***Spring 2020 Lottery Results***

1…137138140142143…163

Comments

  • YAKIMATSU
    YAKIMATSU Santa Fe Posts: 1,143
    RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
    YAKIMATSU said:
    bootlegger10 said:
    We have heard people who put LA1 and LA2 as both BA and lost.  Even if they screwed up and entered separately and negated one of the shows, they still should have won or got an email that their cc was declined.

    i won LA2 with my third pick.

    I got LA2 with my 5th priority. 
    Thanks for posting this. 

    You're welcome. 
    Soldier Field 7-11-95, Alpine Valley 6-26-98, United Center 6-29-98, Riverport Amphitheater (St. Louis)7-2-98, MGM Grand Arena 10-22-00, Sprint Center (Kansas City)5-3-10, Adams Event Center (Missoula)9-30-12, Wrigley Field 7-19-13, Jobing.com Arena (Phoenix)11-19-13, Moda Center (Portland)11-29-13, Spokane Arena 11-30-13, Pepsi Center (Denver)10-22-14, Gila River Arena (Phoenix)5-9-22, Moody Center (Austin)9-18-23, Moody Center 9-19-23, Rogers Arena (Vancouver)5-4-24, Rogers Arena 5-6-24, MGM Grand 5-16-24, MGM Grand 5-18-24, Wrigley Field 8-29-24, Wrigley Field 8-31-24, Nashville 5-6-25, Nashville 5-8-25
  • 95Pirate
    95Pirate Posts: 42
    If this has been addressed earlier my apologies...here's what I don't understand...there are some 10C members like myself that put in BA for one show (mine was Baltimore) and were rejected.  However others were granted all 2, 3 or 4 shows they requested.  Example, if a 10C member put in for 3 shows, let's say Nashville, St Louis, and Baltimore in that order and won all 3....you have 10C members like me that put in for one show (Balt) because that's what we can afford....and were rejected, meanwhile some are going to 3 shows.  Why not spread the wealth a little instead of giving some members multiple shows; in the example above I think that member would have been totally happy with 2 shows won.  Sorry, I just don't get it.
    1992: Raleigh, NC Lollapalooza
    2016: Columbia, SC
    2016: (Raleigh, NC)
    2022: (Baltimore, MD)
    2022: Nashville, TN
    2024: New York City N1
    2025: Raleigh, NC N1 and N2

  • chukdotcom
    chukdotcom Posts: 757
    95Pirate said:
    If this has been addressed earlier my apologies...here's what I don't understand...there are some 10C members like myself that put in BA for one show (mine was Baltimore) and were rejected.  However others were granted all 2, 3 or 4 shows they requested.  Example, if a 10C member put in for 3 shows, let's say Nashville, St Louis, and Baltimore in that order and won all 3....you have 10C members like me that put in for one show (Balt) because that's what we can afford....and were rejected, meanwhile some are going to 3 shows.  Why not spread the wealth a little instead of giving some members multiple shows; in the example above I think that member would have been totally happy with 2 shows won.  Sorry, I just don't get it.
    That didn't happen.
  • NewfieintheUSA
    NewfieintheUSA Posts: 2,416
    95Pirate said:
    If this has been addressed earlier my apologies...here's what I don't understand...there are some 10C members like myself that put in BA for one show (mine was Baltimore) and were rejected.  However others were granted all 2, 3 or 4 shows they requested.  Example, if a 10C member put in for 3 shows, let's say Nashville, St Louis, and Baltimore in that order and won all 3....you have 10C members like me that put in for one show (Balt) because that's what we can afford....and were rejected, meanwhile some are going to 3 shows.  Why not spread the wealth a little instead of giving some members multiple shows; in the example above I think that member would have been totally happy with 2 shows won.  Sorry, I just don't get it.
    No one won Baltimore at 2nd or lower priority. 
  • Father Hubbard
    Father Hubbard Chicago Posts: 1,676
    Where is that graphic someone made with the odds just before the lottery closing?  I have searched and searched but there is so much to wade through now.

    If St. Louis closed at 99%, either the odds calculation does not take all entries, regardless of priority, into account anymore (I did not see info on this changing for Ticketmaster, only pointing to the old 10C system), or St. Louis was flawed in Ticketmaster's system.  Based on the email issue last night, guessing it was flawed in some way (number of tickets they had available was overstated, or some other issue(s)). 

    It sounds like several people did not realize they had to prioritize the shows on the screen that listed all of the shows they selected (I believe they were shown chronologically, rather than the order you selected them, and then you had to drag and drop to rearrange).  Also putting the odds in the email you receive after making your picks threw people off.  But at 99%, second or third or even later priorities should not have been rejected at this rate for St. Louis.  I personally got 1 show with first priority and feel grateful for that, but I think that rules out user error for a later priority at 99%.  

