Donald Trump
Comments
-
$750Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180
-
$750Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180
-
fifteen hunnyBristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180
-
I paid more than that.Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180
-
So did a single worker earning $18K in a year. They must be doing something wrong, like you?ikiT said:I paid more than that.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Anyone who pays federal taxes is a sucker and a loser.0
-
I dunno, does not paying taxes really resonate as a big thing with american voters? i'd think that would be cause for admiration, not condemnation.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
-
Admiration when a repub is in office...unacceptable when a Dem is in office. The hypocrisy is deafening.HughFreakingDillon said:I dunno, does not paying taxes really resonate as a big thing with american voters? i'd think that would be cause for admiration, not condemnation.
tRumpsters love to talk about leaches on society. Takers that pay no tax yet receive welfare, etc.
If I were advising Biden I would have him hammer the "I can't release my returns because they are under audit" thing 24/7. We know that the IRS has already stated that there is nothing stopping him from releasing returns. If tRump wants to say he can't release them then the first question is "why won't you release the returns that are NOT under audit?" The IRS can only audit open tax years, generally the last three years of returns. The only reason that returns older than three years would be under audit would be if the IRS suspects or is investigating fraud. Biden needs to press him on that and either make him admit that the IRS is examining him for fraud or to prove the NYT wrong and release his returns.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
darwinstheory said:
Nah, they are more concerned with this story owning the libs.josevolution said:Longest running tax audit in presidential history lol and his deplorable base could give to shits!This. I think a lot of the base loves this. Because it bugs the libs and that's what matters.I personally am not sure this is as big of a story as some people make it out to be. Apparently, it's pretty much legal...the depreciation on the buildings leads to tax credits. It's probably more of a condemnation on our tax laws than it is on him. And working class conservatives loving tax laws that are friendly to the rich? That's not new.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
It's more than that. Depreciation would allow you to offset income but it isn't likely going to create massive losses that offset all of your other income. At a minimum it shows that he is NOT successful.OnWis97 said:darwinstheory said:
Nah, they are more concerned with this story owning the libs.josevolution said:Longest running tax audit in presidential history lol and his deplorable base could give to shits!This. I think a lot of the base loves this. Because it bugs the libs and that's what matters.I personally am not sure this is as big of a story as some people make it out to be. Apparently, it's pretty much legal...the depreciation on the buildings leads to tax credits. It's probably more of a condemnation on our tax laws than it is on him. And working class conservatives loving tax laws that are friendly to the rich? That's not new.
Depreciation can be manipulated to obtain the best tax advantage. The best tax strategy for tRump would be to pay tax every year and use up the 10%-24% tax brackets and push depreciation forward to offset large income years being taxed at 36% or higher.
That he has those massive losses shows that it is not a planning strategy....he's losing his ass.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
I think we're going to find out some day that it was all very illegal. There is a lot of evidence out there of him cooking the books. Saying stuff is worth a lot more/or less when it suits him.OnWis97 said:darwinstheory said:
Nah, they are more concerned with this story owning the libs.josevolution said:Longest running tax audit in presidential history lol and his deplorable base could give to shits!This. I think a lot of the base loves this. Because it bugs the libs and that's what matters.I personally am not sure this is as big of a story as some people make it out to be. Apparently, it's pretty much legal...the depreciation on the buildings leads to tax credits. It's probably more of a condemnation on our tax laws than it is on him. And working class conservatives loving tax laws that are friendly to the rich? That's not new.
Trump Inc podcast has done extensive research into this. As has the NYT.0 -
yeah, i just don't see this moving the needle even with undecideds. many people, not just republicans, view legal but ethically ambiguous tax evasion as something to be proud of. sure, paying ivanka as a consultant seems shady, but is it illegal? this would likely take down a mayor or city councilor, but the president? more importantly, THIS president?Gern Blansten said:
Admiration when a repub is in office...unacceptable when a Dem is in office. The hypocrisy is deafening.HughFreakingDillon said:I dunno, does not paying taxes really resonate as a big thing with american voters? i'd think that would be cause for admiration, not condemnation.
tRumpsters love to talk about leaches on society. Takers that pay no tax yet receive welfare, etc.
If I were advising Biden I would have him hammer the "I can't release my returns because they are under audit" thing 24/7. We know that the IRS has already stated that there is nothing stopping him from releasing returns. If tRump wants to say he can't release them then the first question is "why won't you release the returns that are NOT under audit?" The IRS can only audit open tax years, generally the last three years of returns. The only reason that returns older than three years would be under audit would be if the IRS suspects or is investigating fraud. Biden needs to press him on that and either make him admit that the IRS is examining him for fraud or to prove the NYT wrong and release his returns.
trump's take will likely hit it home: i didn't pay much tax because i'm smart.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
This will hurt him but not by much. If there are any undecideds out there they might be affected...or it might cause some of his diehards to stay home on Nov 3rd.HughFreakingDillon said:
yeah, i just don't see this moving the needle even with undecideds. many people, not just republicans, view legal but ethically ambiguous tax evasion as something to be proud of. sure, paying ivanka as a consultant seems shady, but is it illegal? this would likely take down a mayor or city councilor, but the president? more importantly, THIS president?Gern Blansten said:
Admiration when a repub is in office...unacceptable when a Dem is in office. The hypocrisy is deafening.HughFreakingDillon said:I dunno, does not paying taxes really resonate as a big thing with american voters? i'd think that would be cause for admiration, not condemnation.
tRumpsters love to talk about leaches on society. Takers that pay no tax yet receive welfare, etc.
