Outrage Culture
Comments
-
It isn’t as simple as “feeling I identify as a woman now”, it’s a culmination typically of years or a lifetime of identifying as a different gender, and then living congruent with that. It would be ludicrous for someone to just say they “feel like a woman” and apply for funding without actually taking steps to live in a manner congruent with the stated identification.tempo_n_groove said:
The different labels and being able to change your gender is going to result is problems in the future.dignin said:
I personally like labels and categories, as unpopular as that is. And I could see how some people would want a label and category to have a sense of belonging and community when otherwise they might feel alone. I can also see why some people wouldn't want that. To each their own.mrussel1 said:
To me, the concept of labels and categories is divisive. Now it's easy for me to say since I'm a straight white male, but I could care less how people choose to identify themselves. It doesn't affect my life one iota, so let people do what they want. I get bent out of shape when the right wing tries to make it an issue though. But only for that reason.dignin said:
I see the science is advancing. Been awhile since I've read anything about it. Thanks for sharing.oftenreading said:
No, it isn’t that simple. Biological sex is far more complex. Individuals born with clear intersex genitalia are not in fact rare - it’s twice as common as schizophrenia - but there are many more levels to it than that.dignin said:
I understand your sex is mainly binary man/woman (except in some rare cases of intersex) and gender is fluid. There are many genders now. Am I wrong?oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I read the quote that "gender" is binary, not fluid. Not that the intimate act of sex can only happen between a man and a woman.tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.
Yes, I think that’s what she meant. It’s not correct, but I don’t think someone should be fired for it.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.I understood it to mean, biological sex is binary. born physically female or male.This Scientific American article gives some info
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
Still an interesting topic when it comes to labels and categories.
What if I wanted to change my gender because I feel that I identify as a woman now. So I do and the business I run is applying for WBE status but I get denied.
I'd have one hell of a lawsuit, no?my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
I really think things like bathrooms, MWBE, and other tax credits are nothing on the grand scheme of things.tempo_n_groove said:
The different labels and being able to change your gender is going to result is problems in the future.dignin said:
I personally like labels and categories, as unpopular as that is. And I could see how some people would want a label and category to have a sense of belonging and community when otherwise they might feel alone. I can also see why some people wouldn't want that. To each their own.mrussel1 said:
To me, the concept of labels and categories is divisive. Now it's easy for me to say since I'm a straight white male, but I could care less how people choose to identify themselves. It doesn't affect my life one iota, so let people do what they want. I get bent out of shape when the right wing tries to make it an issue though. But only for that reason.dignin said:
I see the science is advancing. Been awhile since I've read anything about it. Thanks for sharing.oftenreading said:
No, it isn’t that simple. Biological sex is far more complex. Individuals born with clear intersex genitalia are not in fact rare - it’s twice as common as schizophrenia - but there are many more levels to it than that.dignin said:
I understand your sex is mainly binary man/woman (except in some rare cases of intersex) and gender is fluid. There are many genders now. Am I wrong?oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I read the quote that "gender" is binary, not fluid. Not that the intimate act of sex can only happen between a man and a woman.tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.
Yes, I think that’s what she meant. It’s not correct, but I don’t think someone should be fired for it.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.I understood it to mean, biological sex is binary. born physically female or male.This Scientific American article gives some info
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
Still an interesting topic when it comes to labels and categories.
What if I wanted to change my gender because I feel that I identify as a woman now. So I do and the business I run is applying for WBE status but I get denied.
I'd have one hell of a lawsuit, no?0 -
I understand that but someone is going to test these boundaries, you know it happens with everything else that goes on.oftenreading said:
It isn’t as simple as “feeling I identify as a woman now”, it’s a culmination typically of years or a lifetime of identifying as a different gender, and then living congruent with that. It would be ludicrous for someone to just say they “feel like a woman” and apply for funding without actually taking steps to live in a manner congruent with the stated identification.tempo_n_groove said:
The different labels and being able to change your gender is going to result is problems in the future.dignin said:
I personally like labels and categories, as unpopular as that is. And I could see how some people would want a label and category to have a sense of belonging and community when otherwise they might feel alone. I can also see why some people wouldn't want that. To each their own.mrussel1 said:
To me, the concept of labels and categories is divisive. Now it's easy for me to say since I'm a straight white male, but I could care less how people choose to identify themselves. It doesn't affect my life one iota, so let people do what they want. I get bent out of shape when the right wing tries to make it an issue though. But only for that reason.dignin said:
I see the science is advancing. Been awhile since I've read anything about it. Thanks for sharing.oftenreading said:
No, it isn’t that simple. Biological sex is far more complex. Individuals born with clear intersex genitalia are not in fact rare - it’s twice as common as schizophrenia - but there are many more levels to it than that.dignin said:
I understand your sex is mainly binary man/woman (except in some rare cases of intersex) and gender is fluid. There are many genders now. Am I wrong?oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I read the quote that "gender" is binary, not fluid. Not that the intimate act of sex can only happen between a man and a woman.tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.
