The Democratic Presidential Debates
Comments
-

I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Democrats ran an old, white, straight woman in 2016 and lost. They are now going to run an old(er), straight, white man in 2020. Both are the clear choice of the most moderate elements of the party. Maybe the result will be different this time. I really hope it will. But we have been here before.___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
That is an excellent point. Side note, Chuck Schumer is a moron.Ledbetterman10 said:
Talk about a dumb thing to say. But in somewhat of the same token, I haven't seen a single post on this board about Chuck Schumer leading an angry mob outside the Supreme Court and making threats. That's strange.Spiritual_Chaos said:
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
I think it is stupid to call out Schumer and not tRump for similar shit he has said....we are numb to his bullshitmcgruff10 said:
That is an excellent point. Side note, Chuck Schumer is a moron.Ledbetterman10 said:
Talk about a dumb thing to say. But in somewhat of the same token, I haven't seen a single post on this board about Chuck Schumer leading an angry mob outside the Supreme Court and making threats. That's strange.Spiritual_Chaos said:Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
I just chose Yang at random as one of the younger people in the race who didn't have a national profile. I'm not suggesting he's in the same ballpark as Obama. I just wish you didn't have to be in the same ballpark as an Obama to make it. As for the part I bolded, oh yeah, that's exactly what I'd expect from the average democrat. On name alone, it was Biden's race to lose from the start.mrussel1 said:
No offense to Yang, but his policies were a real problem. UBI is a non-starter for the vast majority of Americans, even me. He also needs charisma. I thought it was mildly interesting, but certainly not charismatic. If you're not charismatic, and your policies are meh, why wouldn't the average Democrat go with the person they've watched for decades, saw as VP, etc.? It's perfectly rational. Obama put it all together, good policies, charisma, youth, energy, once in a lifetime. Yang isn't in the same ballparkLedbetterman10 said:
Yeah but don't ya feel there's a "glass ceiling" so to speak that someone like an Andrew Yang (for example) simply can't possibly break through when there's a Biden in the race? I get what you're saying about those Obama-types not coming around too often. They could break through. I just wish you didn't have to be an Obama-type to break through the "established" candidates.mrussel1 said:^Yep! Can't argue with the data.
Plus, we can't sit around and expect every cycle we're going to have an FDR, JFK, Obama, Clinton.. they are once in a generation at best. After that, we should hope for a candidate that is competent, empathetic, and represents our values. I'd love if we had an Obama every time, but it's not reality. The R's had Reagan, and now a generation later they have Trump...for better or worse.
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
I never understood this thinking.Gern Blansten said:
I think it is stupid to call out Schumer and not tRump for similar shit he has said....we are numb to his bullshitmcgruff10 said:
That is an excellent point. Side note, Chuck Schumer is a moron.Ledbetterman10 said:
Talk about a dumb thing to say. But in somewhat of the same token, I haven't seen a single post on this board about Chuck Schumer leading an angry mob outside the Supreme Court and making threats. That's strange.Spiritual_Chaos said:I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
JimmyV said:
Voter turnout will never not be a problem. At least not in our lifetimes. But inspired people will show up more readily than uninspired. The system these last two cycles has done a crap job of producing inspiring candidates.CM189191 said:
it's seems easy to blame the systemJimmyV said:
Yeah, I don't know how to fix it but it does feel increasingly like our primary system is one more in a series that is beginning to fail.Ledbetterman10 said:
It's just such a sad system that of all those people that declared themselves to be candidates, the one that's going to emerge has failed in two presidential runs, and is showing major signs of decline. Even sadder is that despite that, he probably does have the best chance to beat Trump.JimmyV said:The horse race doesn't matter. Biden is going to be the nominee. Bernie's candidacy is over. Dems getting buyer's remorse as these primaries march on might not be the worst case scenario but it would be a bad one. .
It seems like the two best ways to become a major party nominee during my lifetime is to be a master politician like Bill Clinton, Obama, and Trump, or to simply hang around for a very long time like Dole, Kerry, McCain, and Hillary. And unfortunately, Biden falls into the second category. Here's hoping he gets a better outcome that than those four did.
