Viruses / Vaccines
Comments
-
Survive? More accurate is no appetite for force fed coke and chips while waiting for veggies.HughFreakingDillon said:
so if have to survive on only available food like potato chips and coke, I should...starve, because they are inferior to vegetables?AW124797 said:
Inferior to any other vaccine on the market. Besides flu vaccine, of course.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.
Seems like free will is radical concept. There's a reason why flu vaccine is completely useless. oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I guess mutation is a foreign concept to you. There's a reason why year 2 of the Spanish Flu pandemic was far more deadly than year one. There's a reason why the flu shot is changed every year, as the virus mutates. These are not radical concepts for those of us that pay attention.AW124797 said:
Data? "The amazing efficacy" and record breaking cases globally as we speak. You're right. Eyeroll and a wink.mrussel1 said:
Other than all the data that shows the amazing efficacy at preventing hospitalization and death, and for the two original rampant variants, the efficacy at preventing the disease, you're right. It's unfinished. Eyeroll. See these comments continue to reinforce why you couldn't understand that Fox interview.AW124797 said:
I know and I'm happy too, but can't force unfinished product on everybody. Freedom of choice.mfc2006 said:The fact that we even have a vaccine (and there are a few to choose from) is absolutely amazing. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Give me the inferior vaccine over dying any fucking day. There's my story.
When it stops the spread. Let's start with that. Should be one of the basics that everyone forgot about.
At what point would you consider a vaccine "finished", then, when many infectious agents mutate.AW124797 said:
I know and I'm happy too, but can't force unfinished product on everybody. Freedom of choice.mfc2006 said:The fact that we even have a vaccine (and there are a few to choose from) is absolutely amazing. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Give me the inferior vaccine over dying any fucking day. There's my story.Post edited by AW124797 on0 -
AW124797 said:
Survive? More accurate is no appetite for force fed coke and chips while waiting for veggies.HughFreakingDillon said:
so if have to survive on only available food like potato chips and coke, I should...starve, because they are inferior to vegetables?AW124797 said:
Inferior to any other vaccine on the market. Besides flu vaccine, of course.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.
Seems like free will is radical concept. There's a reason why flu vaccine is completely useless. oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I guess mutation is a foreign concept to you. There's a reason why year 2 of the Spanish Flu pandemic was far more deadly than year one. There's a reason why the flu shot is changed every year, as the virus mutates. These are not radical concepts for those of us that pay attention.AW124797 said:
Data? "The amazing efficacy" and record breaking cases globally as we speak. You're right. Eyeroll and a wink.mrussel1 said:
Other than all the data that shows the amazing efficacy at preventing hospitalization and death, and for the two original rampant variants, the efficacy at preventing the disease, you're right. It's unfinished. Eyeroll. See these comments continue to reinforce why you couldn't understand that Fox interview.AW124797 said:
I know and I'm happy too, but can't force unfinished product on everybody. Freedom of choice.mfc2006 said:The fact that we even have a vaccine (and there are a few to choose from) is absolutely amazing. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Give me the inferior vaccine over dying any fucking day. There's my story.
When it stops the spread. Let's start with that. Should be one a the basics that everyone forgot about.
At what point would you consider a vaccine "finished", then, when many infectious agents mutate.AW124797 said:
I know and I'm happy too, but can't force unfinished product on everybody. Freedom of choice.mfc2006 said:The fact that we even have a vaccine (and there are a few to choose from) is absolutely amazing. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Give me the inferior vaccine over dying any fucking day. There's my story.
so really you speak of a people problem not a vaccine problem.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Yes, pretty much.mickeyrat said:AW124797 said:
Survive? More accurate is no appetite for force fed coke and chips while waiting for veggies.HughFreakingDillon said:
so if have to survive on only available food like potato chips and coke, I should...starve, because they are inferior to vegetables?AW124797 said:
Inferior to any other vaccine on the market. Besides flu vaccine, of course.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.
