#47 President Donald Trump
Comments
-
PJ_Soul said:So what has Trump accomplished with this tariff war so far?- Turned the west against him even more- unsettled the stock market- decreased US tourism- decreased purchasing of US goods in Canada and Mexico and the EU- increased political solidarity in Canada, Mexico, and the EU- added 10,000 Mexican troops at the southern border- forced Canada to overspend on border security for an essentially irrelevant impact (not that i argue against the illegal drug trade or illegal immigration - nobody does, and nobody ever has)- destroyed America's good relationship with its strongest trading partnersAwesome. Bravo to the GOP.It's a hopeless situation...0
-
tbergs said:PJ_Soul said:So what has Trump accomplished with this tariff war so far?- Turned the west against him even more- unsettled the stock market- decreased US tourism- decreased purchasing of US goods in Canada and Mexico and the EU- increased political solidarity in Canada, Mexico, and the EU- added 10,000 Mexican troops at the southern border- forced Canada to overspend on border security for an essentially irrelevant impact (not that i argue against the illegal drug trade or illegal immigration - nobody does, and nobody ever has)- destroyed America's good relationship with its strongest trading partnersAwesome. Bravo to the GOP.Well there you go, and just like the actions Canada had already taken at their border.Just such destructive bullshit.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0
-
Tim Simmons said:I think the real issue is that he would be willing to throw the good economy out with the boarder issue bathwater.Vancouver '03, Paramount Theatre '05, Saskatoon '05, Calgary '05, Edmonton '05, Saskatoon '11, Calgary '11, Calgary '13
2010 WATCH IT GO TO FIRE!!0 -
evsgjamm said:Tim Simmons said:I think the real issue is that he would be willing to throw the good economy out with the boarder issue bathwater.
I have to admit that I have no problem with this message. I am a self-admitted "grammar-Nazi", although I try to keep it to myself, since I know how many people don't so much appreciate our well-intended mission, which is, of course, to help people know how to write properly, lol. Also, the reason I just said it was to bring me to my next point: I learned somewhat recently to not say the term "grammar-Nazi" in real life. I accidentally said it in the company of a Jewish colleague. I apologized later, after realizing what I did. She very much appreciated my apology, and pointed out that malicious intent was needed for it to be offensive. Still, I felt bad.
Not as bad as it makes me feel when I see someone mixing up "your" and "you're" though, or not knowing how to use apostophes.Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
If you hear about the 50501 protests planned for this Wednesday, 2/5/21, please read this: (quote from Reddit)"Please know: not a single national group (like MoveOn or Working Families or Indivisible) or national union (including the AFL-CIO) have co-signed this event, or are promoting it.
I live in Minnesota. I am political staff for a small education union. We had stuff like this pop up after the Uprising in 2020 and they were 100% fake, cooked up by bots and groups trying to co-opt the genuine movement. Some of these ended up with rally attendees being taken into the freeways and getting kettled and facing real jail time. This is a very real risk
If there aren’t any of the big players involved you should be extremely careful. It doesn’t take any real proof to pull a permit. Anyone can do it. No big players means there is likely no safety plan, no police liaison (which are helpful for large actions), and probably no marshals.
The date and time are also extremely suspicious. A rally designed to great a large crowd would not be held at noon on a weekday.
The website listed in the Newsweek article does not exist. The Insta page is new, and there is no list of other supporters. It is absolutely possible that this is an event created for the very purpose of sharing disinformation and sowing distrust in the progressive/labor community."
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
PJ_Soul said:evsgjamm said:Tim Simmons said:I think the real issue is that he would be willing to throw the good economy out with the boarder issue bathwater.
I have to admit that I have no problem with this message. I am a self-admitted "grammar-Nazi", although I try to keep it to myself, since I know how many people don't so much appreciate our well-intended mission, which is, of course, to help people know how to write properly, lol. Also, the reason I just said it was to bring me to my next point: I learned somewhat recently to not say the term "grammar-Nazi" in real life. I accidentally said it in the company of a Jewish colleague. I apologized later, after realizing what I did. She very much appreciated my apology, and pointed out that malicious intent was needed for it to be offensive. Still, I felt bad.
Not as bad as it makes me feel when I see someone mixing up "your" and "you're" though, or not knowing how to use apostophes.0 -
battle1 said:PJ_Soul said:evsgjamm said:Tim Simmons said:I think the real issue is that he would be willing to throw the good economy out with the boarder issue bathwater.
