#46 President Joe Biden

1341342344346347605

Comments

  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,849
    mace1229 said:
    “This was a PRC (People’s Republic of China) surveillance balloon. This surveillance balloon purposely traversed the United States and Canada and we are confident it was seeking to monitor sensitive military sites,” a senior US administration official said.
    https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/04/asia/beijing-reacts-us-jets-shoot-chinese-spy-balloon-intl-hnk/index.html

    I don’t know why anyone is still believing it was just a giant weather balloon at this point. 12 hours ago the idea this could be a spy balloon was being mocked here. Kinda crazy people still trust China that much.
    Who was mocking the idea? No one I can see. 
    I didn’t remember who, but someone said it’s weird because of these things called satellites they could spy with. I thought they were mocking the idea of this being anything but a weather balloon. But I just reread it, I think I read into it wrong.
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,849
    mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I read Biden Biden wanted it shot down we’d essay too, but was advised to wait by the pentagon.
    Still doesn’t make sense to me. The reason they gave and what others came up with here, none make sense.
     It flew right over Malmstrom AFB, which is home to some nuclear silos apparently and to some accounts seemed to linger there. The path also covered some of the most remote areas of the country. There were plenty of opportunities to shoot it down without danger to anyone below. 
    I read they’d shot it down so that it would land in only 40-50 feet of water. They can be that precise over water, but not keep it in the eastern third of Montana that is empty?
    Fears of not being able to secure it are ridiculous. Pretty sure the Air Force can deploy a unit within a few hundred miles pretty quickly, that’s pretty much what they do. Pretty sure they’d outgun any random hicks who eventually show up in some quad hours later too.
    If there’s a chance it’s a spy balloon it should have been shot down sooner. If there’s not, why shoot it down at all?  The whole let’s let it fly across the entire US then shoot it down for security doesn’t make sense.
    Well you want to recover it too.  So landing in the mountains makes it impossible to recover and the payload would be destroyed.  So water makes the most sense, presuming they expected it to float.  

    Regarding the spy aspect, the military said it was able to impede its abilities.  They didn’t say how.  Also, there are satellites above us that are pretty powerful.  It actually makes the most sense that it is a weather balloon.  The Chinese would know that it would be identified quickly.  The military also said this has happened several times in the last few years.
    I’m not buying the recovery issues. If they can shoot it down so it lands just off shore in 40 feet of water, they can certainly target an accessible but remote area on land with a recovery team standing by. Seems a lot easier actually since they’re now worried about sunken debris that will be lost. Falling at full speed landing on water or land won’t make much of a difference if you’re worried about damage. If the deflated balloon acted like a sort of parachute, shouldn’t make much difference either. And just because they get some data from satellites doesn’t mean we should ignore blatant attempts to gather more information while studying our nuclear silos and ignoring air traffic laws. We had to shut down air space to let this thing fly across our country. There clearly was enough of a concern to do that.
    Now if they were able to hack into it, monitor the data it was collecting and prevent it from being my sent back, then that does make a lot of sense to wait. I guess that’s why Biden didn’t call me for my advice.
    ‘The Americans were able to collect intelligence on the balloon as it flew over the U.S., giving them a number of days to analyze it and learn how it moved and what it was capable of surveilling, according to two senior defense officials said. The officials briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.  The officials said the U.S. military was constantly assessing the threat, and concluded that the technology on the balloon didn’t give the Chinese significant intelligence beyond what it could already obtain from satellites, though the U.S. took steps to mitigate what information it could gather as it moved along.’
    I saw that too. Not sure if I believe it. Why would they send a balloon that gets less surveillance than what they already have? Within a day of this being public, US officials labeled it as a spy balloon and acknowledged it flew over military bases and nuclear sites. I’m just not comfortable with that..
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,630
    all hail the expert
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,849
    Never claimed to be an expert. Are we not allowed to share opinions here?
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,888
    mace1229 said:
    mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I read Biden Biden wanted it shot down we’d essay too, but was advised to wait by the pentagon.
    Still doesn’t make sense to me. The reason they gave and what others came up with here, none make sense.
     It flew right over Malmstrom AFB, which is home to some nuclear silos apparently and to some accounts seemed to linger there. The path also covered some of the most remote areas of the country. There were plenty of opportunities to shoot it down without danger to anyone below. 
    I read they’d shot it down so that it would land in only 40-50 feet of water. They can be that precise over water, but not keep it in the eastern third of Montana that is empty?
    Fears of not being able to secure it are ridiculous. Pretty sure the Air Force can deploy a unit within a few hundred miles pretty quickly, that’s pretty much what they do. Pretty sure they’d outgun any random hicks who eventually show up in some quad hours later too.
    If there’s a chance it’s a spy balloon it should have been shot down sooner. If there’s not, why shoot it down at all?  The whole let’s let it fly across the entire US then shoot it down for security doesn’t make sense.
    Well you want to recover it too.  So landing in the mountains makes it impossible to recover and the payload would be destroyed.  So water makes the most sense, presuming they expected it to float.  