Seems like free will is radical concept. There's a reason why flu vaccine is completely useless. oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I guess mutation is a foreign concept to you. There's a reason why year 2 of the Spanish Flu pandemic was far more deadly than year one. There's a reason why the flu shot is changed every year, as the virus mutates. These are not radical concepts for those of us that pay attention.AW124797 said:
Data? "The amazing efficacy" and record breaking cases globally as we speak. You're right. Eyeroll and a wink.mrussel1 said:
Other than all the data that shows the amazing efficacy at preventing hospitalization and death, and for the two original rampant variants, the efficacy at preventing the disease, you're right. It's unfinished. Eyeroll. See these comments continue to reinforce why you couldn't understand that Fox interview.AW124797 said:
I know and I'm happy too, but can't force unfinished product on everybody. Freedom of choice.mfc2006 said:The fact that we even have a vaccine (and there are a few to choose from) is absolutely amazing. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Give me the inferior vaccine over dying any fucking day. There's my story.
When it stops the spread. Let's start with that. Should be one a the basics that everyone forgot about.
At what point would you consider a vaccine "finished", then, when many infectious agents mutate.AW124797 said:
I know and I'm happy too, but can't force unfinished product on everybody. Freedom of choice.mfc2006 said:The fact that we even have a vaccine (and there are a few to choose from) is absolutely amazing. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Give me the inferior vaccine over dying any fucking day. There's my story.
so really you speak of a people problem not a vaccine problem.0 -
It is inferior to what we were originally told it was. It was first sold as 95% effective at getting infected with the virus. We were told get the vaccine and this can go away. When it turned out it wasn’t quite as effective at preventing infections and preventing the spread, the focus turned to the lower number of hospitalizations and milder symptoms. And we’re now told get the vaccine so when you get sick you have a lesser chance of being hospitalized.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.I’m not saying we shouldn’t move the goal posts. We should as we get more data and information. But the vaccine isn’t as effective even before Omricron as originally believed. That could be considered inferior.
Id still recommend getting to everyone I know.0 -
I lost interest at “completely useless.” Good luck ‘Murica, you’re gonna need it.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Don't bother.Halifax2TheMax said:I lost interest at “completely useless.” Good luck ‘Murica, you’re gonna need it.0 -
Great points.mace1229 said:
It is inferior to what we were originally told it was. It was first sold as 95% effective at getting infected with the virus. We were told get the vaccine and this can go away. When it turned out it wasn’t quite as effective at preventing infections and preventing the spread, the focus turned to the lower number of hospitalizations and milder symptoms. And we’re now told get the vaccine so when you get sick you have a lesser chance of being hospitalized.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.I’m not saying we shouldn’t move the goal posts. We should as we get more data and information. But the vaccine isn’t as effective even before Omricron as originally believed. That could be considered inferior.
Id still recommend getting to everyone I know.0 -
Did 100% of those eligible to be vaccinated get vaccinated? What’s the percentage of vaccinated in ‘Murica? Those who’d ride herd, what’s the “having been infected” percentage rate to gain herd immunity?
Oh yea, don’t bother.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
And not the only dumb thing that President said or did.mickeyrat said:Halifax2TheMax said:
We even had a repub president, Ronnie Rayguns, declare ketchup as a vegetable.mrussel1 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
this means ranch is a vegetable!!! best news i have heard all week!!!!!!!!mrussel1 said:
THANK YOU! I've been arguing this with my wife for years. Anything I can put on a salad is a vegetable, including steak.Poncier said:
Potato chips are a vegetableHughFreakingDillon said:
so if have to survive on only available food like potato chips and coke, I should...starve, because they are inferior to vegetables?AW124797 said:
Inferior to any other vaccine on the market. Besides flu vaccine, of course.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.
I love this place. It affirms my faith in humansmickeyrat said:mrussel1 said:
THANK YOU! I've been arguing this with my wife for years. Anything I can put on a salad is a vegetable, including steak.Poncier said:
Potato chips are a vegetableHughFreakingDillon said:
so if have to survive on only available food like potato chips and coke, I should...starve, because they are inferior to vegetables?AW124797 said:
Inferior to any other vaccine on the market. Besides flu vaccine, of course.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.
beef eats grass, grains... its plant based.
