WOKE
Options
Comments
-
Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:"EvErYtHiNg Is ChAnGiNg AnD eVeRyOnE wAnTs To Be ReCoGnIzEd AnD aCcEpTeD aNd I cAn'T hAnDlE iT!!!"
There is a Black Mirror episode where the parent can turn off anything that may be upsetting to her child like a dog barking and scaring her or a person screaming. It reminds me of the "triggers" that people want identified.
I'm on the side of inclusion but if you keep excluding things then what are we really doing?0 -
tempo_n_groove said:Halifax2TheMax said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:"EvErYtHiNg Is ChAnGiNg AnD eVeRyOnE wAnTs To Be ReCoGnIzEd AnD aCcEpTeD aNd I cAn'T hAnDlE iT!!!"
There is a Black Mirror episode where the parent can turn off anything that may be upsetting to her child like a dog barking and scaring her or a person screaming. It reminds me of the "triggers" that people want identified.
I'm on the side of inclusion but if you keep excluding things then what are we really doing?
I think the author doesn’t have the meaning of woke or wokeness figured out yet. Meanwhile, repub states are banning books and waging war on “others.” You know, real impacts on lives and not just in the realm of ideas or thoughts. Did the Tea Baggers allow candidates to speak at their constituent coffee hours and meet and greets? Let me know when liberals show up enmass armed to state houses while civil debate occurs, will you?
As per usual, from the article, the responsibility lies with the left. Sorry, go clutch your (general you) pearls somewhere else:
While the right’s response to woke panic is often to fan the flames, the center-left has a special responsibility to step up when progressive groupthink rears its head.
”progressive group think.” GTFO. The other side invented group think. Remember “ditto heads?”09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:"EvErYtHiNg Is ChAnGiNg AnD eVeRyOnE wAnTs To Be ReCoGnIzEd AnD aCcEpTeD aNd I cAn'T hAnDlE iT!!!"
There is a Black Mirror episode where the parent can turn off anything that may be upsetting to her child like a dog barking and scaring her or a person screaming. It reminds me of the "triggers" that people want identified.
I'm on the side of inclusion but if you keep excluding things then what are we really doing?My go-to about all this is really basic: If someone is doing something that does not negatively affect someone else, it is OK by me. That doesn't mean I have to like it. For example, sex change. Physically altering ones body to change one's sex to me sounds like mutilation and the very idea creeps me out, but only when I think about how I would react to having that done. I know someone who has done this (gone from male to female) and although I fully admit the idea of that leaves me feeling uncomfortable, I fully respect this person's right to make that change and I still consider that person a good friend.As long as we are doing no harm to one another, we could so easily resolve a lot of conflict if we took a more live and let live approach."It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
brianlux said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:"EvErYtHiNg Is ChAnGiNg AnD eVeRyOnE wAnTs To Be ReCoGnIzEd AnD aCcEpTeD aNd I cAn'T hAnDlE iT!!!"
There is a Black Mirror episode where the parent can turn off anything that may be upsetting to her child like a dog barking and scaring her or a person screaming. It reminds me of the "triggers" that people want identified.
I'm on the side of inclusion but if you keep excluding things then what are we really doing?My go-to about all this is really basic: If someone is doing something that does not negatively affect someone else, it is OK by me. That doesn't mean I have to like it. For example, sex change. Physically altering ones body to change one's sex to me sounds like mutilation and the very idea creeps me out, but only when I think about how I would react to having that done. I know someone who has done this (gone from male to female) and although I fully admit the idea of that leaves me feeling uncomfortable, I fully respect this person's right to make that change and I still consider that person a good friend.As long as we are doing no harm to one another, we could so easily resolve a lot of conflict if we took a more live and let live approach.Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
brianlux said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:"EvErYtHiNg Is ChAnGiNg AnD eVeRyOnE wAnTs To Be ReCoGnIzEd AnD aCcEpTeD aNd I cAn'T hAnDlE iT!!!"
There is a Black Mirror episode where the parent can turn off anything that may be upsetting to her child like a dog barking and scaring her or a person screaming. It reminds me of the "triggers" that people want identified.
I'm on the side of inclusion but if you keep excluding things then what are we really doing?My go-to about all this is really basic: If someone is doing something that does not negatively affect someone else, it is OK by me. That doesn't mean I have to like it. For example, sex change. Physically altering ones body to change one's sex to me sounds like mutilation and the very idea creeps me out, but only when I think about how I would react to having that done. I know someone who has done this (gone from male to female) and although I fully admit the idea of that leaves me feeling uncomfortable, I fully respect this person's right to make that change and I still consider that person a good friend.As long as we are doing no harm to one another, we could so easily resolve a lot of conflict if we took a more live and let live approach.
I recently talked to an old friend who is married and is now a she. Does it bother me? Nope.
