The Official New York Yankees Thread

1…533534536538539…1256

Comments

  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    McDonald...Qualls??? Are they trying to boot the season? :lol:
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    Seems like I picked a good one to miss last night.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    DS1119 wrote:
    So they sign Darnell McDOnald??? :? Fairly confused with this. Pretty much means they have to release Wise or Nix. I have a feeling this is becasue Gardner won't be back this season. :?

    Send Phelps down after today, they don't need him with CC coming back. Keep McDonald until after the All Star break and go from there. McDonald can be mildly useful against lefties. But yeah, in the long run it would have to be Wise, if they plan on keep McDonald.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    First fucking hit the kid gives up goes for a run. Good job from him though. Cigar and grilling time means John Sterling and Suzyn Waldman time.
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    I don't think I have ever seen umpire's interference before. :think:
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    DS1119 wrote:
    I don't think I have ever seen umpire's interference before. :think:

    I just came on to say. I don't get that shit a little bit. The catcher either cocks back too far or the umpire fucks up and the Yankees are penalized. Baseball is a hell of a game. If I were a catcher, I would sit back in running situations. I don't like that rule and not just because it cost the Yankees a run.
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:
    I don't think I have ever seen umpire's interference before. :think:

    I just came on to say. I don't get that shit a little bit. The catcher either cocks back too far or the umpire fucks up and the Yankees are penalized. Baseball is a hell of a game. If I were a catcher, I would sit back in running situations. I don't like that rule and not just because it cost the Yankees a run.


    I agree. Maybe Martin should just lean back from now on when he doesn't have a shot. I never even knew or thought such a rule existed.
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    Thank you Farnsworthless.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    Farnsworth complaining after 15 balls in the inning
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    DS1119 wrote:
    Thank you Farnsworthless.

    A Farnsworth special. God I hate his face
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    DS1119 wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:
    I don't think I have ever seen umpire's interference before. :think:

    I just came on to say. I don't get that shit a little bit. The catcher either cocks back too far or the umpire fucks up and the Yankees are penalized. Baseball is a hell of a game. If I were a catcher, I would sit back in running situations. I don't like that rule and not just because it cost the Yankees a run.


    I agree. Maybe Martin should just lean back from now on when he doesn't have a shot. I never even knew or thought such a rule existed.

    Either did I and why the hell not. Such a dumb rule. Probably still in the books because it never happens so no one complains about it.
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    Cliffy6745 wrote:

    Either did I and why the hell not. Such a dumb rule. Probably still in the books because it never happens so no one complains about it.


    I figured it would be like any other ump in play. A ball hits an ump you just play through it. A catcher happens to hit the home plate ump you just play through it. Guess not. Dumb rule. Almost figure that if the runner would have to return to the base the pitch would have to be replayed as well. :?
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    Tampa Bay fans I'm sure still wished Farnworthless was on the DL. :lol:
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    Robbie!
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    DS1119 wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:

    Either did I and why the hell not. Such a dumb rule. Probably still in the books because it never happens so no one complains about it.


    I figured it would be like any other ump in play. A ball hits an ump you just play through it. A catcher happens to hit the home plate ump you just play through it. Guess not. Dumb rule. Almost figure that if the runner would have to return to the base the pitch would have to be replayed as well. :?

    Yeah, agreed completely.
  • davidtrios
    davidtrios Posts: 9,732
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    Robbie!


    i love having cano and grandy on my fant team. plus, my opponent this week has that animal Price on his team. he will NOT factor in the decision.
  • igotid88
    igotid88 Posts: 28,628
    3 of the 4 runs were not because of the homerun. So does that take away from winning without a hr? If the lead holds?
    I miss igotid88
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    davidtrios wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    Robbie!


    i love having cano and grandy on my fant team. plus, my opponent this week has that animal Price on his team. he will NOT factor in the decision.

    I love having Cano and Grady on my real team :lol: But yeah, gotta be pretty nice.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,024
    Back to the deck. Hopefully a bounce back from Robertson.
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    igotid88 wrote:
    3 of the 4 runs were not because of the homerun. So does that take away from winning without a hr? If the lead holds?


    They actually did hit a homerun so no it doesn't.

Categories