OMG Black people are joining the TEA party

135

Comments

  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.



    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?

    for me, I rather have folks play the "race card" over the "whiny-victim card"...

    and let me add, I really like the "here and now card" as opposed to "well, a 100 years ago card"...but that's just me... :lol:
  • puremagic
    puremagic Posts: 1,907
    edited April 2010
    prfctlefts wrote:
    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.



    I understand your selective parrot pattern, but could you at least, every once in awhile, come close to not sounding like you have lost the ability to think for yourself.

    --First you say they didn't spit on these people.
    --Now you are claiming it was unintentional because they didn't launch a hawker.

    What an idiotic analogy.
    Post edited by puremagic on
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • puremagic
    puremagic Posts: 1,907
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.



    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?


    Ordinary people reading these posting are thinking, WTF does this have to do with spitting on people!!! You on the other hand, regress into your parrot pattern and try to inject a point that is so damn off base, as to warrant criticism. You just can't be that mentally challenged, howver, patterns usually tell a story.
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • FiveB247x
    FiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    I think if given the opportunity, the original members of the Boston tea party would throw the current members besmirching its name into the harbor.. but why use history as a focal point? It's more fun to say grandiose rhetoric and speak in broad terms rather than discuss issues with details and fact.
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.

    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • WaveCameCrashin
    WaveCameCrashin Posts: 2,929
    FiveB247x wrote:
    I think if given the opportunity, the original members of the Boston tea party would throw the current members besmirching its name into the harbor.. but why use history as a focal point? It's more fun to say grandiose rhetoric and speak in broad terms rather than discuss issues with details and fact.
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.

    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?

    Thats' a pretty bold statment don't you think ? I bet the original members would stand shoulder to shoulder at the Tea parties. There have been other political protest where the Boston tea party has been referenced and that never seemed to bother anyone before. Even Ghandi once did when he threw salt over his shoulder when he met with the british viceroy in 1930.

    Im not speaking in broad terms either. It's a fact more Democrats voted against the civil rights act of 1964 than republicans did.
    The original House version:

    Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
    Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)

    The Senate version:

    Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
    Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

    The Senate version, voted on by the House:[9]

    Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
    Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)

    From this you can see the Republican Party supported and passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964
  • FiveB247x
    FiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    You're painting a political party now by using historical data from anywhere between 50-150 years ago...and I'm making bold statements? You're funny.
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Thats' a pretty bold statment don't you think ? I bet the original members would stand shoulder to shoulder at the Tea parties. There have been other political protest where the Boston tea party has been referenced and that never seemed to bother anyone before. Even Ghandi once did when he threw salt over his shoulder when he met with the british viceroy in 1930.

    Im not speaking in broad terms either. It's a fact more Democrats voted against the civil rights act of 1964 than republicans did.
    The original House version:

    Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
    Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)

    The Senate version:

    Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
    Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

    The Senate version, voted on by the House:[9]

    Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
    Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)

    From this you can see the Republican Party supported and passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • fife
    fife Posts: 3,327
    Am i the only one who is upset that it still matters if a group of people belong to the tea party. does having more African people, or middle eastern people or etc etc in the Tea Party make you OK with their ideas? on the other hand, does not having many visible minorities make their views wrong.

    racism ends when we decide that it is not a person skin color that matters but what they stand for.
  • WaveCameCrashin
    WaveCameCrashin Posts: 2,929
    puremagic wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.



    I understand your selective parrot pattern, but could you at least, every once in awhile, come close to not sounding like you have lost the ability to think for yourself.

    --First you say they didn't spit on these people.
    --Now you are claiming it was unintentional because they didn't launch a hawker.

    What an idiotic analogy.

    I can think for my self just fine.
    . So your going to sit there and tell me that you have never had spit accidentally come out of your mouth when you were talking to someone ??

    Please man. You people are a joke sometimes. Well actually most of the time. Facts don't matter to people like you because you are an ideologue. No one was spit on and you know it. Quit wtih the B.S. Like i said before there's $100,000.00 to the UNCF if anyone has proof of anyone intentionally being spit on. And yet nothing.....
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    prfctlefts wrote:
    puremagic wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.



    I understand your selective parrot pattern, but could you at least, every once in awhile, come close to not sounding like you have lost the ability to think for yourself.

    --First you say they didn't spit on these people.
    --Now you are claiming it was unintentional because they didn't launch a hawker.

    What an idiotic analogy.