I have to admit that I have no problem with this message. I am a self-admitted "grammar-Nazi", although I try to keep it to myself, since I know how many people don't so much appreciate our well-intended mission, which is, of course, to help people know how to write properly, lol. Also, the reason I just said it was to bring me to my next point: I learned somewhat recently to not say the term "grammar-Nazi" in real life. I accidentally said it in the company of a Jewish colleague. I apologized later, after realizing what I did. She very much appreciated my apology, and pointed out that malicious intent was needed for it to be offensive. Still, I felt bad.
Not as bad as it makes me feel when I see someone mixing up "your" and "you're" though, or not knowing how to use apostophes.What is 'my kind'?The term is a well-know colloquialism of course, as I know you know. Like I said, not very appropriate. Although using the word Nazi is not a problem. Acting like a Nazi is where the problem comes in. In any case, keep on trolling bud.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:battle1 said:PJ_Soul said:evsgjamm said:Tim Simmons said:I think the real issue is that he would be willing to throw the good economy out with the boarder issue bathwater.
I have to admit that I have no problem with this message. I am a self-admitted "grammar-Nazi", although I try to keep it to myself, since I know how many people don't so much appreciate our well-intended mission, which is, of course, to help people know how to write properly, lol. Also, the reason I just said it was to bring me to my next point: I learned somewhat recently to not say the term "grammar-Nazi" in real life. I accidentally said it in the company of a Jewish colleague. I apologized later, after realizing what I did. She very much appreciated my apology, and pointed out that malicious intent was needed for it to be offensive. Still, I felt bad.
Not as bad as it makes me feel when I see someone mixing up "your" and "you're" though, or not knowing how to use apostophes.What is 'my kind'?The term is a well-know colloquialism of course, as I know you know. Like I said, not very appropriate. Although using the word Nazi is not a problem. Acting like a Nazi is where the problem comes in. In any case, keep on trolling bud.These people actually take themselves seriously.0 -
Hey, I'm good with the "grammar nazis"! Yes, please, help make America literate again! A little more brain power and education down here might someday help this nation learn how to make better choices!"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0
-
battle1 said:PJ_Soul said:battle1 said:PJ_Soul said:evsgjamm said:Tim Simmons said:I think the real issue is that he would be willing to throw the good economy out with the boarder issue bathwater.
I have to admit that I have no problem with this message. I am a self-admitted "grammar-Nazi", although I try to keep it to myself, since I know how many people don't so much appreciate our well-intended mission, which is, of course, to help people know how to write properly, lol. Also, the reason I just said it was to bring me to my next point: I learned somewhat recently to not say the term "grammar-Nazi" in real life. I accidentally said it in the company of a Jewish colleague. I apologized later, after realizing what I did. She very much appreciated my apology, and pointed out that malicious intent was needed for it to be offensive. Still, I felt bad.
Not as bad as it makes me feel when I see someone mixing up "your" and "you're" though, or not knowing how to use apostophes.What is 'my kind'?The term is a well-know colloquialism of course, as I know you know. Like I said, not very appropriate. Although using the word Nazi is not a problem. Acting like a Nazi is where the problem comes in. In any case, keep on trolling bud.These people actually take themselves seriously.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:battle1 said:PJ_Soul said:battle1 said:PJ_Soul said:evsgjamm said:Tim Simmons said:I think the real issue is that he would be willing to throw the good economy out with the boarder issue bathwater.
I have to admit that I have no problem with this message. I am a self-admitted "grammar-Nazi", although I try to keep it to myself, since I know how many people don't so much appreciate our well-intended mission, which is, of course, to help people know how to write properly, lol. Also, the reason I just said it was to bring me to my next point: I learned somewhat recently to not say the term "grammar-Nazi" in real life. I accidentally said it in the company of a Jewish colleague. I apologized later, after realizing what I did. She very much appreciated my apology, and pointed out that malicious intent was needed for it to be offensive. Still, I felt bad.
