OMG Black people are joining the TEA party

24

Comments

  • Why do some of you continue to lie? No racial slurs were said and no one was spit on. A.Brietbart has offered up $10,000 to any one that has any audio or video of this happening,and said he woud donate it to the UNCF. It's been 2weeks and nothing. It didn't happen.
  • puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Why do some of you continue to lie? No racial slurs were said and no
    one was spit on. A.Brietbart has offered up $10,000 to any one that has
    any audio or video of this happening,and said he woud donate it to the
    UNCF. It's been 2weeks and nothing. It didn't happen.


    So these men are liars because no one has come forth with an audio recording. Nice ploy. I guess they, also, recorded their own hateful phone messages. Denial, a dish best served with humble pie.

    The Tea Party is what it is and just because you say hey look, we have black people, everyone is suppose to coward down. If these so called black teabaggers meant anything to the Tea party other than a promotional tool, they would not had have to be put on display as 'BLACK' Tea Party members. Since they allowed themselves be used, they should have known what the reaction from their own community was going to be like; no need in acting like a crybaby now. Maybe one of the'real' - I want my America back - teabaggers should have informed them of the danger associated with sticking their necks out.
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • Pepe SilviaPepe Silvia Posts: 3,758
    puremagic wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Why do some of you continue to lie? No racial slurs were said and no
    one was spit on. A.Brietbart has offered up $10,000 to any one that has
    any audio or video of this happening,and said he woud donate it to the
    UNCF. It's been 2weeks and nothing. It didn't happen.


    So these men are liars because no one has come forth with an audio recording. Nice ploy. I guess they, also, recorded their own hateful phone messages. Denial, a dish best served with humble pie.

    The Tea Party is what it is and just because you say hey look, we have black people, everyone is suppose to coward down. If these so called black teabaggers meant anything to the Tea party other than a promotional tool, they would not had have to be put on display as 'BLACK' Tea Party members. Since they allowed themselves be used, they should have known what the reaction from their own community was going to be like; no need in acting like a crybaby now. Maybe one of the'real' - I want my America back - teabaggers should have informed them of the danger associated with sticking their necks out.


    someone had posted a video of one of them being spat on a few weeks ago
    don't compete; coexist

    what are you but my reflection? who am i to judge or strike you down?

    "I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank." - Barack Obama

    when you told me 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'
    i was thinkin 'death before dishonor'
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    the tea party trying to find black members reminds me of george costanza trying to find a black friend


    anybody in the tea party have a black exterminator? ;)
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    puremagic wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Why do some of you continue to lie? No racial slurs were said and no
    one was spit on. A.Brietbart has offered up $10,000 to any one that has
    any audio or video of this happening,and said he woud donate it to the
    UNCF. It's been 2weeks and nothing. It didn't happen.


    So these men are liars because no one has come forth with an audio recording. Nice ploy. I guess they, also, recorded their own hateful phone messages. Denial, a dish best served with humble pie.

    The Tea Party is what it is and just because you say hey look, we have black people, everyone is suppose to coward down. If these so called black teabaggers meant anything to the Tea party other than a promotional tool, they would not had have to be put on display as 'BLACK' Tea Party members. Since they allowed themselves be used, they should have known what the reaction from their own community was going to be like; no need in acting like a crybaby now. Maybe one of the'real' - I want my America back - teabaggers should have informed them of the danger associated with sticking their necks out.
    Yes they are liars...they were escorted by policemen.....the police do not back up there lies.....no one does.....
    No Tea Party members are used as tools....the only reason this was posted was to prove the Tea Party is NOT a racist movement.....and hopefully those that claim racisim will stop the lies....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L88WhHfe84&feature=player_embedded
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • brandon10 wrote:
    There are also white Americans in Al Qaeda.

    Exactly.
  • brandon10 wrote:
    There are also white Americans in Al Qaeda.

    Exactly.[/quote


    so :roll: BFD. What's your point.
  • WaveCameCrashinWaveCameCrashin Posts: 2,929
    edited April 2010
    aerial wrote:
    puremagic wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Why do some of you continue to lie? No racial slurs were said and no
    one was spit on. A.Brietbart has offered up $10,000 to any one that has
    any audio or video of this happening,and said he woud donate it to the
    UNCF. It's been 2weeks and nothing. It didn't happen.


    So these men are liars because no one has come forth with an audio recording. Nice ploy. I guess they, also, recorded their own hateful phone messages. Denial, a dish best served with humble pie.