but voters only have a voice if they actually show up to vote

again, blaming the system and not the voter
show up, vote and you will get your candidate elected
don't show up, don't vote, you get stuck with the shit sandwich0 -
What are you talking about? Trump gets called out for anything and everything on this board every day. I just noted that nothing has been said about Schumer for doing the same sort of stuff (which isn't surprising at all). But let's face it, leading an angry mob outside the Court and calling justices out by name is worse than the equivalent Trump tweets.Gern Blansten said:
I think it is stupid to call out Schumer and not tRump for similar shit he has said....we are numb to his bullshitmcgruff10 said:
That is an excellent point. Side note, Chuck Schumer is a moron.Ledbetterman10 said:
Talk about a dumb thing to say. But in somewhat of the same token, I haven't seen a single post on this board about Chuck Schumer leading an angry mob outside the Supreme Court and making threats. That's strange.Spiritual_Chaos said:
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
Voters are part of the system. Some don't show up, some make bad choices.CM189191 said:JimmyV said:
Voter turnout will never not be a problem. At least not in our lifetimes. But inspired people will show up more readily than uninspired. The system these last two cycles has done a crap job of producing inspiring candidates.CM189191 said:
it's seems easy to blame the systemJimmyV said:
Yeah, I don't know how to fix it but it does feel increasingly like our primary system is one more in a series that is beginning to fail.Ledbetterman10 said:
It's just such a sad system that of all those people that declared themselves to be candidates, the one that's going to emerge has failed in two presidential runs, and is showing major signs of decline. Even sadder is that despite that, he probably does have the best chance to beat Trump.JimmyV said:The horse race doesn't matter. Biden is going to be the nominee. Bernie's candidacy is over. Dems getting buyer's remorse as these primaries march on might not be the worst case scenario but it would be a bad one. .
It seems like the two best ways to become a major party nominee during my lifetime is to be a master politician like Bill Clinton, Obama, and Trump, or to simply hang around for a very long time like Dole, Kerry, McCain, and Hillary. And unfortunately, Biden falls into the second category. Here's hoping he gets a better outcome that than those four did.
but voters only have a voice if they actually show up to vote

again, blaming the system and not the voter
show up, vote and you will get your candidate elected
don't show up, don't vote, you get stuck with the shit sandwich___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
Sure why not go with the person we can trust, rather than a wild card? Obama was different and I voted for him in the primaries, and then Clinton in the 16 primaries. Obama's ceiling was just too high to ignore. He was the full package, and his presidency played that out. BTW, my first choice was actually Pete but I was fine when he dropped on Sunday. It made it easy to vote for Joe in the VA primary on Tuesday. I guess I just don't see any of this of evidence of a broken system. My #1 guy didn't win, but I'm not bitter about it. C'est la vie.Ledbetterman10 said:
I just chose Yang at random as one of the younger people in the race who didn't have a national profile. I'm not suggesting he's in the same ballpark as Obama. I just wish you didn't have to be in the same ballpark as an Obama to make it. As for the part I bolded, oh yeah, that's exactly what I'd expect from the average democrat. On name alone, it was Biden's race to lose from the start.mrussel1 said:
No offense to Yang, but his policies were a real problem. UBI is a non-starter for the vast majority of Americans, even me. He also needs charisma. I thought it was mildly interesting, but certainly not charismatic. If you're not charismatic, and your policies are meh, why wouldn't the average Democrat go with the person they've watched for decades, saw as VP, etc.? It's perfectly rational. Obama put it all together, good policies, charisma, youth, energy, once in a lifetime. Yang isn't in the same ballparkLedbetterman10 said:
Yeah but don't ya feel there's a "glass ceiling" so to speak that someone like an Andrew Yang (for example) simply can't possibly break through when there's a Biden in the race? I get what you're saying about those Obama-types not coming around too often. They could break through. I just wish you didn't have to be an Obama-type to break through the "established" candidates.mrussel1 said:^Yep! Can't argue with the data.
Plus, we can't sit around and expect every cycle we're going to have an FDR, JFK, Obama, Clinton.. they are once in a generation at best. After that, we should hope for a candidate that is competent, empathetic, and represents our values. I'd love if we had an Obama every time, but it's not reality. The R's had Reagan, and now a generation later they have Trump...for better or worse.0 -
That's fair enough. I mean, in this two-party system, if you're a member of one of the parties, all you can do in a primary is vote for whoever's on the ballot.mrussel1 said:
Sure why not go with the person we can trust, rather than a wild card? Obama was different and I voted for him in the primaries, and then Clinton in the 16 primaries. Obama's ceiling was just too high to ignore. He was the full package, and his presidency played that out. BTW, my first choice was actually Pete but I was fine when he dropped on Sunday. It made it easy to vote for Joe in the VA primary on Tuesday. I guess I just don't see any of this of evidence of a broken system. My #1 guy didn't win, but I'm not bitter about it. C'est la vie.Ledbetterman10 said:
I just chose Yang at random as one of the younger people in the race who didn't have a national profile. I'm not suggesting he's in the same ballpark as Obama. I just wish you didn't have to be in the same ballpark as an Obama to make it. As for the part I bolded, oh yeah, that's exactly what I'd expect from the average democrat. On name alone, it was Biden's race to lose from the start.mrussel1 said:
No offense to Yang, but his policies were a real problem. UBI is a non-starter for the vast majority of Americans, even me. He also needs charisma. I thought it was mildly interesting, but certainly not charismatic. If you're not charismatic, and your policies are meh, why wouldn't the average Democrat go with the person they've watched for decades, saw as VP, etc.? It's perfectly rational. Obama put it all together, good policies, charisma, youth, energy, once in a lifetime. Yang isn't in the same ballparkLedbetterman10 said:
Yeah but don't ya feel there's a "glass ceiling" so to speak that someone like an Andrew Yang (for example) simply can't possibly break through when there's a Biden in the race? I get what you're saying about those Obama-types not coming around too often. They could break through. I just wish you didn't have to be an Obama-type to break through the "established" candidates.mrussel1 said:^Yep! Can't argue with the data.
