Donald Trump
Comments
-
The new order takes aim at anti-racism training, or as the White House calls it, "offensive and anti-American race and sex stereotyping and scapegoating."
Trump Just Signed an Executive Order Claiming That Anti-Racism Is the Real Racism
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/y3z8m5/trump-just-signed-an-executive-order-claiming-that-anti-racism-is-the-real-racism?utm_medium=vicenewsig&utm_campaign=later-linkinbio-vicenews&utm_content=later-10385243&utm_source=instagram
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
don't even worry about it because one way or another trump is not leaving the white house. he is going to either win, or have it stolen for him.Gern Blansten said:I'm curious as to how tRump will handle leaving office in he loses. I can't imagine a situation where tRump would go to Biden's inauguration."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
No racism here. No problems, racism doesn't exist. At all. And DOJ reform under CYA Barr? Forget about it, his boss said racism doesn't exist.ikiT said:The new order takes aim at anti-racism training, or as the White House calls it, "offensive and anti-American race and sex stereotyping and scapegoating."Trump Just Signed an Executive Order Claiming That Anti-Racism Is the Real Racism
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/y3z8m5/trump-just-signed-an-executive-order-claiming-that-anti-racism-is-the-real-racism?utm_medium=vicenewsig&utm_campaign=later-linkinbio-vicenews&utm_content=later-10385243&utm_source=instagram
Police in the United States kill far more people than do police in other advanced industrial democracies (13). While a substantial body of evidence shows that people of color, especially African Americans, are at greater risk for experiencing criminal justice contact and police-involved harm than are whites (14⇓⇓⇓⇓–19), we lack basic estimates of the prevalence of police-involved deaths, largely due to the absence of definitive official data. Journalists have stepped into this void and initiated a series of systematic efforts to track police-involved killings. These data enable a richer understanding of the geographic and demographic patterning of police violence (17) and an evaluation of the magnitude of exposure to police violence over the life course.
Our results show that people of color face a higher likelihood of being killed by police than do white men and women, that risk peaks in young adulthood, and that men of color face a nontrivial lifetime risk of being killed by police.
displays the ratio of lifetime risk for each racial–ethnic group relative to risk for whites for both men and women. Note that a rate ratio of 1 indicates equality in mortality risk relative to whites. The highest levels of inequality in mortality risk are experienced by black men. Black men are about 2.5 times more likely to be killed by police over the life course than are white men. Black women are about 1.4 times more likely to be killed by police than are white women. Although risks are estimated with less precision for American Indian/Alaska Native men and women than for other groups, we show that they face a higher lifetime risk of being killed by police than do whites. American Indian men are between 1.2 and 1.7 times more likely to be killed by police than are white men, and American Indian women are between 1.1 and 2.1 times more likely to be killed by police than are white women. Latino men are between 1.3 and 1.4 times more likely to be killed by police than are white men, but Latina women are between 12% and 23% less likely to be killed by police than are white women. Both Asian/Pacific Islander men and women are more than 50% less likely to be killed by police than are white men and women, respectively.
Among all groups, black men and boys face the highest lifetime risk of being killed by police. Our models predict that about 1 in 1,000 black men and boys will be killed by police over the life course (96 [77, 120] per 100,000). We predict that between 36 and 81 American Indian/Alaska Native men and boys per 100,000 will be killed by police over the life course. Latino men and boys have an estimated risk of being killed by police of about 53 per 100,000 [41, 67]. Asian/Pacific Islander men and boys face a lifetime risk of between 9 and 23 per 100,000, while white men and boys face a lifetime risk of about 39 [31, 48] per 100,000.
Between the ages of 25 y and 29 y, black men are killed by police at a rate between 2.8 and 4.1 per 100,000, American Indian and Alaska Native men are killed at a rate between 1.5 and 2.8 per 100,000, Asian/Pacific Islander men are killed by police at a rate between 0.3 and 0.6 per 100,000, Latino men at a rate between 1.4 and 2.2 per 100,000, and white men at a rate between 0.9 and 1.4 per 100,000. Inequalities in risk persist throughout the life course.