    The Tea Party is what it is and just because you say hey look, we have black people, everyone is suppose to coward down. If these so called black teabaggers meant anything to the Tea party other than a promotional tool, they would not had have to be put on display as 'BLACK' Tea Party members. Since they allowed themselves be used, they should have known what the reaction from their own community was going to be like; no need in acting like a crybaby now. Maybe one of the'real' - I want my America back - teabaggers should have informed them of the danger associated with sticking their necks out.
    Yes they are liars...they were escorted by policemen.....the police do not back up there lies.....no one does.....
    No Tea Party members are used as tools....the only reason this was posted was to prove the Tea Party is NOT a racist movement.....and hopefully those that claim racisim will stop the lies....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L88WhHfe84&feature=player_embedded


    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.
    Post edited by WaveCameCrashin on
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    prfctlefts wrote:
    brandon10 wrote:
    There are also white Americans in Al Qaeda.

    Exactly.


    so :roll: BFD. What's your point.

    His point is that skin colour doesnt stop someone being a total moron.
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.



    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.



    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?

    for me, I rather have folks play the "race card" over the "whiny-victim card"...

    and let me add, I really like the "here and now card" as opposed to "well, a 100 years ago card"...but that's just me... :lol:
  • puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907
    edited April 2010
    prfctlefts wrote:
    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.



    I understand your selective parrot pattern, but could you at least, every once in awhile, come close to not sounding like you have lost the ability to think for yourself.

    --First you say they didn't spit on these people.
    --Now you are claiming it was unintentional because they didn't launch a hawker.

    What an idiotic analogy.
    Post edited by puremagic on
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.



    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?


    Ordinary people reading these posting are thinking, WTF does this have to do with spitting on people!!! You on the other hand, regress into your parrot pattern and try to inject a point that is so damn off base, as to warrant criticism. You just can't be that mentally challenged, howver, patterns usually tell a story.
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • FiveB247xFiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    I think if given the opportunity, the original members of the Boston tea party would throw the current members besmirching its name into the harbor.. but why use history as a focal point? It's more fun to say grandiose rhetoric and speak in broad terms rather than discuss issues with details and fact.
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.

    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • FiveB247x wrote:
    I think if given the opportunity, the original members of the Boston tea party would throw the current members besmirching its name into the harbor.. but why use history as a focal point? It's more fun to say grandiose rhetoric and speak in broad terms rather than discuss issues with details and fact.
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.

    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?

    Thats' a pretty bold statment don't you think ? I bet the original members would stand shoulder to shoulder at the Tea parties. There have been other political protest where the Boston tea party has been referenced and that never seemed to bother anyone before. Even Ghandi once did when he threw salt over his shoulder when he met with the british viceroy in 1930.

    Im not speaking in broad terms either. It's a fact more Democrats voted against the civil rights act of 1964 than republicans did.
    The original House version:

    Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
    Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)

    The Senate version:

    Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
    Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

    The Senate version, voted on by the House:[9]

    Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
    Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)

    From this you can see the Republican Party supported and passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964
  • FiveB247xFiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    You're painting a political party now by using historical data from anywhere between 50-150 years ago...and I'm making bold statements? You're funny.
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Thats' a pretty bold statment don't you think ? I bet the original members would stand shoulder to shoulder at the Tea parties. There have been other political protest where the Boston tea party has been referenced and that never seemed to bother anyone before. Even Ghandi once did when he threw salt over his shoulder when he met with the british viceroy in 1930.

    Im not speaking in broad terms either. It's a fact more Democrats voted against the civil rights act of 1964 than republicans did.
    The original House version:

    Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
    Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)

    The Senate version:

    Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
    Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

    The Senate version, voted on by the House:[9]

    Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
    Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)

    From this you can see the Republican Party supported and passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • fifefife Posts: 3,327
    Am i the only one who is upset that it still matters if a group of people belong to the tea party. does having more African people, or middle eastern people or etc etc in the Tea Party make you OK with their ideas? on the other hand, does not having many visible minorities make their views wrong.

    racism ends when we decide that it is not a person skin color that matters but what they stand for.
  • puremagic wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.



    I understand your selective parrot pattern, but could you at least, every once in awhile, come close to not sounding like you have lost the ability to think for yourself.

    --First you say they didn't spit on these people.
    --Now you are claiming it was unintentional because they didn't launch a hawker.

