The Democratic Candidates
Comments
-
Agreed.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Like most things to do with the criminal justice system, the US is among the most, if not the most, restrictive worldwide regarding voting rights for those convicted of crimes, whether in custody or out of custody. However, it's not a blanket restriction; it varies state to state, and two states allow felons to vote in prison. Other ban voting in prison but allow voting upon release, or upon completion of parole, or after a waiting period, or upon special application and review, etc.
There is no real, logical reason to deny the right to vote to incarcerated people. It's really just an additional punitive measure - "you can't do this thing that we otherwise ask citizens to do". It's one of those "tough on crime" measures that feels appealing to many but in fact makes people even more disengaged from society and less invested in trying to improve things. In many states it has been deliberately crafted to disproportionately disenfranchise black voters, as certain minor crimes carry lengthy disenfranchisement.
And in response to another point up above, I work with people with serious mental illness, and they make their voting decisions about as well as the average person. Just because someone has mental illness does not automatically mean they are incapable of understanding social and political issues. In fact, they often understand them very well, usually from the disadvantaged side of the equation.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Me too...in theory you've "paid your debt to society." You can work...and be taxed. You should be able to vote.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
My gut says that those who have "paid the debt to society" should vote and those that are incarcerated should not. But I cannot quite articulately defend it. If someone's doing 18 months for burglary, then the election impacts their lives as a free person...but if they're doing life, there's not really as much reason to let them vote. I suppose those people would be one-issue-voters (crime/punishment/prison issues).Spiritual_Chaos said:
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point.1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
There are countries who do not let people serving time for life vote, but other prisoners.OnWis97 said:
My gut says that those who have "paid the debt to society" should vote and those that are incarcerated should not. But I cannot quite articulately defend it. If someone's doing 18 months for burglary, then the election impacts their lives as a free person...but if they're doing life, there's not really as much reason to let them vote. I suppose those people would be one-issue-voters (crime/punishment/prison issues).Spiritual_Chaos said:
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
OnWis97 said:
My gut says that those who have "paid the debt to society" should vote and those that are incarcerated should not. But I cannot quite articulately defend it. If someone's doing 18 months for burglary, then the election impacts their lives as a free person...but if they're doing life, there's not really as much reason to let them vote. I suppose those people would be one-issue-voters (crime/punishment/prison issues).Spiritual_Chaos said:
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point.
Why do you suppose they would be "one issue voters"?
Unlike what most of society thinks of people in jail or prison, inmates often have some ties to the community. They have parents, siblings, spouses, children, friend. They often want the same things in life that the rest of us want, and if not for themselves, for people they care about. Being in prison doesn't automatically mean that someone is unrepentantly evil and hoping for the downfall of humanity.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Who cares if criminals can vote. Life is about choices, they made theirs...now they have to deal with it. However, I do not see inmates causing uprising over whether they can vote or not...Give Peas A Chance…0
-
No, but they have rights taken away. They are not living in society while incarcerated. It seems reasonable to me that they lose their voting rights while in prison and not a part of society at large and the regain them when they are released and rejoin society.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point.hippiemom = goodness0 -
Well, if they are part of society or not could be the POV:s that give you these different opinions on the subject. maybe.cincybearcat said:
No, but they have rights taken away. They are not living in society while incarcerated. It seems reasonable to me that they lose their voting rights while in prison and not a part of society at large and the regain them when they are released and rejoin society.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
cincybearcat said:
No, but they have rights taken away. They are not living in society while incarcerated. It seems reasonable to me that they lose their voting rights while in prison and not a part of society at large and the regain them when they are released and rejoin society.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point.
They have some rights taken away, not all rights. Thus, there is a decision to make about which rights are taken away. For that to happen, there should be good reasons for it. The rationale for incarceration is generally related to risk to the public. What is the rationale for disenfranchisement? What risk to society does it pose if people in prison vote?my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Well the risk is they are voting on matters that they aren’t participating in. They are not living in society.oftenreading said:cincybearcat said:
No, but they have rights taken away. They are not living in society while incarcerated. It seems reasonable to me that they lose their voting rights while in prison and not a part of society at large and the regain them when they are released and rejoin society.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point.
They have some rights taken away, not all rights. Thus, there is a decision to make about which rights are taken away. For that to happen, there should be good reasons for it. The rationale for incarceration is generally related to risk to the public. What is the rationale for disenfranchisement? What risk to society does it pose if people in prison vote?
Its a good question you ask. I’ll have to think on it more.
hippiemom = goodness0 -
The vast majority will be living “in society” again, and if not, their friends and family still do. But it’s worth remembering that prisons exist in society, too, and are affected by policy and law, and not just those strictly relating to corrections policy, but issues related to the economy, the environment, and so much more.cincybearcat said:
Well the risk is they are voting on matters that they aren’t participating in. They are not living in society.oftenreading said:cincybearcat said:
No, but they have rights taken away. They are not living in society while incarcerated. It seems reasonable to me that they lose their voting rights while in prison and not a part of society at large and the regain them when they are released and rejoin society.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point.
They have some rights taken away, not all rights. Thus, there is a decision to make about which rights are taken away. For that to happen, there should be good reasons for it. The rationale for incarceration is generally related to risk to the public. What is the rationale for disenfranchisement? What risk to society does it pose if people in prison vote?