Our analysis shows that the risk of being killed by police is jointly patterned by one’s race, gender, and age. Police violence is a leading cause of death for young men, and young men of color face exceptionally high risk of being killed by police. Inequalities in risk are pronounced throughout the life course. This study reinforces calls to treat police violence as a public health issue (1, 4). Racially unequal exposure to the risk of state violence has profound consequences for public health, democracy, and racial stratification (5, 7⇓–9, 11).
The absence of authoritative official data is a key challenge in reducing police violence. The Bureau of Justice Statistics should renew efforts to develop comprehensive systems to track officer-involved deaths (4, 40). Both the public interest and social science are served by increasing transparency with regard to police use of force. Using such data, the research community has made strides in identifying officers most at risk of being involved in cases of excessive force (41) and system failures that result in civilian deaths (42).
https://www.pnas.org/content/116/34/16793
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Dang!! Pretty fascist, y’all!!0
-
I am so freaking excited for the first debate next week! You guys too?I'm like an opening band for your mom.0
-
Meh.. I hate debates that are zinger contests. I'd rather a one on one with Tim Russert for an hour or two. Or Chris Wallace.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:I am so freaking excited for the first debate next week! You guys too?0 -
Those would be good too! I just like how objective the debates are. You get the same question (hopefully) asked in the same way to each person. You have the nerves of being live with no teleprompters or help, no breaks, and it’s 90 minutes! That’s a long time for anyone- shit, I’m betting that Biden only stays rational for 45 minutes of it- 90 minutes standing is way too long for him, he’ll get pissed at all the Trump jabs at him that he’ll fly off the handle quickly. Trump will go off tangent/off topic because he just babbles and babbles, it’s seriously going to be a hoot. Entertainment value is high when two old white guys argue. Shit, I’m guessing that Biden will contradict himself at least 5 times with things he said earlier in the 90 minutes. Getting old isn’t a pretty sight.mrussel1 said:Meh.. I hate debates that are zinger contests. I'd rather a one on one with Tim Russert for an hour or two. Or Chris Wallace.I'm like an opening band for your mom.0 -
I suggest you go back and watch Biden debate Sanders one on one for 2 hours. He more than held his own against a person who is as fiery as Trump, but also has actual command of the facts. Polls after show that people thought Biden won.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:Those would be good too! I just like how objective the debates are. You get the same question (hopefully) asked in the same way to each person. You have the nerves of being live with no teleprompters or help, no breaks, and it’s 90 minutes! That’s a long time for anyone- shit, I’m betting that Biden only stays rational for 45 minutes of it- 90 minutes standing is way too long for him, he’ll get pissed at all the Trump jabs at him that he’ll fly off the handle quickly. Trump will go off tangent/off topic because he just babbles and babbles, it’s seriously going to be a hoot. Entertainment value is high when two old white guys argue. Shit, I’m guessing that Biden will contradict himself at least 5 times with things he said earlier in the 90 minutes. Getting old isn’t a pretty sight.
0 -
this narrative is getting tired. it's based in no reality.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:Those would be good too! I just like how objective the debates are. You get the same question (hopefully) asked in the same way to each person. You have the nerves of being live with no teleprompters or help, no breaks, and it’s 90 minutes! That’s a long time for anyone- shit, I’m betting that Biden only stays rational for 45 minutes of it- 90 minutes standing is way too long for him, he’ll get pissed at all the Trump jabs at him that he’ll fly off the handle quickly. Trump will go off tangent/off topic because he just babbles and babbles, it’s seriously going to be a hoot. Entertainment value is high when two old white guys argue. Shit, I’m guessing that Biden will contradict himself at least 5 times with things he said earlier in the 90 minutes. Getting old isn’t a pretty sight.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
Lolmrussel1 said:I suggest you go back and watch Biden debate Sanders one on one for 2 hours. He more than held his own against a person who is as fiery as Trump, but also has actual command of the facts. Polls after show that people thought Biden won.