    Regarding the spy aspect, the military said it was able to impede its abilities.  They didn’t say how.  Also, there are satellites above us that are pretty powerful.  It actually makes the most sense that it is a weather balloon.  The Chinese would know that it would be identified quickly.  The military also said this has happened several times in the last few years.
    I’m not buying the recovery issues. If they can shoot it down so it lands just off shore in 40 feet of water, they can certainly target an accessible but remote area on land with a recovery team standing by. Seems a lot easier actually since they’re now worried about sunken debris that will be lost. Falling at full speed landing on water or land won’t make much of a difference if you’re worried about damage. If the deflated balloon acted like a sort of parachute, shouldn’t make much difference either. And just because they get some data from satellites doesn’t mean we should ignore blatant attempts to gather more information while studying our nuclear silos and ignoring air traffic laws. We had to shut down air space to let this thing fly across our country. There clearly was enough of a concern to do that.
    Now if they were able to hack into it, monitor the data it was collecting and prevent it from being my sent back, then that does make a lot of sense to wait. I guess that’s why Biden didn’t call me for my advice.
    ‘The Americans were able to collect intelligence on the balloon as it flew over the U.S., giving them a number of days to analyze it and learn how it moved and what it was capable of surveilling, according to two senior defense officials said. The officials briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.  The officials said the U.S. military was constantly assessing the threat, and concluded that the technology on the balloon didn’t give the Chinese significant intelligence beyond what it could already obtain from satellites, though the U.S. took steps to mitigate what information it could gather as it moved along.’
    I saw that too. Not sure if I believe it. Why would they send a balloon that gets less surveillance than what they already have? Within a day of this being public, US officials labeled it as a spy balloon and acknowledged it flew over military bases and nuclear sites. I’m just not comfortable with that..
    First you have to decide whether you think the US military and the admin has our best interests in mind or China's. Once you come to that answer,  the thought path is simple. If it's our interests,  then I believe the military that it analyzed the balloon,  the capabilities and determined the course of action that best balanced national security and safety for the citizens.  If you believe that the military prefers China,  then all of the challenges come into play (like the MAGAs are doing) and they'll never be satisfied.  

    To me,  this is a nothing and it's what the military does every day.
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,630
    think I recall reading an estimated 7 ton unit below the balloon., 14,000 lbs dropping from 60,000 feet. would have picked up quite a bit of speed , dont ya think? water landing is preferable to a ground landing. pilots when ditching will shoot for water if possible. estimated 7 mile debris field in the ocean. more easily controlled by USN + USCG in the water with ship and aircraft. than a ground recovery.  Estimated 47 feet of water is more easily recoverable with greater likelihood of intact or mitigated damaged parts than over land......

    theres a reason why NASA had ocean landings for capsules........

    Its interesting to me that China is coming out like they are claiming a private company or entity owned this balloon and equipment. IF thats the case, then I should think a company would seek permission to overfly the sovereign airspace of not 1 country but 2 maybe even enlistthe scientific communities of said countries to further the research......

    wtf do I know though, I drive a truck.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,298
    mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I read Biden Biden wanted it shot down we’d essay too, but was advised to wait by the pentagon.
    Still doesn’t make sense to me. The reason they gave and what others came up with here, none make sense.
     It flew right over Malmstrom AFB, which is home to some nuclear silos apparently and to some accounts seemed to linger there. The path also covered some of the most remote areas of the country. There were plenty of opportunities to shoot it down without danger to anyone below. 
    I read they’d shot it down so that it would land in only 40-50 feet of water. They can be that precise over water, but not keep it in the eastern third of Montana that is empty?
    Fears of not being able to secure it are ridiculous. Pretty sure the Air Force can deploy a unit within a few hundred miles pretty quickly, that’s pretty much what they do. Pretty sure they’d outgun any random hicks who eventually show up in some quad hours later too.
    If there’s a chance it’s a spy balloon it should have been shot down sooner. If there’s not, why shoot it down at all?  The whole let’s let it fly across the entire US then shoot it down for security doesn’t make sense.
    Well you want to recover it too.  So landing in the mountains makes it impossible to recover and the payload would be destroyed.  So water makes the most sense, presuming they expected it to float.  

