Donald Trump
Comments
-
trump is unethically pushing for a treatment that has no scientifically proven efficacy against corona. corona is a novel virus that has never been seen before.
in medicine, you have to have clinical rationale based on science before you should try any treatment. the number one rule is to not put your patient at risk. using an unproven treatment carries risk, potential allergic reaction, etc."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
I agree with this statement, but I also think we need to get it to trial. So let's not make it a partisan issue.gimmesometruth27 said:trump is unethically pushing for a treatment that has no proved efficacy.
in medicine, you have to have clinical rationale based on science before you should try any treatment. the number one rule is to not put your patient at risk. using an unproven treatment carries risk, potential allergic reaction, etc.0 -
I agree. Let’s not make this medicine a trump thing. I personally know someone who actually had great success with this medication. It was not looking good 6 days ago. He was discharged yesterday. Obviously this is one situation. But the doctors are using this drug in NY when the situation starts to look dire. He is 66 years old, no underlying illness besides high blood pressure which is controlled by his daily medication.mrussel1 said:
I agree with this statement, but I also think we need to get it to trial. So let's not make it a partisan issue.gimmesometruth27 said:trump is unethically pushing for a treatment that has no proved efficacy.
in medicine, you have to have clinical rationale based on science before you should try any treatment. the number one rule is to not put your patient at risk. using an unproven treatment carries risk, potential allergic reaction, etc.0 -
Not having health insurance will make you say some crazy shit.
Actually I just re-upped so I suppose a 4000 dollar deductible isn't TOO bad.Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
gimmesometruth27 said:trump is unethically pushing for a treatment that has no scientifically proven efficacy against corona. corona is a novel virus that has never been seen before.
in medicine, you have to have clinical rationale based on science before you should try any treatment. the number one rule is to not put your patient at risk. using an unproven treatment carries risk, potential allergic reaction, etc.
Firstly do no harm
Then put your seatbelt on
Buckle up
0 -
Hot take CM. I would think Trump has investments in many companies that stand to gain in any given situation you could think of, he has a couple billion reasons why. Did you think he pulled all of his investments and buried his money in the rose garden? The story here should be about whether or not Hydroxychloroquine is safe for the masses without proper testing and that there are people currently using this drug for other illnesses who may be without it if this ends up being a viable treatment for CoVid-19. Since you can't help but immerse yourself in everything Trump, there are plenty of better examples for you to complain about other than falling for all of your biased twitter following.CM189191 said:
Okoftenreading said:
Oh for FSM’s sake.ikiT said:The drug was discovered in 1955. It’s been off patent for decades. Multiple companies make it.
If we’re going to post conspiracy theories can we at least do a basic check on common sense first?
0 -
We are so used to getting screwed over that a $4000 deductible isn't TOO BADikiT said:Not having health insurance will make you say some crazy shit.
Actually I just re-upped so I suppose a 4000 dollar deductible isn't TOO bad."The heart and mind are the true lens of the camera." - Yusuf Karsh
0 -
JW269453 said:
Hot take CM. I would think Trump has investments in many companies that stand to gain in any given situation you could think of, he has a couple billion reasons why. Did you think he pulled all of his investments and buried his money in the rose garden? The story here should be about whether or not Hydroxychloroquine is safe for the masses without proper testing and that there are people currently using this drug for other illnesses who may be without it if this ends up being a viable treatment for CoVid-19. Since you can't help but immerse yourself in everything Trump, there are plenty of better examples for you to complain about other than falling for all of your biased twitter following.CM189191 said:
Okoftenreading said:
Oh for FSM’s sake.ikiT said:The drug was discovered in 1955. It’s been off patent for decades. Multiple companies make it.
If we’re going to post conspiracy theories can we at least do a basic check on common sense first?
Hot take:
where are tRUmp's tax returns like he promised?
That would sure clear things up, wouldn't it now?0 -
Would it? Maybe I missed it, but I don’t recall seeing anything about tax returns in your tweet love.CM189191 said:JW269453 said:
Hot take CM. I would think Trump has investments in many companies that stand to gain in any given situation you could think of, he has a couple billion reasons why. Did you think he pulled all of his investments and buried his money in the rose garden? The story here should be about whether or not Hydroxychloroquine is safe for the masses without proper testing and that there are people currently using this drug for other illnesses who may be without it if this ends up being a viable treatment for CoVid-19. Since you can't help but immerse yourself in everything Trump, there are plenty of better examples for you to complain about other than falling for all of your biased twitter following.CM189191 said:
Okoftenreading said:
Oh for FSM’s sake.ikiT said:The drug was discovered in 1955. It’s been off patent for decades. Multiple companies make it.
