POLL - The WEAKEST LINK of BRITISH BANDS - ROUND 4
Comments
-
The Beatles
Your nan!tbergs said:Well I threw one at Floyd so f-off you Beatles haters. Pretentious bunch of brits!0 -
Pink FloydWhile I dislike the Beatles the most, Pink Floyd has the weakest catalogue. Yes, their big albums shaped rock and roll as we know it today, but the first half (if not more) of their catalogue was weird (and not good) as heck.
*and there's no denying that all the remaining bands shaped rock & roll in one way or another.1998: Barrie 2000: Toronto 2005: Kitchener, London, Hamilton, Toronto 2006: Toronto 1&2, Paris, Milan, Torino, Pistoia 2009: Calgary, Vancouver 2011: Canada 2013: London, Wrigley, Philly 1&2 2014: St. Louis, ACL 1, Detroit 2016: Lexington, Quebec, Ottawa, Toronto 1&2, Fenway 1&2, Wrigley 1&2 2017: EV - Louisville 2018: London 1&2, Milan, Padova, Rome, Prague, Krakow, Berlin, Wrigley 1&2, Fenway 1&2 2020: Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton 2021: London 1&2 2022: Hamilton, Toronto 2023: Chicago 1&2, Noblesville 2024: Seattle 1&2, Noblesville, Wrigley 1&20 -
Pink FloydI'm with Bob on this one:

"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
The Beatles
First half is their prime! White teenage girls’ libidos basically set the tone for what shaped rock & roll back then.Gibson said:While I dislike the Beatles the most, Pink Floyd has the weakest catalogue. Yes, their big albums shaped rock and roll as we know it today, but the first half (if not more) of their catalogue was weird (and not good) as heck.
*and there's no denying that all the remaining bands shaped rock & roll in one way or another.Floyd reshaped rock & roll (many times over) without that particular following, starting with the goddamn Beatles and Stones, both of which got better (or “weird as heck,” as you say) because they saw early Floyd (and Hendrix) shows all around London.Take away Syd, Jimi, and Brian Wilson, and I think the Beatles and Stones would’ve stayed stuck in their respective ruts.I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
Pink Floyd
It's an interesting argument because the most influential bands or artists aren't necessarily the best so if this poll was based on influence, I may have voted differently, but what you saw from the Beatles was a band willing to evolve and who worked harder than any other band during their time. To the point they broke apart and became completely different than how they started. As much as I love LZ, they didn't evolve a lot. They had a formula and they hammered away at it successfully. I can's speak to the Stones or PF lesser known parts of their catalog, but honestly, I don't really like the output on a lot of albums. I tried to get in to some of it after hearing others fawn over it, but it does nothing for me. Kind of like Radiohead, I don't get in to them at all. As for the Beatles, a lot of their later musical influence came from non-traditional sources as well and I think what they created is amazing.dankind said:
First half is their prime! White teenage girls’ libidos basically set the tone for what shaped rock & roll back then.Gibson said:While I dislike the Beatles the most, Pink Floyd has the weakest catalogue. Yes, their big albums shaped rock and roll as we know it today, but the first half (if not more) of their catalogue was weird (and not good) as heck.
*and there's no denying that all the remaining bands shaped rock & roll in one way or another.Floyd reshaped rock & roll (many times over) without that particular following, starting with the goddamn Beatles and Stones, both of which got better (or “weird as heck,” as you say) because they saw early Floyd (and Hendrix) shows all around London.Take away Syd, Jimi, and Brian Wilson, and I think the Beatles and Stones would’ve stayed stuck in their respective ruts.
I think a lot of the bands PJ was influenced by for the most part sucked, but without them, they would have never become the amazing rock band they are. It doesn't matter if you have a ton of original music if no one wants to listen to it. There's a balance to be had in order to be successful and create good music.It's a hopeless situation...0 -
The BeatlesIn a perfect world, all the guys from The Rolling Stones thread would just come on over to this thread and blow every other band out of the water!0
-
The Beatles
True W. but we're on PJ forum!!OffSheGoes35 said:In a perfect world, all the guys from The Rolling Stones thread would just come on over to this thread and blow every other band out of the water!Athens 2006. Dusseldorf 2007. Berlin 2009. Venice 2010. Amsterdam 1 2012. Amsterdam 1+2 2014. Buenos Aires 2015.
Prague Krakow Berlin 2018. Berlin 2022
EV, Taormina 1+2 2017.
I wish i was the souvenir you kept your house key on..0 -
The Beatles23scidoo said:
True W. but we're on PJ forum!!OffSheGoes35 said:In a perfect world, all the guys from The Rolling Stones thread would just come on over to this thread and blow every other band out of the water!
0 -
The Beatles

Athens 2006. Dusseldorf 2007. Berlin 2009. Venice 2010. Amsterdam 1 2012. Amsterdam 1+2 2014. Buenos Aires 2015.
Prague Krakow Berlin 2018. Berlin 2022
EV, Taormina 1+2 2017.
I wish i was the souvenir you kept your house key on..0 -
The BeatlesJust in case an RS fan happens to mosey on over, please vote for The Beatles. If you vote for the Stones, it is actually a vote against The Stones.
Post edited by OffSheGoes35 on0 -
The BeatlesPink Floyd feeling the love.

I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
Pink FloydGo away Floyd, go away....It's a hopeless situation...0
-
Pink Floyd23scidoo said:

After all these years and the nauseating over abundance of Beatles threads on another forum I participate in, I'm actually somewhat Beatled out (but have fond memories, nevertheless), but that ^^^ is just silliness and so over-the-top. I hope you are at least somewhat joking?!
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
The Beatles
You’re a joke, sir!brianlux said:23scidoo said:
After all these years and the nauseating over abundance of Beatles threads on another forum I participate in, I'm actually somewhat Beatled out (but have fond memories, nevertheless), but that ^^^ is just silliness and so over-the-top. I hope you are at least somewhat joking?!
You’re a joke!!I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
Pink Floyd
Hello, hello, hello? Is there anybody in there?dankind said:
You’re a joke, sir!brianlux said:23scidoo said:
After all these years and the nauseating over abundance of Beatles threads on another forum I participate in, I'm actually somewhat Beatled out (but have fond memories, nevertheless), but that ^^^ is just silliness and so over-the-top. I hope you are at least somewhat joking?!
You’re a joke!!It's a hopeless situation...0 -
Pink Floyddankind said:
You’re a joke, sir!brianlux said:23scidoo said:
After all these years and the nauseating over abundance of Beatles threads on another forum I participate in, I'm actually somewhat Beatled out (but have fond memories, nevertheless), but that ^^^ is just silliness and so over-the-top. I hope you are at least somewhat joking?!
You’re a joke!!
Hey no fair! Everybody know that already!
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
Led Zeppelin
I couldn’t agree more.brianlux said:I'm with Bob on this one:
0 -
The Beatles
You're handling this really well, DK. We'll get 'em next time.dankind said:Pink Floyd feeling the love.
0 -
The Beatles
Ha! Made me laugh too.tempo_n_groove said:
Soft underbellies they have, but they aren't to be trifled with either.OffSheGoes35 said:Oh excuse me, no one will leave unscathed except the Led Zeppelin freaks.
I wrote this in a Monty Python accent and laughed to myself... Hohum, it's Friday.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help





