israel sentences arab to 18months for consentual sex

Commy

Pepe Silvia wrote:

perhaps you should take the time to read

According to the complaint filed by the woman with the Jerusalem district court, the two met in downtown Jerusalem in September 2008 where Kashur, an Arab from East Jerusalem, introduced himself as a Jewish bachelor seeking a serious relationship. The two then had consensual sex in a nearby building before Kashur left......

In his verdict, Judge Zvi Segal conceded that it was not "a classical rape by force". He added: "If she hadn't thought the accused was a Jewish bachelor interested in a serious romantic relationship, she would not have co-operated. The court is obliged to protect the public interest from sophisticated, smooth-tongued criminals who can deceive innocent victims at an unbearable price – the sanctity of their bodies and souls."....

The woman was given a medical examination, presented in court, which showed, according to Kushour, no signs of force or injury.


so you can cite an article from haaretz, who published a fraudulent photo in regards to the flotilla raid, giving her account but that is meaningless because THREE Israeli judges heard her testimony and decided it was consentual.

and you never explained why if he was forcing himself on her and acting like a psychopath she would follow him into an elevator and upwards AFTER that???

so yeah, if you want to take the words from a disturbed former prostitute who claims to have been a virgin before this go right ahead :roll: but her account makes no sense and she contradicts her testimony....how can you be raped by your father and be a former prostitute AND still be a virgin????

what was it you said about assuming?

and this is the end of the thread.


the hasbarats lose again.



queue crowd noise.

yosi

I love how even TIME itself makes no difference to you guys. New information has come to light. You can't just keep pointing to old articles and insisting that they are definitive.

yosi

Although I suppose that is very marxist of you. You have your theories and you're sticking to them, reality be damned.

Commy

yosi wrote:

I love how even TIME itself makes no difference to you guys. New information has come to light. You can't just keep pointing to old articles and insisting that they are definitive.

new information?


this story of yours with no evidence is hardly new information.




this part is crucial, read it carefully.

The woman was given a medical examination, presented in court, which showed, according to Kushour, no signs of force or injury.

the story you are presenting tells of a woman forcibly raped left bleeding a stairwell. evidence, presented in court, contradicts your story.

Commy

yosi wrote:

Although I suppose that is very marxist of you. You have your theories and you're sticking to them, reality be damned.

nice try.

i'm no marxist.

Hugh Freaking Dillon

actually, everything Pepe has raised has NOT been covered. I for one find it interesting how the evidence directly contradicts her claims.

And it would be nice if you were a less dismissive....well.......I'm not going to resort to name calling.

yosi wrote:

Pepe, I'm not even going to bother. Everything you've raised has already been covered in the thread. It would be nice if you could be a little less of a hostile prick, though.

Paul, if I remember the most recent article correctly the police arrived at the scene a few hours (maybe sooner) after the rape was alleged to have occurred.

Hugh Freaking Dillon

but that's kind of what you are doing though, isn't it?

yosi wrote:

I love how even TIME itself makes no difference to you guys. New information has come to light. You can't just keep pointing to old articles and insisting that they are definitive.