---President Elect Musk and Convicted Felon Donald J Trump---
Comments
-
2023
You’re not being honest. Read the indictments and see if the questions you have are answered. If not, re-read the indictments and follow up with multiple sources of reporting, not just repub bullet talking points. Example, senator Tom “I’m A Warrior, Hear Me Roar” Cotton stated that the indictment reads like an MSNBC producer wrote it. Do you agree with the fine senator from Arkansass? Do you agree with Ruddy Ghouliani’s statement that the indictment is an outrage? How could you form an opinion if you haven’t read the indictment?JB16057 said:
Why the personal attack? You call me foolish yet I'm asking legitimate questions. Do you want this thread to get locked? I've broken the rules and have had my account blocked on this message board before but I don't see the same treatment for people like you(left, democrat). The thread gets locked and everyone moves on with no consequence and then the cycle just repeats itself.The Juggler said:
I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry. You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man.JB16057 said:
I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it.
If you don’t and still ask questions, you’re not an honest discusser of the issue at hand.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
2023Did you watch the impeachment hearings? How about the 1/6 hearings? If not, it explains a lot.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
2023
open your eyes and look around at the facts. or do not reply to me. i am not going to spoonfeed you evidence that you will not read. good day.JB16057 said:
So because it is on a Pearl Jam message board, that makes it a fact? "Trump is the best President we've ever had." Is that now a fact?gimmesometruth27 said:jesus there are 58 pages in this thread showing how he is a threat to national security. read one of them and you will see evidence of this fact."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
2023
yes, thank you. i was referring to all of the links to reputable sources and all of the tweets also to reputable sources containing facts in each case.The Juggler said:
No, JB, I think what gimmie is referring to, and gimmie--please correct me if I am wrong, would be the hundreds of links to credible news articles over the previous 58 pages that support his point.JB16057 said:
So because it is on a Pearl Jam message board, that makes it a fact? "Trump is the best President we've ever had." Is that now a fact?gimmesometruth27 said:jesus there are 58 pages in this thread showing how he is a threat to national security. read one of them and you will see evidence of this fact.
seriously, this is not that difficult for posters to read the posted links and process the information, is it?"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
2023
Apparently, it is, for some.gimmesometruth27 said:
yes, thank you. i was referring to all of the links to reputable sources and all of the tweets also to reputable sources containing facts in each case.The Juggler said:
No, JB, I think what gimmie is referring to, and gimmie--please correct me if I am wrong, would be the hundreds of links to credible news articles over the previous 58 pages that support his point.JB16057 said:
So because it is on a Pearl Jam message board, that makes it a fact? "Trump is the best President we've ever had." Is that now a fact?gimmesometruth27 said:jesus there are 58 pages in this thread showing how he is a threat to national security. read one of them and you will see evidence of this fact.
seriously, this is not that difficult for posters to read the posted links and process the information, is it?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
You are not discussing the topic. You are discussing me. You won't even admit to breaking that rule which is my whole point.The Juggler said:
You consider "foolish" a personal attack?JB16057 said:
Why the personal attack? You call me foolish yet I'm asking legitimate questions. Do you want this thread to get locked? I've broken the rules and have had my account blocked on this message board before but I don't see the same treatment for people like you(left, democrat). The thread gets locked and everyone moves on with no consequence and then the cycle just repeats itself.The Juggler said:
I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry. You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man.JB16057 said:
I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it.
Sorry but your posts on the prior page about being absolutely certain Biden stole documents (with no proof) while doubting what's in an actual indictment on Trump, while admitting you did not read the indictment, appear foolish to me. I am sorry but that behavior just seems foolish. We're all adults here, I never thought "foolish" is a word someone would get so worked up over.
Please read up on this stuff. It's important.
