Hilariously hypocritical tweet from a user claiming to be a "free speech activist".
free speech is only protected from prosecution by the government, not criticism.
when will people figure this out?
He is upset they broadcasted a banned videos. He is advocating that since the videos have been banned by a private companies that it should not be shown. He doesn't provide any criticism or counter argument other than the content is wrong and has been banned.
Hilariously hypocritical tweet from a user claiming to be a "free speech activist".
free speech is only protected from prosecution by the government, not criticism.
when will people figure this out?
He is upset they broadcasted a banned videos. He is advocating that since the videos have been banned by a private companies that it should not be shown. He doesn't provide any criticism or counter argument other than the content is wrong and has been banned.
It's a tweet.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
Hilariously hypocritical tweet from a user claiming to be a "free speech activist".
free speech is only protected from prosecution by the government, not criticism.
when will people figure this out?
He is upset they broadcasted a banned videos. He is advocating that since the videos have been banned by a private companies that it should not be shown. He doesn't provide any criticism or counter argument other than the content is wrong and has been banned.
It's a tweet.
That and it's Alex Jones.
I'm curious to see how someone would go about defending Alex "Sandy Hook shooting was a false flag" Jones.
Hilariously hypocritical tweet from a user claiming to be a "free speech activist".
free speech is only protected from prosecution by the government, not criticism.
when will people figure this out?
He is upset they broadcasted a banned videos. He is advocating that since the videos have been banned by a private companies that it should not be shown. He doesn't provide any criticism or counter argument other than the content is wrong and has been banned.
you sure are making assumptions based on that one tweet. he's upset rogan is giving jones a platform. of course he's aware that rogan is legally allowed to do so, but he thinks it's irresponsible.
otherwise his tweet would be advocating calling the cops. which he didn't.
Yes, from a person that describes themselves solely as a "free speech activist". Criticizing JRE for platforming AJ without acknowledging his own role in boosting that platform. It is hilariously hypocritical and not self-aware.
no, it is not hypocritical at all. free speech has ZERO to do with it.
100% this. A private citizen can use his/her speech to request a private company take an action and that company can consider it or ignore them entirely.
no, it is not hypocritical at all. free speech has ZERO to do with it.
100% this. A private citizen can use his/her speech to request a private company take an action and that company can consider it or ignore them entirely.
just wow... I'm gonna stick to lost dogs. Sorry to break the seal on your vacuum.
no, it is not hypocritical at all. free speech has ZERO to do with it.
100% this. A private citizen can use his/her speech to request a private company take an action and that company can consider it or ignore them entirely.
just wow... I'm gonna stick to lost dogs. Sorry to break the seal on your vacuum.
no, it is not hypocritical at all. free speech has ZERO to do with it.
100% this. A private citizen can use his/her speech to request a private company take an action and that company can consider it or ignore them entirely.
just wow... I'm gonna stick to lost dogs. Sorry to break the seal on your vacuum.
You should be focused on the fact that Spotify doesn't seem to be bending on this. It's more important to encourage large companies and institutions to push back than get worked up over a rando Twitter blue check exercising his own rights.
If you don't want a private company to censor, lobby that company. If they hear more voices in support, that affects their decision (see: Trader Joe's). You're not going to resolve anything by bickering with a howling mob. But some guys just want to be aggrieved and fight a culture war.
no, it is not hypocritical at all. free speech has ZERO to do with it.
100% this. A private citizen can use his/her speech to request a private company take an action and that company can consider it or ignore them entirely.
just wow... I'm gonna stick to lost dogs. Sorry to break the seal on your vacuum.
Yes, from a person that describes themselves solely as a "free speech activist". Criticizing JRE for platforming AJ without acknowledging his own role in boosting that platform. It is hilariously hypocritical and not self-aware.
The government didn't stop him from speaking....that is what the 1st Amendment is about.
That people have a response to what was said has nothing to do with the 1A. Ridiculous.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
no, it is not hypocritical at all. free speech has ZERO to do with it.
100% this. A private citizen can use his/her speech to request a private company take an action and that company can consider it or ignore them entirely.
just wow... I'm gonna stick to lost dogs. Sorry to break the seal on your vacuum.
You should be focused on the fact that Spotify doesn't seem to be bending on this. It's more important to encourage large companies and institutions to push back than get worked up over a rando Twitter blue check exercising his own rights.
"Free speech activist uses free speech to criticize corporation for amplifying misinformation" isn't the gotcha that Shorty seems to think it is.
no, it is not hypocritical at all. free speech has ZERO to do with it.
100% this. A private citizen can use his/her speech to request a private company take an action and that company can consider it or ignore them entirely.
just wow... I'm gonna stick to lost dogs. Sorry to break the seal on your vacuum.
You should be focused on the fact that Spotify doesn't seem to be bending on this. It's more important to encourage large companies and institutions to push back than get worked up over a rando Twitter blue check exercising his own rights.
"Free speech activist uses free speech to criticize corporation for amplifying misinformation" isn't the gotcha that Shorty seems to think it is.