    Regarding the spy aspect, the military said it was able to impede its abilities.  They didn’t say how.  Also, there are satellites above us that are pretty powerful.  It actually makes the most sense that it is a weather balloon.  The Chinese would know that it would be identified quickly.  The military also said this has happened several times in the last few years.
    I’m not buying the recovery issues. If they can shoot it down so it lands just off shore in 40 feet of water, they can certainly target an accessible but remote area on land with a recovery team standing by. Seems a lot easier actually since they’re now worried about sunken debris that will be lost. Falling at full speed landing on water or land won’t make much of a difference if you’re worried about damage. If the deflated balloon acted like a sort of parachute, shouldn’t make much difference either. And just because they get some data from satellites doesn’t mean we should ignore blatant attempts to gather more information while studying our nuclear silos and ignoring air traffic laws. We had to shut down air space to let this thing fly across our country. There clearly was enough of a concern to do that.
    Now if they were able to hack into it, monitor the data it was collecting and prevent it from being my sent back, then that does make a lot of sense to wait. I guess that’s why Biden didn’t call me for my advice.
    There isn't just the issue of the thing falling to earth and damaging someone's life or property...there is also the issue of the method of taking it down causing unknown or unpredictable damage. What if they shoot a missile at it and miss and it hits a hospital 400 miles away?

    And to think that the Chinese really thought they could float a balloon over here without us seeing it? They knew we saw it several days ago. Does anyone really believe that the balloon was still capable of transmitting information once we discovered it? No fucking way. One of our satellites put the scramble on that thing as soon as it hit our airspace.

    Bunch of armchair military intelligence officers sure know how to light themselves on fire.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I read Biden Biden wanted it shot down we’d essay too, but was advised to wait by the pentagon.
    Still doesn’t make sense to me. The reason they gave and what others came up with here, none make sense.
     It flew right over Malmstrom AFB, which is home to some nuclear silos apparently and to some accounts seemed to linger there. The path also covered some of the most remote areas of the country. There were plenty of opportunities to shoot it down without danger to anyone below. 
    I read they’d shot it down so that it would land in only 40-50 feet of water. They can be that precise over water, but not keep it in the eastern third of Montana that is empty?
    Fears of not being able to secure it are ridiculous. Pretty sure the Air Force can deploy a unit within a few hundred miles pretty quickly, that’s pretty much what they do. Pretty sure they’d outgun any random hicks who eventually show up in some quad hours later too.
    If there’s a chance it’s a spy balloon it should have been shot down sooner. If there’s not, why shoot it down at all?  The whole let’s let it fly across the entire US then shoot it down for security doesn’t make sense.
    Well you want to recover it too.  So landing in the mountains makes it impossible to recover and the payload would be destroyed.  So water makes the most sense, presuming they expected it to float.  

    Regarding the spy aspect, the military said it was able to impede its abilities.  They didn’t say how.  Also, there are satellites above us that are pretty powerful.  It actually makes the most sense that it is a weather balloon.  The Chinese would know that it would be identified quickly.  The military also said this has happened several times in the last few years.
    I’m not buying the recovery issues. If they can shoot it down so it lands just off shore in 40 feet of water, they can certainly target an accessible but remote area on land with a recovery team standing by. Seems a lot easier actually since they’re now worried about sunken debris that will be lost. Falling at full speed landing on water or land won’t make much of a difference if you’re worried about damage. If the deflated balloon acted like a sort of parachute, shouldn’t make much difference either. And just because they get some data from satellites doesn’t mean we should ignore blatant attempts to gather more information while studying our nuclear silos and ignoring air traffic laws. We had to shut down air space to let this thing fly across our country. There clearly was enough of a concern to do that.
    Now if they were able to hack into it, monitor the data it was collecting and prevent it from being my sent back, then that does make a lot of sense to wait. I guess that’s why Biden didn’t call me for my advice.
    There isn't just the issue of the thing falling to earth and damaging someone's life or property...there is also the issue of the method of taking it down causing unknown or unpredictable damage. What if they shoot a missile at it and miss and it hits a hospital 400 miles away?

