** KAMALA HARRIS FOR PRESIDENT -PART DEUX **

1…108109111113114…308

Comments

  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    edited August 2024
    teskeinc said:
    So far 3 responses and all can’t defend Kamala without referencing Trump. Trump wasn’t at the interview. Trump really controls your lives. I really feel bad for you guys 




    What are you talking about?  There's nothing wrong with a candidate moving towards the center for the GE.  It's how it works.  There's nothing to defend.  

    But here's something interesting, Harris takes a 5 point lead.  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/08/29/kamala-harris-donald-trump-suffolk-usa-today-poll-results/74984967007/

    So according to your expert analysis, without RFK dropping, this would have been a 10 point lead for Harris.  Amiright?
    Post edited by Kat on
  • Johnny Abruzzo
    Johnny Abruzzo Philly Posts: 12,358
    I don’t get the whole fracking thing. I don’t think being for fracking does anything to win PA. We have fracking because we couldn’t produce enough gas otherwise. Not enough renewables and PA residents have no tax incentives for them due to republicans clogging our state legislature for decades. 
    Spectrum 10/27/09; New Orleans JazzFest 5/1/10; Made in America 9/2/12; Phila, PA 10/21/13; Phila,  PA 10/22/13; Baltimore Arena 10/27/13; Phila, PA 4/28/16; Phila, PA 4/29/16; Fenway Park 8/7/16; Fenway Park 9/2/18; Asbury Park 9/18/21; Camden 9/14/22; Las Vegas 5/16/24; Las Vegas 5/18/24; Phila, PA 9/7/24; Phila, PA 9/9/24; Baltimore Arena 9/12/24; Pittsburgh 5/16/25; Pittsburgh 5/18/25

    Tres Mtns - TLA 3/23/11; EV - Tower Theatre 6/25/11; Temple of the Dog - Tower Theatre 11/5/16
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,370
    to start, the overall "quality" of question were questionable imo. thats on cnn. so the answers were candidate speak and would have been regardless. fine.


    I'm doing better than 4 years ago. I wasnt doing all that bad during covid given my profession, but believe the country as whole is doing far better than 4 years ago. yes, improvements can be made. media being honest journalism brokers would help, calling out corporate greed. (if inflation is supply chain shit, then why do they continue making record profit over and above inflation rates)

    give them a B- this first go round.

    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • CO278952
    CO278952 Orlando, FL Posts: 1,451
    Not expecting Harris to win. There is just smoke and mirrors. Good luck guys!
    4.17.94 Paramount 9.28.96 Randall's Island 8.25.00 Jones Beach 4.28.03 Spectrum 7.5.03 Camden 7.6.03 Camden 07.08.03 MSG 07.09.03 MSG 7.12.03 Hershey 7.14.03 Holmdel 6.12.08 Tampa 10.19.13 Brooklyn 4.11.16 Tampa 5.1.16 MSG 5.2.16 MSG 8.7.16 Fenway 9.2.18 Fenway 9.4.18 Fenway 9.11.22 MSG 9.16.22 Nashville 9.18.23 Austin 9.19.23 Austin 9.3.24 MSG 9.4.24 MSG Fenway 9.15.24 Fenway 9.17.24 Hollywood 4.24.25 Nashville 5.6.25 Nashville 5.8.25
  • teskeinc
    teskeinc Posts: 1,784
    edited August 2024
    mrussel1 said:
    teskeinc said:
    So far 3 responses and all can’t defend Kamala without referencing Trump. Trump wasn’t at the interview. Trump really controls your lives. I really feel bad for you guys 




    What are you talking about?  There's nothing wrong with a candidate moving towards the center for the GE.  It's how it works.  There's nothing to defend.  

    But here's something interesting, Harris takes a 5 point lead.  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/08/29/kamala-harris-donald-trump-suffolk-usa-today-poll-results/74984967007/

    So according to your expert analysis, without RFK dropping, this would have been a 10 point lead for Harris.  Amiright?
    Polls are all over the place. The only one that averages all the bigger polls is Real Clear Politics. And it’s around 2 points or within margin of error. Kamala’s convention bounce and RFK endorsement basically canceled each other out.
    Post edited by Kat on
  • teskeinc
    teskeinc Posts: 1,784
    Johnny Abruzzo said:
    I don’t get the whole fracking thing. I don’t think being for fracking does anything to win PA. We have fracking because we couldn’t produce enough gas otherwise. Not enough renewables and PA residents have no tax incentives for them due to republicans clogging our state legislature for decades. 
    How many people lose their jobs if you ban fracking?
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 9,541
    teskeinc said:

    She was ranked 1/100 in most liberal Senators, even more than Bernie Sanders, who wasn’t happy by the way. 
    Why does read like a Trump quote.

    also, incorrect.

