***Spring 2020 Lottery Results***

kkdowning

eRock10 said:

So does anyone think getting tickets on the public sale (Baltimore or NYC) will be possible this time around?

Are you signed up for the verified fan presale? If selected, you will have better odds than the general onsale, obviously. I also figure single seats will be easier if the tix go as fast as we all think they will. If you have multiple computers (smart phone, tablet, laptop), have all of them ready prior to the onsale. And stay with it for a while. Sometimes tix pop up late due to people selecting them but then dropping them.

ecdanc

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

Jamiechris2005

CopperTom said:

mdbhound25 said:

Did anyone screenshot Nashville or Denver 10c reserves seating map from the ticket submission?

Nashville:
https://static.ticketstoday.com/tenclub-us/images/bridgestone.jpg

Denver:
https://static.ticketstoday.com/tenclub-us/images/pepsicenter.jpg

Do you have on for LA as well? Thx in advance. 😊

Banjo

ecdanc said:

Banjo said:

I've read on these forums that they drew everyone with a #1 priority first then moved on to #2 priority for same show, etc. Was that (or whatever method they used) ever stated by 10c anywhere? I have a guess as to how it may have gone (or maybe a suggestion for future drawings) but if its already been contradicted, I'll keep it to myself 

Yes. 

Where? I cant find it in the Presale Info page or email (which have the same info I think)

Luckytwn1

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

 Of course, there’s evidence. The rejection emails say specifically “After running the ticket request process, unfortunately, due to demand, we were unable to fulfill your ticket request for Pearl Jam.” That was for Nashville, which closed at 99 percent reserved. 

RoleModelsinBlood31

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick.  I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error.  That just can’t be correct

ecdanc

Luckytwn1 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

 Of course, there’s evidence. The rejection emails say specifically “After running the ticket request process, unfortunately, due to demand, we were unable to fulfill your ticket request for Pearl Jam.” That was for Nashville, which closed at 99 percent for reserved. 

Yes, but we have instances of people getting that email who later confirmed user error. One earlier theory is that this email was going out to anyone who didn't get tickets, no matter WHY they didn't get tickets. We discussed how that was a problem at some length. 

mace1229

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

mace1229 said:

ecdanc said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

chukdotcom said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

chukdotcom said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Why are so many folks assuming it must be “user error” with all the issues that have happened? How difficult was this that it must be the person’s fault? All you had to do was pick shows!  

Because almost all of the issues have been explained as user error.

People that didn't have matching info with Ticketmaster
People that didn't realize they had to arrange the order after selecting their picks
People that didn't understand the difference between selecting GA vs BA

The only legit error I have seen is the incorrect denial emails.

I’ve seen lots of instances of people who had both BA first and second choice lose out to folks who had GA or BA or RES as a third or lower pick.  They usually won their first pick but not their second.  Don’t think user error is involved in any of them

The user error is that that never actually happened.  They probably never ordered their choices.  No one is getting tickets with 3rd picks over someone with the same first pick.  Period.  They may THINK they are because they can't follow directions.

Well if it happens to me (I haven’t heard yet on my second pick (oak 2 BA), I’m an example of it happening.  Want a screenshot?

Any theories on the "haven't heard" issue? I know there were several reports, especially with the 2-show cities.

My theory is, and many have admitted to this, they deleted their picks by adding new sections. So no confirmation or denial email was needed since they technically withdrew from the lottery.
I’m not eliminating the possibility of TM error, but the amount of user error involved has proven to be very high. People flat out didn’t read the directions. I saw several cases where people uploaded their entry emails as proof they selected a show as priority 1 when all it did was show they really added new shows and deleted old ones without realizing it. That is why they never heard back because they didn’t enter. 

Also I’ve seen several people not know you had to arrange priority at the end, not while you selected. So shows people thought were priority 1 was maybe 3 or 4. That wouldn’t explain a no response, but I am guessing this is the case for anyone who won GA beyond first pick.

The few who got shut out completely I am guessing had incorrect info or something that invalidated their entry (didn’t include their 10c email when asked for it)

Again, not me. I only put 1 order in and never even went back into the TM site to check odds for fear of any complication.  One login, one entrance with two shows, one confirmation and ghosted on the other.