Not as bad as it makes me feel when I see someone mixing up "your" and "you're" though, or not knowing how to use apostophes.What is 'my kind'?The term is a well-know colloquialism of course, as I know you know. Like I said, not very appropriate. Although using the word Nazi is not a problem. Acting like a Nazi is where the problem comes in. In any case, keep on trolling bud.These people actually take themselves seriously.0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:Get_Right said:Lerxst1992 said:Get_Right said:Lerxst1992 said:Get_Right said:Like it or not, politics is a dirty business in the US. To think otherwise is to be naive. Trump made a promise to levy tariffs if our neighboring countries do not allocate more resources to border security. He kept his promise in less than a month. The efficacy remains to been seen and it is likely his executive orders would not withstand judicial scrutiny, but he made a promise and kept it. I cannot say that about many politicians in the US.No one manipulates facts like this dude. No one.And your comment is Not exactly true when taken in context, per the AP:
“Unlike during the 2024 campaign, when Trump billed his economic agenda as guaranteed to reduce the cost of living for Americans, the Republcan president now is acknowledging what many economists have long forecasted: that the levies could yield higher prices and lower supplies across the market.”
My comments address his actions on tariffs regarding border security, not economic impact of tariffs on US citizens with respect to the importation of tangible goods or the cost of living. It does not take much manipulation of facts to assess the financial impact of fentanyl being imported into our country, whether direct from China or through our North American neighbors. And all politicians manipulate facts to support their agenda.So in your republican logic, let’s tank our economy to solve ten percent of the immigration problem, maybe.
Not immigration. Drug smuggling.
.2%, of identified fentanyl seizures. That does not account for what was not identified, or other drugs that may contain fentanyl. Do people really think it is a bad thing if Canada and Mexico increased border security with drug smugglers as a specific target? They have 30 days to put their money where their mouth is. Trump may very well be a moron, and I can see how people think this is bad politics. But if Canada and Mexico do even 20% of what they promised, then fewer drugs may enter our country. I fail to see how that is a bad thing.0 -
benjs said:PJ_Soul said:So what has Trump accomplished with this tariff war so far?- Turned the west against him even more- unsettled the stock market- decreased US tourism- decreased purchasing of US goods in Canada and Mexico and the EU- increased political solidarity in Canada, Mexico, and the EU- added 10,000 Mexican troops at the southern border- forced Canada to overspend on border security for an essentially irrelevant impact (not that i argue against the illegal drug trade or illegal immigration - nobody does, and nobody ever has)- destroyed America's good relationship with its strongest trading partnersAwesome. Bravo to the GOP.
I think Trump was probably well advised that invoking the Emergency Powers Act to impose tariffs may not survive judicial scrutiny, but was also advised that there was nothing to lose. His position is that Canada and Mexico are not doing enough and was looking for potential solutions that could be swiftly implemented without seeking Congressional approval. He was not chicken shit in 2018 when it came to China and those actions have survived judicial scrutiny.0 -
Get_Right said:HughFreakingDillon said:Get_Right said:Lerxst1992 said:Get_Right said:Lerxst1992 said:Get_Right said:Like it or not, politics is a dirty business in the US. To think otherwise is to be naive. Trump made a promise to levy tariffs if our neighboring countries do not allocate more resources to border security. He kept his promise in less than a month. The efficacy remains to been seen and it is likely his executive orders would not withstand judicial scrutiny, but he made a promise and kept it. I cannot say that about many politicians in the US.No one manipulates facts like this dude. No one.And your comment is Not exactly true when taken in context, per the AP:
“Unlike during the 2024 campaign, when Trump billed his economic agenda as guaranteed to reduce the cost of living for Americans, the Republcan president now is acknowledging what many economists have long forecasted: that the levies could yield higher prices and lower supplies across the market.”
My comments address his actions on tariffs regarding border security, not economic impact of tariffs on US citizens with respect to the importation of tangible goods or the cost of living. It does not take much manipulation of facts to assess the financial impact of fentanyl being imported into our country, whether direct from China or through our North American neighbors. And all politicians manipulate facts to support their agenda.So in your republican logic, let’s tank our economy to solve ten percent of the immigration problem, maybe.
Not immigration. Drug smuggling.
.2%, of identified fentanyl seizures. That does not account for what was not identified, or other drugs that may contain fentanyl. Do people really think it is a bad thing if Canada and Mexico increased border security with drug smugglers as a specific target? They have 30 days to put their money where their mouth is. Trump may very well be a moron, and I can see how people think this is bad politics. But if Canada and Mexico do even 20% of what they promised, then fewer drugs may enter our country. I fail to see how that is a bad thing.
the announced money was already publically pledged in Dec....