    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/report-cards/2020/senate/ideology
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 9,541
    I didn’t watch the interview because I was at PJ. But by all accounts from political reporters it was fine but she needs to do more which it seems everyone here agrees with too.  
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 9,541
    She’s is correct to be for fracking, so I don’t get what the issue is here. 
  • teskeinc
    teskeinc Posts: 1,784
    Tim Simmons said:
    teskeinc said:

    She was ranked 1/100 in most liberal Senators, even more than Bernie Sanders, who wasn’t happy by the way. 
    Why does read like a Trump quote.

    also, incorrect.

    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/report-cards/2020/senate/ideology
    Not that it makes much difference.. Bernie was probably so pissed after 2019 he had to get the title back.


  • teskeinc
    teskeinc Posts: 1,784
    edited August 2024
    Tim Simmons said:
    She’s is correct to be for fracking, so I don’t get what the issue is here. 
    She stated in 2019 at a town hall in response to that question that she would ban fracking Day 1 if elected President. As well as offshore drilling.

    Post edited by teskeinc on
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    edited August 2024
    teskeinc said:
    mrussel1 said:
    teskeinc said:
    So far 3 responses and all can’t defend Kamala without referencing Trump. Trump wasn’t at the interview. Trump really controls your lives. I really feel bad for you guys 




    What are you talking about?  There's nothing wrong with a candidate moving towards the center for the GE.  It's how it works.  There's nothing to defend.  

    But here's something interesting, Harris takes a 5 point lead.  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/08/29/kamala-harris-donald-trump-suffolk-usa-today-poll-results/74984967007/

    So according to your expert analysis, without RFK dropping, this would have been a 10 point lead for Harris.  Amiright?
    Polls are all over the place. The only one that averages all the bigger polls is Real Clear Politics. And it’s around 2 points or within margin of error. Kamala’s convention bounce and RFK endorsement basically canceled each other out.
    All polls aren't created equally.  Rasmussen is included and that's a tracking poll.  It is also averaging polls going back a month.  But now you're saying that Harris' convention bounce was 10 points?  What was Trump's?
    Post edited by Kat on
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,576
    What is worse the CNN interview that from
    all accounts was fine or the despicable political photo op at Arlington that was used as a campaign commercial! Did you see the idiot trying to pin it on the current administration? It’s not even close..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 9,541
    teskeinc said:
    Tim Simmons said:
    She’s is correct to be for fracking, so I don’t get what the issue is here. 
    She stated in 2019 at a town hall in response to that question that she would ban fracking Day 1 if elected President. As well as offshore drilling.


  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,852
    edited August 2024
    teskeinc said:
    So far 3 responses and all can’t defend Kamala without referencing Trump. Trump wasn’t at the interview. Trump really controls your lives. I really feel bad for you guys 





    I didn’t reference him. Didn’t stop you from ignoring my comment.
    Post edited by Kat on
  • teskeinc
    teskeinc Posts: 1,784
    Tim Simmons said:
    teskeinc said:
    Tim Simmons said:
    She’s is correct to be for fracking, so I don’t get what the issue is here. 
    She stated in 2019 at a town hall in response to that question that she would ban fracking Day 1 if elected President. As well as offshore drilling.


    All of them? If she is for fracking why not explain what changed from 2019? Maybe she did some research and it showed the positives outweighed the
    negatives. To the people who hate Trump and don’t care about policy it doesn’t matter. But to undecided and independent it does.


  • teskeinc
    teskeinc Posts: 1,784

  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    yeah, let's take a tweet from the GOP as actual fact. HAHAHAHAHA
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,576
    teskeinc said:

    Here’s your brilliant candidate 
    https://www.threads.net/@kamalahq/post/C_TxI2uI8f4/?xmt=AQGz2yBNuWUtkES12UezZLOfPXhEgm-Szi_DoGtFlcnlLg
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,576
    edited August 2024
    teskeinc said:

    Post edited by josevolution on
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
This discussion has been closed.

Categories