the whole country has a vested interest in this guy(even byrnzie), I feel the same about nobama as most of you do about Bush, I didn't vote for Bush but I find it real funny that all these people keep blaming Bush for everything that is wrong with the country today,btw he may as well watch him self(<joking) I usally change the channel when that goof ball is on the air.
Godfather.
...
Question: Do you believe that people should be held responsible for their actions and decisions that affect others?
I do. Whether it's a person who decides not to pay their taxes or a President who sends people in herm's way under questionable reasoning. Both need to be held responsible for their decisions and accountable for the consequences. It's not a matter of 'Blame', rather, placing accountability on the responsible parties.
Regarding this:
"just so ya know; I don't like war and wish we were not involved in this war now but I also don't believe that the US should just step back and take attacks on our country and our people."
Who ever claimed that we sit back and let people attack us?
We all can protect our nation using due diligence. If you discover someone taking lessons at a flight school and just want to learn how to fly a plane and aim it, instead of all of the things required to obtain a pilot's license... it is your responsibility to report them to law enforcement and let them sort out the details. Just as that T-Shirt salesman reported the suspicious behaviour in Times Square.
National Guardsmen should be patrolling our airports instead of nation building in Iraq.
Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!
the whole country has a vested interest in this guy(even byrnzie), I feel the same about nobama as most of you do about Bush, I didn't vote for Bush but I find it real funny that all these people keep blaming Bush for everything that is wrong with the country today,btw he may as well watch him self(<joking) I usally change the channel when that goof ball is on the air.
Godfather.
...
Question: Do you believe that people should be held responsible for their actions and decisions that affect others?
I do. Whether it's a person who decides not to pay their taxes or a President who sends people in herm's way under questionable reasoning. Both need to be held responsible for their decisions and accountable for the consequences. It's not a matter of 'Blame', rather, placing accountability on the responsible parties.
Regarding this:
"just so ya know; I don't like war and wish we were not involved in this war now but I also don't believe that the US should just step back and take attacks on our country and our people."
Who ever claimed that we sit back and let people attack us?
We all can protect our nation using due diligence. If you discover someone taking lessons at a flight school and just want to learn how to fly a plane and aim it, instead of all of the things required to obtain a pilot's license... it is your responsibility to report them to law enforcement and let them sort out the details. Just as that T-Shirt salesman reported the suspicious behaviour in Times Square.
National Guardsmen should be patrolling our airports instead of nation building in Iraq.
Question: Do you believe that people should be held responsible for their actions and decisions that affect others? yes.
Who ever claimed that we sit back and let people attack us?.......I didn't say that but I have read stuff from people on here that have sympathized with our attackers.
We all can protect our nation using due diligence. If you discover someone taking lessons at a flight school and just want to learn how to fly a plane and aim it, instead of all of the things required to obtain a pilot's license... it is your responsibility to report them to law enforcement and let them sort out the details. Just as that T-Shirt salesman reported the suspicious behaviour in Times Square.
National Guardsmen should be patrolling our airports instead of nation building in Iraq.[/quote]
agreed !
I didn't say that but I have read stuff from people on here that have sympathized with our attackers.
Godfather.
there is more meanings to sympathize with the attackers than what you are implying. nobody on here wishes they were like the attackers. the signs of wise people is they try to see both sides of an issue and try to understand the motives of their adversary. without knowing that there will never be peace. if you fail to try to put yourself in their position you will never understand what motivates them and you will never ever stop them. if you just keep killing them without attempting to gain understanding then you are doing nothing more than creating more terrorists and potentially defeating your own cause....don't confuse "wanting to understand the terrorists' position" with "wanting the terrorists to win"...
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
...
Then, we are to presume that you understand the difference between 'Blame' and 'Holding someone responsible for their decisions and actions' and are going to stop shirking off the validity of our points, right?
And that the Bush Administration should be held responsible for the consequences of the decisions they made and the actions that they took... right?
Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!