Plus, we can't sit around and expect every cycle we're going to have an FDR, JFK, Obama, Clinton.. they are once in a generation at best. After that, we should hope for a candidate that is competent, empathetic, and represents our values. I'd love if we had an Obama every time, but it's not reality. The R's had Reagan, and now a generation later they have Trump...for better or worse.
I actually didn't see Obama's ceiling as that high at the time. I was a democrat then, and I voted for Hillary in the primary. But I was wrong that one. My theme of the day to some degree.
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
I thought he was electric at the 2004 convention when he gave the key note. I was all in at that moment and was super excited about 08. I didn't need any convincing. I did and still do like Hillary. I think she's smart as a whip and am super impressed with her life. Anyone who criticizes her for losing in 16 is an idiot. How many people ever work as hard as she did to get there? She doesn't carry the same magnetic personality as Barack though.Ledbetterman10 said:
That's fair enough. I mean, in this two-party system, if you're a member of one of the parties, all you can do in a primary is vote for whoever's on the ballot.mrussel1 said:
Sure why not go with the person we can trust, rather than a wild card? Obama was different and I voted for him in the primaries, and then Clinton in the 16 primaries. Obama's ceiling was just too high to ignore. He was the full package, and his presidency played that out. BTW, my first choice was actually Pete but I was fine when he dropped on Sunday. It made it easy to vote for Joe in the VA primary on Tuesday. I guess I just don't see any of this of evidence of a broken system. My #1 guy didn't win, but I'm not bitter about it. C'est la vie.Ledbetterman10 said:
I just chose Yang at random as one of the younger people in the race who didn't have a national profile. I'm not suggesting he's in the same ballpark as Obama. I just wish you didn't have to be in the same ballpark as an Obama to make it. As for the part I bolded, oh yeah, that's exactly what I'd expect from the average democrat. On name alone, it was Biden's race to lose from the start.mrussel1 said:
No offense to Yang, but his policies were a real problem. UBI is a non-starter for the vast majority of Americans, even me. He also needs charisma. I thought it was mildly interesting, but certainly not charismatic. If you're not charismatic, and your policies are meh, why wouldn't the average Democrat go with the person they've watched for decades, saw as VP, etc.? It's perfectly rational. Obama put it all together, good policies, charisma, youth, energy, once in a lifetime. Yang isn't in the same ballparkLedbetterman10 said:
Yeah but don't ya feel there's a "glass ceiling" so to speak that someone like an Andrew Yang (for example) simply can't possibly break through when there's a Biden in the race? I get what you're saying about those Obama-types not coming around too often. They could break through. I just wish you didn't have to be an Obama-type to break through the "established" candidates.mrussel1 said:^Yep! Can't argue with the data.
Plus, we can't sit around and expect every cycle we're going to have an FDR, JFK, Obama, Clinton.. they are once in a generation at best. After that, we should hope for a candidate that is competent, empathetic, and represents our values. I'd love if we had an Obama every time, but it's not reality. The R's had Reagan, and now a generation later they have Trump...for better or worse.
I actually didn't see Obama's ceiling as that high at the time. I was a democrat then, and I voted for Hillary in the primary. But I was wrong that one. My theme of the day to some degree.0 -
JimmyV said:
Voters are part of the system. Some don't show up, some make bad choices.CM189191 said:JimmyV said:
Voter turnout will never not be a problem. At least not in our lifetimes. But inspired people will show up more readily than uninspired. The system these last two cycles has done a crap job of producing inspiring candidates.CM189191 said:
it's seems easy to blame the systemJimmyV said:
Yeah, I don't know how to fix it but it does feel increasingly like our primary system is one more in a series that is beginning to fail.Ledbetterman10 said:
It's just such a sad system that of all those people that declared themselves to be candidates, the one that's going to emerge has failed in two presidential runs, and is showing major signs of decline. Even sadder is that despite that, he probably does have the best chance to beat Trump.JimmyV said:The horse race doesn't matter. Biden is going to be the nominee. Bernie's candidacy is over. Dems getting buyer's remorse as these primaries march on might not be the worst case scenario but it would be a bad one. .