    I do like this new system in theory (the best available option and the ability to resell at face value online).
  • ecdanc
    ecdanc Posts: 1,814
    95Pirate said:
    If this has been addressed earlier my apologies...here's what I don't understand...there are some 10C members like myself that put in BA for one show (mine was Baltimore) and were rejected.  However others were granted all 2, 3 or 4 shows they requested.  Example, if a 10C member put in for 3 shows, let's say Nashville, St Louis, and Baltimore in that order and won all 3....you have 10C members like me that put in for one show (Balt) because that's what we can afford....and were rejected, meanwhile some are going to 3 shows.  Why not spread the wealth a little instead of giving some members multiple shows; in the example above I think that member would have been totally happy with 2 shows won.  Sorry, I just don't get it.
    No one won Baltimore with a priority 3. But, to your larger point, I agree, but the show-by-show method is how 10c does things (for better or worse). 
  • buck502000
    buck502000 Birthplace of GIBSON guitar Posts: 8,951
    Yeah, I can’t understand how the lottery worked.... my friend put in for several shows that were at 99% and chose reserved seats.... not sure how he missed out on those shows🤔 
  • chukdotcom
    chukdotcom Posts: 757
    Father Hubbard said:
    Where is that graphic someone made with the odds just before the lottery closing?  I have searched and searched but there is so much to wade through now.

    If St. Louis closed at 99%, either the odds calculation does not take all entries, regardless of priority, into account anymore (I did not see info on this changing for Ticketmaster, only pointing to the old 10C system), or St. Louis was flawed in Ticketmaster's system.  Based on the email issue last night, guessing it was flawed in some way (number of tickets they had available was overstated, or some other issue(s)). 

    It sounds like several people did not realize they had to prioritize the shows on the screen that listed all of the shows they selected (I believe they were shown chronologically, rather than the order you selected them, and then you had to drag and drop to rearrange).  Also putting the odds in the email you receive after making your picks threw people off.  But at 99%, second or third or even later priorities should not have been rejected at this rate for St. Louis.  I personally got 1 show with first priority and feel grateful for that, but I think that rules out user error for a later priority at 99%.  

    I do like this new system in theory (the best available option and the ability to resell at face value online).
    I believe this is a large source of confusion where people THINK they got GA with their 4th pick.  It was in fact their first pick and they didn't realize it.
  • ecdanc
    ecdanc Posts: 1,814
    Father Hubbard said:
    Where is that graphic someone made with the odds just before the lottery closing?  I have searched and searched but there is so much to wade through now.

    If St. Louis closed at 99%, either the odds calculation does not take all entries, regardless of priority, into account anymore (I did not see info on this changing for Ticketmaster, only pointing to the old 10C system), or St. Louis was flawed in Ticketmaster's system.  Based on the email issue last night, guessing it was flawed in some way (number of tickets they had available was overstated, or some other issue(s)). 

    It sounds like several people did not realize they had to prioritize the shows on the screen that listed all of the shows they selected (I believe they were shown chronologically, rather than the order you selected them, and then you had to drag and drop to rearrange).  Also putting the odds in the email you receive after making your picks threw people off.  But at 99%, second or third or even later priorities should not have been rejected at this rate for St. Louis.  I personally got 1 show with first priority and feel grateful for that, but I think that rules out user error for a later priority at 99%.  

    I do like this new system in theory (the best available option and the ability to resell at face value online).
    The StL and Nashville rejection emails were (in many cases) mistakes that were later retracted. Not sure we've had any clear instances of people being shut out of those shows (with reserved or best available selections). 
  • RatsTJRats
    RatsTJRats Boston Posts: 436
    chukdotcom said:
    95Pirate said:
    If this has been addressed earlier my apologies...here's what I don't understand...there are some 10C members like myself that put in BA for one show (mine was Baltimore) and were rejected.  However others were granted all 2, 3 or 4 shows they requested.  Example, if a 10C member put in for 3 shows, let's say Nashville, St Louis, and Baltimore in that order and won all 3....you have 10C members like me that put in for one show (Balt) because that's what we can afford....and were rejected, meanwhile some are going to 3 shows.  Why not spread the wealth a little instead of giving some members multiple shows; in the example above I think that member would have been totally happy with 2 shows won.  Sorry, I just don't get it.
    That didn't happen.
    Yup.  Hearsay runs wild on these boards!
    This could be the day
  • ecdanc
    ecdanc Posts: 1,814
    chukdotcom said:
    Father Hubbard said:
    Where is that graphic someone made with the odds just before the lottery closing?  I have searched and searched but there is so much to wade through now.

    If St. Louis closed at 99%, either the odds calculation does not take all entries, regardless of priority, into account anymore (I did not see info on this changing for Ticketmaster, only pointing to the old 10C system), or St. Louis was flawed in Ticketmaster's system.  Based on the email issue last night, guessing it was flawed in some way (number of tickets they had available was overstated, or some other issue(s)). 

