#46 President Joe Biden
Comments
-
And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency
Post edited by The Juggler onwww.myspace.com0 -
But but but Trump!!The Juggler said:And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency
0 -
Funny that you still haven’t answered any pertinent questions. Again, what was a lie in President Biden’s statement that you posted? What are the “gigs and gigs” of proof? If the media hadn’t reported on Hunter Biden’s laptop, why do I consistently find WaPo, CNN, NYT, USA Today articles with datelines of September/October 2020?JB16057 said:
You and I are wasting our time on this message board. If that doesn't explain a lot, I don't know what would.Halifax2TheMax said:Beat me to it but it’s nice to know the poster’s sources and where they’re spending time.The CMI promoted its mission through editorials and research reports. Among its viewpoints include opposition to the Fairness Doctrine[3] and same-sex marriage.[4] In March 2007, the CMI published a "National Cultural Values Survey" and concluded from its results that most Americans perceived a decline in moral values.[5] One study released by the organization in June 2007 claimed that television viewing time correlated directly with one's liberal attitude, even possibly degrading to moral attitudes.[6]
The nonprofit MRC has received financial support primarily from Robert Mercer,[7] but with several other conservative-leaning sources, including the Bradley, Scaife, Olin, Castle Rock, Carthage and JM foundations, as well as ExxonMobil.[8][9][10] It has been described as "one of the most active and best-funded, and yet least known" arms of the modern conservative movement in the United States.[11] The organization rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, and criticizes media coverage that reflects the scientific consensus.[9][12]
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I'll tell you when you prove to me there is a P tape.Halifax2TheMax said:
Funny that you still haven’t answered any pertinent questions. Again, what was a lie in President Biden’s statement that you posted? What are the “gigs and gigs” of proof? If the media hadn’t reported on Hunter Biden’s laptop, why do I consistently find WaPo, CNN, NYT, USA Today articles with datelines of September/October 2020?JB16057 said:
You and I are wasting our time on this message board. If that doesn't explain a lot, I don't know what would.Halifax2TheMax said:Beat me to it but it’s nice to know the poster’s sources and where they’re spending time.The CMI promoted its mission through editorials and research reports. Among its viewpoints include opposition to the Fairness Doctrine[3] and same-sex marriage.[4] In March 2007, the CMI published a "National Cultural Values Survey" and concluded from its results that most Americans perceived a decline in moral values.[5] One study released by the organization in June 2007 claimed that television viewing time correlated directly with one's liberal attitude, even possibly degrading to moral attitudes.[6]
The nonprofit MRC has received financial support primarily from Robert Mercer,[7] but with several other conservative-leaning sources, including the Bradley, Scaife, Olin, Castle Rock, Carthage and JM foundations, as well as ExxonMobil.[8][9][10] It has been described as "one of the most active and best-funded, and yet least known" arms of the modern conservative movement in the United States.[11] The organization rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, and criticizes media coverage that reflects the scientific consensus.[9][12]
0 -
I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.0
-
You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again.JB16057 said:
But but but Trump!!The Juggler said:And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency
www.myspace.com0 -
The Juggler said:
You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again.JB16057 said:
But but but Trump!!The Juggler said:And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency
But but but Trump!!!!
0 -
Okay. I honestly don't think you even know what I am talking about, nor do you care.JB16057 said:The Juggler said:
You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again.JB16057 said:
But but but Trump!!The Juggler said:And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency
But but but Trump!!!!www.myspace.com0 -
Read the Team Mueller report, specifically the footnotes.JB16057 said:
I'll tell you when you prove to me there is a P tape.Halifax2TheMax said:
Funny that you still haven’t answered any pertinent questions. Again, what was a lie in President Biden’s statement that you posted? What are the “gigs and gigs” of proof? If the media hadn’t reported on Hunter Biden’s laptop, why do I consistently find WaPo, CNN, NYT, USA Today articles with datelines of September/October 2020?JB16057 said:
You and I are wasting our time on this message board. If that doesn't explain a lot, I don't know what would.Halifax2TheMax said:Beat me to it but it’s nice to know the poster’s sources and where they’re spending time.The CMI promoted its mission through editorials and research reports. Among its viewpoints include opposition to the Fairness Doctrine[3] and same-sex marriage.[4] In March 2007, the CMI published a "National Cultural Values Survey" and concluded from its results that most Americans perceived a decline in moral values.[5] One study released by the organization in June 2007 claimed that television viewing time correlated directly with one's liberal attitude, even possibly degrading to moral attitudes.[6]
The nonprofit MRC has received financial support primarily from Robert Mercer,[7] but with several other conservative-leaning sources, including the Bradley, Scaife, Olin, Castle Rock, Carthage and JM foundations, as well as ExxonMobil.[8][9][10] It has been described as "one of the most active and best-funded, and yet least known" arms of the modern conservative movement in the United States.[11] The organization rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, and criticizes media coverage that reflects the scientific consensus.[9][12]
#THEPTAPEISREAL
I’m going to have that printed on a t-shirt and wear it on tour. What do you think, in red, white and blue? Maybe with a byline, “My Tape Bleeds Yellow.”09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll. It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election. Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever. With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%. So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link? What's your point?JB16057 said:I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.0 -
You don't like a taste of your own medicine? That's too bad! But but but.....The Juggler said:
Okay. I honestly don't think you even know what I am talking about, nor do you care.JB16057 said:The Juggler said:
You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again.JB16057 said:
But but but Trump!!The Juggler said:And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency
But but but Trump!!!!