Yes, I think that’s what she meant. It’s not correct, but I don’t think someone should be fired for it.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.I understood it to mean, biological sex is binary. born physically female or male.This Scientific American article gives some info
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
Still an interesting topic when it comes to labels and categories.
What if I wanted to change my gender because I feel that I identify as a woman now. So I do and the business I run is applying for WBE status but I get denied.
I'd have one hell of a lawsuit, no?
NY just passed some laws where it IS that easy for me to identify w a woman so it is coming. I'm not trying to be a dick about it either, it's just bound to happen.0 -
Take the M out of it because I'm going straight for the Woman owned and not the Minority owned status. The W is better to have than the M here in NY.mrussel1 said:
I really think things like bathrooms, MWBE, and other tax credits are nothing on the grand scheme of things.tempo_n_groove said:
The different labels and being able to change your gender is going to result is problems in the future.dignin said:
I personally like labels and categories, as unpopular as that is. And I could see how some people would want a label and category to have a sense of belonging and community when otherwise they might feel alone. I can also see why some people wouldn't want that. To each their own.mrussel1 said:
To me, the concept of labels and categories is divisive. Now it's easy for me to say since I'm a straight white male, but I could care less how people choose to identify themselves. It doesn't affect my life one iota, so let people do what they want. I get bent out of shape when the right wing tries to make it an issue though. But only for that reason.dignin said:
I see the science is advancing. Been awhile since I've read anything about it. Thanks for sharing.oftenreading said:
No, it isn’t that simple. Biological sex is far more complex. Individuals born with clear intersex genitalia are not in fact rare - it’s twice as common as schizophrenia - but there are many more levels to it than that.dignin said:
I understand your sex is mainly binary man/woman (except in some rare cases of intersex) and gender is fluid. There are many genders now. Am I wrong?oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I read the quote that "gender" is binary, not fluid. Not that the intimate act of sex can only happen between a man and a woman.tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.
Yes, I think that’s what she meant. It’s not correct, but I don’t think someone should be fired for it.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.I understood it to mean, biological sex is binary. born physically female or male.This Scientific American article gives some info
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
Still an interesting topic when it comes to labels and categories.
What if I wanted to change my gender because I feel that I identify as a woman now. So I do and the business I run is applying for WBE status but I get denied.
I'd have one hell of a lawsuit, no?0 -
"Soul Man" is a true story.tempo_n_groove said:
Take the M out of it because I'm going straight for the Woman owned and not the Minority owned status. The W is better to have than the M here in NY.mrussel1 said:
I really think things like bathrooms, MWBE, and other tax credits are nothing on the grand scheme of things.tempo_n_groove said:
The different labels and being able to change your gender is going to result is problems in the future.dignin said:
I personally like labels and categories, as unpopular as that is. And I could see how some people would want a label and category to have a sense of belonging and community when otherwise they might feel alone. I can also see why some people wouldn't want that. To each their own.mrussel1 said:
To me, the concept of labels and categories is divisive. Now it's easy for me to say since I'm a straight white male, but I could care less how people choose to identify themselves. It doesn't affect my life one iota, so let people do what they want. I get bent out of shape when the right wing tries to make it an issue though. But only for that reason.dignin said:
I see the science is advancing. Been awhile since I've read anything about it. Thanks for sharing.oftenreading said:
No, it isn’t that simple. Biological sex is far more complex. Individuals born with clear intersex genitalia are not in fact rare - it’s twice as common as schizophrenia - but there are many more levels to it than that.dignin said:
I understand your sex is mainly binary man/woman (except in some rare cases of intersex) and gender is fluid. There are many genders now. Am I wrong?oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I read the quote that "gender" is binary, not fluid. Not that the intimate act of sex can only happen between a man and a woman.tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.
Yes, I think that’s what she meant. It’s not correct, but I don’t think someone should be fired for it.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.I understood it to mean, biological sex is binary. born physically female or male.This Scientific American article gives some info
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
Still an interesting topic when it comes to labels and categories.
What if I wanted to change my gender because I feel that I identify as a woman now. So I do and the business I run is applying for WBE status but I get denied.