    It sounds like several people did not realize they had to prioritize the shows on the screen that listed all of the shows they selected (I believe they were shown chronologically, rather than the order you selected them, and then you had to drag and drop to rearrange).  Also putting the odds in the email you receive after making your picks threw people off.  But at 99%, second or third or even later priorities should not have been rejected at this rate for St. Louis.  I personally got 1 show with first priority and feel grateful for that, but I think that rules out user error for a later priority at 99%.  

    I do like this new system in theory (the best available option and the ability to resell at face value online).
    I believe this is a large source of confusion where people THINK they got GA with their 4th pick.  It was in fact their first pick and they didn't realize it.
    This x 100. 
  • judyblueyes
    judyblueyes Posts: 84
    Baltimore 1st pick reserved
    Nashville 2nd pick BA

    No e-mail on either. What do I do?
    Help
    E Rutherford, 2006
    MSG I & II 2008
    EV United Palace 2008
    Newark 2010, MSG 1 2010
    EV Beacon 2011
    Wrigley 2013, Brooklyn 1 & 2, Hartford, SD, LA 1 & 2
    2014 Detroit, Moline, St. Paul & Milwaukee
    Ed Sullivan Theater/Central Park 2015
    2016 FTL, Miami, Philly 1 & 2, MSG 1 & 2, Fenway 1
    RRHOF 2017
    2018 Seattle I & @, Missoula, Boston I & II
    2022 Apollo, MSG, Camden, Nashville & St. Louis
    2023 St. Paul 1 & 2, Austin 1 & 2
  • ecdanc
    ecdanc Posts: 1,814
    buck502000 said:
    Yeah, I can’t understand how the lottery worked.... my friend put in for several shows that were at 99% and chose reserved seats.... not sure how he missed out on those shows🤔 
    If he missed out on ALL the shows, it's (unfortunately) probably user error. 
  • NewfieintheUSA
    NewfieintheUSA Posts: 2,416
    judyblueyes said:
    Baltimore 1st pick reserved
    Nashville 2nd pick BA

    No e-mail on either. What do I do?
    Help
    Check you credit card
    Email tenclubsupport@ticketmaster.com
  • judyblueyes
    judyblueyes Posts: 84
    Thanks
    E Rutherford, 2006
    MSG I & II 2008
    EV United Palace 2008
    Newark 2010, MSG 1 2010
    EV Beacon 2011
    Wrigley 2013, Brooklyn 1 & 2, Hartford, SD, LA 1 & 2
    2014 Detroit, Moline, St. Paul & Milwaukee
    Ed Sullivan Theater/Central Park 2015
    2016 FTL, Miami, Philly 1 & 2, MSG 1 & 2, Fenway 1
    RRHOF 2017
    2018 Seattle I & @, Missoula, Boston I & II
    2022 Apollo, MSG, Camden, Nashville & St. Louis
    2023 St. Paul 1 & 2, Austin 1 & 2
  • buck502000
    buck502000 Birthplace of GIBSON guitar Posts: 8,951
    ecdanc said:
    buck502000 said:
    Yeah, I can’t understand how the lottery worked.... my friend put in for several shows that were at 99% and chose reserved seats.... not sure how he missed out on those shows🤔 
    If he missed out on ALL the shows, it's (unfortunately) probably user error. 
    He got one..... his first choice
  • wsimon74
    wsimon74 Posts: 517
    what time do picks start being announced based on the last three days?
  • ecdanc
    ecdanc Posts: 1,814
    buck502000 said:
    ecdanc said:
    buck502000 said:
    Yeah, I can’t understand how the lottery worked.... my friend put in for several shows that were at 99% and chose reserved seats.... not sure how he missed out on those shows🤔 
    If he missed out on ALL the shows, it's (unfortunately) probably user error. 
    He got one..... his first choice
    Hmmm. I don't know your friend, and I don't want to cast aspersions on him, but maybe he resubmitted (tried to add a show as others reported)? Otherwise, I've got nothing. 
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,663
    bootlegger10 said:
    We have heard people who put LA1 and LA2 as both BA and lost.  Even if they screwed up and entered separately and negated one of the shows, they still should have won or got an email that their cc was declined.

    i won LA2 with my third pick.
    Perfect starting point. What we need is someone who lost LA2 with a 1st or 2nd priority to get an answer and report back. So far *every* person who has actually followed up reported a user error of some kind. That's why people are assuming this first in the other circumstances. 

    If it were me, I would hound TM/10C until I got a satisfactory response. They'd need to either tell me what I did wrong or cop to the mistake. It's possible something in the system screwed up, but seeing the sheer volume of confusion and (to some extent) stupidity in these threads, I'd want to see some actual evidence before I blame the system.
  • RoleModelsinBlood31
    RoleModelsinBlood31 Austin TX Posts: 6,249
    Hey can someone bump that google spreadsheet thread so we can get some more folks to add their experiences?  I’ll try to find it
    I'm like an opening band for your mom.

Categories