They’re are 2 other possibilities I can easily think of. Some have said their email account combined the emails and they didn’t notice at first, so check for that. There are also reports of CC processing emails coming out giving people until Tuesday to fix the CC issue. Maybe your CC saw a large out of state purchase and flagged it, and you’ll get a CC email today. 

ecdanc

Banjo said:

ecdanc said:

Banjo said:

I've read on these forums that they drew everyone with a #1 priority first then moved on to #2 priority for same show, etc. Was that (or whatever method they used) ever stated by 10c anywhere? I have a guess as to how it may have gone (or maybe a suggestion for future drawings) but if its already been contradicted, I'll keep it to myself 

Yes. 

Where? I cant find it in the Presale Info page or email (which have the same info I think)

From the ticket-confirmation email: "Ten Club and Ticketmaster are working closely to ensure the fan club ticket request process remains the same as in years past." This is how they've done things in the past. 

Jamiechris2005

I got LA 1 and 2 for first and 2nd picks. BA.

YAKIMATSU

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick.  I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error.  That just can’t be correct

Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.

RoleModelsinBlood31

mace1229 said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

mace1229 said:

ecdanc said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

chukdotcom said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

chukdotcom said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Why are so many folks assuming it must be “user error” with all the issues that have happened? How difficult was this that it must be the person’s fault? All you had to do was pick shows!  

Because almost all of the issues have been explained as user error.

People that didn't have matching info with Ticketmaster
People that didn't realize they had to arrange the order after selecting their picks
People that didn't understand the difference between selecting GA vs BA

The only legit error I have seen is the incorrect denial emails.

I’ve seen lots of instances of people who had both BA first and second choice lose out to folks who had GA or BA or RES as a third or lower pick.  They usually won their first pick but not their second.  Don’t think user error is involved in any of them

The user error is that that never actually happened.  They probably never ordered their choices.  No one is getting tickets with 3rd picks over someone with the same first pick.  Period.  They may THINK they are because they can't follow directions.

Well if it happens to me (I haven’t heard yet on my second pick (oak 2 BA), I’m an example of it happening.  Want a screenshot?

Any theories on the "haven't heard" issue? I know there were several reports, especially with the 2-show cities.

My theory is, and many have admitted to this, they deleted their picks by adding new sections. So no confirmation or denial email was needed since they technically withdrew from the lottery.
I’m not eliminating the possibility of TM error, but the amount of user error involved has proven to be very high. People flat out didn’t read the directions. I saw several cases where people uploaded their entry emails as proof they selected a show as priority 1 when all it did was show they really added new shows and deleted old ones without realizing it. That is why they never heard back because they didn’t enter. 

Also I’ve seen several people not know you had to arrange priority at the end, not while you selected. So shows people thought were priority 1 was maybe 3 or 4. That wouldn’t explain a no response, but I am guessing this is the case for anyone who won GA beyond first pick.

The few who got shut out completely I am guessing had incorrect info or something that invalidated their entry (didn’t include their 10c email when asked for it)

Again, not me. I only put 1 order in and never even went back into the TM site to check odds for fear of any complication.  One login, one entrance with two shows, one confirmation and ghosted on the other.

They’re are 2 other possibilities I can easily think of. Some have said their email account combined the emails and they didn’t notice at first, so check for that. There are also reports of CC processing emails coming out giving people until Tuesday to fix the CC issue. Maybe your CC saw a large out of state purchase and flagged it, and you’ll get a CC email today. 

Already checked both on laptop and phone. I knew that gmail can do that so I had checked immediately.  Only 1 email. Email was correct since I got tickets to my first choice.

already called my credit card company yesterday morning and they confirmed there was no issue and that I’d only been charged or even attempted once.

i also called and chatted with Ticketmaster, they could only say that the lottery wasn’t closed until Sunday evening.

others I’ve talked to in the Oakland thread are in the same exact boat, having scored tix to one and ghosted on the other.

Mozzy

x

Luckytwn1

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

 Of course, there’s evidence. The rejection emails say specifically “After running the ticket request process, unfortunately, due to demand, we were unable to fulfill your ticket request for Pearl Jam.” That was for Nashville, which closed at 99 percent for reserved. 

Yes, but we have instances of people getting that email who later confirmed user error. One earlier theory is that this email was going out to anyone who didn't get tickets, no matter WHY they didn't get tickets. We discussed how that was a problem at some length. 