You forgot “free speech” between “amplifying” and “misinformation.”
no, it is not hypocritical at all. free speech has ZERO to do with it.
100% this. A private citizen can use his/her speech to request a private company take an action and that company can consider it or ignore them entirely.
just wow... I'm gonna stick to lost dogs. Sorry to break the seal on your vacuum.
You should be focused on the fact that Spotify doesn't seem to be bending on this. It's more important to encourage large companies and institutions to push back than get worked up over a rando Twitter blue check exercising his own rights.
"Free speech activist uses free speech to criticize corporation for amplifying misinformation" isn't the gotcha that Shorty seems to think it is.
Exactly. Private citizen is criticizing big company with no repercussions from the state. Another private citizen could agree with the company and that's ok! What a system!
rogan posted on instagram about this. he said (paraphrasing) that he knew people would judge this podcast without even watching it, and "i was right". he said he fact checked everything jones said, and he was mostly right on everything. he posted an interview that bill gates did where he admits that the corona vaccine that moderna is testing that 80% of the people in the study got sick. and bill gates looked uncharacteristically uncomfortable talking about it the entire time.
he said "look, we all know alex is nuts, but he's also right about a lot of things".
maybe i'll watch the podcast to see what his idea of fact checking is. I know that someone who posted a video of their proof that rogan is a nut/full of shit, but the video they posted was rogan looking at an article by the associated press.
rogan posted on instagram about this. he said (paraphrasing) that he knew people would judge this podcast without even watching it, and "i was right". he said he fact checked everything jones said, and he was mostly right on everything. he posted an interview that bill gates did where he admits that the corona vaccine that moderna is testing that 80% of the people in the study got sick. and bill gates looked uncharacteristically uncomfortable talking about it the entire time.
he said "look, we all know alex is nuts, but he's also right about a lot of things".
maybe i'll watch the podcast to see what his idea of fact checking is. I know that someone who posted a video of their proof that rogan is a nut/full of shit, but the video they posted was rogan looking at an article by the associated press.
This is the AP article they were supposedly discussing:
On one hand, I have some criticism of Rogan and one is that he gives Alex Jones too much leeway. On the other hand, the people who are perpetually mad about him distort their critiques in the hope of maximizing impact. I probably wasn't going to listen to this episode to begin with and don't have the time to make myself a scholar on it. So I shrug my shoulders and just keep listening to the ones where the guests are interesting. MJK, Quinn, Burr, etc.
"I am all col with giving a platform for a fucking idiot spewing bullshit, because I ask my off-camera friend to google stuff sometimes"
i don't even know what your point is here. and jamie is a producer. not an "off camera friend". you don't have a $100 million show by employing a buddy who isn't a professional.
"I am all col with giving a platform for a fucking idiot spewing bullshit, because I ask my off-camera friend to google stuff sometimes"
i don't even know what your point is here. and jamie is a producer. not an "off camera friend". you don't have a $100 million show by employing a buddy who isn't a professional.
Lol. Okey. Sorry, I touched a nerve.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
"I am all col with giving a platform for a fucking idiot spewing bullshit, because I ask my off-camera friend to google stuff sometimes"
i don't even know what your point is here. and jamie is a producer. not an "off camera friend". you don't have a $100 million show by employing a buddy who isn't a professional.
Lol. Okey. Sorry, I touched a nerve.
again with this "touched a nerve" shit. that's what people mean by trolling. you didn't touch any nerve. you once again showed your seemingly unending ignorance. and if touching people's nerves is some motivation for posting, then maybe you should take some time to reflect on why.
Comments
when will people figure this out?
www.headstonesband.com
They won't, because it doesn't suit their narrative.
What's their take on Ghislaine Maxwell? Is she another victim of "globalist" George Soros?
I'm curious to see how someone would go about defending Alex "Sandy Hook shooting was a false flag" Jones.
otherwise his tweet would be advocating calling the cops. which he didn't.
www.headstonesband.com
www.headstonesband.com
www.headstonesband.com
That people have a response to what was said has nothing to do with the 1A. Ridiculous.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
"Free speech activist uses free speech to criticize corporation for amplifying misinformation" isn't the gotcha that Shorty seems to think it is.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
he said "look, we all know alex is nuts, but he's also right about a lot of things".
maybe i'll watch the podcast to see what his idea of fact checking is. I know that someone who posted a video of their proof that rogan is a nut/full of shit, but the video they posted was rogan looking at an article by the associated press.
www.headstonesband.com
www.headstonesband.com
https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-health-middle-east-africa-united-nations-619efb65b9eeec5650f011b960a152e9
On one hand, I have some criticism of Rogan and one is that he gives Alex Jones too much leeway. On the other hand, the people who are perpetually mad about him distort their critiques in the hope of maximizing impact. I probably wasn't going to listen to this episode to begin with and don't have the time to make myself a scholar on it. So I shrug my shoulders and just keep listening to the ones where the guests are interesting. MJK, Quinn, Burr, etc.
Here it is just a given. Doesn't need to be a "thing".
www.headstonesband.com
www.headstonesband.com