I can see people defending Bush based on political beliefs and the fact that he was just a front man, although I'd disagree that that it is a reason to feel sympathy for him. If he was promoting interests other than those of the country knowingly, he does not deserve a pass.
I am, however, dumbfounded that people are defending his intelligence. I would be willing to bet that most of the regs on AMT could win a debate against the guy, and that pretty much all of us have greater book AND street smarts. I'm also willing to bet he would fail a GED exam miserably.
What, exactly, has he done to demonstrate intelligence, aside from his bought-and-paid-for resume? Has he accomplished ANYTHING that was not overshadowed by nepotism?
...
Then, we are to presume that you understand the difference between 'Blame' and 'Holding someone responsible for their decisions and actions' and are going to stop shirking off the validity of our points, right?
And that the Bush Administration should be held responsible for the consequences of the decisions they made and the actions that they took... right?
Truth, fair enough it would be better to understand your attackers mind set so you can defeat them.
Cosmo,yea I get it "'Blame' and 'Holding someone responsible " but how far back are you willing to go to make sure every president and their admin is held responsible and how can you prove their guilt 100% with all the wacos in the white house ? tuff one man. but yes I understand what your saying.
there is more meanings to sympathize with the attackers than what you are implying. nobody on here wishes they were like the attackers. the signs of wise people is they try to see both sides of an issue and try to understand the motives of their adversary. without knowing that there will never be peace. if you fail to try to put yourself in their position you will never understand what motivates them and you will never ever stop them. if you just keep killing them without attempting to gain understanding then you are doing nothing more than creating more terrorists and potentially defeating your own cause....don't confuse "wanting to understand the terrorists' position" with "wanting the terrorists to win"...
I was giving you a hard time for your Mel Gibson moment the other day, but this is a pretty solid post ... I can see the value in understanding the terrorists' position, even as I feel that there is no way to condone their actions. Its not that different from the position of a pedophile or another serial murderer ... The behavior is loathsome, but if one believes that such things come about (in part) as a function of social policy, one does have to understand where the behavior comes from and perhaps assume some degree of societal responsibility in fixing the problem.
there is more meanings to sympathize with the attackers than what you are implying. nobody on here wishes they were like the attackers. the signs of wise people is they try to see both sides of an issue and try to understand the motives of their adversary. without knowing that there will never be peace. if you fail to try to put yourself in their position you will never understand what motivates them and you will never ever stop them. if you just keep killing them without attempting to gain understanding then you are doing nothing more than creating more terrorists and potentially defeating your own cause....don't confuse "wanting to understand the terrorists' position" with "wanting the terrorists to win"...
I was giving you a hard time for your Mel Gibson moment the other day, but this is a pretty solid post ... I can see the value in understanding the terrorists' position, even as I feel that there is no way to condone their actions. Its not that different from the position of a pedophile or another serial murderer ... The behavior is loathsome, but if one believes that such things come about (in part) as a function of social policy, one does have to understand where the behavior comes from and perhaps assume some degree of societal responsibility in fixing the problem.
the only way to have any kind of progress is through understanding. this is true in any field in all of humanity. medicine, domestic and foreign policy, sociology, crime and policework. military strategy, science, etc...a problem can never ever be completely solved without understanding the causes, whether natural like in the body, psychological, genetic, economic, etc... you can not treat or solve these problems without understanding. understanding your enemy is all consuming, you have to put yourself in their position, find their motivation and go from there. bush never did any of this stuff. it is like he was trying to treat a cancer patient without knowing the type of cancer cell and tumor he was up against...
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
i'm pretty confident that i'm smarter than George Bush. maybe not as smart as his dad, but definitely smarter than jr.
have you ever spoken in front of the world? maybe he gets nervous...I don't know, I have come around on him, policy wise I wasn't a fan at all, but I don't think he is the bumbling idiot he was made out to be. He had a lot of moments that would point to the contrary, but he just isn't stupid. And the idea that he was just some little puppet is stupid, but it is so much easier to believe in some sort of conspiracy.