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

 Of course, there’s evidence. The rejection emails say specifically “After running the ticket request process, unfortunately, due to demand, we were unable to fulfill your ticket request for Pearl Jam.” That was for Nashville, which closed at 99 percent for reserved. 

Yes, but we have instances of people getting that email who later confirmed user error. One earlier theory is that this email was going out to anyone who didn't get tickets, no matter WHY they didn't get tickets. We discussed how that was a problem at some length. 

As I stated above, obviously there’s no user error with my order as I successfully received other shows. This conspiracy theory about emails and the like (mine matched anyway) would invalidate an entire entry, not just one show. I can assure you there was no user error on my entry and as it happens, I am extremely good with numbers. The issue here was in the wording that most, if not all, orders would be filled and then that was compounded by showing 99 percent odds for many of the shows where they clearly couldn’t fill every order. 

Again, I’m not complaining about not getting a show as I think the 10C does a great job and this is the first time ever since 2013 that I’ve had a show go unfilled. As Nashville was my 5th choice, it’s totally reasonable they wouldn’t be able to fill it but again that is not what the info they provided would indicate prior to the draw. I think they absolutely should provide accurate info as it pertains to the process and that was not the case here. 

ecdanc

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

mace1229 said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

mace1229 said:

ecdanc said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

chukdotcom said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

chukdotcom said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Why are so many folks assuming it must be “user error” with all the issues that have happened? How difficult was this that it must be the person’s fault? All you had to do was pick shows!  

Because almost all of the issues have been explained as user error.

People that didn't have matching info with Ticketmaster
People that didn't realize they had to arrange the order after selecting their picks
People that didn't understand the difference between selecting GA vs BA

The only legit error I have seen is the incorrect denial emails.

I’ve seen lots of instances of people who had both BA first and second choice lose out to folks who had GA or BA or RES as a third or lower pick.  They usually won their first pick but not their second.  Don’t think user error is involved in any of them

The user error is that that never actually happened.  They probably never ordered their choices.  No one is getting tickets with 3rd picks over someone with the same first pick.  Period.  They may THINK they are because they can't follow directions.

Well if it happens to me (I haven’t heard yet on my second pick (oak 2 BA), I’m an example of it happening.  Want a screenshot?

Any theories on the "haven't heard" issue? I know there were several reports, especially with the 2-show cities.

My theory is, and many have admitted to this, they deleted their picks by adding new sections. So no confirmation or denial email was needed since they technically withdrew from the lottery.
I’m not eliminating the possibility of TM error, but the amount of user error involved has proven to be very high. People flat out didn’t read the directions. I saw several cases where people uploaded their entry emails as proof they selected a show as priority 1 when all it did was show they really added new shows and deleted old ones without realizing it. That is why they never heard back because they didn’t enter. 

Also I’ve seen several people not know you had to arrange priority at the end, not while you selected. So shows people thought were priority 1 was maybe 3 or 4. That wouldn’t explain a no response, but I am guessing this is the case for anyone who won GA beyond first pick.

The few who got shut out completely I am guessing had incorrect info or something that invalidated their entry (didn’t include their 10c email when asked for it)

Again, not me. I only put 1 order in and never even went back into the TM site to check odds for fear of any complication.  One login, one entrance with two shows, one confirmation and ghosted on the other.

They’re are 2 other possibilities I can easily think of. Some have said their email account combined the emails and they didn’t notice at first, so check for that. There are also reports of CC processing emails coming out giving people until Tuesday to fix the CC issue. Maybe your CC saw a large out of state purchase and flagged it, and you’ll get a CC email today. 

Already checked both on laptop and phone. I knew that gmail can do that so I had checked immediately.  Only 1 email. Email was correct since I got tickets to my first choice.

already called my credit card company yesterday morning and they confirmed there was no issue and that I’d only been charged or even attempted once.

i also called and chatted with Ticketmaster, they could only say that the lottery wasn’t closed until Sunday evening.

others I’ve talked to in the Oakland thread are in the same exact boat, having scored tix to one and ghosted on the other.

While it sucks for you, I'm intrigued by your case. I hope you'll let us know what--if anything--you ever find out. Might give us some more specific insight into the process's shortcomings. 

mace1229

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I agree if shouldn’t have said that if it is the case. But I really don’t think it is, just said it as a possibility. I really think 10c had an insane amount of tickets for each show.
There was something else going on that prevented people from getting tickets. If it was purely an odds thing then round 1 would win and later rounds wouldn’t. But with many, even most 3rd and 4th round picks winning it wasn’t due to a lack of tickets if you lost round 1 (except MSG and BAL). The easiest explanation is user error and many have admitted to that. But there is definitely a possibility TM screwed up in another way.  I just don’t think it was a lack of tickets that made people lose round 1 and 2 picks

Mozzy

.

