NCAA College Football -

Options
1402403405407408413

Comments

  • SPEEDY MCCREADY
    SPEEDY MCCREADY Posts: 26,812
    Might as well start now 

    GO PENN STATE!!!!!
    Take me piece by piece.....
    Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
  • SPEEDY MCCREADY
    SPEEDY MCCREADY Posts: 26,812
    Dylan Bell

    I do not want you delivering my pizza. 
    As I am pretty sure you will drop it. 
    Take me piece by piece.....
    Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,232
    Might as well start now 

    GO PENN STATE!!!!!
    not over yet but, sorry speedy, I’m rooting for whomever to beat fraudulent penn st.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Wobbie said:
    Might as well start now 

    GO PENN STATE!!!!!
    not over yet but, sorry speedy, I’m rooting for whomever to beat fraudulent penn st.
    Penn State isn’t fraudulent. They are the exact same team as ND. When they play it will be like the Alabama LSU championship…. Boring 
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    edited January 3
    Georgia has played awful. Poor tackling, confused blocking assignments, etc. 

    And I have watched #7 take a poor angle and blow contain multiple times on the edges. 
    Post edited by mrussel1 on
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,232
    mrussel1 said:
    Wobbie said:
    Might as well start now 

    GO PENN STATE!!!!!
    not over yet but, sorry speedy, I’m rooting for whomever to beat fraudulent penn st.
    Penn State isn’t fraudulent. They are the exact same team as ND. When they play it will be like the Alabama LSU championship…. Boring 
    Third (fourth?) best team in the B1G. They’re goodish but it would be a shame to see them in the title game.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Wobbie said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Wobbie said:
    Might as well start now 

    GO PENN STATE!!!!!
    not over yet but, sorry speedy, I’m rooting for whomever to beat fraudulent penn st.
    Penn State isn’t fraudulent. They are the exact same team as ND. When they play it will be like the Alabama LSU championship…. Boring 
    Third (fourth?) best team in the B1G. They’re goodish but it would be a shame to see them in the title game.
    They would schlack Indiana, so 3rd   But I think it’s clear that the Big Ten in the best conference, not the top-heavy narrative Look at what Michigan and Illinois did in the bowls. And USC was 4-5 in league play but beats LSU and A&M. 
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,864
    The bye was very helpful in this new format.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • SPEEDY MCCREADY
    SPEEDY MCCREADY Posts: 26,812
    Poncier said:
    The bye was very helpful in this new format.
    Yes it was.
    No doubt a week break was very useful. 
    Take me piece by piece.....
    Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Poncier said:
    The bye was very helpful in this new format.
    Yes it was.
    No doubt a week break was very useful. 
    Sarcasm I presume
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Interesting note under the current format. Even if ND was consensus number one, they can’t get a bye. I believe it to be true but someone check me. 
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,907
    mrussel1 said:
    Interesting note under the current format. Even if ND was consensus number one, they can’t get a bye. I believe it to be true but someone check me. 
    You are correct 
  • pearldavidson
    pearldavidson Posts: 1,696
    mrussel1 said:
    Interesting note under the current format. Even if ND was consensus number one, they can’t get a bye. I believe it to be true but someone check me. 
    Is this because they don’t play in a conference?
  • SPEEDY MCCREADY
    SPEEDY MCCREADY Posts: 26,812
    Of course my friends who went down to New Orleans for the game had to send me this.


    Take me piece by piece.....
    Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
  • darwinstheory
    darwinstheory LaPorte, IN Posts: 7,343
    mrussel1 said:
    Interesting note under the current format. Even if ND was consensus number one, they can’t get a bye. I believe it to be true but someone check me. 
    Is this because they don’t play in a conference?
    This is correct.
    "A smart monkey doesn't monkey around with another monkey's monkey" - Darwin's Theory
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,864
    mrussel1 said:
    Interesting note under the current format. Even if ND was consensus number one, they can’t get a bye. I believe it to be true but someone check me. 
    Is this because they don’t play in a conference?
    This is correct.
    And pretty stupid. One of the things that should (and probably will) be tweaked.
    These conferences have hated Notre Dame's independent status for decades (once upon a time Penn St. and Pitt were also both independents and powerhouses) so they figure they can punish them by making the likes of Boise State and Arizona State get seeded higher as a result. Worked out well for them.
    This age of these super conferences is stupid.
    I mean as a result you have 16 teams in the "Big 12" and 18 teams in the "Big 10", plus you have Stanford and Cal with campuses one good earthquake away from falling into the Pacific Ocean in the Atlantic Coast Conference. And lest we forget the Pac 12 conference this year featured 2 whole teams. Shouldn't their conference champ have been given an invite to the CFP?
    It's ludicrous.



    This weekend we rock Portland
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    From an economic perspective, the super conferences make perfect sense.  Think about the tv deal the Big Ten struck now that they have the NY, DC and LA markets.  

    I definitely think the seedings will be tweaked.  It wasn't just the byes that didn't make sense, but Oregon drawing OSU for their first game was bad setup too.  Although the Rose Bowl loved it.  I passionately think that if the NCAA is committed to rewarding teh conference championships (which they are), then you have to seed like the basketball tournament.  Winning your conference gets you in, but then you seed based on perceived strength of the team.  
  • cutz
    cutz Posts: 12,226
    mrussel1 said:
    From an economic perspective, the super conferences make perfect sense.  Think about the tv deal the Big Ten struck now that they have the NY, DC and LA markets.  

    I definitely think the seedings will be tweaked.  It wasn't just the byes that didn't make sense, but Oregon drawing OSU for their first game was bad setup too.  Although the Rose Bowl loved it.  I passionately think that if the NCAA is committed to rewarding teh conference championships (which they are), then you have to seed like the basketball tournament.  Winning your conference gets you in, but then you seed based on perceived strength of the team.  
    I agree with Seeding based on strength of schedule.

    But, what about Reseeding?
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    edited January 3
    cutz said:
    mrussel1 said:
    From an economic perspective, the super conferences make perfect sense.  Think about the tv deal the Big Ten struck now that they have the NY, DC and LA markets.  

    I definitely think the seedings will be tweaked.  It wasn't just the byes that didn't make sense, but Oregon drawing OSU for their first game was bad setup too.  Although the Rose Bowl loved it.  I passionately think that if the NCAA is committed to rewarding teh conference championships (which they are), then you have to seed like the basketball tournament.  Winning your conference gets you in, but then you seed based on perceived strength of the team.  
    I agree with Seeding based on strength of schedule.

    But, what about Reseeding?
    I like reseeding.  I'm not sure they will go that far but I would be for it.  Is it a tournament or playoffs?  Tournaments do not reseed, playoffs do.  Again, someone correct me.  Baseball, pro-football, basketball and hockey basically reseed.  Hockey has an asterisk because of the way their first rounds works.  NCAA basketball is a tournament so no reseed.  

    edit - what do you mean by seeding by SOS?  Are you saying that if Georgia had a stronger SOS than Oregon, they would be seeded higher even if Oregon was 12-0 and UGA 10-2?  
    Post edited by mrussel1 on
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,864
    NFL is only one of the 4 majors that reseeds. NBA, NHL and MLB do not.
    This weekend we rock Portland