Capitol Riots 2

1192022242578

Comments

  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,818
    Blue Lives Matter! 

    Support the troops!!! 

  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,973
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Falling down,...not staying down
  • JB16057
    JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,643
    JB16057 said:
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
    Do repubs want to know the truth of the insurrection of January 6th? If so, they could serve on the special committee and find out who shot the thug climbing through the window. Capitol Police & Secrete Service aren’t Mayberry cops because of who they protect and serve, where they serve and how and what it all represents. There’s a process for the “protection” you seem so concerned about.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,783
    JB16057 said:
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
    Laughable 🤣🤣🤣 that’s how I take all your post! Let me guess if that chick was breaking & entering your household I bet you’d welcome her with open arms? 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,599
    Blue Lives Matter! 

    Support the troops!!! 

    He doesn't mention the cops other than that their riot gear was locked away?

    He also mentions as to why the National Guard wasn't at the Capitol that day.  Isn't that what is being investigated?  That was a big question that I don't think was answered.

    The caption for the tweet didn't match what he said.  Not sure if anyone else listened to this or not?
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,599
    JB16057 said:
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
    It was filmed for everyone to see.  The woman was attempting to bust through a barricaded door that was protecting the Vice President among others.

    This is cut and dry justified.

    Trump is pandering to his followers and the other TV hosts whom want to make Babbitt a martyr...
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,818
    Blue Lives Matter! 

    Support the troops!!! 

    He doesn't mention the cops other than that their riot gear was locked away?

    He also mentions as to why the National Guard wasn't at the Capitol that day.  Isn't that what is being investigated?  That was a big question that I don't think was answered.

    The caption for the tweet didn't match what he said.  Not sure if anyone else listened to this or not?

    The caption is that he had tougher words for the guards protecting the Capitol than the people attacking it. If you want to argue those tougher words [the line of questioning] were more about the response than the cops & guard themselves I can see that point of view, but the fact remains he's trying to shift the focus to the lack of police & military response as opposed to the actual offenders.

    If McCarthy was calling for an investigation into the (lack of) response, I would have no problem with this, but as far as I know he's against any sort of investigation. 


    Why? (jk, we all know why) 
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,818
    JB16057 said:
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
    It was filmed for everyone to see.  The woman was attempting to bust through a barricaded door that was protecting the Vice President among others.

    This is cut and dry justified.

    Trump is pandering to his followers and the other TV hosts whom want to make Babbitt a martyr...
    I can't fathom anyone coming to the defense of Babbit at this point. 



    F'n cult behavior right there. 
  • F Me In The Brain
    F Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,871
    edited July 2021
    JB16057 said:
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
    It was filmed for everyone to see.  The woman was attempting to bust through a barricaded door that was protecting the Vice President among others.

    This is cut and dry justified.

    Trump is pandering to his followers and the other TV hosts whom want to make Babbitt a martyr...
    I can't fathom anyone coming to the defense of Babbit at this point. 



    F'n cult behavior right there. 

    As pointed out by everyone with a brain, the most baffling part is the condemnation of the cop(s) by the same fucking idiot assholes that used their love of the po-lice as a focal point against black people protesting in 2020.

    I just don't get it.  How fucking dumb can these assholes be?
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,599
    Blue Lives Matter! 

    Support the troops!!! 

    He doesn't mention the cops other than that their riot gear was locked away?

    He also mentions as to why the National Guard wasn't at the Capitol that day.  Isn't that what is being investigated?  That was a big question that I don't think was answered.

    The caption for the tweet didn't match what he said.  Not sure if anyone else listened to this or not?

    The caption is that he had tougher words for the guards protecting the Capitol than the people attacking it. If you want to argue those tougher words [the line of questioning] were more about the response than the cops & guard themselves I can see that point of view, but the fact remains he's trying to shift the focus to the lack of police & military response as opposed to the actual offenders.

    If McCarthy was calling for an investigation into the (lack of) response, I would have no problem with this, but as far as I know he's against any sort of investigation. 


    Why? (jk, we all know why) 
    Got it, I was just getting the context of what the clip showed.  TY for the explanation.

    I always thought that there was questions as to why the National Guard wasn't called in?  That was a main question from day one and that is one of the inside jobs that were talked about perhaps.

  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited July 2021
    JB16057 said:
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
    Laughable 🤣🤣🤣 that’s how I take all your post! Let me guess if that chick was breaking & entering your household I bet you’d welcome her with open arms? 
    What would you do?  Shoot her? And with what, good vibes?
    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,818
    PJPOWER said:
    JB16057 said:
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
    Laughable 🤣🤣🤣 that’s how I take all your post! Let me guess if that chick was breaking & entering your household I bet you’d welcome her with open arms? 
    What would you do?  Shoot her?

    Would you not have, with that mob behind her ready to follow? 
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited July 2021
    PJPOWER said:
    JB16057 said:
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
    Laughable 🤣🤣🤣 that’s how I take all your post! Let me guess if that chick was breaking & entering your household I bet you’d welcome her with open arms? 
    What would you do?  Shoot her?

    Would you not have, with that mob behind her ready to follow? 
    I think it was justified, but I get a kick out of these hardcore anti-gun people defending any kind of shooting.  So is everyone saying that it would be okay to shoot her if she was breaking into your house?  Please tell me what other scenarios would it be okay to defend your home with a firearm?
    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,599
    PJPOWER said:
    JB16057 said:
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
    Laughable 🤣🤣🤣 that’s how I take all your post! Let me guess if that chick was breaking & entering your household I bet you’d welcome her with open arms? 
    What would you do?  Shoot her? And with what, good vibes?
    Jose seemed to think it was justifiable too here.

    I'll let him answer though.
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    PJPOWER said:
    JB16057 said:
    Kat said:
    He wants to know who is responsible? He's responsible. Just give him a mirror.


    Do you believe in police reform? Do you think that all officers should have this same kind of protection when they are involved in a deadly shooting that is considered "justified"?
    Laughable 🤣🤣🤣 that’s how I take all your post! Let me guess if that chick was breaking & entering your household I bet you’d welcome her with open arms? 
    What would you do?  Shoot her? And with what, good vibes?
    Jose seemed to think it was justifiable too here.

    I'll let him answer though.
    I know, just a bit ironic seeing these hardcore anti-gun people defending a shooting of an unarmed person.
  • OnWis97
    OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,637
    The “play stupid games, win stupid prizes” crowd is not loving the stupid prizes part now that the recipient is a white nationalist trying to help install Trump as a dictator.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
    2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited July 2021
    OnWis97 said:
    The “play stupid games, win stupid prizes” crowd is not loving the stupid prizes part now that the recipient is a white nationalist trying to help install Trump as a dictator.
    I, for one, still agree with the “play stupid games, win stupid prizes” mantra.  I just recognize and appreciate the irony in this from all angles.  Where are all of the “why didn’t he shoot her in the leg” idiots?  Pretty silent on that front for some reason…
    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,818
    PJPOWER said:
    OnWis97 said:
    The “play stupid games, win stupid prizes” crowd is not loving the stupid prizes part now that the recipient is a white nationalist trying to help install Trump as a dictator.
    I, for one, still agree with the “play stupid games, win stupid prizes” mantra.  I just recognize and appreciate the irony in this from all angles.
    Not everyone lives in the either / or reality. 

    I'm for gun control, but I'm not anti 2A. We need reform.

    I support local police departments and make annual donations to LEO charities,,, but I'm also against police brutality. We need reform. 



    It is possible to hold both positions.