    What an idiotic analogy.

    I can think for my self just fine.
    . So your going to sit there and tell me that you have never had spit accidentally come out of your mouth when you were talking to someone ??

    Please man. You people are a joke sometimes. Well actually most of the time. Facts don't matter to people like you because you are an ideologue. No one was spit on and you know it. Quit wtih the B.S. Like i said before there's $100,000.00 to the UNCF if anyone has proof of anyone intentionally being spit on. And yet nothing.....
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    prfctlefts wrote:
    puremagic wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.



    I understand your selective parrot pattern, but could you at least, every once in awhile, come close to not sounding like you have lost the ability to think for yourself.

    --First you say they didn't spit on these people.
    --Now you are claiming it was unintentional because they didn't launch a hawker.

    What an idiotic analogy.

    I can think for my self just fine.
    . So your going to sit there and tell me that you have never had spit accidentally come out of your mouth when you were talking to someone ??

    Please man. You people are a joke sometimes. Well actually most of the time. It doesn't matter to people like you because you are an ideologue. No one was spit on and you know it. quit wtih the B.S.

    dude, why so pissy lately...?
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    prfctlefts wrote:
    puremagic wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.



    I understand your selective parrot pattern, but could you at least, every once in awhile, come close to not sounding like you have lost the ability to think for yourself.

    --First you say they didn't spit on these people.
    --Now you are claiming it was unintentional because they didn't launch a hawker.

    What an idiotic analogy.

    I can think for my self just fine.
    . So your going to sit there and tell me that you have never had spit accidentally come out of your mouth when you were talking to someone ??

    Please man. You people are a joke sometimes. Well actually most of the time. It doesn't matter to people like you because you are an ideologue. No one was spit on and you know it. quit wtih the B.S.
    why would someone say they were spit on if they were not spit on? where is your rightwing blog with proof that it did not happen? were we supposed to dust the congressman's face for saliva or something?? i take him at his word.

    you call the other poster an ideologue, when you have opposed everything obama has proposed just because. that is being unreasonable. yet you, like your party, and the teabaggers can not provide sound reasons for your opposition. so let me ask you, who is the ideologue?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    fife wrote:
    Am i the only one who is upset that it still matters if a group of people belong to the tea party. does having more African people, or middle eastern people or etc etc in the Tea Party make you OK with their ideas? on the other hand, does not having many visible minorities make their views wrong.

    racism ends when we decide that it is not a person skin color that matters but what they stand for.


    One of the BEST post I have seen on the MT
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    aerial wrote:
    fife wrote:
    Am i the only one who is upset that it still matters if a group of people belong to the tea party. does having more African people, or middle eastern people or etc etc in the Tea Party make you OK with their ideas? on the other hand, does not having many visible minorities make their views wrong.

    racism ends when we decide that it is not a person skin color that matters but what they stand for.


    One of the BEST post I have seen on the MT
    so it just so happens that obama is black then, because you would also hate him if he was white? is that what you are saying?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.[/quote]



    I understand your selective parrot pattern, but could you at least, every once in awhile, come close to not sounding like you have lost the ability to think for yourself.

    --First you say they didn't spit on these people.
    --Now you are claiming it was unintentional because they didn't launch a hawker.

    What an idiotic analogy.[/quote]

    I can think for my self just fine.
    . So your going to sit there and tell me that you have never had spit accidentally come out of your mouth when you were talking to someone ??

    Please man. You people are a joke sometimes. Well actually most of the time. It doesn't matter to people like you because you are an ideologue. No one was spit on and you know it. quit wtih the B.S.[/quote]
    why would someone say they were spit on if they were not spit on? where is your rightwing blog with proof that it did not happen? were we supposed to dust the congressman's face for saliva or something?? i take him at his word.
    you call the other poster an ideologue, when you have opposed everything obama has proposed just because. that is being unreasonable. yet you, like your party, and the teabaggers can not provide sound reasons for your opposition. so let me ask you, who is the ideologue?

    There was a policeman right beside the congressman why was the guy not arrested?
    We have posted many reasons for our opposition you just refuse to comprehend...
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    aerial wrote:
    fife wrote:
    Am i the only one who is upset that it still matters if a group of people belong to the tea party. does having more African people, or middle eastern people or etc etc in the Tea Party make you OK with their ideas? on the other hand, does not having many visible minorities make their views wrong.

    racism ends when we decide that it is not a person skin color that matters but what they stand for.