which is dumb. tomatoes are fruit09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
This is a misrepresentation. The vaccine was 95% against the virus as it existed at the time. Then it was lower against Delta but still effective. Now less so again, without the booster. The science communities cannot read the future nor develop a vaccine for something that doesn't yet exist.mace1229 said:
It is inferior to what we were originally told it was. It was first sold as 95% effective at getting infected with the virus. We were told get the vaccine and this can go away. When it turned out it wasn’t quite as effective at preventing infections and preventing the spread, the focus turned to the lower number of hospitalizations and milder symptoms. And we’re now told get the vaccine so when you get sick you have a lesser chance of being hospitalized.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.I’m not saying we shouldn’t move the goal posts. We should as we get more data and information. But the vaccine isn’t as effective even before Omricron as originally believed. That could be considered inferior.
Id still recommend getting to everyone I know.0 -
The flu vaccine is completely useless? Are you just bad with words? The flu vaccine is historically 40-60% effective in preventing infection. That is not "completely", just like not "every" doctor "guaranteed life".AW124797 said:
Survive? More accurate is no appetite for force fed coke and chips while waiting for veggies.HughFreakingDillon said:
so if have to survive on only available food like potato chips and coke, I should...starve, because they are inferior to vegetables?AW124797 said:
Inferior to any other vaccine on the market. Besides flu vaccine, of course.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.
Seems like free will is radical concept. There's a reason why flu vaccine is completely useless. oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I guess mutation is a foreign concept to you. There's a reason why year 2 of the Spanish Flu pandemic was far more deadly than year one. There's a reason why the flu shot is changed every year, as the virus mutates. These are not radical concepts for those of us that pay attention.AW124797 said:
Data? "The amazing efficacy" and record breaking cases globally as we speak. You're right. Eyeroll and a wink.mrussel1 said:
Other than all the data that shows the amazing efficacy at preventing hospitalization and death, and for the two original rampant variants, the efficacy at preventing the disease, you're right. It's unfinished. Eyeroll. See these comments continue to reinforce why you couldn't understand that Fox interview.AW124797 said:
I know and I'm happy too, but can't force unfinished product on everybody. Freedom of choice.mfc2006 said:The fact that we even have a vaccine (and there are a few to choose from) is absolutely amazing. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Give me the inferior vaccine over dying any fucking day. There's my story.
When it stops the spread. Let's start with that. Should be one of the basics that everyone forgot about.
At what point would you consider a vaccine "finished", then, when many infectious agents mutate.AW124797 said:
I know and I'm happy too, but can't force unfinished product on everybody. Freedom of choice.mfc2006 said:The fact that we even have a vaccine (and there are a few to choose from) is absolutely amazing. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Give me the inferior vaccine over dying any fucking day. There's my story.
Is science binary to you?0 -
40%? Great odds for fanatics.mrussel1 said:
The flu vaccine is completely useless? Are you just bad with words? The flu vaccine is historically 40-60% effective in preventing infection. That is not "completely", just like not "every" doctor "guaranteed life".AW124797 said:
Survive? More accurate is no appetite for force fed coke and chips while waiting for veggies.HughFreakingDillon said:
so if have to survive on only available food like potato chips and coke, I should...starve, because they are inferior to vegetables?AW124797 said:
Inferior to any other vaccine on the market. Besides flu vaccine, of course.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.
Seems like free will is radical concept. There's a reason why flu vaccine is completely useless. oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I guess mutation is a foreign concept to you. There's a reason why year 2 of the Spanish Flu pandemic was far more deadly than year one. There's a reason why the flu shot is changed every year, as the virus mutates. These are not radical concepts for those of us that pay attention.AW124797 said:
Data? "The amazing efficacy" and record breaking cases globally as we speak. You're right. Eyeroll and a wink.mrussel1 said:
Other than all the data that shows the amazing efficacy at preventing hospitalization and death, and for the two original rampant variants, the efficacy at preventing the disease, you're right. It's unfinished. Eyeroll. See these comments continue to reinforce why you couldn't understand that Fox interview.AW124797 said:
I know and I'm happy too, but can't force unfinished product on everybody. Freedom of choice.mfc2006 said:The fact that we even have a vaccine (and there are a few to choose from) is absolutely amazing. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Give me the inferior vaccine over dying any fucking day. There's my story.