    I can think for my self just fine.
    . So your going to sit there and tell me that you have never had spit accidentally come out of your mouth when you were talking to someone ??

    Please man. You people are a joke sometimes. Well actually most of the time. It doesn't matter to people like you because you are an ideologue. No one was spit on and you know it. quit wtih the B.S.

    dude, why so pissy lately...?
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,878
    prfctlefts wrote:
    puremagic wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.



    I understand your selective parrot pattern, but could you at least, every once in awhile, come close to not sounding like you have lost the ability to think for yourself.

    --First you say they didn't spit on these people.
    --Now you are claiming it was unintentional because they didn't launch a hawker.

    What an idiotic analogy.

    I can think for my self just fine.
    . So your going to sit there and tell me that you have never had spit accidentally come out of your mouth when you were talking to someone ??

    Please man. You people are a joke sometimes. Well actually most of the time. It doesn't matter to people like you because you are an ideologue. No one was spit on and you know it. quit wtih the B.S.
    why would someone say they were spit on if they were not spit on? where is your rightwing blog with proof that it did not happen? were we supposed to dust the congressman's face for saliva or something?? i take him at his word.

    you call the other poster an ideologue, when you have opposed everything obama has proposed just because. that is being unreasonable. yet you, like your party, and the teabaggers can not provide sound reasons for your opposition. so let me ask you, who is the ideologue?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • aerial
    aerial Posts: 2,319
    fife wrote:
    Am i the only one who is upset that it still matters if a group of people belong to the tea party. does having more African people, or middle eastern people or etc etc in the Tea Party make you OK with their ideas? on the other hand, does not having many visible minorities make their views wrong.

    racism ends when we decide that it is not a person skin color that matters but what they stand for.


    One of the BEST post I have seen on the MT
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,878
    aerial wrote:
    fife wrote:
    Am i the only one who is upset that it still matters if a group of people belong to the tea party. does having more African people, or middle eastern people or etc etc in the Tea Party make you OK with their ideas? on the other hand, does not having many visible minorities make their views wrong.

    racism ends when we decide that it is not a person skin color that matters but what they stand for.


    One of the BEST post I have seen on the MT
    so it just so happens that obama is black then, because you would also hate him if he was white? is that what you are saying?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • aerial
    aerial Posts: 2,319
    No one was intentionally spit on. There's no footage of anyone rearing there head back and launching a loogie on anybody. If that guy intentionally spit on that congressman than that officer would have arrested him on the spot.[/quote]



    I understand your selective parrot pattern, but could you at least, every once in awhile, come close to not sounding like you have lost the ability to think for yourself.

    --First you say they didn't spit on these people.
    --Now you are claiming it was unintentional because they didn't launch a hawker.

    What an idiotic analogy.[/quote]

    I can think for my self just fine.
    . So your going to sit there and tell me that you have never had spit accidentally come out of your mouth when you were talking to someone ??

    Please man. You people are a joke sometimes. Well actually most of the time. It doesn't matter to people like you because you are an ideologue. No one was spit on and you know it. quit wtih the B.S.[/quote]
    why would someone say they were spit on if they were not spit on? where is your rightwing blog with proof that it did not happen? were we supposed to dust the congressman's face for saliva or something?? i take him at his word.
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    you call the other poster an ideologue, when you have opposed everything obama has proposed just because. that is being unreasonable. yet you, like your party, and the teabaggers can not provide sound reasons for your opposition. so let me ask you, who is the ideologue?

    There was a policeman right beside the congressman why was the guy not arrested?
    We have posted many reasons for our opposition you just refuse to comprehend...
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • aerial
    aerial Posts: 2,319
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    aerial wrote:
    fife wrote:
    Am i the only one who is upset that it still matters if a group of people belong to the tea party. does having more African people, or middle eastern people or etc etc in the Tea Party make you OK with their ideas? on the other hand, does not having many visible minorities make their views wrong.

    racism ends when we decide that it is not a person skin color that matters but what they stand for.


    One of the BEST post I have seen on the MT
    so it just so happens that obama is black then, because you would also hate him if he was white? is that what you are saying?
    I’m saying color is not an issue....
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,878
    aerial wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    you call the other poster an ideologue, when you have opposed everything obama has proposed just because. that is being unreasonable. yet you, like your party, and the teabaggers can not provide sound reasons for your opposition. so let me ask you, who is the ideologue?

