***Spring 2020 Lottery Results***

YAKIMATSU

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

YAKIMATSU said:

bootlegger10 said:

We have heard people who put LA1 and LA2 as both BA and lost.  Even if they screwed up and entered separately and negated one of the shows, they still should have won or got an email that their cc was declined.

i won LA2 with my third pick.

I got LA2 with my 5th priority. 

Thanks for posting this. 

You're welcome. 

95Pirate

If this has been addressed earlier my apologies...here's what I don't understand...there are some 10C members like myself that put in BA for one show (mine was Baltimore) and were rejected.  However others were granted all 2, 3 or 4 shows they requested.  Example, if a 10C member put in for 3 shows, let's say Nashville, St Louis, and Baltimore in that order and won all 3....you have 10C members like me that put in for one show (Balt) because that's what we can afford....and were rejected, meanwhile some are going to 3 shows.  Why not spread the wealth a little instead of giving some members multiple shows; in the example above I think that member would have been totally happy with 2 shows won.  Sorry, I just don't get it.

chukdotcom

95Pirate said:

If this has been addressed earlier my apologies...here's what I don't understand...there are some 10C members like myself that put in BA for one show (mine was Baltimore) and were rejected.  However others were granted all 2, 3 or 4 shows they requested.  Example, if a 10C member put in for 3 shows, let's say Nashville, St Louis, and Baltimore in that order and won all 3....you have 10C members like me that put in for one show (Balt) because that's what we can afford....and were rejected, meanwhile some are going to 3 shows.  Why not spread the wealth a little instead of giving some members multiple shows; in the example above I think that member would have been totally happy with 2 shows won.  Sorry, I just don't get it.

That didn't happen.

NewfieintheUSA

95Pirate said:

If this has been addressed earlier my apologies...here's what I don't understand...there are some 10C members like myself that put in BA for one show (mine was Baltimore) and were rejected.  However others were granted all 2, 3 or 4 shows they requested.  Example, if a 10C member put in for 3 shows, let's say Nashville, St Louis, and Baltimore in that order and won all 3....you have 10C members like me that put in for one show (Balt) because that's what we can afford....and were rejected, meanwhile some are going to 3 shows.  Why not spread the wealth a little instead of giving some members multiple shows; in the example above I think that member would have been totally happy with 2 shows won.  Sorry, I just don't get it.

No one won Baltimore at 2nd or lower priority. 

Father Hubbard

Where is that graphic someone made with the odds just before the lottery closing?  I have searched and searched but there is so much to wade through now.

If St. Louis closed at 99%, either the odds calculation does not take all entries, regardless of priority, into account anymore (I did not see info on this changing for Ticketmaster, only pointing to the old 10C system), or St. Louis was flawed in Ticketmaster's system.  Based on the email issue last night, guessing it was flawed in some way (number of tickets they had available was overstated, or some other issue(s)). 

It sounds like several people did not realize they had to prioritize the shows on the screen that listed all of the shows they selected (I believe they were shown chronologically, rather than the order you selected them, and then you had to drag and drop to rearrange).  Also putting the odds in the email you receive after making your picks threw people off.  But at 99%, second or third or even later priorities should not have been rejected at this rate for St. Louis.  I personally got 1 show with first priority and feel grateful for that, but I think that rules out user error for a later priority at 99%.  

I do like this new system in theory (the best available option and the ability to resell at face value online).

ecdanc

95Pirate said:

If this has been addressed earlier my apologies...here's what I don't understand...there are some 10C members like myself that put in BA for one show (mine was Baltimore) and were rejected.  However others were granted all 2, 3 or 4 shows they requested.  Example, if a 10C member put in for 3 shows, let's say Nashville, St Louis, and Baltimore in that order and won all 3....you have 10C members like me that put in for one show (Balt) because that's what we can afford....and were rejected, meanwhile some are going to 3 shows.  Why not spread the wealth a little instead of giving some members multiple shows; in the example above I think that member would have been totally happy with 2 shows won.  Sorry, I just don't get it.

No one won Baltimore with a priority 3. But, to your larger point, I agree, but the show-by-show method is how 10c does things (for better or worse). 

buck502000

Yeah, I can’t understand how the lottery worked.... my friend put in for several shows that were at 99% and chose reserved seats.... not sure how he missed out on those shows🤔 

chukdotcom

Father Hubbard said:

Where is that graphic someone made with the odds just before the lottery closing?  I have searched and searched but there is so much to wade through now.

If St. Louis closed at 99%, either the odds calculation does not take all entries, regardless of priority, into account anymore (I did not see info on this changing for Ticketmaster, only pointing to the old 10C system), or St. Louis was flawed in Ticketmaster's system.  Based on the email issue last night, guessing it was flawed in some way (number of tickets they had available was overstated, or some other issue(s)). 

It sounds like several people did not realize they had to prioritize the shows on the screen that listed all of the shows they selected (I believe they were shown chronologically, rather than the order you selected them, and then you had to drag and drop to rearrange).  Also putting the odds in the email you receive after making your picks threw people off.  But at 99%, second or third or even later priorities should not have been rejected at this rate for St. Louis.  I personally got 1 show with first priority and feel grateful for that, but I think that rules out user error for a later priority at 99%.  

I do like this new system in theory (the best available option and the ability to resell at face value online).