    And to think that the Chinese really thought they could float a balloon over here without us seeing it? They knew we saw it several days ago. Does anyone really believe that the balloon was still capable of transmitting information once we discovered it? No fucking way. One of our satellites put the scramble on that thing as soon as it hit our airspace.

    Bunch of armchair military intelligence officers sure know how to light themselves on fire.
    More than that, it’s “I don’t trust the gubmint or military,” because it’s Brandon at the helm despite it being the exact same military if it were POOTWH at the helm. Faux news reported that the balloon was shot down over Montana, twice, while interviewing Montana’s gubner and not a peep. Good lord is ‘Murica fucked.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,849
    edited February 2023
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I read Biden Biden wanted it shot down we’d essay too, but was advised to wait by the pentagon.
    Still doesn’t make sense to me. The reason they gave and what others came up with here, none make sense.
     It flew right over Malmstrom AFB, which is home to some nuclear silos apparently and to some accounts seemed to linger there. The path also covered some of the most remote areas of the country. There were plenty of opportunities to shoot it down without danger to anyone below. 
    I read they’d shot it down so that it would land in only 40-50 feet of water. They can be that precise over water, but not keep it in the eastern third of Montana that is empty?
    Fears of not being able to secure it are ridiculous. Pretty sure the Air Force can deploy a unit within a few hundred miles pretty quickly, that’s pretty much what they do. Pretty sure they’d outgun any random hicks who eventually show up in some quad hours later too.
    If there’s a chance it’s a spy balloon it should have been shot down sooner. If there’s not, why shoot it down at all?  The whole let’s let it fly across the entire US then shoot it down for security doesn’t make sense.
    Well you want to recover it too.  So landing in the mountains makes it impossible to recover and the payload would be destroyed.  So water makes the most sense, presuming they expected it to float.  

    Regarding the spy aspect, the military said it was able to impede its abilities.  They didn’t say how.  Also, there are satellites above us that are pretty powerful.  It actually makes the most sense that it is a weather balloon.  The Chinese would know that it would be identified quickly.  The military also said this has happened several times in the last few years.
    I’m not buying the recovery issues. If they can shoot it down so it lands just off shore in 40 feet of water, they can certainly target an accessible but remote area on land with a recovery team standing by. Seems a lot easier actually since they’re now worried about sunken debris that will be lost. Falling at full speed landing on water or land won’t make much of a difference if you’re worried about damage. If the deflated balloon acted like a sort of parachute, shouldn’t make much difference either. And just because they get some data from satellites doesn’t mean we should ignore blatant attempts to gather more information while studying our nuclear silos and ignoring air traffic laws. We had to shut down air space to let this thing fly across our country. There clearly was enough of a concern to do that.
    Now if they were able to hack into it, monitor the data it was collecting and prevent it from being my sent back, then that does make a lot of sense to wait. I guess that’s why Biden didn’t call me for my advice.
    ‘The Americans were able to collect intelligence on the balloon as it flew over the U.S., giving them a number of days to analyze it and learn how it moved and what it was capable of surveilling, according to two senior defense officials said. The officials briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.  The officials said the U.S. military was constantly assessing the threat, and concluded that the technology on the balloon didn’t give the Chinese significant intelligence beyond what it could already obtain from satellites, though the U.S. took steps to mitigate what information it could gather as it moved along.’
    I saw that too. Not sure if I believe it. Why would they send a balloon that gets less surveillance than what they already have? Within a day of this being public, US officials labeled it as a spy balloon and acknowledged it flew over military bases and nuclear sites. I’m just not comfortable with that..
    First you have to decide whether you think the US military and the admin has our best interests in mind or China's. Once you come to that answer,  the thought path is simple. If it's our interests,  then I believe the military that it analyzed the balloon,  the capabilities and determined the course of action that best balanced national security and safety for the citizens.  If you believe that the military prefers China,  then all of the challenges come into play (like the MAGAs are doing) and they'll never be satisfied.  

    To me,  this is a nothing and it's what the military does every day.
    I don’t believe our government is looking out for China. I also don’t believe China paid Biden to leave it up, or that Biden was compromised and had to, or any of that. Just saying I’d error on the side of shooting it down before it gathers secured information.