Also, I am not a democrat.0 -
2023
I am discussing your seemingly inability to be an informed discusser of the topic. There’s an ignore feature. I suggest that you use it.JB16057 said:
You are not discussing the topic. You are discussing me. You won't even admit to breaking that rule which is my whole point.The Juggler said:
You consider "foolish" a personal attack?JB16057 said:
Why the personal attack? You call me foolish yet I'm asking legitimate questions. Do you want this thread to get locked? I've broken the rules and have had my account blocked on this message board before but I don't see the same treatment for people like you(left, democrat). The thread gets locked and everyone moves on with no consequence and then the cycle just repeats itself.The Juggler said:
I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry. You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man.JB16057 said:
I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it.
Sorry but your posts on the prior page about being absolutely certain Biden stole documents (with no proof) while doubting what's in an actual indictment on Trump, while admitting you did not read the indictment, appear foolish to me. I am sorry but that behavior just seems foolish. We're all adults here, I never thought "foolish" is a word someone would get so worked up over.
Please read up on this stuff. It's important.
Also, I am not a democrat.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
2023
Okay. What, exactly, are we doing here? lolJB16057 said:
You are not discussing the topic. You are discussing me. You won't even admit to breaking that rule which is my whole point.The Juggler said:
You consider "foolish" a personal attack?JB16057 said:
Why the personal attack? You call me foolish yet I'm asking legitimate questions. Do you want this thread to get locked? I've broken the rules and have had my account blocked on this message board before but I don't see the same treatment for people like you(left, democrat). The thread gets locked and everyone moves on with no consequence and then the cycle just repeats itself.The Juggler said:
I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry. You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man.JB16057 said:
I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it.
Sorry but your posts on the prior page about being absolutely certain Biden stole documents (with no proof) while doubting what's in an actual indictment on Trump, while admitting you did not read the indictment, appear foolish to me. I am sorry but that behavior just seems foolish. We're all adults here, I never thought "foolish" is a word someone would get so worked up over.
Please read up on this stuff. It's important.
Also, I am not a democrat.
Hey, let's get back on topic---so there are eyewitness accounts, there is an audio tape, and there is an actual document in possession of the special counsel. All of this information is in the indictment, which you now have a pdf of so you can see all of this for yourself. Check it out! There's a ton of stuff in there and they really made it easy to read, in stark contrast to the Mueller Report. Everyone who wants to know what happened can do so.Post edited by The Juggler onwww.myspace.com0 -
2023
eyewitness accounts from witnesses who were in the administration that have flipped on trump to save themselves, because they know trump is toast. they know he is guilty af, and they know that they are guilty too. they are not going to go to jail for a man who only cares about himself.The Juggler said:
Okay. Seems like you are discussing me now? What, exactly, are we doing here? lolJB16057 said:
You are not discussing the topic. You are discussing me. You won't even admit to breaking that rule which is my whole point.The Juggler said:
You consider "foolish" a personal attack?JB16057 said:
Why the personal attack? You call me foolish yet I'm asking legitimate questions. Do you want this thread to get locked? I've broken the rules and have had my account blocked on this message board before but I don't see the same treatment for people like you(left, democrat). The thread gets locked and everyone moves on with no consequence and then the cycle just repeats itself.The Juggler said:
I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry. You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man.JB16057 said:
I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it.
Sorry but your posts on the prior page about being absolutely certain Biden stole documents (with no proof) while doubting what's in an actual indictment on Trump, while admitting you did not read the indictment, appear foolish to me. I am sorry but that behavior just seems foolish. We're all adults here, I never thought "foolish" is a word someone would get so worked up over.
Please read up on this stuff. It's important.
Also, I am not a democrat.
