How easily can you admire a product of creativity despite the flaws of the one who created it?

brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,663
I'm stealing the general idea here from another forum but thought it would be interesting to poll something similar here.
Is it possible for you to admire a piece of music, art, literature, or other product of creativity despite the flaws of the person who created it? To what extent?
I general do find it possible to admire a work of creativity even when I do not admire the person who created it. There are limits for me, but only in very severe cases. If I perceive a work of art, music, or literature as excellent, I am able to admire it even if I find great fault in the one who created it.
Your take?
(Poll is anonymous.)
"It's a sad and beautiful world"
-Roberto Benigni
How easily can you admire a product of creativity despite the flaws of the one who created it? 17 votes
Yes, always.
5%
1 vote
In most cases, yes.
47%
8 votes
Only sometimes.
35%
6 votes
Seldom.
11%
2 votes
Never.
0%
0 votes
0
Comments
-
Michael Jackson.
Great music . Great live but I dislike his habits
this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -0 -
lastexitlondon said:Michael Jackson.
Great music . Great live but I dislike his habits
Do not listen to him (anymore).
It feels uneasy."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
For me, it depends on whether or not I am able to separate the art from the artist. For example, a lot of the classical music that I like, or old movies that I watch, the artists were often racist, misogynistic, or homophobic. To be fair, most of the population publicly exhibited those traits for long periods of human history. Perhaps I real life they weren’t any of those things (Is it wrong, or was it survival?) Thankfully, if far too slowly, attitudes are evolving in many parts of the world.
However, if by those standards that I mentioned above, I were to preclude taking any enjoyment from the art / artists of the past, I would be culturally impoverished right now. We all would be. That being said, there are lines for me. I will not pay or give support to artists who exhibit those negative, harmful behaviours currently. on a positive note, I know that I do watch / listen more critically. Things that I didn’t really notice, or that I accepted because that’s the way things were, can really anger me now and detract from my enjoyment.
So I guess, after all that, it depends on the offence and the harm done."What the CANUCK happened?!? - Esquimalt Barber Shop0 -
The difference for me, between lets say music artists and other creative people, like actors... even though the "Damn, let's watch something with Kevin Spacey!" mood doesn't strike me anymore... is that I am watching a fictional character played by an asshole (e.g. John Wayne). But putting on a e.g. Ryan Adams album, I am listening to and supporting him on "personal" level.
That is why I can put on Leonard Cohens Death of a Ladies man sadly produced by that rapist dude who died right now... eh.. Phil Spector in that it is Leonard Cohen and his words and stories I am listening to and for. It is not Phil Spector's album.
So for me, there is a difference in separating the artist and the art - when it comes to Michael Jackson versus whatever asshole who plays a part in a film.
But I am not rushing to watch Woody Allen movies nowadays - with it being very much his personal creative art - from scriptwriting to having directors cut.
While, having e.g. a director who is an asshole working for a Marvel movie for a paycheck would not make it as hard to put on that movie.
But I guess for the "shut up and just sing" crowd who doesn't want their artists to say any political or I guess... show any kind of personality... they don't care as long as they get to hear the hits (With words I assume they do not care about, as long as the song has a great hook).
SHUT UP AND JUST PLAY BORN IN THE USA BRUCE - I LOVE IT WHEN IT POPS UP ON MY PLAYLIST WITH TED NUGENT AND KID ROCK SONGS!Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
I don’t think I’ve bought a single Pearl Jam/Eddie Vedder item since he stepped off the EasyJet.
That hypocrisy just doesn’t sit well with me. Pearl Jam: protecting the planet, one private jet at a time.
I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
Michael Jackson already mentioned by name -- I would not knowingly support anything to do with that guy. Lost count of how many arguments I have had about this over the years -- and took the same position when he was alive.The love he receives is the love that is saved0
-
I love reading Hunter S Thompson Material. His writing is frantic and exciting.
Hunter S the person is a mental patient whom probably should have been heavily medicated professionally.0 -
Too early to properly formulate an answer right now, so...
Polanski. Fuck him.0 -
I found this to be a tough question. I know for a fact that there are musicians, artists, and writers who's work I highly admire but are people who have done some pretty awful things. But then, I also know some of the things we read are hearsay, or gossip, or exaggerations, so is a clear and simple judgement that easy to make? And who is blameless? Who among us has never done a single thing in our lives such that we are blameless? So for me, if the artist is not a wholey despicable person, I can forgive certain transgressions and appreciate their work. That would include a HUGE number of rock and roll artists. A lot of them have done some really shitty things, but they are not necessarily wholly despicable people.But, of course, there are instances of severe transgression. If I thought Mein Kampf was a great work of literature (I don't know, I haven't read it), I would still find it impossible to regard that work because of the terrible person who wrote it. I think I would have to discount the work of people who committed atrocious acts at that level.The most difficult cases (and I'm not going to name the obvious because I'm not interested in arguing over a particular case) involve a work of art that was created by one person but enhanced by another. For example, a song sung by a wonderful singer and yet produced by someone you find despicable. Do you disregard the song because of the horrible producer, or love it because it is a great vocal by a decent person? I would chose the latter."It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0
-
brianlux said:But then, I also know some of the things we read are hearsay, or gossip, or exaggerations, so is a clear and simple judgement that easy to make? And who is blameless?
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:brianlux said:But then, I also know some of the things we read are hearsay, or gossip, or exaggerations, so is a clear and simple judgement that easy to make? And who is blameless?
Was Freddie Kruger based on a real person???
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
brianlux said:Spiritual_Chaos said:brianlux said:But then, I also know some of the things we read are hearsay, or gossip, or exaggerations, so is a clear and simple judgement that easy to make? And who is blameless?
Was Freddie Kruger based on a real person???"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:brianlux said:Spiritual_Chaos said:brianlux said:But then, I also know some of the things we read are hearsay, or gossip, or exaggerations, so is a clear and simple judgement that easy to make? And who is blameless?
Was Freddie Kruger based on a real person???Interesting.I'm not at all a fan of slasher type artistry. Enough of that exists in the real world."It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
We all judge, and we’re all judged.
I don’t know what lies in a stranger’s heart any more than they do mine, and what flies for me won’t for another (and vice versa). Goes with my own level of (dis)comfort toward the act itself.
Not losing any sleep over it, that’s for sure.0 -
Cosby.....
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Anyone sleeping on a MyPillow?This weekend we rock Portland0
-
Poncier said:Anyone sleeping on a MyPillow?0
-
JeBurkhardt said:Poncier said:Anyone sleeping on a MyPillow?This weekend we rock Portland0
-
I had a hard time with this question as well.
I can think of one example where my opinion changed on an artist after seeing them live. It’s something I can’t help, any new music by this artist just doesn’t really appeal to me anymore because I had that one experience that did not sit well with me.
The artist/band was the Foo Fighters. Dave Grohl was so CRUDE, totally insulting to women, telling very graphic stories about women; basically indicating their purpose in life is to satisfy men.
I went to that show with two males, and we all walked out of there shocked at what we witnessed. I was blown away that this was his front man persona.
Don't come closer or I'll have to go0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help