If I were advising Biden I would have him hammer the "I can't release my returns because they are under audit" thing 24/7. We know that the IRS has already stated that there is nothing stopping him from releasing returns. If tRump wants to say he can't release them then the first question is "why won't you release the returns that are NOT under audit?" The IRS can only audit open tax years, generally the last three years of returns. The only reason that returns older than three years would be under audit would be if the IRS suspects or is investigating fraud. Biden needs to press him on that and either make him admit that the IRS is examining him for fraud or to prove the NYT wrong and release his returns.
trump's take will likely hit it home: i didn't pay much tax because i'm smart.
The Ivanka thing isn't a big deal. He paid her for "consulting" and as long as she picked it up as income on her return it's totally legal.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Guess I need to see this play out a bit, but I'll be disappointed in anyone that isn't upset that Trump pays significantly lower taxes then them.
That said, businesses create jobs and products that lead to income tax and sales tax so I can understand why they should get some tax advantages. But I think we all know this isn't the case we are talking about with trump.hippiemom = goodness0 -
That's not Trumps take though. He says it's fake news.HughFreakingDillon said:
yeah, i just don't see this moving the needle even with undecideds. many people, not just republicans, view legal but ethically ambiguous tax evasion as something to be proud of. sure, paying ivanka as a consultant seems shady, but is it illegal? this would likely take down a mayor or city councilor, but the president? more importantly, THIS president?Gern Blansten said:
Admiration when a repub is in office...unacceptable when a Dem is in office. The hypocrisy is deafening.HughFreakingDillon said:I dunno, does not paying taxes really resonate as a big thing with american voters? i'd think that would be cause for admiration, not condemnation.
tRumpsters love to talk about leaches on society. Takers that pay no tax yet receive welfare, etc.
If I were advising Biden I would have him hammer the "I can't release my returns because they are under audit" thing 24/7. We know that the IRS has already stated that there is nothing stopping him from releasing returns. If tRump wants to say he can't release them then the first question is "why won't you release the returns that are NOT under audit?" The IRS can only audit open tax years, generally the last three years of returns. The only reason that returns older than three years would be under audit would be if the IRS suspects or is investigating fraud. Biden needs to press him on that and either make him admit that the IRS is examining him for fraud or to prove the NYT wrong and release his returns.
trump's take will likely hit it home: i didn't pay much tax because i'm smart.
He's hiding those returns because they show lots of illegal activity.0 -
his kneejerk is always fake news. then he sometimes pivots. i think he might pivot on this one.dignin said:
That's not Trumps take though. He says it's fake news.HughFreakingDillon said:
yeah, i just don't see this moving the needle even with undecideds. many people, not just republicans, view legal but ethically ambiguous tax evasion as something to be proud of. sure, paying ivanka as a consultant seems shady, but is it illegal? this would likely take down a mayor or city councilor, but the president? more importantly, THIS president?Gern Blansten said:
Admiration when a repub is in office...unacceptable when a Dem is in office. The hypocrisy is deafening.HughFreakingDillon said:I dunno, does not paying taxes really resonate as a big thing with american voters? i'd think that would be cause for admiration, not condemnation.
tRumpsters love to talk about leaches on society. Takers that pay no tax yet receive welfare, etc.
If I were advising Biden I would have him hammer the "I can't release my returns because they are under audit" thing 24/7. We know that the IRS has already stated that there is nothing stopping him from releasing returns. If tRump wants to say he can't release them then the first question is "why won't you release the returns that are NOT under audit?" The IRS can only audit open tax years, generally the last three years of returns. The only reason that returns older than three years would be under audit would be if the IRS suspects or is investigating fraud. Biden needs to press him on that and either make him admit that the IRS is examining him for fraud or to prove the NYT wrong and release his returns.
trump's take will likely hit it home: i didn't pay much tax because i'm smart.
He's hiding those returns because they show lots of illegal activity.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
if i paid someone $70k to maintain my hair and it came out looking like that piss yellow cotton candy on top of his head, i would be pretty upset."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
fake billionaire.
100% tax cheat
100% fraud"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
Pivot and release the returns or just tell us what's on them? No way he releases them. Doesn't want anyone to be able to go into them in detail. He's more afraid of going to jail than not getting elected.HughFreakingDillon said:
his kneejerk is always fake news. then he sometimes pivots. i think he might pivot on this one.dignin said:
That's not Trumps take though. He says it's fake news.HughFreakingDillon said:
yeah, i just don't see this moving the needle even with undecideds. many people, not just republicans, view legal but ethically ambiguous tax evasion as something to be proud of. sure, paying ivanka as a consultant seems shady, but is it illegal? this would likely take down a mayor or city councilor, but the president? more importantly, THIS president?Gern Blansten said:
Admiration when a repub is in office...unacceptable when a Dem is in office. The hypocrisy is deafening.HughFreakingDillon said:I dunno, does not paying taxes really resonate as a big thing with american voters? i'd think that would be cause for admiration, not condemnation.
tRumpsters love to talk about leaches on society. Takers that pay no tax yet receive welfare, etc.
If I were advising Biden I would have him hammer the "I can't release my returns because they are under audit" thing 24/7. We know that the IRS has already stated that there is nothing stopping him from releasing returns. If tRump wants to say he can't release them then the first question is "why won't you release the returns that are NOT under audit?" The IRS can only audit open tax years, generally the last three years of returns. The only reason that returns older than three years would be under audit would be if the IRS suspects or is investigating fraud. Biden needs to press him on that and either make him admit that the IRS is examining him for fraud or to prove the NYT wrong and release his returns.
trump's take will likely hit it home: i didn't pay much tax because i'm smart.
He's hiding those returns because they show lots of illegal activity.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help