    There’s always the possibility they analyzed it, didn’t see any capabilities they don’t already have via satellites, but were wrong.
    I just don’t like a foreign aircraft hovering over nuclear and military sites. We were first told they left it up for safety. Now it’s they left it up so they could study it’s movements and capabilities because it was harmless? Wouldn’t be the first time the US government was wrong with intelligence.
    Post edited by mace1229 on
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,849
    edited February 2023
    mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I read Biden Biden wanted it shot down we’d essay too, but was advised to wait by the pentagon.
    Still doesn’t make sense to me. The reason they gave and what others came up with here, none make sense.
     It flew right over Malmstrom AFB, which is home to some nuclear silos apparently and to some accounts seemed to linger there. The path also covered some of the most remote areas of the country. There were plenty of opportunities to shoot it down without danger to anyone below. 
    I read they’d shot it down so that it would land in only 40-50 feet of water. They can be that precise over water, but not keep it in the eastern third of Montana that is empty?
    Fears of not being able to secure it are ridiculous. Pretty sure the Air Force can deploy a unit within a few hundred miles pretty quickly, that’s pretty much what they do. Pretty sure they’d outgun any random hicks who eventually show up in some quad hours later too.
    If there’s a chance it’s a spy balloon it should have been shot down sooner. If there’s not, why shoot it down at all?  The whole let’s let it fly across the entire US then shoot it down for security doesn’t make sense.
    Well you want to recover it too.  So landing in the mountains makes it impossible to recover and the payload would be destroyed.  So water makes the most sense, presuming they expected it to float.  

    Regarding the spy aspect, the military said it was able to impede its abilities.  They didn’t say how.  Also, there are satellites above us that are pretty powerful.  It actually makes the most sense that it is a weather balloon.  The Chinese would know that it would be identified quickly.  The military also said this has happened several times in the last few years.
    I’m not buying the recovery issues. If they can shoot it down so it lands just off shore in 40 feet of water, they can certainly target an accessible but remote area on land with a recovery team standing by. Seems a lot easier actually since they’re now worried about sunken debris that will be lost. Falling at full speed landing on water or land won’t make much of a difference if you’re worried about damage. If the deflated balloon acted like a sort of parachute, shouldn’t make much difference either. And just because they get some data from satellites doesn’t mean we should ignore blatant attempts to gather more information while studying our nuclear silos and ignoring air traffic laws. We had to shut down air space to let this thing fly across our country. There clearly was enough of a concern to do that.
    Now if they were able to hack into it, monitor the data it was collecting and prevent it from being my sent back, then that does make a lot of sense to wait. I guess that’s why Biden didn’t call me for my advice.
    There isn't just the issue of the thing falling to earth and damaging someone's life or property...there is also the issue of the method of taking it down causing unknown or unpredictable damage. What if they shoot a missile at it and miss and it hits a hospital 400 miles away?

    And to think that the Chinese really thought they could float a balloon over here without us seeing it? They knew we saw it several days ago. Does anyone really believe that the balloon was still capable of transmitting information once we discovered it? No fucking way. One of our satellites put the scramble on that thing as soon as it hit our airspace.

    Bunch of armchair military intelligence officers sure know how to light themselves on fire.
    More than that, it’s “I don’t trust the gubmint or military,” because it’s Brandon at the helm despite it being the exact same military if it were POOTWH at the helm. Faux news reported that the balloon was shot down over Montana, twice, while interviewing Montana’s gubner and not a peep. Good lord is ‘Murica fucked.
    If you’re referring to what you posted in the Fox News thread, they didn’t claim to have shot it down.
    Its poor journalism to show that video I agree. But they made no connection to the balloon. Even reported that it was currently in Missouri during that interview. Not sure how others are making that connection. Unless that was a cut version or the interview or something.
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,630
    dont recall reading the reason they let it go was changed to study it, only that since it was left to float they then took the opportunity to  study it
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,630
    gift article....

    Timeline: A suspected Chinese spy balloon’s eight-day journey
    By Kelly Kasulis Cho
    February 05, 2023 at 4:05 ET
    The United States’ dramatic takedown of what it has called a Chinese surveillance balloon started with a few civilian sightings in America’s heartland and ended with a missile explosion over South Carolina so loud that it rattled homes below.
    Although it’s not the first time a spy balloon has been spotted by U.S. officials, this latest one has become the center of a diplomatic dispute that could set back dialogue between Washington and Beijing, said John Delury, a professor of Chinese studies at Yonsei University in South Korea who recently wrote a book about Cold War-era U.S. espionage in China.
    “It’s hard to know how long this is going to play out diplomatically,” he said, noting that Pentagon officials have indicated the balloon would not be more effective for information gathering than a satellite. “But now that this has gotten so big, whatever the intention, the effect is that this pushes the issue of surveillance to the forefront of U.S.-China relations.”


    continues.....