Hey, let's get back on topic---so there are eyewitness accounts, there is an audio tape, and there is an actual document in possession of the special counsel. All of this information is in the indictment, which you now have a pdf of so you can see all of this for yourself. Check it out! There's a ton of stuff in there and they really made it easy to read, in stark contrast to the Mueller Report. Everyone who wants to know what happened can do so."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
2023
Unless they don't really want to knowThe Juggler said:
Okay. What, exactly, are we doing here? lolJB16057 said:
You are not discussing the topic. You are discussing me. You won't even admit to breaking that rule which is my whole point.The Juggler said:
You consider "foolish" a personal attack?JB16057 said:
Why the personal attack? You call me foolish yet I'm asking legitimate questions. Do you want this thread to get locked? I've broken the rules and have had my account blocked on this message board before but I don't see the same treatment for people like you(left, democrat). The thread gets locked and everyone moves on with no consequence and then the cycle just repeats itself.The Juggler said:
I'm sorry. Don't take this the wrong way but you look foolish. I'm sorry. You come on here and cast doubt after doubt about what is in the indictment and then admit you haven't ready the damn thing. Come on man.JB16057 said:
I haven't read it so that does that mean that I can't ask pertinent questions?The Juggler said:JB16057 said:You are both confusing me by sending me two different indictments.
If information is in an indictment, does that make it an indisputable fact?
Literally one of the biggest stories in this country's history is happening right now. You might want to look into it...especially before voting for the guy who's accused of the damn crimes spelled out in it.
Sorry but your posts on the prior page about being absolutely certain Biden stole documents (with no proof) while doubting what's in an actual indictment on Trump, while admitting you did not read the indictment, appear foolish to me. I am sorry but that behavior just seems foolish. We're all adults here, I never thought "foolish" is a word someone would get so worked up over.
Please read up on this stuff. It's important.
Also, I am not a democrat.
Hey, let's get back on topic---so there are eyewitness accounts, there is an audio tape, and there is an actual document in possession of the special counsel. All of this information is in the indictment, which you now have a pdf of so you can see all of this for yourself. Check it out! There's a ton of stuff in there and they really made it easy to read, in stark contrast to the Mueller Report. Everyone who wants to know what happened can do so.Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
This is what is in the indictment. It's on tape and one would be wise to presume there is corroborating testimony by the two reporters. If not, it would likely not be part of the charges. Tell me you were aware that this was in the indictment. From Fox News no less... https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-heard-tape-discussing-classified-documentJB16057 said:
Do you have proof that happened? Can you show me the video, not audio, where he does this? You are assuming you this is true by what you heard. That's not proof.mrussel1 said:
Showing reporters battle plans for Iran.JB16057 said:
How is he a clear and present danger to national security?Halifax2TheMax said:
POOTWH is a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States. Similar to how Michael Milken was a clear and present danger to Wall Street and was denied securities training on Wall Street for life, I believe. But he also served jail time.mrussel1 said:
I don't see how the DOJ could or would make a deal that includes him dropping out. That would be a mistake and feed the right wing narrative that the charges were only made to damage him and make him leave the race.Halifax2TheMax said:POOTWH’s ego won’t allow him to drop out. The only thing I can think of that might be palatable would be a plea bargain whereas he pleads guilty, agrees he drops out and doesn’t run in exchange for no jail time. And the plea agreement would be under seal so POOTWH could grift off the made up unfairness of it all, have a podcast or some other stupid media outlet that his deluded base could access. He’s the biggest carnival barker the world has ever seen, had the pleasure of knowing and proving PT Barnum was right.
Tell me you knew about this...Former President Trump can be heard on tape discussing classified documents in a leaked recording obtained by multiple news outlets Tuesday.
The recording reveals a conversation Trump had with aides in which he seems to be holding a Pentagon document detailing plans to attack Iran, despite telling Fox News Host Bret Baier earlier this month that there was no such document.
"These are the papers," Trump can be heard saying in the recording while discussing the Pentagon documents. The former president referenced Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark Milley, who he said had provided a plan of attack for Iran through the Pentagon.
"I was just thinking, because we were talking about it. And you know, he said, ‘He wanted to attack Iran, and what…,'" Trump said.
"These are the papers," Trump continued.
0 -
.... "see look......."
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
"See as president I could have declassified it," Trump said. "Now I can’t, you know, but this is still a secret."
"Now we have a problem," a staffer can be heard responding.
"Isn’t that interesting," Trump finishes.
