses because these types of questions aren't going anywhere. The league is growing, fan base is growing. This kind of reminds me of when Tiger Woods was on top. He would lose a tourney and still be front page news like "Tiger places third in TPC" and no mention of whom came in 1st.
Hopefully the world takes notice of the other players or is it that there is a person that other people can identify with in Clark? Is it deeper than that or simpler?
EDIT: The WNBAPA has asked for her removal.0 -
I thought you meant Caitlintempo_n_groove said:
The WNBA has literally asked for her removal, lol.igotid88 said:
I don't believe they want her banned. The WNBA has been about inclusivity and such. Obviously they want to grow the game.tempo_n_groove said:I know this is a Liberty Thread, you want to start a new one for all of the WNBA? Or just leave it here?
Liberty w a win the other day to go up 2-0.
Read a VERY interesting article in the Washington post by Ben Strauss. "A reporter keeps asking about CC. Players want her banned."
Very good read on what is going on in the WNBA. So reporter Brennan, a white female, goes around asking other players about CC. It makes it out that it is ALL she asks about. The players are getting peeved and feel they are being baited. They want her credentials pulled.
I get it.
Another angle showing that the WNBA is squandering their opportunities to make the league bigger than what it is and say maybe they aren't ready for the attention it is receiving.
I think all the ladies need to take PR courses because these types of questions aren't going anywhere. The league is growing, fan base is growing. This kind of reminds me of when Tiger Woods was on top. He would lose a tourney and still be front page news like "Tiger places third in TPC" and no mention of whom came in 1st.
Hopefully the world takes notice of the other players or is it that there is a person that other people can identify with in Clark? Is it deeper than that or simpler?
EDIT: The WNBAPA has asked for her removal.I miss igotid880 -
Yeah the first time I read the sentence I thought it said they wanted CC banned. Read it again and realized they wanted the reporter banned.igotid88 said:
I thought you meant Caitlintempo_n_groove said:
The WNBA has literally asked for her removal, lol.igotid88 said:
I don't believe they want her banned. The WNBA has been about inclusivity and such. Obviously they want to grow the game.tempo_n_groove said:I know this is a Liberty Thread, you want to start a new one for all of the WNBA? Or just leave it here?
Liberty w a win the other day to go up 2-0.
Read a VERY interesting article in the Washington post by Ben Strauss. "A reporter keeps asking about CC. Players want her banned."
Very good read on what is going on in the WNBA. So reporter Brennan, a white female, goes around asking other players about CC. It makes it out that it is ALL she asks about. The players are getting peeved and feel they are being baited. They want her credentials pulled.
I get it.
Another angle showing that the WNBA is squandering their opportunities to make the league bigger than what it is and say maybe they aren't ready for the attention it is receiving.
I think all the ladies need to take PR courses because these types of questions aren't going anywhere. The league is growing, fan base is growing. This kind of reminds me of when Tiger Woods was on top. He would lose a tourney and still be front page news like "Tiger places third in TPC" and no mention of whom came in 1st.
Hopefully the world takes notice of the other players or is it that there is a person that other people can identify with in Clark? Is it deeper than that or simpler?
EDIT: The WNBAPA has asked for her removal.Post edited by JeBurkhardt on0 -
I did say "players".igotid88 said:
I thought you meant Caitlintempo_n_groove said:
The WNBA has literally asked for her removal, lol.igotid88 said:
I don't believe they want her banned. The WNBA has been about inclusivity and such. Obviously they want to grow the game.tempo_n_groove said:I know this is a Liberty Thread, you want to start a new one for all of the WNBA? Or just leave it here?
Liberty w a win the other day to go up 2-0.
Read a VERY interesting article in the Washington post by Ben Strauss. "A reporter keeps asking about CC. Players want her banned."
Very good read on what is going on in the WNBA. So reporter Brennan, a white female, goes around asking other players about CC. It makes it out that it is ALL she asks about. The players are getting peeved and feel they are being baited. They want her credentials pulled.
I get it.
Another angle showing that the WNBA is squandering their opportunities to make the league bigger than what it is and say maybe they aren't ready for the attention it is receiving.
I think all the ladies need to take PR courses because these types of questions aren't going anywhere. The league is growing, fan base is growing. This kind of reminds me of when Tiger Woods was on top. He would lose a tourney and still be front page news like "Tiger places third in TPC" and no mention of whom came in 1st.
Hopefully the world takes notice of the other players or is it that there is a person that other people can identify with in Clark? Is it deeper than that or simpler?
EDIT: The WNBAPA has asked for her removal.
It an interesting read if you can get past the pay wall. It touched on what you had brought up on the racist remarks. One was "did you trip on your eyelashes" and "ban nails". Not sure how those are racist rather than bullying?0 -
I knew it wasn't going to be a sweep. But I wanted them to finish it early. Hopefully it doesn't go to a game 5I miss igotid880
-
That reporter should have credentials pulledtempo_n_groove said:
I did say "players".igotid88 said:
I thought you meant Caitlintempo_n_groove said:
The WNBA has literally asked for her removal, lol.igotid88 said:
I don't believe they want her banned. The WNBA has been about inclusivity and such. Obviously they want to grow the game.tempo_n_groove said:I know this is a Liberty Thread, you want to start a new one for all of the WNBA? Or just leave it here?
Liberty w a win the other day to go up 2-0.
Read a VERY interesting article in the Washington post by Ben Strauss. "A reporter keeps asking about CC. Players want her banned."
Very good read on what is going on in the WNBA. So reporter Brennan, a white female, goes around asking other players about CC. It makes it out that it is ALL she asks about. The players are getting peeved and feel they are being baited. They want her credentials pulled.
I get it.
Another angle showing that the WNBA is squandering their opportunities to make the league bigger than what it is and say maybe they aren't ready for the attention it is receiving.
I think all the ladies need to take PR courses because these types of questions aren't going anywhere. The league is growing, fan base is growing. This kind of reminds me of when Tiger Woods was on top. He would lose a tourney and still be front page news like "Tiger places third in TPC" and no mention of whom came in 1st.
Hopefully the world takes notice of the other players or is it that there is a person that other people can identify with in Clark? Is it deeper than that or simpler?
EDIT: The WNBAPA has asked for her removal.
It an interesting read if you can get past the pay wall. It touched on what you had brought up on the racist remarks. One was "did you trip on your eyelashes" and "ban nails". Not sure how those are racist rather than bullying?
The NFL has many people who are credentialed in the modern press makeup who should also be banned. Harassing the players is not the same thing as asking tough questions or building am unpopular story.
Asking about the most popular players is fine, but if that is your angle on everything and you are trying to stir shit up all of the time, that is not needed.
Hardly a shock given the clickbait trash that many media outlets have become.
Si.com is some of the worst bullshit going right now.
Horrible.The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
On to the FinalsI miss igotid880
-
I think this is the time they finally win one!igotid88 said:On to the Finalssevered hand thirteen2006: Gorge 7/23 2008: Hartford 6/27 Beacon 7/1 2009: Spectrum 10/30-31
2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
2017: RRHoF 4/7 2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4 2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18
2022: MSG 9/11 2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
2025: Pittsburgh 5/16+5/180
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help