If we’re going to post conspiracy theories can we at least do a basic check on common sense first?
Hot take:
where are tRUmp's tax returns like he promised?
That would sure clear things up, wouldn't it now?
0 -
I’ll never argue against tax returns, but would they clear up where his investments are? I don’t believe that my tax returns show exactly where my investments are, just how it all shook out over the year.CM189191 said:JW269453 said:
Hot take CM. I would think Trump has investments in many companies that stand to gain in any given situation you could think of, he has a couple billion reasons why. Did you think he pulled all of his investments and buried his money in the rose garden? The story here should be about whether or not Hydroxychloroquine is safe for the masses without proper testing and that there are people currently using this drug for other illnesses who may be without it if this ends up being a viable treatment for CoVid-19. Since you can't help but immerse yourself in everything Trump, there are plenty of better examples for you to complain about other than falling for all of your biased twitter following.CM189191 said:
Okoftenreading said:
Oh for FSM’s sake.ikiT said:The drug was discovered in 1955. It’s been off patent for decades. Multiple companies make it.
If we’re going to post conspiracy theories can we at least do a basic check on common sense first?
Hot take:
where are tRUmp's tax returns like he promised?
That would sure clear things up, wouldn't it now?my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
You don’t know if he had great success with the medication, you just know he’s doing better now, which is great, but the studies still need to be done.nicknyr15 said:
I agree. Let’s not make this medicine a trump thing. I personally know someone who actually had great success with this medication. It was not looking good 6 days ago. He was discharged yesterday. Obviously this is one situation. But the doctors are using this drug in NY when the situation starts to look dire. He is 66 years old, no underlying illness besides high blood pressure which is controlled by his daily medication.mrussel1 said:
I agree with this statement, but I also think we need to get it to trial. So let's not make it a partisan issue.gimmesometruth27 said:trump is unethically pushing for a treatment that has no proved efficacy.
in medicine, you have to have clinical rationale based on science before you should try any treatment. the number one rule is to not put your patient at risk. using an unproven treatment carries risk, potential allergic reaction, etc.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Absolutely. It needs to be studied quickly but fulsomely, and we have almost ideal circumstances right now, because we have ample patients worldwide and outcome data will be measured in days to weeks, rather than months to years as with many drug studies.mrussel1 said:
I agree with this statement, but I also think we need to get it to trial. So let's not make it a partisan issue.gimmesometruth27 said:trump is unethically pushing for a treatment that has no proved efficacy.
in medicine, you have to have clinical rationale based on science before you should try any treatment. the number one rule is to not put your patient at risk. using an unproven treatment carries risk, potential allergic reaction, etc.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Absolutely they need to be done. Just sharing some good news.oftenreading said:
You don’t know if he had great success with the medication, you just know he’s doing better now, which is great, but the studies still need to be done.nicknyr15 said:
I agree. Let’s not make this medicine a trump thing. I personally know someone who actually had great success with this medication. It was not looking good 6 days ago. He was discharged yesterday. Obviously this is one situation. But the doctors are using this drug in NY when the situation starts to look dire. He is 66 years old, no underlying illness besides high blood pressure which is controlled by his daily medication.mrussel1 said:
I agree with this statement, but I also think we need to get it to trial. So let's not make it a partisan issue.gimmesometruth27 said:trump is unethically pushing for a treatment that has no proved efficacy.
in medicine, you have to have clinical rationale based on science before you should try any treatment. the number one rule is to not put your patient at risk. using an unproven treatment carries risk, potential allergic reaction, etc.0 -
I can't tell you how much this idea appeals to me but Barr is head of DOJ and the Conservative members of the Supreme Court have had their souls eaten.mrussel1 said:
I agree with this statement, but I also think we need to get it to trial. So let's not make it a partisan issue.gimmesometruth27 said:trump is unethically pushing for a treatment that has no proved efficacy.
in medicine, you have to have clinical rationale based on science before you should try any treatment. the number one rule is to not put your patient at risk. using an unproven treatment carries risk, potential allergic reaction, etc.
So now what do we do? Falling down,...not staying down0 -
YOU BLEW IT is trending #1 on twitter. it is in response to trump tweet telling the WHO they blew it on corona. i am glad to see people giving it back to president dumbass."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
GOOD. What a POS.gimmesometruth27 said:YOU BLEW IT is trending #1 on twitter. it is in response to trump tweet telling the WHO they blew it on corona. i am glad to see people giving it back to president dumbass.I LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0 -
-
-
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help