0 -
"Now we have a problem". Talk about an understatement!0
-
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
2023
Everything POOTWH said is true. Prove its false.mickeyrat said:09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
2023
well it is on the internet, so like all hot takes, it has to be true.Halifax2TheMax said:
Everything POOTWH said is true. Prove its false.mickeyrat said:"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
2023
Locked away?JB16057 said:
Is it illegal to hold and retain classified documents? I don't know if Biden "stole" them or not. The fact of the matter is that he had them in his position. Trump had documents and they were locked away. The government knew he had them. Biden has held classified documents for years out in the open. Are you not concerned about the papers that Biden had because of a bias?Gern Blansten said:
He didn't actually.JB16057 said:
Biden stole documents when he was a Senator and then VP.Gern Blansten said:
uh...have you not been aware that he stole classified documents? Some DoD related stuff included?JB16057 said:
How is he a clear and present danger to national security?Halifax2TheMax said:
POOTWH is a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States. Similar to how Michael Milken was a clear and present danger to Wall Street and was denied securities training on Wall Street for life, I believe. But he also served jail time.mrussel1 said:
I don't see how the DOJ could or would make a deal that includes him dropping out. That would be a mistake and feed the right wing narrative that the charges were only made to damage him and make him leave the race.Halifax2TheMax said:POOTWH’s ego won’t allow him to drop out. The only thing I can think of that might be palatable would be a plea bargain whereas he pleads guilty, agrees he drops out and doesn’t run in exchange for no jail time. And the plea agreement would be under seal so POOTWH could grift off the made up unfairness of it all, have a podcast or some other stupid media outlet that his deluded base could access. He’s the biggest carnival barker the world has ever seen, had the pleasure of knowing and proving PT Barnum was right.
Do you know what papers Biden had? I don't and no one wants to talk about it but Biden had more than Trump did. Does that concern you at all?
"Stole" refers to being asked to return documents that the archives knew that tRump had. He lied and said he didn't have them, told associates to hide them, then got them taken away by the FBI.
Biden immediately (as well as Pence) returned the documents that were requested.
No where near the same offense. I think you know this.
This weekend we rock Portland0 -
2025
Pretty safe spots no?Poncier said:
Locked away?JB16057 said:
Is it illegal to hold and retain classified documents? I don't know if Biden "stole" them or not. The fact of the matter is that he had them in his position. Trump had documents and they were locked away. The government knew he had them. Biden has held classified documents for years out in the open. Are you not concerned about the papers that Biden had because of a bias?Gern Blansten said:
He didn't actually.JB16057 said:
Biden stole documents when he was a Senator and then VP.Gern Blansten said:
uh...have you not been aware that he stole classified documents? Some DoD related stuff included?JB16057 said:
How is he a clear and present danger to national security?Halifax2TheMax said:
POOTWH is a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States. Similar to how Michael Milken was a clear and present danger to Wall Street and was denied securities training on Wall Street for life, I believe. But he also served jail time.mrussel1 said:
I don't see how the DOJ could or would make a deal that includes him dropping out. That would be a mistake and feed the right wing narrative that the charges were only made to damage him and make him leave the race.Halifax2TheMax said:POOTWH’s ego won’t allow him to drop out. The only thing I can think of that might be palatable would be a plea bargain whereas he pleads guilty, agrees he drops out and doesn’t run in exchange for no jail time. And the plea agreement would be under seal so POOTWH could grift off the made up unfairness of it all, have a podcast or some other stupid media outlet that his deluded base could access. He’s the biggest carnival barker the world has ever seen, had the pleasure of knowing and proving PT Barnum was right.
Do you know what papers Biden had? I don't and no one wants to talk about it but Biden had more than Trump did. Does that concern you at all?
"Stole" refers to being asked to return documents that the archives knew that tRump had. He lied and said he didn't have them, told associates to hide them, then got them taken away by the FBI.
Biden immediately (as well as Pence) returned the documents that were requested.
No where near the same offense. I think you know this.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help