I'd have one hell of a lawsuit, no?0 -
Years ago I wanted to put "other" on my applications and put "European American". Not sure how well that would have gone over for my interview with the LAPD though so I declined...mrussel1 said:
"Soul Man" is a true story.tempo_n_groove said:
Take the M out of it because I'm going straight for the Woman owned and not the Minority owned status. The W is better to have than the M here in NY.mrussel1 said:
I really think things like bathrooms, MWBE, and other tax credits are nothing on the grand scheme of things.tempo_n_groove said:
The different labels and being able to change your gender is going to result is problems in the future.dignin said:
I personally like labels and categories, as unpopular as that is. And I could see how some people would want a label and category to have a sense of belonging and community when otherwise they might feel alone. I can also see why some people wouldn't want that. To each their own.mrussel1 said:
To me, the concept of labels and categories is divisive. Now it's easy for me to say since I'm a straight white male, but I could care less how people choose to identify themselves. It doesn't affect my life one iota, so let people do what they want. I get bent out of shape when the right wing tries to make it an issue though. But only for that reason.dignin said:
I see the science is advancing. Been awhile since I've read anything about it. Thanks for sharing.oftenreading said:
No, it isn’t that simple. Biological sex is far more complex. Individuals born with clear intersex genitalia are not in fact rare - it’s twice as common as schizophrenia - but there are many more levels to it than that.dignin said:
I understand your sex is mainly binary man/woman (except in some rare cases of intersex) and gender is fluid. There are many genders now. Am I wrong?oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I read the quote that "gender" is binary, not fluid. Not that the intimate act of sex can only happen between a man and a woman.tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.
Yes, I think that’s what she meant. It’s not correct, but I don’t think someone should be fired for it.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.I understood it to mean, biological sex is binary. born physically female or male.This Scientific American article gives some info
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
Still an interesting topic when it comes to labels and categories.
What if I wanted to change my gender because I feel that I identify as a woman now. So I do and the business I run is applying for WBE status but I get denied.
I'd have one hell of a lawsuit, no?
If Soul Man is a true story then White Chicks must be too, or do you mean Soul Men?0 -
tempo_n_groove said:
Years ago I wanted to put "other" on my applications and put "European American". Not sure how well that would have gone over for my interview with the LAPD though so I declined...mrussel1 said:
"Soul Man" is a true story.tempo_n_groove said:
Take the M out of it because I'm going straight for the Woman owned and not the Minority owned status. The W is better to have than the M here in NY.mrussel1 said:
I really think things like bathrooms, MWBE, and other tax credits are nothing on the grand scheme of things.tempo_n_groove said:
The different labels and being able to change your gender is going to result is problems in the future.dignin said:
I personally like labels and categories, as unpopular as that is. And I could see how some people would want a label and category to have a sense of belonging and community when otherwise they might feel alone. I can also see why some people wouldn't want that. To each their own.mrussel1 said:
To me, the concept of labels and categories is divisive. Now it's easy for me to say since I'm a straight white male, but I could care less how people choose to identify themselves. It doesn't affect my life one iota, so let people do what they want. I get bent out of shape when the right wing tries to make it an issue though. But only for that reason.dignin said:
I see the science is advancing. Been awhile since I've read anything about it. Thanks for sharing.oftenreading said:
No, it isn’t that simple. Biological sex is far more complex. Individuals born with clear intersex genitalia are not in fact rare - it’s twice as common as schizophrenia - but there are many more levels to it than that.dignin said:
I understand your sex is mainly binary man/woman (except in some rare cases of intersex) and gender is fluid. There are many genders now. Am I wrong?oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I read the quote that "gender" is binary, not fluid. Not that the intimate act of sex can only happen between a man and a woman.tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.
Yes, I think that’s what she meant. It’s not correct, but I don’t think someone should be fired for it.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.I understood it to mean, biological sex is binary. born physically female or male.This Scientific American article gives some info
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
Still an interesting topic when it comes to labels and categories.
What if I wanted to change my gender because I feel that I identify as a woman now. So I do and the business I run is applying for WBE status but I get denied.
I'd have one hell of a lawsuit, no?
If Soul Man is a true story then White Chicks must be too, or do you mean Soul Men?
0 -
HAHAHA! I thought you were referring to a Sam and Dave movie!mrussel1 said:tempo_n_groove said:
Years ago I wanted to put "other" on my applications and put "European American". Not sure how well that would have gone over for my interview with the LAPD though so I declined...mrussel1 said:
"Soul Man" is a true story.tempo_n_groove said:
Take the M out of it because I'm going straight for the Woman owned and not the Minority owned status. The W is better to have than the M here in NY.mrussel1 said:
I really think things like bathrooms, MWBE, and other tax credits are nothing on the grand scheme of things.tempo_n_groove said:
The different labels and being able to change your gender is going to result is problems in the future.dignin said:
I personally like labels and categories, as unpopular as that is. And I could see how some people would want a label and category to have a sense of belonging and community when otherwise they might feel alone. I can also see why some people wouldn't want that. To each their own.mrussel1 said:
To me, the concept of labels and categories is divisive. Now it's easy for me to say since I'm a straight white male, but I could care less how people choose to identify themselves. It doesn't affect my life one iota, so let people do what they want. I get bent out of shape when the right wing tries to make it an issue though. But only for that reason.dignin said:
I see the science is advancing. Been awhile since I've read anything about it. Thanks for sharing.oftenreading said:
No, it isn’t that simple. Biological sex is far more complex. Individuals born with clear intersex genitalia are not in fact rare - it’s twice as common as schizophrenia - but there are many more levels to it than that.dignin said:
I understand your sex is mainly binary man/woman (except in some rare cases of intersex) and gender is fluid. There are many genders now. Am I wrong?oftenreading said:mrussel1 said:
I read the quote that "gender" is binary, not fluid. Not that the intimate act of sex can only happen between a man and a woman.tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.
