Fox News

CM189191 · March 2020

RobZ said:

My favorite is Michael Avenotti's 65 appearances on CNN and 43 appearances on MSNBC with both networks anchors slobbering all over the guy......I wonder what ever happened to this lawyer the left said was going to be the next President?

cry moar

Image: https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/0-124.jpg

Image: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSWcWxBX1dfIUvWnPLNqFzHPClel-mdcKIdpr7G7TANQ8g5hhriRw&s

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5021252/uploads/editor/lv/3xeuo5hlkzj2.jpg

Image result for Michael Flynn fox news interview

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5021252/uploads/editor/dn/3i9syoxrt8il.jpg

this is not a bookmark for when Giuliani ends up in jail

RobZ · March 2020

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

Halifax2TheMax · March 2020

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

RobZ · March 2020

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

CM189191 · March 2020

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

clip clop

enjoy your horseshoes!

jeffbr · March 2020

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

Image: https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/FT_18.12.11_WomenInCongress.png?resize=420,825

RobZ · March 2020

jeffbr said:

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

Thank you for the graphic, now I understand why you democrats are so anti-woman....the white, males of the party feel threatened. There were, according to Halifax, " three female senators, one a woman of color", running for President, and yet the voting democrats clearly dumped them in favor of THREE old, white guys. Maybe someday your party will become a bit more progressive...because that's just embarrassing.

RobZ · March 2020

CM189191 said:

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

clip clop

enjoy your horseshoes!

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5021252/uploads/editor/2r/n6ofgqkwvkly.png

Brian Williams MSNBC Math.......

CM189191 · March 2020

RobZ said:

CM189191 said:

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

clip clop

enjoy your horseshoes!

Brian Williams MSNBC Math.......

Yet, MSNBC Math is still more solid and reliable than RobZ Park City logic

RobZ · March 2020

CM189191 said:

RobZ said:

CM189191 said:

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

clip clop

enjoy your horseshoes!

Brian Williams MSNBC Math.......

Yet, MSNBC Math is still more solid and reliable than RobZ Park City logic

LOL....Not an original thought or fact rolling around in that empty space of yours, huh?? Join the herd, scream at the sky...clip-clop....LOL

jeffbr · March 2020

RobZ said:

jeffbr said:

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

Thank you for the graphic, now I understand why you democrats are so anti-woman....the white, males of the party feel threatened. There were, according to Halifax, " three female senators, one a woman of color", running for President, and yet the voting democrats clearly dumped them in favor of THREE old, white guys. Maybe someday your party will become a bit more progressive...because that's just embarrassing.

Do you understand what you're seeing here? Can you see which party, by a wide margin, elects women? I'm pretty sure you launched a boomerang with your first post, but forgot they could swing back and knock you in the head. Strange.

Halifax2TheMax · March 2020

RobZ said:

jeffbr said:

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

Thank you for the graphic, now I understand why you democrats are so anti-woman....the white, males of the party feel threatened. There were, according to Halifax, " three female senators, one a woman of color", running for President, and yet the voting democrats clearly dumped them in favor of THREE old, white guys. Maybe someday your party will become a bit more progressive...because that's just embarrassing.

I guess Hillary running and becoming the party’s nominee in 2016 slipped through your mind as did Obama being the first black president in the nation’s history or Geraldine Ferraro being the first female Veep candidate to win her party’s nomination. Maybe you need to get down to sea level or expound upon which political party has been or is more diverse? The repubs? Those greens? Libertarian? The rent is too damn high party?

Me senses some real panic setting in amongst “the believers.”

CM189191 · March 2020

RobZ said:

CM189191 said:

RobZ said:

CM189191 said:

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

clip clop

enjoy your horseshoes!

Brian Williams MSNBC Math.......

Yet, MSNBC Math is still more solid and reliable than RobZ Park City logic

LOL....Not an original thought or fact rolling around in that empty space of yours, huh?? Join the herd, scream at the sky...clip-clop....LOL

The herd showed up at the polls, voted, and told Tulsi and Bernie to pound sand

You'll get over it

jeffbr · March 2020

RobZ said:

jeffbr said:

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

Thank you for the graphic, now I understand why you democrats are so anti-woman....the white, males of the party feel threatened. There were, according to Halifax, " three female senators, one a woman of color", running for President, and yet the voting democrats clearly dumped them in favor of THREE old, white guys. Maybe someday your party will become a bit more progressive...because that's just embarrassing.

In case you still don't understand the graphic, perhaps a picture would help. Here's a little side-by-side of the 2016 congressional internship program. Just FYI, Paul Ryan is standing in front of the GOP group in case you weren't sure which party was which. Can you tell me which picture shows more diversity?

Image: https://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2016_29/1632011/160721-house-interns-divesity-mn-1315_d3c804ebe89c74045e935f09240a5c36.fit-760w.jpg

CM189191 · March 2020

jeffbr said:

RobZ said:

jeffbr said:

RobZ said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

RobZ said:

LOL....is it warm inside the echo chamber?...meanwhile, two old-rich-white-men batteling for control of the left, yet Tulsi Gabbard isnt allowed to debate??...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?

No primary opponents nor debates on the other side, now is there? What was Gabby's polling and fund raising? Oh yea, the criteria used to gain entrance to the debate stage wasn't met. Too bad. Meanwhile, a couple of billionaires, three male senators, one of color, three female senators, one a woman of color, a gay mayor and a couple of AARP certified seniors. Yea, no diversity there.

But the rules can be changed for Bloomberg (of course, old, white, rich)...but not Tulsi,...so Gabbard is banned from debating, CNN and Warren both claim Sanders told Warren "women don't make good Presidents"....so I guess the question is why the Democrat party so anti-women??

Thank you for the graphic, now I understand why you democrats are so anti-woman....the white, males of the party feel threatened. There were, according to Halifax, " three female senators, one a woman of color", running for President, and yet the voting democrats clearly dumped them in favor of THREE old, white guys. Maybe someday your party will become a bit more progressive...because that's just embarrassing.

In case you still don't understand the graphic, perhaps a picture would help. Here's a little side-by-side of the 2016 congressional internship program. Just FYI, Paul Ryan is standing in front of the GOP group in case you weren't sure which party was which. Can you tell me which picture shows more diversity?

ooooh, this is fun game, can i play too?!

Image result for 2016 gop candidates for president

Image result for 2020 DNC candidates for president

CM189191 · March 2020

https://youtu.be/QTTLRtoqbMk

Fox News' coronavirus coverage stands in stark contrast to its coverage of Ebola in 2014

blackhawks · March 2020

I don’t care the color or sex of a candidate. I am interested in the message, platform, plan. If you are voting just because of sex or
color it seems like you are missing the mark.

jeffbr · March 2020

blackhawks said:

I don’t care the color or sex of a candidate. I am interested in the message, platform, plan. If you are voting just because of sex or
color it seems like you are missing the mark.

Of course. But the recent discussion of color and gender was raised by one of your fellow Trumpeters on the previous page when he said "...."the party of diversity and INCLUSION" huh?". So people naturally provided some feedback demonstrating which party had that diversity, and which party probably shouldn't bring it up as an issue.

CM189191 · March 2020

blackhawks said:

I don’t care the color or sex of a candidate. I am interested in the message, platform, plan. If you are voting just because of sex or
color it seems like you are missing the mark.

I think the mark that's being missed here is the DNC has a message, platform and plan that speaks to inclusion and diversity.

Whereas the GOP is basically the poster child for advocating white supremacy

Spiritual_Chaos · March 2020

https://youtu.be/Vd643CmfiEM

Fox News

Comments

Categories