When it stops the spread. Let's start with that. Should be one of the basics that everyone forgot about.
At what point would you consider a vaccine "finished", then, when many infectious agents mutate.AW124797 said:
I know and I'm happy too, but can't force unfinished product on everybody. Freedom of choice.mfc2006 said:The fact that we even have a vaccine (and there are a few to choose from) is absolutely amazing. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Give me the inferior vaccine over dying any fucking day. There's my story.
Is science binary to you?0 -
Hey! Brakes in your car don’t prevent 100% of accidents. Completely useless. Get rid of em and don’t use them.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
mrussel1 said:
This is a misrepresentation. The vaccine was 95% against the virus as it existed at the time. Then it was lower against Delta but still effective. Now less so again, without the booster. The science communities cannot read the future nor develop a vaccine for something that doesn't yet exist.mace1229 said:
It is inferior to what we were originally told it was. It was first sold as 95% effective at getting infected with the virus. We were told get the vaccine and this can go away. When it turned out it wasn’t quite as effective at preventing infections and preventing the spread, the focus turned to the lower number of hospitalizations and milder symptoms. And we’re now told get the vaccine so when you get sick you have a lesser chance of being hospitalized.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.I’m not saying we shouldn’t move the goal posts. We should as we get more data and information. But the vaccine isn’t as effective even before Omricron as originally believed. That could be considered inferior.
Id still recommend getting to everyone I know.
Yes. Plenty of excuses for inferior product. Let's hear again about hospitalization/death rate/mild symptoms.0 -
You mentioned "lost interest?"Halifax2TheMax said:Hey! Brakes in your car don’t prevent 100% of accidents. Completely useless. Get rid of em and don’t use them.0 -
You’re really bad at distilling information. Let me guess… you’re Trumpy.AW124797 said:mrussel1 said:
This is a misrepresentation. The vaccine was 95% against the virus as it existed at the time. Then it was lower against Delta but still effective. Now less so again, without the booster. The science communities cannot read the future nor develop a vaccine for something that doesn't yet exist.mace1229 said:
It is inferior to what we were originally told it was. It was first sold as 95% effective at getting infected with the virus. We were told get the vaccine and this can go away. When it turned out it wasn’t quite as effective at preventing infections and preventing the spread, the focus turned to the lower number of hospitalizations and milder symptoms. And we’re now told get the vaccine so when you get sick you have a lesser chance of being hospitalized.mrussel1 said:
Was the product inferior before Omnicron? If you say yes, you better have some really strong data to back up such a statement. And also tell us about the superior product comparatively.JB16057 said:
inferior product - current vaccineHughFreakingDillon said:
inferior product?AW124797 said:
Correct! I'm tired of mandates and propaganda with this inferior product - current vaccine. Hopefully, they'll come up with something better in the near future. Till then, "think for yourself and question authority."HughFreakingDillon said:I think what A-dub is saying is that when the vaccine effectiveness first was reported at up to 90%, yes, people were rejoicing. However, once we learned more about how the effectiveness wanes, but also can be thrown for a loop, depending on the next variant, so it was kind of a false hope that we were given. (however, we were given that hope since that was all that was known at the time)
I think he/she is speaking somewhat off the cuff about it, using adjectives that are absolute, when we should know they don't mean it literally.
correct me if I'm wrong, however.I’m not saying we shouldn’t move the goal posts. We should as we get more data and information. But the vaccine isn’t as effective even before Omricron as originally believed. That could be considered inferior.
Id still recommend getting to everyone I know.
Yes. Plenty of excuses for inferior product. Let's hear again about hospitalization/death rate/mild symptoms.0 -
Right. I knew it was coming. Can't keep it civil when somebody has a different opinion.0
-
As had you. But you also haven’t defended your positions or declarations very well. I’m not sure why that is, though.AW124797 said:
You mentioned "lost interest?"Halifax2TheMax said:Hey! Brakes in your car don’t prevent 100% of accidents. Completely useless. Get rid of em and don’t use them.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
US is 59th in the world in vaccine status, behind Iran. Also, we’re the lowest of any wealthy country. It’s probably because we’re the best at doing our own research, along with owning the libs. I’m proud.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help