    One of the BEST post I have seen on the MT
    so it just so happens that obama is black then, because you would also hate him if he was white? is that what you are saying?
    I’m saying color is not an issue....
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    aerial wrote:
    you call the other poster an ideologue, when you have opposed everything obama has proposed just because. that is being unreasonable. yet you, like your party, and the teabaggers can not provide sound reasons for your opposition. so let me ask you, who is the ideologue?

    There was a policeman right beside the congressman why was the guy not arrested?
    We have posted many reasons for our opposition you just refuse to comprehend...
    are you not aware that the victim has the right to press charges or not press charges? he chose not to press charges, so no need for the police to get involved. prove to me he was not spit on...did you watch the video?

    also please answer the question about hating obama if he were white.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    aerial wrote:
    I’m saying color is not an issue....
    but you hate obama right? you are raging against the machine aren't you? if he were white would you still be doing that? i do not think you would be, but hey, that's just me...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    aerial wrote:
    I’m saying color is not an issue....
    but you hate obama right? you are raging against the machine aren't you? if he were white would you still be doing that? i do not think you would be, but hey, that's just me...
    I’m saying color is not be an issue....Your right, That is you...not me.....
    I could careless what color he is....I don’t trust him.....
    Why do you assume I am a racist when I have NEVER given you a reason to say such a thing....do you just go around calling anyone a racist when you don’t like what they have to say?
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    aerial wrote:
    aerial wrote:
    I’m saying color is not an issue....
    but you hate obama right? you are raging against the machine aren't you? if he were white would you still be doing that? i do not think you would be, but hey, that's just me...
    I’m saying color is not be an issue....Your right, That is you...not me.....
    I could careless what color he is....I don’t trust him.....
    Why do you assume I am a racist when I have NEVER given you a reason to say such a thing....do you just go around calling anyone a racist when you don’t like what they have to say?
    aerial some of the links you post are from people that have white supremacist leanings. many in the tea party are white supremacists, why else would they say and do some of the things they have said and done? obama's policies are really no different than bush's for the most part. where were you then? why were you not protesting then? is it because southern whitey was making the decisions against the will of the majority or americans? you are in florida right? is it because southern whitey's brother was governor of your state, therefore his policies were going to be good for you? obama is trying to help people like you, that have to work 3 jobs. if you fail to see that, then there is no helping you...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    quote="aerial"]
    aerial wrote:
    I’m saying color is not an issue....
    but you hate obama right? you are raging against the machine aren't you? if he were white would you still be doing that? i do not think you would be, but hey, that's just me...
    I’m saying color is not be an issue....Your right, That is you...not me.....
    I could careless what color he is....I don’t trust him.....
    Why do you assume I am a racist when I have NEVER given you a reason to say such a thing....do you just go around calling anyone a racist when you don’t like what they have to say?[/quote]
    [aerial some of the links you post are from people that have white supremacist leanings. many in the tea party are white supremacists, why else would they say and do some of the things they have said and done? obama's policies are really no different than bush's for the most part. where were you then? why were you not protesting then? is it because southern whitey was making the decisions against the will of the majority or americans? you are in florida right? is it because southern whitey's brother was governor of your state, therefore his policies were going to be good for you? obama is trying to help people like you, that have to work 3 jobs. if you fail to see that, then there is no helping you...
    Please show me any White Supremacist link I have provided....
    What is wrong with you....with your whitey rant?
    I did not agree with Bush...
    or his brother nor any other politician in the white house... black, white, Hispanic, Asian, male or female
    I am just wondering how many times I will post this before you will comprehend what I am saying?
    Your hatred just spews out all over this site with just about everything you post....were do you get this from....
    If there are white suprem. In the Tea Party ( thou I have never seen any) I have to say I have NEVER heard a racist comment at ANY rally I have ever been to.....nothing like the racism you post ....and If I had seen any signs of racism I would NOT be involved with the movement....one reason I am involved is because they do NOT promote violence!!! At ALL...as in NONE! EVERYONE IS INVITED!!!
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • OnTheEdgeOnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    inmytree wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.



    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?

    for me, I rather have folks play the "race card" over the "whiny-victim card"...

    and let me add, I really like the "here and now card" as opposed to "well, a 100 years ago card"...but that's just me... :lol:


    Or the 3,4, or 5 year ago card.
Sign In or Register to comment.