    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,450
    edited February 2023
    Yea, let's discuss balloons and military actions, or lack thereof.

    Chinese balloons flew over US three times during Trump administration: officials

    Balloons similar to the one that was shot down off the coast of South Carolina this weekend flew over the U.S. at least three times during the Trump administration, according to a senior U.S. defense official.

    As Republicans spent the past few days criticizing the Biden administration over its response to the suspected Chinese spy balloon that flew across the country, an official revealed during a briefing on Saturday that the U.S. was aware of three other instances during the prior administration and one instance earlier in the Biden administration that such an apparatus “transited” the country.

    “PRC [People’s Republic of China] government surveillance balloons transited the continental United States briefly at least three times during the prior administration and once that we know of at the beginning of this administration but never for this duration of time,” said a senior defense official. “We spoke directly with Chinese officials through multiple channels, but rather than address their intrusion into our airspace, the PRC put out an explanation that lacked any credibility.”

    Biden authorized the missile strike that shot down the balloon Saturday. Republican lawmakers have been arguing that the response should have come sooner, but military officials warned the president that the best time to take down the balloon was when it was over water, citing the risk of damage to people and property if it was shot down over land. Biden told reporters he wanted it shot down when he learned it entered U.S. airspace last week.

    Trump denied the revelation by defense officials that Chinese balloons flew over the U.S. during his administration, calling it “disinformation.”

    “The Chinese Balloon situation is a disgrace, just like the Afghanistan horror show, and everything else surrounding the grossly incompetent Biden Administration,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site. “They are only good at cheating in elections, and disinformation — and now they are putting out that a Balloon was put up by China during the Trump Administration, in order to take the ‘heat’ off the slow moving Biden fools. China had too much respect for ‘TRUMP’ for this to have happened, and it NEVER did. JUST FAKE DISINFORMATION!”

    Defense officials also countered an explanation by the Chinese that the balloon was blown off course.

    “This surveillance balloon purposefully traversed the United States and Canada. And we are confident it was seeking to monitor sensitive military sites. Its route over the United States, near many potential sensitive sites, contradicts the PRC government’s explanation that it was a weather balloon,” the official said, adding that additional balloons have been spotted over Central America and South America.


    Chinese balloons flew over US three times during Trump administration: officials (msn.com)

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Bahaha. And the left fall for the stupid.  Knew this was coming
  • mace1229 said:
    Never claimed to be an expert. Are we not allowed to share opinions here?
    Come on man….you know the answer to that.   Heads explode when you don’t follow leftist playbook on here, HOW DARE YOU!!! 
  • Bahaha. And the left fall for the stupid.  Knew this was coming

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mace1229 said:
    Never claimed to be an expert. Are we not allowed to share opinions here?
    Come on man….you know the answer to that.   Heads explode when you don’t follow leftist playbook on here, HOW DARE YOU!!! 

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,590
    mace1229 said:
    Never claimed to be an expert. Are we not allowed to share opinions here?
    Come on man….you know the answer to that.   Heads explode when you don’t follow leftist playbook on here, HOW DARE YOU!!! 
    I lost my playbook. What’s it saying to do? 
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,849
    Yea, let's discuss balloons and military actions, or lack thereof.

    Chinese balloons flew over US three times during Trump administration: officials

    Balloons similar to the one that was shot down off the coast of South Carolina this weekend flew over the U.S. at least three times during the Trump administration, according to a senior U.S. defense official.

    As Republicans spent the past few days criticizing the Biden administration over its response to the suspected Chinese spy balloon that flew across the country, an official revealed during a briefing on Saturday that the U.S. was aware of three other instances during the prior administration and one instance earlier in the Biden administration that such an apparatus “transited” the country.

    “PRC [People’s Republic of China] government surveillance balloons transited the continental United States briefly at least three times during the prior administration and once that we know of at the beginning of this administration but never for this duration of time,” said a senior defense official. “We spoke directly with Chinese officials through multiple channels, but rather than address their intrusion into our airspace, the PRC put out an explanation that lacked any credibility.”