Yes, I think that’s what she meant. It’s not correct, but I don’t think someone should be fired for it.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
I really don't investigate most of the definitions that are thrown around because they aren't in my wheel house so I had to look this one up.mickeyrat said:
essentially that she supported an academic who stated that physical sex is binary and believed said academic shouldnt be fired for such a position.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm still confused at what irked people about what Rowling tweeted?mickeyrat said:huh, so we can say no to mob rules sensibilities?https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-jk-rowling-figured-out-a-way-to-break-our-cancel-culture/2019/12/31/10798748-2bf3-11ea-bcb3-ac6482c4a92f_story.html
So a woman said that sex should be w a man and a woman and she was ok with that.
Got it.I understood it to mean, biological sex is binary. born physically female or male.This Scientific American article gives some info
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
Still an interesting topic when it comes to labels and categories.
What if I wanted to change my gender because I feel that I identify as a woman now. So I do and the business I run is applying for WBE status but I get denied.
I'd have one hell of a lawsuit, no?
If Soul Man is a true story then White Chicks must be too, or do you mean Soul Men?0 -
The vitriolic response to Harry and Meghan's decision to back out of public life- an example of outrage culture? Not the most important news on earth, but I think they deserve to have the life they want and I would say the hyperbolic reaction to that is outrage culture. What'cha think?
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
I think it's ridiculous and hilarious, especially when he's what, how many spots away from the throne? their roles are merely symbolic. I see that racist sack of shit katie whatsername weighed in and thinks they are spoiled brats. really? wanting to distance yourself from royalty and be financially independent? HEAVEN FOR FENDbrianlux said:The vitriolic response to Harry and Meghan's decision to back out of public life- an example of outrage culture? Not the most important news on earth, but I think they deserve to have the life they want and I would say the hyperbolic reaction to that is outrage culture. What'cha think?Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
I've never gave 2 shits about the royal family or anything they do.brianlux said:The vitriolic response to Harry and Meghan's decision to back out of public life- an example of outrage culture? Not the most important news on earth, but I think they deserve to have the life they want and I would say the hyperbolic reaction to that is outrage culture. What'cha think?
What I find hysterical is that a newspaper dedicated 17 pages SEVENTEEN PAGES, to them.
I just don't get it? Let them do their own thing, dear lord. God forbid someone doesn't enjoy the spotlight...0 -
I guess Canada is to blame. They spent New Year’s with us, only a few kilometres from where I live, and decided to chuck it all
. I don’t blame them - there’s no way I’d go back to the hellish frenzy that is the British media.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
100%. as someone online pointed out, they are protecting themselves from suffering the same fate as his mother. good for them.oftenreading said:I guess Canada is to blame. They spent New Year’s with us, only a few kilometres from where I live, and decided to chuck it all. I don’t blame them - there’s no way I’d go back to the hellish frenzy that is the British media.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
-
Yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!dankind said:0 -
so i was perusing twitter trending topics again (my mistake) and found Alec Baldwin trending. so I clicked on it, thinking he did something to his daughter again. nope.
an instagram post, ONE INSTAGRAM POST, claiming his wife has been "faking being spanish" went viral and now all the right leaning media are latching onto it as if it were true, and not only that, that it fucking matters.
that's really what gets me. that people think stuff like this is something to actually be mad about.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Don’t click on it. That feeds the animal.0
-
HughFreakingDillon said:so i was perusing twitter trending topics again (my mistake) and found Alec Baldwin trending. so I clicked on it, thinking he did something to his daughter again. nope.
an instagram post, ONE INSTAGRAM POST, claiming his wife has been "faking being spanish" went viral and now all the right leaning media are latching onto it as if it were true, and not only that, that it fucking matters.
that's really what gets me. that people think stuff like this is something to actually be mad about.
Proof yet again that the far right es lleno de mierda!
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
From an Instagram joke to an Alec Baldwin rant: The Hilaria Baldwin accent controversy, explained
By Bethonie Butler and Sonia Rao
https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2020/12/28/hilaria-baldwin-accent-controversy-explained/
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
You know what? Fuck this thread!
:perturbed:
I SAW PEARL JAM0
https://youtu.be/bOR38552MJA
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help