    There was a policeman right beside the congressman why was the guy not arrested?
    We have posted many reasons for our opposition you just refuse to comprehend...
    are you not aware that the victim has the right to press charges or not press charges? he chose not to press charges, so no need for the police to get involved. prove to me he was not spit on...did you watch the video?

    also please answer the question about hating obama if he were white.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,878
    aerial wrote:
    I’m saying color is not an issue....
    but you hate obama right? you are raging against the machine aren't you? if he were white would you still be doing that? i do not think you would be, but hey, that's just me...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • aerial
    aerial Posts: 2,319
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    aerial wrote:
    I’m saying color is not an issue....
    but you hate obama right? you are raging against the machine aren't you? if he were white would you still be doing that? i do not think you would be, but hey, that's just me...
    I’m saying color is not be an issue....Your right, That is you...not me.....
    I could careless what color he is....I don’t trust him.....
    Why do you assume I am a racist when I have NEVER given you a reason to say such a thing....do you just go around calling anyone a racist when you don’t like what they have to say?
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,878
    aerial wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    aerial wrote:
    I’m saying color is not an issue....
    but you hate obama right? you are raging against the machine aren't you? if he were white would you still be doing that? i do not think you would be, but hey, that's just me...
    I’m saying color is not be an issue....Your right, That is you...not me.....
    I could careless what color he is....I don’t trust him.....
    Why do you assume I am a racist when I have NEVER given you a reason to say such a thing....do you just go around calling anyone a racist when you don’t like what they have to say?
    aerial some of the links you post are from people that have white supremacist leanings. many in the tea party are white supremacists, why else would they say and do some of the things they have said and done? obama's policies are really no different than bush's for the most part. where were you then? why were you not protesting then? is it because southern whitey was making the decisions against the will of the majority or americans? you are in florida right? is it because southern whitey's brother was governor of your state, therefore his policies were going to be good for you? obama is trying to help people like you, that have to work 3 jobs. if you fail to see that, then there is no helping you...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • aerial
    aerial Posts: 2,319
    quote="aerial"]
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    aerial wrote:
    I’m saying color is not an issue....
    but you hate obama right? you are raging against the machine aren't you? if he were white would you still be doing that? i do not think you would be, but hey, that's just me...
    I’m saying color is not be an issue....Your right, That is you...not me.....
    I could careless what color he is....I don’t trust him.....
    Why do you assume I am a racist when I have NEVER given you a reason to say such a thing....do you just go around calling anyone a racist when you don’t like what they have to say?[/quote]
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    [aerial some of the links you post are from people that have white supremacist leanings. many in the tea party are white supremacists, why else would they say and do some of the things they have said and done? obama's policies are really no different than bush's for the most part. where were you then? why were you not protesting then? is it because southern whitey was making the decisions against the will of the majority or americans? you are in florida right? is it because southern whitey's brother was governor of your state, therefore his policies were going to be good for you? obama is trying to help people like you, that have to work 3 jobs. if you fail to see that, then there is no helping you...
    Please show me any White Supremacist link I have provided....
    What is wrong with you....with your whitey rant?
    I did not agree with Bush...
    or his brother nor any other politician in the white house... black, white, Hispanic, Asian, male or female
    I am just wondering how many times I will post this before you will comprehend what I am saying?
    Your hatred just spews out all over this site with just about everything you post....were do you get this from....
    If there are white suprem. In the Tea Party ( thou I have never seen any) I have to say I have NEVER heard a racist comment at ANY rally I have ever been to.....nothing like the racism you post ....and If I had seen any signs of racism I would NOT be involved with the movement....one reason I am involved is because they do NOT promote violence!!! At ALL...as in NONE! EVERYONE IS INVITED!!!
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    inmytree wrote:
    prfctlefts wrote:
    Isn't it funny how all the people on here that voted for obama and suport the Democratic party are so quik to forget that it was the democratic party that fought against abolishing slavery and that stood for segregation. What about the supreme court ruling in Dread Scott that reversed the Missouri compromise. When ever the left wing democrats are in trouble they play the race card so it will divert attention to the real issues.



    So those of us that support and hold up the constituion, Support limited gov,support Free enterprise,and stand for liberty. and were the ones being called racist ? :?

    for me, I rather have folks play the "race card" over the "whiny-victim card"...

    and let me add, I really like the "here and now card" as opposed to "well, a 100 years ago card"...but that's just me... :lol:


    Or the 3,4, or 5 year ago card.

Categories