0 -
My gosh. Are you okay? You posted a link for us to click on that mentioned a poll ran by MRC, who happens to be owned by one of Trump's biggest donors. So you brought him into this conversation... unknowingly, apparently.JB16057 said:
You don't like a taste of your own medicine? That's too bad! But but but.....The Juggler said:
Okay. I honestly don't think you even know what I am talking about, nor do you care.JB16057 said:The Juggler said:
You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again.JB16057 said:
But but but Trump!!The Juggler said:And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency
But but but Trump!!!!www.myspace.com0 -
mrussel1 said:
Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll. It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election. Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever. With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%. So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link? What's your point?JB16057 said:I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.Hiding it or whatever?Like I said, PLEASE, double down on this! It's only going to hurt Biden with more and more people not thinking this is a big deal.My point is that Americans are waking up and it's too bad many didn't realize that Hunter's laptop was legit until only last week. You don't like the polling I link to? I don't care. Find me a poll that is in favor of Joe Biden! Oh wait, you can't......
0 -
Whataboutism and twisted logic. A Trump supporter is arguing about facts, truth and justice....haha!It's a hopeless situation...0
-
Ok. Then move on.....The Juggler said:
My gosh. Are you okay? You posted a link for us to click on that mentioned a poll ran by MRC, who happens to be owned by one of Trump's biggest donors. So you brought him into this conversation... unknowingly, apparently.JB16057 said:
You don't like a taste of your own medicine? That's too bad! But but but.....The Juggler said:
Okay. I honestly don't think you even know what I am talking about, nor do you care.JB16057 said:The Juggler said:
You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again.JB16057 said:
But but but Trump!!The Juggler said:And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency
But but but Trump!!!!
0 -
Why does this hurt Biden? Who will switch votes because of this? Do you really believe Hunter's laptop is the tipping point for someone voting Trump or Biden in 2020? If so, you actually believe anyone not on life support in a vegetative state would now vote Trump over Biden because of, wait for it, concerns about Biden lying? Wowee.JB16057 said:mrussel1 said:
Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll. It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election. Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever. With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%. So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link? What's your point?JB16057 said:I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.Hiding it or whatever?Like I said, PLEASE, double down on this! It's only going to hurt Biden with more and more people not thinking this is a big deal.My point is that Americans are waking up and it's too bad many didn't realize that Hunter's laptop was legit until only last week. You don't like the polling I link to? I don't care. Find me a poll that is in favor of Joe Biden! Oh wait, you can't......It's a hopeless situation...0 -
Ummm, no. They’re getting dumber by the minute and are still asleep. Shhhhhhhh.JB16057 said:mrussel1 said:
Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll. It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election. Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever. With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%. So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link? What's your point?JB16057 said:I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.Hiding it or whatever?Like I said, PLEASE, double down on this! It's only going to hurt Biden with more and more people not thinking this is a big deal.My point is that Americans are waking up and it's too bad many didn't realize that Hunter's laptop was legit until only last week. You don't like the polling I link to? I don't care. Find me a poll that is in favor of Joe Biden! Oh wait, you can't......09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Hiding it or whatever = whatever the phraseology that was used.JB16057 said:mrussel1 said:
Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll. It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election. Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever. With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%. So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link? What's your point?JB16057 said:I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.Hiding it or whatever?Like I said, PLEASE, double down on this! It's only going to hurt Biden with more and more people not thinking this is a big deal.My point is that Americans are waking up and it's too bad many didn't realize that Hunter's laptop was legit until only last week. You don't like the polling I link to? I don't care. Find me a poll that is in favor of Joe Biden! Oh wait, you can't......
Dude.. no swing voter fucking cares about Hunter Biden. No one. If you are just a normal person that isn't on Team D or Team R every single vote, you don't give a shit about this. It doesn't affect your life. You're living in a bubble if you think this somehow moves the needle in 2024. It's ridiculous. It's just more right wing red meat.
What evidence do you have that "Americans are waking up" to Hunter Biden. Please post something. If you think Joe's approval ratings are linked to Hunter Biden in the least, then you are completely demented.0 -
I guess we'll find out.....mrussel1 said:
Hiding it or whatever = whatever the phraseology that was used.JB16057 said:mrussel1 said:
Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll. It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election. Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever. With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%. So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link? What's your point?JB16057 said:I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.Hiding it or whatever?Like I said, PLEASE, double down on this! It's only going to hurt Biden with more and more people not thinking this is a big deal.My point is that Americans are waking up and it's too bad many didn't realize that Hunter's laptop was legit until only last week. You don't like the polling I link to? I don't care. Find me a poll that is in favor of Joe Biden! Oh wait, you can't......
Dude.. no swing voter fucking cares about Hunter Biden. No one. If you are just a normal person that isn't on Team D or Team R every single vote, you don't give a shit about this. It doesn't affect your life. You're living in a bubble if you think this somehow moves the needle in 2024. It's ridiculous. It's just more right wing red meat.
What evidence do you have that "Americans are waking up" to Hunter Biden. Please post something. If you think Joe's approval ratings are linked to Hunter Biden in the least, then you are completely demented.
0 -
If the Republicans want to run on the 2020 election for the 2020 midterms, by all means, please do so. Will give the dems a fighting chance. lolwww.myspace.com0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help