I would like to see anyone on this forum give a speech everyday and have every word they say in public recorded by the media, that would be fantastic.
now watch this drive
Id like to think if you're the president of one of the most powerful countries you'd have rid yourself of public speaking issues....
live pearl jam is best pearl jam
0
g under p
Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
god damnit stop saying godfather! I CAN PLAINLY SEE WHO YOU ARE!
you're worse than the PEACE guy! :roll:
Just catching up with things....this is funny BTW what's wrong with....
Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
Comments
Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.
Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.
Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.Godfather.
Question: Do you believe that people should be held responsible for their actions and decisions that affect others?
I do. Whether it's a person who decides not to pay their taxes or a President who sends people in herm's way under questionable reasoning. Both need to be held responsible for their decisions and accountable for the consequences. It's not a matter of 'Blame', rather, placing accountability on the responsible parties.
Regarding this: Who ever claimed that we sit back and let people attack us?
We all can protect our nation using due diligence. If you discover someone taking lessons at a flight school and just want to learn how to fly a plane and aim it, instead of all of the things required to obtain a pilot's license... it is your responsibility to report them to law enforcement and let them sort out the details. Just as that T-Shirt salesman reported the suspicious behaviour in Times Square.
National Guardsmen should be patrolling our airports instead of nation building in Iraq.
Hail, Hail!!!
Question: Do you believe that people should be held responsible for their actions and decisions that affect others? yes.
Who ever claimed that we sit back and let people attack us?.......I didn't say that but I have read stuff from people on here that have sympathized with our attackers.
We all can protect our nation using due diligence. If you discover someone taking lessons at a flight school and just want to learn how to fly a plane and aim it, instead of all of the things required to obtain a pilot's license... it is your responsibility to report them to law enforcement and let them sort out the details. Just as that T-Shirt salesman reported the suspicious behaviour in Times Square.
National Guardsmen should be patrolling our airports instead of nation building in Iraq.[/quote]
agreed !
Godfather.
there is more meanings to sympathize with the attackers than what you are implying. nobody on here wishes they were like the attackers. the signs of wise people is they try to see both sides of an issue and try to understand the motives of their adversary. without knowing that there will never be peace. if you fail to try to put yourself in their position you will never understand what motivates them and you will never ever stop them. if you just keep killing them without attempting to gain understanding then you are doing nothing more than creating more terrorists and potentially defeating your own cause....don't confuse "wanting to understand the terrorists' position" with "wanting the terrorists to win"...
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Then, we are to presume that you understand the difference between 'Blame' and 'Holding someone responsible for their decisions and actions' and are going to stop shirking off the validity of our points, right?
And that the Bush Administration should be held responsible for the consequences of the decisions they made and the actions that they took... right?
Hail, Hail!!!
I am, however, dumbfounded that people are defending his intelligence. I would be willing to bet that most of the regs on AMT could win a debate against the guy, and that pretty much all of us have greater book AND street smarts. I'm also willing to bet he would fail a GED exam miserably.
What, exactly, has he done to demonstrate intelligence, aside from his bought-and-paid-for resume? Has he accomplished ANYTHING that was not overshadowed by nepotism?
I say it every day out on the street with a loudspeaker but no fucker understands me.
Truth, fair enough it would be better to understand your attackers mind set so you can defeat them.
Cosmo,yea I get it "'Blame' and 'Holding someone responsible " but how far back are you willing to go to make sure every president and their admin is held responsible and how can you prove their guilt 100% with all the wacos in the white house ? tuff one man. but yes I understand what your saying.
Godfather.
Godfather.
I was giving you a hard time for your Mel Gibson moment the other day, but this is a pretty solid post ... I can see the value in understanding the terrorists' position, even as I feel that there is no way to condone their actions. Its not that different from the position of a pedophile or another serial murderer ... The behavior is loathsome, but if one believes that such things come about (in part) as a function of social policy, one does have to understand where the behavior comes from and perhaps assume some degree of societal responsibility in fixing the problem.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Just catching up with things....this is funny
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)