Having a difference of opinion and silencing that person does though.0 -
i was at a hospital the other day and some OR staff were in a disagreement. one of them is trans and the other person continued to deadname the trans person. i am not a hospital employee so i could not say any thing, but i was disgusted by the pettiness. this is the reason mistakes happen in hospitals. people have petty disagreements and do not communicate."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
deadname? what is that, like calling them their old name?Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0
-
HughFreakingDillon said:deadname? what is that, like calling them their old name?"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 said:HughFreakingDillon said:deadname? what is that, like calling them their old name?"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:brianlux said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:"EvErYtHiNg Is ChAnGiNg AnD eVeRyOnE wAnTs To Be ReCoGnIzEd AnD aCcEpTeD aNd I cAn'T hAnDlE iT!!!"
There is a Black Mirror episode where the parent can turn off anything that may be upsetting to her child like a dog barking and scaring her or a person screaming. It reminds me of the "triggers" that people want identified.
I'm on the side of inclusion but if you keep excluding things then what are we really doing?My go-to about all this is really basic: If someone is doing something that does not negatively affect someone else, it is OK by me. That doesn't mean I have to like it. For example, sex change. Physically altering ones body to change one's sex to me sounds like mutilation and the very idea creeps me out, but only when I think about how I would react to having that done. I know someone who has done this (gone from male to female) and although I fully admit the idea of that leaves me feeling uncomfortable, I fully respect this person's right to make that change and I still consider that person a good friend.As long as we are doing no harm to one another, we could so easily resolve a lot of conflict if we took a more live and let live approach.tempo_n_groove said:brianlux said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:"EvErYtHiNg Is ChAnGiNg AnD eVeRyOnE wAnTs To Be ReCoGnIzEd AnD aCcEpTeD aNd I cAn'T hAnDlE iT!!!"
There is a Black Mirror episode where the parent can turn off anything that may be upsetting to her child like a dog barking and scaring her or a person screaming. It reminds me of the "triggers" that people want identified.
I'm on the side of inclusion but if you keep excluding things then what are we really doing?My go-to about all this is really basic: If someone is doing something that does not negatively affect someone else, it is OK by me. That doesn't mean I have to like it. For example, sex change. Physically altering ones body to change one's sex to me sounds like mutilation and the very idea creeps me out, but only when I think about how I would react to having that done. I know someone who has done this (gone from male to female) and although I fully admit the idea of that leaves me feeling uncomfortable, I fully respect this person's right to make that change and I still consider that person a good friend.As long as we are doing no harm to one another, we could so easily resolve a lot of conflict if we took a more live and let live approach.
I recently talked to an old friend who is married and is now a she. Does it bother me? Nope.
Having a difference of opinion and silencing that person does though.Exactly.gimmesometruth27 said:i was at a hospital the other day and some OR staff were in a disagreement. one of them is trans and the other person continued to deadname the trans person. i am not a hospital employee so i could not say any thing, but i was disgusted by the pettiness. this is the reason mistakes happen in hospitals. people have petty disagreements and do not communicate.
Yeah, there are things worth standing up for and then there is pettiness. I was just reading a discussion about handshakes and some people were bitching about how they hate a "wet noodle handshake" like this is something worth getting worked up about (not to mention that a firm handshake can be really painful to someone with arthritis).
Petty shit is often like paperwork and bureaucracy- it can really clutter things up and get in the way."It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
Question?
Is is "Woke" to get mad at a Beer Company for a commercial or image on a can? ..."The heart and mind are the true lens of the camera." - Yusuf Karsh
0 -
myoung321 said:Question?
Is is "Woke" to get mad at a Beer Company for a commercial or image on a can? ..."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 said:myoung321 said:Question?
Is is "Woke" to get mad at a Beer Company for a commercial or image on a can? ...
BOYCOTT!0 -
myoung321 said:Question?
Is is "Woke" to get mad at a Beer Company for a commercial or image on a can? ...
Seeing Kid Rock lose it like that doesn't make any sense. He was never an anti LGBT type...0 -
tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:myoung321 said:Question?
Is is "Woke" to get mad at a Beer Company for a commercial or image on a can? ...
BOYCOTT!"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
tempo_n_groove said:myoung321 said:Question?
Is is "Woke" to get mad at a Beer Company for a commercial or image on a can? ...
Seeing Kid Rock lose it like that doesn't make any sense. He was never an anti LGBT type..."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:myoung321 said:Question?
Is is "Woke" to get mad at a Beer Company for a commercial or image on a can? ...
BOYCOTT!
Bud Light could put anything they want on the can, still offended by the taste…"The heart and mind are the true lens of the camera." - Yusuf Karsh
0 -
myoung321 said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:myoung321 said:Question?
Is is "Woke" to get mad at a Beer Company for a commercial or image on a can? ...
BOYCOTT!
Bud Light could put anything they want on the can, still offended by the taste…
lol"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 said:myoung321 said:tempo_n_groove said:gimmesometruth27 said:myoung321 said:Question?
Is is "Woke" to get mad at a Beer Company for a commercial or image on a can? ...
BOYCOTT!
Bud Light could put anything they want on the can, still offended by the taste…
lol
I'll complain it's my 1st amendment right even though it's on a private platform...
0 -
I’ll be posting this on the cancelled thread too. Maybe Kid Rock will shoot these up too?
it should say White Trash Jill though…0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 273 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help