Its a good question you ask. I’ll have to think on it more.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
As as an aside, I have lots of thoughts on how prisons work, thanks to the bold.oftenreading said:
The vast majority will be living “in society” again, and if not, their friends and family still do. But it’s worth remembering that prisons exist in society, too, and are affected by policy and law, and not just those strictly relating to corrections policy, but issues related to the economy, the environment, and so much more.cincybearcat said:
Well the risk is they are voting on matters that they aren’t participating in. They are not living in society.oftenreading said:cincybearcat said:
No, but they have rights taken away. They are not living in society while incarcerated. It seems reasonable to me that they lose their voting rights while in prison and not a part of society at large and the regain them when they are released and rejoin society.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point.
They have some rights taken away, not all rights. Thus, there is a decision to make about which rights are taken away. For that to happen, there should be good reasons for it. The rationale for incarceration is generally related to risk to the public. What is the rationale for disenfranchisement? What risk to society does it pose if people in prison vote?
Its a good question you ask. I’ll have to think on it more.
Anyway...I'm starting to move toward "let 'em vote." Hell, if they cannot vote, that leaves "throwing blacks in jail for marijuana charges" incentivized.1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
I’m still in the “no vote in jail” but no problem voting once released camp at this moment. But could still move. I appreciate often’s response.OnWis97 said:
As as an aside, I have lots of thoughts on how prisons work, thanks to the bold.oftenreading said:
The vast majority will be living “in society” again, and if not, their friends and family still do. But it’s worth remembering that prisons exist in society, too, and are affected by policy and law, and not just those strictly relating to corrections policy, but issues related to the economy, the environment, and so much more.cincybearcat said:
Well the risk is they are voting on matters that they aren’t participating in. They are not living in society.oftenreading said:cincybearcat said:
No, but they have rights taken away. They are not living in society while incarcerated. It seems reasonable to me that they lose their voting rights while in prison and not a part of society at large and the regain them when they are released and rejoin society.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Because it is seen as a fundamental right of every citizen. Fundamental. Are people in prison also revoked of their citizenship?cincybearcat said:
This is my belief as well. Why would we let someone vote that doesn't even get to decide when they can eat, sleep, etc. Allowing inmates to vote seems pretty crazy to me. But if someone has an interesting point as to why I'd like to hear it.pjhawks said:
I think if they served their time they should be able to vote but not while they are incarcerated.tbergs said:
Besides it being just what we have been doing, what reason is there for them not to be allowed to vote? I can see not allowing someone to vote who is committed to a mental or state institution, but beyond that, why shouldn't felons be allowed to vote? Millions of people who have done much worse deeds than some of the incarcerated individuals you are referring to are still voting. I think the rule that felons not be allowed to vote doesn't make any sense anymore. It's too generic.mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
There you have one point.
They have some rights taken away, not all rights. Thus, there is a decision to make about which rights are taken away. For that to happen, there should be good reasons for it. The rationale for incarceration is generally related to risk to the public. What is the rationale for disenfranchisement? What risk to society does it pose if people in prison vote?
Its a good question you ask. I’ll have to think on it more.
Anyway...I'm starting to move toward "let 'em vote." Hell, if they cannot vote, that leaves "throwing blacks in jail for marijuana charges" incentivized.hippiemom = goodness0 -
why so judgey? what do you care?mcgruff10 said:
I can’t give a rats ass what you and your high horse are saying, felons should not vote. Period.Spiritual_Chaos said:
In a functional democracy, that is not an uncommon right or an uncommon stance to have. Don't see how that can be seen as outrageous by someone in a functional democracy. Agree or not.mcgruff10 said:ugh. Bernie Sanders is starting to wear thin on me. He just said he would be in favor of felons having the right to vote while IN prison.
I do understand though, you have never experienced a functional democracy.
it's so statistically insignificant..Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
Once again, the greatest country that ever was....is in the minority here
21 Countries- No Restriction (felons can vote even while in prison)
14 Countries- Selective Restriction (some felons may be banned from voting while in prison)10 Countries - Complete Ban on Voting While in Prison (felons can vote upon release from prison)-Belgium bans felons from voting after release if sentence was over seven years.4 Countries (incl. USA) - Post release Restrictions (felons are banned from voting even after release from prison)
-Germany bans felons from voting only in rare cases if ordered by the court.-Iceland bans from voting those felons whose prison sentence is at least four years.
-The United States bans felons from voting in some states but not in others. Two states (Maine and Vermont) permit felons to vote while in prison.
https://felonvoting.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=0002890 -
I think most people are on board with felons voting after prison. Hell, even Florida voted for it, even though its legislature is trying to stop it.0
-
Yeah it's a state issue, no 1 rule of law for the greatest country that ever was....CM189191 said:Once again, the greatest country that ever was....is in the minority here
21 Countries- No Restriction (felons can vote even while in prison)
14 Countries- Selective Restriction (some felons may be banned from voting while in prison)10 Countries - Complete Ban on Voting While in Prison (felons can vote upon release from prison)-Belgium bans felons from voting after release if sentence was over seven years.4 Countries (incl. USA) - Post release Restrictions (felons are banned from voting even after release from prison)
-Germany bans felons from voting only in rare cases if ordered by the court.-Iceland bans from voting those felons whose prison sentence is at least four years.
-The United States bans felons from voting in some states but not in others. Two states (Maine and Vermont) permit felons to vote while in prison.
https://felonvoting.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000289
And regardless, why do you think this is a black mark on the US? Why when different do you assume that the US is in the wrong? Or really that some states are?hippiemom = goodness0 -
CNN reporting Biden announcing his run on Thursday. Ironically the story just under it is the Luke walton Sexual assault story. At first I read them together..
Biden running for president - no duh
Biden accused of sexual assault - makes sense too
hippiemom = goodness0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help