    Biden authorized the missile strike that shot down the balloon Saturday. Republican lawmakers have been arguing that the response should have come sooner, but military officials warned the president that the best time to take down the balloon was when it was over water, citing the risk of damage to people and property if it was shot down over land. Biden told reporters he wanted it shot down when he learned it entered U.S. airspace last week.

    Trump denied the revelation by defense officials that Chinese balloons flew over the U.S. during his administration, calling it “disinformation.”

    “The Chinese Balloon situation is a disgrace, just like the Afghanistan horror show, and everything else surrounding the grossly incompetent Biden Administration,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site. “They are only good at cheating in elections, and disinformation — and now they are putting out that a Balloon was put up by China during the Trump Administration, in order to take the ‘heat’ off the slow moving Biden fools. China had too much respect for ‘TRUMP’ for this to have happened, and it NEVER did. JUST FAKE DISINFORMATION!”

    Defense officials also countered an explanation by the Chinese that the balloon was blown off course.

    “This surveillance balloon purposefully traversed the United States and Canada. And we are confident it was seeking to monitor sensitive military sites. Its route over the United States, near many potential sensitive sites, contradicts the PRC government’s explanation that it was a weather balloon,” the official said, adding that additional balloons have been spotted over Central America and South America.


    Chinese balloons flew over US three times during Trump administration: officials (msn.com)

    I  curious about those previous balloons and how they compare. Everyone who worked with Trump says it didn’t happen, but that surprised no one.
    Did they cross the entire US over several days? Or just approach the coast then leave? When did they know about it? I’m guessing they’ll elaborate more on that soon.
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,630
    mace1229 said:
    Yea, let's discuss balloons and military actions, or lack thereof.

    Chinese balloons flew over US three times during Trump administration: officials

    Balloons similar to the one that was shot down off the coast of South Carolina this weekend flew over the U.S. at least three times during the Trump administration, according to a senior U.S. defense official.

    As Republicans spent the past few days criticizing the Biden administration over its response to the suspected Chinese spy balloon that flew across the country, an official revealed during a briefing on Saturday that the U.S. was aware of three other instances during the prior administration and one instance earlier in the Biden administration that such an apparatus “transited” the country.

    “PRC [People’s Republic of China] government surveillance balloons transited the continental United States briefly at least three times during the prior administration and once that we know of at the beginning of this administration but never for this duration of time,” said a senior defense official. “We spoke directly with Chinese officials through multiple channels, but rather than address their intrusion into our airspace, the PRC put out an explanation that lacked any credibility.”

    Biden authorized the missile strike that shot down the balloon Saturday. Republican lawmakers have been arguing that the response should have come sooner, but military officials warned the president that the best time to take down the balloon was when it was over water, citing the risk of damage to people and property if it was shot down over land. Biden told reporters he wanted it shot down when he learned it entered U.S. airspace last week.

    Trump denied the revelation by defense officials that Chinese balloons flew over the U.S. during his administration, calling it “disinformation.”

    “The Chinese Balloon situation is a disgrace, just like the Afghanistan horror show, and everything else surrounding the grossly incompetent Biden Administration,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site. “They are only good at cheating in elections, and disinformation — and now they are putting out that a Balloon was put up by China during the Trump Administration, in order to take the ‘heat’ off the slow moving Biden fools. China had too much respect for ‘TRUMP’ for this to have happened, and it NEVER did. JUST FAKE DISINFORMATION!”

    Defense officials also countered an explanation by the Chinese that the balloon was blown off course.

    “This surveillance balloon purposefully traversed the United States and Canada. And we are confident it was seeking to monitor sensitive military sites. Its route over the United States, near many potential sensitive sites, contradicts the PRC government’s explanation that it was a weather balloon,” the official said, adding that additional balloons have been spotted over Central America and South America.


    Chinese balloons flew over US three times during Trump administration: officials (msn.com)

    I  curious about those previous balloons and how they compare. Everyone who worked with Trump says it didn’t happen, but that surprised no one.
    Did they cross the entire US over several days? Or just approach the coast then leave? When did they know about it? I’m guessing they’ll elaborate more on that soon.

    from the quoted post. RIF.


    PRC [People’s Republic of China] government surveillance balloons transited the continental United States briefly at least three times during the prior administration and once that we know of at the beginning of this administration but never for this duration of time,” said a senior defense official. “We spoke directly with Chinese officials through multiple channels, but rather than address their intrusion into our airspace, the PRC put out an explanation that lacked any credibility.”

    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14