I believe this is a large source of confusion where people THINK they got GA with their 4th pick.  It was in fact their first pick and they didn't realize it.

ecdanc

Father Hubbard said:

Where is that graphic someone made with the odds just before the lottery closing?  I have searched and searched but there is so much to wade through now.

If St. Louis closed at 99%, either the odds calculation does not take all entries, regardless of priority, into account anymore (I did not see info on this changing for Ticketmaster, only pointing to the old 10C system), or St. Louis was flawed in Ticketmaster's system.  Based on the email issue last night, guessing it was flawed in some way (number of tickets they had available was overstated, or some other issue(s)). 

It sounds like several people did not realize they had to prioritize the shows on the screen that listed all of the shows they selected (I believe they were shown chronologically, rather than the order you selected them, and then you had to drag and drop to rearrange).  Also putting the odds in the email you receive after making your picks threw people off.  But at 99%, second or third or even later priorities should not have been rejected at this rate for St. Louis.  I personally got 1 show with first priority and feel grateful for that, but I think that rules out user error for a later priority at 99%.  

I do like this new system in theory (the best available option and the ability to resell at face value online).

The StL and Nashville rejection emails were (in many cases) mistakes that were later retracted. Not sure we've had any clear instances of people being shut out of those shows (with reserved or best available selections). 

RatsTJRats

chukdotcom said:

95Pirate said:

If this has been addressed earlier my apologies...here's what I don't understand...there are some 10C members like myself that put in BA for one show (mine was Baltimore) and were rejected.  However others were granted all 2, 3 or 4 shows they requested.  Example, if a 10C member put in for 3 shows, let's say Nashville, St Louis, and Baltimore in that order and won all 3....you have 10C members like me that put in for one show (Balt) because that's what we can afford....and were rejected, meanwhile some are going to 3 shows.  Why not spread the wealth a little instead of giving some members multiple shows; in the example above I think that member would have been totally happy with 2 shows won.  Sorry, I just don't get it.

That didn't happen.

Yup.  Hearsay runs wild on these boards!

ecdanc

chukdotcom said:

Father Hubbard said:

Where is that graphic someone made with the odds just before the lottery closing?  I have searched and searched but there is so much to wade through now.

If St. Louis closed at 99%, either the odds calculation does not take all entries, regardless of priority, into account anymore (I did not see info on this changing for Ticketmaster, only pointing to the old 10C system), or St. Louis was flawed in Ticketmaster's system.  Based on the email issue last night, guessing it was flawed in some way (number of tickets they had available was overstated, or some other issue(s)). 

It sounds like several people did not realize they had to prioritize the shows on the screen that listed all of the shows they selected (I believe they were shown chronologically, rather than the order you selected them, and then you had to drag and drop to rearrange).  Also putting the odds in the email you receive after making your picks threw people off.  But at 99%, second or third or even later priorities should not have been rejected at this rate for St. Louis.  I personally got 1 show with first priority and feel grateful for that, but I think that rules out user error for a later priority at 99%.  

I do like this new system in theory (the best available option and the ability to resell at face value online).

I believe this is a large source of confusion where people THINK they got GA with their 4th pick.  It was in fact their first pick and they didn't realize it.

This x 100. 

judyblueyes

Baltimore 1st pick reserved
Nashville 2nd pick BA

No e-mail on either. What do I do?
Help

ecdanc

buck502000 said:

Yeah, I can’t understand how the lottery worked.... my friend put in for several shows that were at 99% and chose reserved seats.... not sure how he missed out on those shows🤔 

If he missed out on ALL the shows, it's (unfortunately) probably user error. 

NewfieintheUSA

judyblueyes said:

Baltimore 1st pick reserved
Nashville 2nd pick BA

No e-mail on either. What do I do?
Help

Check you credit card
Email tenclubsupport@ticketmaster.com

judyblueyes

Thanks

buck502000

ecdanc said:

buck502000 said:

Yeah, I can’t understand how the lottery worked.... my friend put in for several shows that were at 99% and chose reserved seats.... not sure how he missed out on those shows🤔 

If he missed out on ALL the shows, it's (unfortunately) probably user error. 

He got one..... his first choice

wsimon74

what time do picks start being announced based on the last three days?

ecdanc

buck502000 said:

ecdanc said:

buck502000 said:

Yeah, I can’t understand how the lottery worked.... my friend put in for several shows that were at 99% and chose reserved seats.... not sure how he missed out on those shows🤔 

If he missed out on ALL the shows, it's (unfortunately) probably user error. 

He got one..... his first choice

Hmmm. I don't know your friend, and I don't want to cast aspersions on him, but maybe he resubmitted (tried to add a show as others reported)? Otherwise, I've got nothing. 

pjl44

bootlegger10 said:

We have heard people who put LA1 and LA2 as both BA and lost.  Even if they screwed up and entered separately and negated one of the shows, they still should have won or got an email that their cc was declined.

i won LA2 with my third pick.

Perfect starting point. What we need is someone who lost LA2 with a 1st or 2nd priority to get an answer and report back. So far *every* person who has actually followed up reported a user error of some kind. That's why people are assuming this first in the other circumstances. 

If it were me, I would hound TM/10C until I got a satisfactory response. They'd need to either tell me what I did wrong or cop to the mistake. It's possible something in the system screwed up, but seeing the sheer volume of confusion and (to some extent) stupidity in these threads, I'd want to see some actual evidence before I blame the system.

RoleModelsinBlood31

Hey can someone bump that google spreadsheet thread so we can get some more folks to add their experiences?  I’ll try to find it