Trump essentially lost a townhall to the audience members last week.www.myspace.com0 -
LMAO. true enough..The Juggler said:By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
Ha! That's awesome.The Juggler said:0 -
Unfortunately, any debate involving Trump devolves in to one liners and zingers because that is his norm for communication. Maybe less rallies and pandering interviews from Fox would make him more knowledgeable and able to discuss issues. Presidential debates shouldn't be for entertainment purposes, but even Trump supporters prefer watching to see how man "funny" things he will say. It's pathetic. I'm sure Joe will say some off hand nonsense too, but it won't be the main point of any of his responses whereas that's where Trump lives.It's a hopeless situation...0
-
The old saying is never truer than here... "Never argue with a crazy person (sic). They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience".tbergs said:Unfortunately, any debate involving Trump devolves in to one liners and zingers because that is his norm for communication. Maybe less rallies and pandering interviews from Fox would make him more knowledgeable and able to discuss issues. Presidential debates shouldn't be for entertainment purposes, but even Trump supporters prefer watching to see how man "funny" things he will say. It's pathetic. I'm sure Joe will say some off hand nonsense too, but it won't be the main point of any of his responses whereas that's where Trump lives.0 -
There is little doubt that you will see it that way. You will ignore all of the ridiculous BS and verbal gaffes that tRump says and focus on Biden making a verbal gaffe.RoleModelsinBlood31 said:Those would be good too! I just like how objective the debates are. You get the same question (hopefully) asked in the same way to each person. You have the nerves of being live with no teleprompters or help, no breaks, and it’s 90 minutes! That’s a long time for anyone- shit, I’m betting that Biden only stays rational for 45 minutes of it- 90 minutes standing is way too long for him, he’ll get pissed at all the Trump jabs at him that he’ll fly off the handle quickly. Trump will go off tangent/off topic because he just babbles and babbles, it’s seriously going to be a hoot. Entertainment value is high when two old white guys argue. Shit, I’m guessing that Biden will contradict himself at least 5 times with things he said earlier in the 90 minutes. Getting old isn’t a pretty sight.
It is hilarious that tRumpsters will yap about Biden and ignore that tRump did not recognize the name of the most famous national park in history when it came up on his teleprompter.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
i'm surprised he didn't call it Jellystone.Gern Blansten said:There is little doubt that you will see it that way. You will ignore all of the ridiculous BS and verbal gaffes that tRump says and focus on Biden making a verbal gaffe.
It is hilarious that tRumpsters will yap about Biden and ignore that tRump did not recognize the name of the most famous national park in history when it came up on his teleprompter.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
"YO SEMITES!! WHERE MY SEMITES AT, YO??"Gern Blansten said:There is little doubt that you will see it that way. You will ignore all of the ridiculous BS and verbal gaffes that tRump says and focus on Biden making a verbal gaffe.
It is hilarious that tRumpsters will yap about Biden and ignore that tRump did not recognize the name of the most famous national park in history when it came up on his teleprompter."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
Where I’ve had many fine pick a nic baskets!HughFreakingDillon said:i'm surprised he didn't call it Jellystone.Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0 -
"melania, makes the best sandwiches anywhere in the world....melania? where is she? there she is! take a bow honey. you deserve it. the best sandwiches, folks, the BEST"static111 said:Where I’ve had many fine pick a nic baskets!By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
I haven’t watched it but I’m definitely going to, thanks!mrussel1 said:I suggest you go back and watch Biden debate Sanders one on one for 2 hours. He more than held his own against a person who is as fiery as Trump, but also has actual command of the facts. Polls after show that people thought Biden won.I'm like an opening band for your mom.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help