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Get_Right said:HughFreakingDillon said:Get_Right said:Lerxst1992 said:Get_Right said:Lerxst1992 said:Get_Right said:Like it or not, politics is a dirty business in the US. To think otherwise is to be naive. Trump made a promise to levy tariffs if our neighboring countries do not allocate more resources to border security. He kept his promise in less than a month. The efficacy remains to been seen and it is likely his executive orders would not withstand judicial scrutiny, but he made a promise and kept it. I cannot say that about many politicians in the US.No one manipulates facts like this dude. No one.And your comment is Not exactly true when taken in context, per the AP:
“Unlike during the 2024 campaign, when Trump billed his economic agenda as guaranteed to reduce the cost of living for Americans, the Republcan president now is acknowledging what many economists have long forecasted: that the levies could yield higher prices and lower supplies across the market.”
My comments address his actions on tariffs regarding border security, not economic impact of tariffs on US citizens with respect to the importation of tangible goods or the cost of living. It does not take much manipulation of facts to assess the financial impact of fentanyl being imported into our country, whether direct from China or through our North American neighbors. And all politicians manipulate facts to support their agenda.So in your republican logic, let’s tank our economy to solve ten percent of the immigration problem, maybe.
Not immigration. Drug smuggling.
.2%, of identified fentanyl seizures. That does not account for what was not identified, or other drugs that may contain fentanyl. Do people really think it is a bad thing if Canada and Mexico increased border security with drug smugglers as a specific target? They have 30 days to put their money where their mouth is. Trump may very well be a moron, and I can see how people think this is bad politics. But if Canada and Mexico do even 20% of what they promised, then fewer drugs may enter our country. I fail to see how that is a bad thing.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Get_Right said:benjs said:PJ_Soul said:So what has Trump accomplished with this tariff war so far?- Turned the west against him even more- unsettled the stock market- decreased US tourism- decreased purchasing of US goods in Canada and Mexico and the EU- increased political solidarity in Canada, Mexico, and the EU- added 10,000 Mexican troops at the southern border- forced Canada to overspend on border security for an essentially irrelevant impact (not that i argue against the illegal drug trade or illegal immigration - nobody does, and nobody ever has)- destroyed America's good relationship with its strongest trading partnersAwesome. Bravo to the GOP.
I think Trump was probably well advised that invoking the Emergency Powers Act to impose tariffs may not survive judicial scrutiny, but was also advised that there was nothing to lose. His position is that Canada and Mexico are not doing enough and was looking for potential solutions that could be swiftly implemented without seeking Congressional approval. He was not chicken shit in 2018 when it came to China and those actions have survived judicial scrutiny.
Also, the nonchalance with which Trump spoke of the pain which his own citizens would endure 'temporarily' would give pause to anyone with their brain still activated on the day-to-day.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
.Post edited by Tim Simmons on0
-
.Post edited by Tim Simmons on0
-
benjs said:Get_Right said:benjs said:PJ_Soul said:So what has Trump accomplished with this tariff war so far?- Turned the west against him even more- unsettled the stock market- decreased US tourism- decreased purchasing of US goods in Canada and Mexico and the EU- increased political solidarity in Canada, Mexico, and the EU- added 10,000 Mexican troops at the southern border- forced Canada to overspend on border security for an essentially irrelevant impact (not that i argue against the illegal drug trade or illegal immigration - nobody does, and nobody ever has)- destroyed America's good relationship with its strongest trading partnersAwesome. Bravo to the GOP.
I think Trump was probably well advised that invoking the Emergency Powers Act to impose tariffs may not survive judicial scrutiny, but was also advised that there was nothing to lose. His position is that Canada and Mexico are not doing enough and was looking for potential solutions that could be swiftly implemented without seeking Congressional approval. He was not chicken shit in 2018 when it came to China and those actions have survived judicial scrutiny.
Also, the nonchalance with which Trump spoke of the pain which his own citizens would endure 'temporarily' would give pause to anyone with their brain still activated on the day-to-day.
I think it is important to show strength, even if it is smoke and mirrors. I think the nonchalance speaks to the fact that the US economy survived his tariff actions in 2018. It hurt at first, but most businesses survived. The GOP is not exactly known for its concern with the individual.0 -
I am more worried about this sovereign wealth fund than I am the tariff strategy. It reeks of self dealing. If he puts Musk in charge of the fund then I would be deeply concerned.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help