MLB 2025 Season

Options
1105610571059106110621219

Comments

  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,022
    Mets don’t like the physical either
  • F Me In The Brain
    F Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,800
    Would be funny if Boros convinced another big spender to sign him today
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,851
    Would be funny if Boros convinced another big spender to sign him today
    Haha!
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,022
    Yankees should shoot donaldson to the sun and offer a huge short term deal
  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,517
    I saw a buncha comments here, and all I wanted to see was about the now back wheeling of the Correa deal. This is fantastic.
  • Is his physical that bad?  He actually played 2 full seasons.  My thoughts on him getting hurt is he usually gets plunked w a pitch, not a knee injury.
    This is some interesting shit.
  • HesCalledDyer
    HesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,491
    Wobbie said:
    I think there’s no denying that huge FA signings might increase your CHANCES of winning it all but as I look at the 12 years since the original evil empire won a WS I see a lot of teams that came together at the right time either with young talent and/or key non-splashy acquisitions. My Giants had no superstars in 2010-2014, other than Buster Posey, who they had just drafted. They relied on great homegrown pitching and a total team “vibe.” In the past 12 years, I would say the only big spenders to win it all were the Cubs, BoSox and D*dgers (for the fraudulent 2020 mini WS). In a lot of cases, these big buck FA’s might have already peaked and may never replicate their early seasons again. I really like Judge, but I don’t expect him to ever have another 2022 year.

    Off topic - I can’t understand why Votto never requested a trade. Maybe he likes making money with no pressure or expectations. It always seemed to me like Palmiero resisted going anywhere that “mattered.” It was more like, “let me compile numbers that don’t really matter at all.” Maybe Ohtani will feel the same, but…..I DON’T THINK SO! :lol:
    The Cubs weren't really big spenders in the grand scheme of things. Heyward was the only big money acquisition that offseason; Lester was already 2 years into his deal.  Lackey, Zobrist, & Fowler were all done on the short & cheap.  Everyone else was either home grown - Baez, Bryant, Contreras, Schwarber, Almora, Soler, Edwards Jr -  or acquired thru low-level trades which conveniently all worked out at the same time and immensely in their favor - Rizzo [Cashner], Russell [Samardzija], Arrieta/Strop [Feldman/Clevenger], Hendricks [Dempster] - and the Chapman loan [Torres].

    FWIW, the Cubs payroll in 2016 was lower than the Giants.
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,240
    Wobbie said:
    I think there’s no denying that huge FA signings might increase your CHANCES of winning it all but as I look at the 12 years since the original evil empire won a WS I see a lot of teams that came together at the right time either with young talent and/or key non-splashy acquisitions. My Giants had no superstars in 2010-2014, other than Buster Posey, who they had just drafted. They relied on great homegrown pitching and a total team “vibe.” In the past 12 years, I would say the only big spenders to win it all were the Cubs, BoSox and D*dgers (for the fraudulent 2020 mini WS). In a lot of cases, these big buck FA’s might have already peaked and may never replicate their early seasons again. I really like Judge, but I don’t expect him to ever have another 2022 year.

    Off topic - I can’t understand why Votto never requested a trade. Maybe he likes making money with no pressure or expectations. It always seemed to me like Palmiero resisted going anywhere that “mattered.” It was more like, “let me compile numbers that don’t really matter at all.” Maybe Ohtani will feel the same, but…..I DON’T THINK SO! :lol:
    The Cubs weren't really big spenders in the grand scheme of things. Heyward was the only big money acquisition that offseason; Lester was already 2 years into his deal.  Lackey, Zobrist, & Fowler were all done on the short & cheap.  Everyone else was either home grown - Baez, Bryant, Contreras, Schwarber, Almora, Soler, Edwards Jr -  or acquired thru low-level trades which conveniently all worked out at the same time and immensely in their favor - Rizzo [Cashner], Russell [Samardzija], Arrieta/Strop [Feldman/Clevenger], Hendricks [Dempster] - and the Chapman loan [Torres].

    FWIW, the Cubs payroll in 2016 was lower than the Giants.
    my bad. you’re right….the cubs didn’t have a big payroll but they were clearly “going for it.”
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • Hi!
    Hi! Posts: 3,095
    edited January 2023
    Looking forward to having Cabrera at $25million next year, or whatever. Hey, at least he’s having fun in the dugout😒

    Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022

  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,517
    I didn't know there was this much development for it so far, but seems like Nashville is pretty close to being a definitive expansion team.



    Who should the other be? Based on everything I've read makes a lot of sense for it to be Portland. Personally, I want the Expos to come back.
  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,851
    I didn't know there was this much development for it so far, but seems like Nashville is pretty close to being a definitive expansion team.



    Who should the other be? Based on everything I've read makes a lot of sense for it to be Portland. Personally, I want the Expos to come back.
    I have seen Charlotte mentioned
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,869

    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,517
    Yeah top 5 seem to be Nash, Portland, Vegas, Charlotte, Montreal.

    I can see football working for Vegas, but I don't know if anything else. Seems like a good spot for winter ball, and other football team fans can supplement 70k+ attendance, don't know about baseball tho and filling a 35/45k ballpark consistently.

    Apparently Portland is the biggest market with only one major sports team. And a bigger market than Milwaukee, Cincy, and Kansas City. Would give a decent rival for the M's, too.
  • JeBurkhardt
    JeBurkhardt Posts: 5,321
    Poncier said:

    When the new Oakland A's stadium plans flame out, this will be the new home of the A's. 
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,869
    Poncier said:

    When the new Oakland A's stadium plans flame out, this will be the new home of the A's. 
    Definitely on the table as well.

    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,869
     

    I can see football working for Vegas, but I don't know if anything else 
    Golden Knights have played to 104-105% of capacity every season so far. And an NBA team in Vegas would do great business.
    Baseball, they need an enclosed stadium for sure in the summer, but I think it could do well.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,517
    Poncier said:
     

    I can see football working for Vegas, but I don't know if anything else 
    Golden Knights have played to 104-105% of capacity every season so far. And an NBA team in Vegas would do great business.
    Baseball, they need an enclosed stadium for sure in the summer, but I think it could do well.
    Ha, I forgot about them, but I meant major sports.

    Even Nashville has a hockey team. You're right tho, sports teams would do fine in Vegas.
  • Nashville and baseball?  That would be interesting.  That means the team will be music related I'm sure...
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,590
    No league needs more teams at this point.
    www.myspace.com