It seems like the two best ways to become a major party nominee during my lifetime is to be a master politician like Bill Clinton, Obama, and Trump, or to simply hang around for a very long time like Dole, Kerry, McCain, and Hillary. And unfortunately, Biden falls into the second category. Here's hoping he gets a better outcome that than those four did.
but voters only have a voice if they actually show up to vote

again, blaming the system and not the voter
show up, vote and you will get your candidate elected
don't show up, don't vote, you get stuck with the shit sandwich
A LOT don't show up
as this election and the last indicated, it's not for lack of choices.
There were over 29 major D's to choose from
There were 17 major R candidates in 2016
it's lack of voter participation0 -
0
-
JimmyV said:Democrats ran an old, white, straight woman in 2016 and lost. They are now going to run an old(er), straight, white man in 2020. Both are the clear choice of the most moderate elements of the party. Maybe the result will be different this time. I really hope it will. But we have been here before.As a man (unfortunately) and as having the Vice President title preceding his name every time he will be addressed, Biden will be able to have a minimum level of respect from the independents who casually follow politics and are likely the ones to decide the election if close. He will get some slack because he is about as well know as possible.
Hillary was viciously attacked and thought she could ignore it and that cost her. Biden’s team has already said they will vigorously defend and counter attack. Ignoring the attacks cost Hilary badly, as was her decision to not pay attention to warning signs...
the fact she didn’t appear in WI is widely known. But when she did appear in swing states, it was often in safe blue cities like Philly and Ft Lauderdale. She was literally wasting everybody's time. When highly respected campaign vets tried to engage her team on strategy, they were too smart to listen.
Biden, like any D, could certainly lose. But I am confident (?) his campaign won’t be a mismanaged horror show like Hillary’s was.0 -
Ledbetterman10 said:
It's just such a sad system that of all those people that declared themselves to be candidates, the one that's going to emerge has failed in two presidential runs, and is showing major signs of decline. Even sadder is that despite that, he probably does have the best chance to beat Trump.JimmyV said:The horse race doesn't matter. Biden is going to be the nominee. Bernie's candidacy is over. Dems getting buyer's remorse as these primaries march on might not be the worst case scenario but it would be a bad one. .
It seems like the two best ways to become a major party nominee during my lifetime is to be a master politician like Bill Clinton, Obama, and Trump, or to simply hang around for a very long time like Dole, Kerry, McCain, and Hillary. And unfortunately, Biden falls into the second category. Here's hoping he gets a better outcome that than those four did.
how many times did Reagan run?
HW Bush?
Nixon?0 -
CM189191 said:
it's seems easy to blame the systemJimmyV said:
Yeah, I don't know how to fix it but it does feel increasingly like our primary system is one more in a series that is beginning to fail.Ledbetterman10 said:
It's just such a sad system that of all those people that declared themselves to be candidates, the one that's going to emerge has failed in two presidential runs, and is showing major signs of decline. Even sadder is that despite that, he probably does have the best chance to beat Trump.JimmyV said:The horse race doesn't matter. Biden is going to be the nominee. Bernie's candidacy is over. Dems getting buyer's remorse as these primaries march on might not be the worst case scenario but it would be a bad one. .
It seems like the two best ways to become a major party nominee during my lifetime is to be a master politician like Bill Clinton, Obama, and Trump, or to simply hang around for a very long time like Dole, Kerry, McCain, and Hillary. And unfortunately, Biden falls into the second category. Here's hoping he gets a better outcome that than those four did.
but voters only have a voice if they actually show up to vote
If polling like that were razor accurate, the GOP would be losing net 8% of the vote every year on the old side, not counting the huge margins under 40 pro democrat.
politics has changed. I can’t see too many 40 yo who voted against trump changing their minds now. In the old days they’d get a little wealthier and cross over. I can’t see that as much now,0 -
I think they all ran once and lost a primary before going on to win.Lerxst1992 said:Ledbetterman10 said:
It's just such a sad system that of all those people that declared themselves to be candidates, the one that's going to emerge has failed in two presidential runs, and is showing major signs of decline. Even sadder is that despite that, he probably does have the best chance to beat Trump.JimmyV said:The horse race doesn't matter. Biden is going to be the nominee. Bernie's candidacy is over. Dems getting buyer's remorse as these primaries march on might not be the worst case scenario but it would be a bad one. .
It seems like the two best ways to become a major party nominee during my lifetime is to be a master politician like Bill Clinton, Obama, and Trump, or to simply hang around for a very long time like Dole, Kerry, McCain, and Hillary. And unfortunately, Biden falls into the second category. Here's hoping he gets a better outcome that than those four did.
how many times did Reagan run?
HW Bush?
Nixon?
I also think they were coherent during the years when they won.
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
President Redford, anyone?___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
Get out, Bernie. This kind of strategy will not help you.
https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/democratic-candidates-interested-winning-over-warren-supporters-would-be-wise-listen-why
___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help