RoleModelsinBlood31

ecdanc said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

mace1229 said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

mace1229 said:

ecdanc said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

chukdotcom said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

chukdotcom said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Why are so many folks assuming it must be “user error” with all the issues that have happened? How difficult was this that it must be the person’s fault? All you had to do was pick shows!  

Because almost all of the issues have been explained as user error.

People that didn't have matching info with Ticketmaster
People that didn't realize they had to arrange the order after selecting their picks
People that didn't understand the difference between selecting GA vs BA

The only legit error I have seen is the incorrect denial emails.

I’ve seen lots of instances of people who had both BA first and second choice lose out to folks who had GA or BA or RES as a third or lower pick.  They usually won their first pick but not their second.  Don’t think user error is involved in any of them

The user error is that that never actually happened.  They probably never ordered their choices.  No one is getting tickets with 3rd picks over someone with the same first pick.  Period.  They may THINK they are because they can't follow directions.

Well if it happens to me (I haven’t heard yet on my second pick (oak 2 BA), I’m an example of it happening.  Want a screenshot?

Any theories on the "haven't heard" issue? I know there were several reports, especially with the 2-show cities.

My theory is, and many have admitted to this, they deleted their picks by adding new sections. So no confirmation or denial email was needed since they technically withdrew from the lottery.
I’m not eliminating the possibility of TM error, but the amount of user error involved has proven to be very high. People flat out didn’t read the directions. I saw several cases where people uploaded their entry emails as proof they selected a show as priority 1 when all it did was show they really added new shows and deleted old ones without realizing it. That is why they never heard back because they didn’t enter. 

Also I’ve seen several people not know you had to arrange priority at the end, not while you selected. So shows people thought were priority 1 was maybe 3 or 4. That wouldn’t explain a no response, but I am guessing this is the case for anyone who won GA beyond first pick.

The few who got shut out completely I am guessing had incorrect info or something that invalidated their entry (didn’t include their 10c email when asked for it)

Again, not me. I only put 1 order in and never even went back into the TM site to check odds for fear of any complication.  One login, one entrance with two shows, one confirmation and ghosted on the other.

They’re are 2 other possibilities I can easily think of. Some have said their email account combined the emails and they didn’t notice at first, so check for that. There are also reports of CC processing emails coming out giving people until Tuesday to fix the CC issue. Maybe your CC saw a large out of state purchase and flagged it, and you’ll get a CC email today. 

Already checked both on laptop and phone. I knew that gmail can do that so I had checked immediately.  Only 1 email. Email was correct since I got tickets to my first choice.

already called my credit card company yesterday morning and they confirmed there was no issue and that I’d only been charged or even attempted once.

i also called and chatted with Ticketmaster, they could only say that the lottery wasn’t closed until Sunday evening.

others I’ve talked to in the Oakland thread are in the same exact boat, having scored tix to one and ghosted on the other.

While it sucks for you, I'm intrigued by your case. I hope you'll let us know what--if anything--you ever find out. Might give us some more specific insight into the process's shortcomings. 

Yeah, as someone who does the AP poster sales, is a fanatic for Nike sneaker drops (harder to score than PJ merch imo), and been doing lotteries with Pj for years, I am very well versed in reading all the rules and being beyond prepared for these things. Being on, logged in, making sure accounts are correct, etc., I’m ocd about these drops so it only can come down to luck.

ill be sure to post my ultimate result, and as I said before this isn’t an isolated circumstance as other long time members who are frequent posters and avid collectors had the same issue with oakland

josevolution

How about if they choose to release schedule of tour and then do separate lottery for each show and we would have to enter individual picks for every show we wanted to attend , no more priority ...

RoleModelsinBlood31

josevolution said:

How about if they choose to release schedule of tour and then do separate lottery for each show and we would have to enter individual picks for every show we wanted to attend , no more priority ...

I wish we could just go back to the old days where you picked one show per your and you got two tickets or one, to that show.  It could never happen since there are way too many fans in the northeast and it would screw them, but I miss those days.